Soicial Factors and Citizens' Perception of the Police

Authors

  • Mark Pullin Associate Professor or Border and Homeland Security Department of Security Studies, Angelo State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.99.13111

Keywords:

Collective Efficacy, Social Cohesion, Age, Gender, Race, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, Citizens Perception, Police, Community, Locale

Abstract

Research examining citizen perception of the police have typically looked at expanded views of how the police interact in the community. By narrowing the focus to encompass two principles that associate citizen satisfaction with and perceptions of the police, this paper will include areas that influence satisfaction directly from citizens toward police officers themselves. Moreover, recent research stresses the importance of police/citizen relationships for positive outcomes to occur after interaction.  Research regarding race and ethnicity of the citizen is reviewed as well as youth and age to provide context for this article. Demographic variables have been shown to have an impact of citizen perception of the police thus affecting how they view the police and government agencies. Police literature is reviewed as to how these demographics contribute to neighborhood level changes in attitudes toward police officers. Community policing literature and the effects it has on neighborhood social cohesion and collective efficacy is also included. This will lead into a discussion of neighborhood social cohesion and collective efficacy and their impact on citizen perceptions of the police.

References

Baumer, E.P. (2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology, 40, 579-616.

Bureau of Justice Administration (1994). Understanding community policing: A framework for action. Monograph. NC148487.

Capowich, G.E., & Roehl, J.A. (1994). Problem-oriented policing: Actions and effectiveness in San Diego. In D.P. Rosenbaum (Ed.), The challenge of community policing: Testing the promises (pp. 127-146). London, England: Sage.

Cartwright, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In D. Cartwright, & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory. (3rd. ed). New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Cordner, G.W. (1988). A problem-oriented approach to community-oriented policing. In J.R. Greene & S.D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality? (pp. 135-152). New York, NY: Praeger.

Correia, M. (2000). How community factors affect progressive policing. NCJRS, Police Executive Research Forum. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=182480.

Dowler, K. (2003). Media consumption and public attitudes toward crime

and justice: The relationship between fear and crime, punitive attitudes and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 10(2), 109- 126.

Elliott, D.S. & Wilson, W.J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R.J., Elliott, A., & Rankin, B. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33(4) 389-426.

Friedkin, N.E. 2004. Social Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409-25.

Gallager, C., Maguire, E.R., Mastrofski, S.D. & Reisig, M.D. (2001). The public image of police. Final Report to the International Association of Chirfs of Police by the Administration of Justice Program, George Mason University. Retrieved from http://www.theiacp.org/PoliceServices/ExecutiveServices/ProfessionalAssistance/ThePublicImageofthePolice/tabid/198/Default.aspx.

Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem oriented policing. Los Angeles, CA: McGraw Hill, Inc.

Goudriaan, H. (2006). Reporting crime. Effects of social context on the decision of victims to report to the police. Veenendaal, Netherlands: Universal Press.

Greene, J.R., & Decker, S.H. (1989). Police and community perceptions of the community role in policing: The Philadelphia experience. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 105-123.

Hurst, Y. G., & Frank, J. (2000). How kids view cops: The nature of juvenile attitudes toward police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 189-202.

Kubrin, C. & Weitzer, T. (2005). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374-402, doi: 10.1177/0022427803256238.

Lee, J., Steinber, J., & Piquero, A (2010). Ethnic identity and attitudes toward the police among African American juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 781-789.

McLane, S., Jones, L., & Stewart, K. (2011). Analyzing public attitude toward services provided by the San Angelo Police Department. Retrieved from http://www.angelo.edu/dept/cdi/final%20report.pdf.

Morenoff, J., Sampson, R.J. & Raudenbush, S. (2001). Neighborhood

inequality,collective efficacy and the spacial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 39, 517-560.

Obrien, J. (1978). Public attitudes toward police. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 6(3), 303-310.

Reisig, M.D. & Parks, R.B. (2003). Neighborhood context, police behavior

and satisfaction with relations and controls of neighborhood crime victimization. Western Criminology Review Research, 40(1), 138-170.

Sampson, R. (2000). Whither the Sociological Study of Crime? Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 711-714.

Sampson, R. (2002). Transcending tradition: New directions in community research, Chicago style. Criminology, 40 (2), 213-230.

Sampson, R. (2003). The neighborhood context of well-being.

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(3), S53-S64.

Sampson, R., Morenoff, J., & Raudenbush, S. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 224-232.

Sampson, R., Morenoff, J.T., & Gannon-Rawley (2002). Assessing neighborhood effects. social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review in Sociology, 28, 443-478.

Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. (2004). Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(4), 319.

Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-922.

Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1998). Reducing violence through neighborhood collective efficacy. Alternatives to Incarceration, 4(4), 18-19.

Sampson, R., & Sharkey, P. (2008). Neighborhood selection and the social reproduction of concentrated racial inequality. Demography, 45(1), 1-29.

Sampson, R. J. & Raudenbush, S. (1999). Systematic social observation

of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603-651.

San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) (2006). San Francisco community policing: Report on current events. San Francisco Police Department and the San Francisco Office of the Mayor. Retrieved from http://sf-police.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=14702.

Shaw, C.R., & McKay, H.D. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Skogan, W. (2005). Citizen satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 298-321.

Skogan, W. & Frydl, L. (2003). Fairness & effectiveness in policing: The

evidence. Washington, DC: National Academics.

Skogan, W.G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York, NY: Free Press.

Skogan, W. G. (1994). The impact of community policing on neighborhood residents: A

cross-site analysis. In D. P. Rosenbaum (Ed.), The challenge of community policing:Testing the promises (pp. 167-181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Skogan, W. G. (1998). Community participation and community policing.

In J.P. Brodeur (Ed.), How to recognize good policing: Problems and issues (pp. 88-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Skogan, W.G., & Hartnett, S.M. (1997). Community policing, Chicago style. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Travis, L., Novak, K., Winston, C., & Hurley, D. (2000). Cops at the door: The impact of citizen surveys by police on public attitudes. Police Quarterly, 3(1), 85-104.

Tyler, T.R. (2005). Police in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322-342.

Weisburd, D., Greenspan, R., Hamilton, E., Williams, H., & Bryant, K. (2000). Police attitudes toward abuse of authority: Findings from a national survey. Research Brief, U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181312.pdf.

Weisburd, D., & McElroy, J.E. (1988). Enacting the CPO role: Findings from the New York City pilot program in community policing. In J.R. Greene & S.D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality? New York, NY:Praeger.

Weitzer, R. & Tuch, S. A. (2005). Determinants of public satisfaction with the police.

Police Quarterly, 8(3), 279-297.

Worrall, J. (1999). Public perceptions of police efficacy and image: The fuzziness of support for the police. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 7-66.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-17

How to Cite

Pullin, M. (2022). Soicial Factors and Citizens’ Perception of the Police. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(9), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.99.13111