Main Article Content
It is noted that sociology is commonly described as a discipline that studies `action’ as opposed to `behaviour’. However it is argued that this position is untenable given that `action’ is itself a form of behaviour, and hence that a `behavioural’ perspective needs to be incorporated into an action or intepretivist paradigm. Two common objections to such a proposal are then considered: first that `behaviour’ is too insignificant a portion of human conduct to be of concern to sociologists, and second that behavioural and action theory perspectives are incommensurate. The latter claim embracing the related assumptions that a behavioural analysis of human conduct `from the outside’ is incompatible with an `intepretivist’ analysis `from the inside’, and that an understanding of conduct in terms of stimulus-response is incompatible with one that presumes actors to be free agents. It is then demonstrated that neither claim is tenable given that actors are also self-observers while voluntarism does not preclude action being understood as a response to a stimulus. The paper ends with a plea for sociologists to recognise that a behavioural perspective supplies just that theory of agency that is missing from most theories of action and that in restoring it they would be implementing Weber’s recipe for a discipline that seeks to gain an “interpretive understanding of social action in order thereby to arrive at a causal explanation of its course and effects”.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Atkinson, P., (1988) `Ethnomethodology: A Critical Review', Annual Review of Sociology 14: 441-65.
Baldwin, J.W., (1988), `Mead's Solution to the problem of Agency' Sociological Inquiry 58 (2) 139-62.
Brandstadter, J., (1984) `Action Development and Development through Action' in Chapman, M., (ed.), `Intentional Action as a Paradigm for Developmental Psychology: A Symposium', Human Development 27:113-44.
Burgess, R.L. and Bushell, D. Jr., (eds.) (1969), Behavioral Sociology: The Experimental Analysis of Social Process, New York: Columbia University Press.
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G., (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: The Elements of the Sociology Corporate Life, London: Heinemann.
Camic, C. (1986), `The Matter of Habit', American Journal of Sociology 91:1039-87.
Campbell, C., (1996), The Myth of Social Action, Cambridge: CUP.
Cautela, J.R., (1971), `Covert Conditioning' pp. 112-128 in Jacobs, A. and Sachs, L.B. (eds), The Psychology of Private Events: Perspectives on Covert Response Systems, NY: Academic Press.
Cuff, E. C. and Payne, G.C.F., (1981), (eds) Perspectives in Sociology, London: Allen & Unwin.
Dember, W.N., (1974), `Motivation and the Cognitive Revolution', American Psychologist 17:161-8.
Doyal, L. and Harris, R., (1986), Empiricism, Explanation and Rationality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Durkheim, E., (1964), Rules of the Sociological Method, NY: Free Press.
Emerson, R., (1989), `Exchange Theory Part II, Exchange Relations and Networks’ pp. 58-87 in Sociological Theories in Progress Vol 2 Berger, J., Zelditch M. and Anderson, B. (eds.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
Giddens, A., (1976), New Rules of Sociological Method, London: Hutchinson.
Harre, R. and Secord, P. F., (1972), The Explanation of Social Behaviour, Oxford: Blackwell.
Homans, G.C., (1974), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, NY: Harcourt Brace.
Homans, G.C., (1987), `Behaviourism and After' pp. 58-81 in Giddens, A. and Turner, J. (eds.) Social Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Johnson, A.G., (2000), `behaviourism’ q.v. in The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology: A User's Guide to Sociological Language, Oxford: Blackwell.
Kanfer, F. H. and Philips, J. S., (1970), Learning Foundations of Behavior Therapy, NY: Wiley.
Kimble, G. and Perlmuter, L.C., (1970), `The Problem of Volition' Psychological Review
Lazarsfeld, P.F., (1972), `Historical Notes on the Empirical Study of Action: An Intellectual Odyssey' pp. 50-100 in Lazarsfeld, P.F., Qualitative Analysis: Historical and Critical Essays, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lee, D. and Newby, H., (1983), The Problem of Sociology: An Introduction to the Discipline London: Hutchinson.
Lundberg, G. A., (1964), Foundations of Sociology, NY: David McKay.
Mann, M., (1983), The Macmillan Student Encyclopaedia of Sociology, London: Macmillan. Martin, D., (ed.), (1970), 50 Key Words in Sociology, London: Lutterworth.
Martindale, D., (1999), The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory, London: Routledge.
Mischel, W. and Mischel, H.N., (1977), `Self-Control and the Self', pp. 31-64 in Mischel, W., (ed.), The Self: Psychological and Philosophical Issues, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Mixon, D., (1980), `The Place of Habit in the Control of Action', Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 10 (3) 169-86.
Molm, L.D. (1981), `The Legitimacy of Behavioral Theory as a Sociological Perspective’ The American Sociologist 16, 153-165.
Porpora, D.V., (1983), `On the Post-Wittgensteinian Critique of the Concept of Action in Sociology' The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13:129-46.
Silverman, D., (1970), The Theory of Organisations, London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Skinner, B. F., (1968), Contingencies of Reinforcement: A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Turner, J.H., (1988), `A Behavioral Theory of Social Structure' Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 18 (4) 355-68.
von Mises, L., (1949), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, London: William Hodge.
Weber, M., (1964), The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, trans. Henderson, A.M. and Parsons, T., (ed.) with Intro. by Parsons, T., New York: Free Press.