Improving stakeholder participation in schools: Intentionally inviting practices of school heads in Cape Coast and Ajumako school districts, Ghana

Authors

  • Michael Amakyi a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:79:"Institute for Educational Planning and Administration, University of Cape Coast";}
  • Alfred Ampah-Mensah
  • Marie Baah Bakah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.94.12161

Keywords:

Key words: stakeholder participation, school-community relations, school improvement, school capital

Abstract

A sequential mixed-method design adopting a non-experimental survey and a basic interpretive study was used to explore the intentionally inviting practices of school heads of the Cape Coast metropolis and Ajumako district. Data were collected using 2 X 2 Intentionally-Inviting Matrix and semi-structured interview protocols.

Data collected from the survey were analysed using frequency counts, while the data from the interview were analyzed and put into themes that provided a description on how the adopted practices promote stakeholder participation. The study findings revealed that school heads in Cape Coast metropolis and Ajumako district adopt intentionally inviting practices that address the physical frame of the school, communication with stakeholders, and building relationship with stakeholders to promote stakeholder involvement in schools. The study further revealed that the adopted practices of the school heads foster a sense of pride in the stakeholders to be connected to the school. The practices also increase stakeholder confidence and trust in the school head. The Ghana Education Service should replicate the study in other school districts to identify the practices that support stakeholder participation in schools and also conduct a similar study to elicit the perceptions of stakeholders on practices that enhance their participation in schools.

 

 

 

References

Amakyi, M. (2017). School improvement: Strategies for effective change. Accra, Ghana: Datro & Wrenco.

Bartle P., (2007). Participatory management: methods to increase staff input in organizational decision making: accessed available at http://cec.vcn.bc.ca/cmp/modules/pm-pm.htm

Bourne, L. (2016). Targeted communication: the key to effective stakeholder engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 431 – 438

Burnside-Lawry, J. (2011). The dark side of stakeholder communication: stakeholder perceptions of ineffective organisational listening. Australian Journal of Communication, 38 (1), 150-156.

Ceka, A. & Murati, R. (2016). The role of parents in the education of children. Journal of Education and Practice, 7 (5), 61-64

Epstein (2010) Epstein, J.L. (2009). In School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (3rd ed.). USA: Corwin Press.

Epstein, J. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview

First, R. (2009, September). Engaging stakeholders: Including parents and the community to sustain improved reading outcomes. Sustainability Series, 6

Gichohi, G. W. (2015). Stakeholder involvement in Schools in 21st Century for Academic Excellence. International Journal of Education and Research, 3 (2), 13 - 22

Gross, K., & Godwin, P. (2005). Education's many stakeholders. University Business. Retrieved from www.universitybusiness.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=174&p=2

Hanson, E. M. (2003). Educational administration and organizational behavior, (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Johnson BR, Christensen LB. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. 6. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2017

Kowalski, T. (2010). The school principal: visionary leadership and competent management. New York: Routledge.

Kowalski, T. (2011). Public relations in school. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson

Lamb, N. H., & Roundy, P. T. (2018). Institutional, stakeholder, and cultural influences on corporate social performance: An institution-based view. Comparative Management, 1 (1), 4 -18.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Communication: The process, barriers, and improving effectiveness. Schooling, 1 (1), 1 – 11.

Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010). A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science, 2(1-2):126-135.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Education Limited.

Nieto, S. (2004). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson

Purkey, W. W, & Novak, J. M. (2008). Fundamentals of invitational education. Kennesaw, GA: International Alliance for Invitational Education.

Rajhans, K. (2018). Effective communication management: A key to stakeholder relationship management in project-based organizations. The IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 12(4), 47 - 66

Roy, M. & Giraldo-García, R. (2018). The role of parental involvement and social/ emotional skills in academic achievement: Global perspectives. School Community Journal, 28(2), 29-46

Schein, E. (2018). Organizational culture and leaderhip (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Stosich, E., & Bae, S. (2018). Engaging diverse stakeholders to strengthen policy. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(8), 8-12.

Young, T. L. (2006), Successful project management (2nd ed). Kogan Page, UK.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-29

How to Cite

Amakyi, M., Ampah-Mensah, A., & Bakah, M. B. (2022). Improving stakeholder participation in schools: Intentionally inviting practices of school heads in Cape Coast and Ajumako school districts, Ghana . Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.94.12161