Investigating communication strategies in L2 learners’ discourse: a study in primary education

Authors

  • Isaak Papadopoulos Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • Dimitra Tzamali University of Western Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.29.1471

Keywords:

Communication strategies, bilingual learners, students’ interaction, teacher flexibility

Abstract

In cases of language learners’ inability to use a word/phrase in the target language, they opt for communication strategies by imitating sounds, inventing new words or using their hands to communicate. Although communication strategies are used very often by students, teachers are not fully aware of their importance during the teaching process and thus they do not train their students to use them. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of communication strategies by learners of Greek as a second language during the lessons so that it can become obvious to teachers who abandon the message convey or switch to the first language to avoid miscommunication. The researchers used three methodological tools: (1) audio-recordings of naturally occurring classroom interactions and (2) observation notes taken in 25 class sessions. For the interaction transcripts, the researchers used the taxonomy of communication strategies of Faerch and Kasper’s (1983) while the researcher’s journal was used for the observations. The analysis of the results indicated that the most frequently used strategy used by the students was the language switch while the role of the teacher and the activities implemented each time were crucial as for the communication strategies used by the students. 

 

References

Bongaerts, T., and Poulisse, N. (1989). Communication strategies in L1 and L2: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 253-268.

Boxer and Cohen (2004), Chapter 12. C. Roever. Difficulty and practiciality in tests of interlanguage pragmatics, pp. 283-301

Chen, S.Q. “A Study of Communication Strategies in Interlanguage Production By Chinese EFL Learners.” Language Learning, vol. 40 (2), pp. 155-187,1990 Retrieved September 19, 2011 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467

Clement, R. (1986). Second language proficiency and acculturation: An investigation of the effects of language status and individual characteristics. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 5, 271-290.

Dörnyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 55–85.

Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). On identifying communication strategies in interlanguage production. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 210–238). London: Longman

Kellerman, E., Ammerlaan, T., Bongaerts, T., & Poulisse, N. (1990). System and hierarchy in L2 compensatory strategies. In R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language, (pp. 163-178). New York: Newbury House

Kellerman, E., Ammerlaan, T., Bongaerts, T., and Poulisse, N. (1990). System and hierarchy in L2 compensatory strategies. In R.C. Scarcella, E.S. Andersen, and S.D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language. (pp.163-178). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

O'Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tuan, H.J. “Is Extroversion-Intriversion Tendency A Variable in The Choice of Strategies in Communication?” in: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China Taipei: Crane. Pp.306-324, 2001

Downloads

Published

2015-09-28

How to Cite

Papadopoulos, I., & Tzamali, D. (2015). Investigating communication strategies in L2 learners’ discourse: a study in primary education. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.29.1471