Communicating The Amil Zakat National Agency (BAZNAS) and Its Authority Based on the Zakat Management Act (23/2011) in Indonesi

Main Article Content

Kholil Kholil
Andi Amrullah
Fahrudin Faiz

Abstract

This research aimed to see how BAZNAS communicates its authority based on Law 23/2011 to its stakeholders. Zakat management in Indonesia is being regulated by the Law Number 23 of 2011 which replaced Law Number 38 of 1999. The change of regulation was expected to push Zakat collection higher as its great potential, but until 2019 there was no significant change in the amount of Zakat collection. We see the problem in the authority changes that have not working optimally. Thus, this research can help BAZNAS to map out the problems related to the implementation of Law 23/2011. The research used a qualitative approach by conducting in-depth interviews, library and documentation studies. Eleven expert informants were chosen for their connection and understanding of BAZNAS. The results showed that the BAZNAS authority was accepted by all stakeholders even though it did not take place as the prerequisite for the acceptance of Barnard's authority. The changes in authority had been understood by the leaders but only halfway understood by the employees. The changes in the authority were following the vision and mission of BAZNAS. However, they were still not in line with the expectations of many parties. Finally, the changes in the BAZNAS authority were still not fully implemented by BAZNAS stakeholders. The regulatory changes could not be fully implemented yet due to differences in the interpretation of legal authority between each level of BAZNAS.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Kholil, K., Amrullah, A., & Faiz, F. (2022). Communicating The Amil Zakat National Agency (BAZNAS) and Its Authority Based on the Zakat Management Act (23/2011) in Indonesi. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.91.11510
Section
Articles

References

Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2011). Fiqh Al-Zakah : A Comparative Study Of Zakah, Regulations And Philosophy In The Light Of Qur’an And Sunnah. Islamic Book Trust.

Alharahsheh, H. H., & Pius, A. (2020). A Review of key paradigms: positivism VS interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39–43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338244145

Andiani, K., Hafidhuddin, D., Beik, I. S., & Ali, K. M. (2018). Strategy of BAZNAS and Laku Pandai For Collecting and Distributing Zakah in Indonesia. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 10(2), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v10i2.6943

Ascarya, & Yumanita, D. (2018). Analisis Rendahnya Pengumpulan Zakat Di Indonesia Dan Alternatif Solusinya (Vol. 9).

Ayuniyyah, Q. (2011). Factors Affecting Zakat Payment Through Institution of Amil: Muzakki’S Perspectives Analysis (Case Study of Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (Baznas). Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Al-Infaq, 2(2), 49–64.

Barnard, C. I. (1956). The functions of the executive (Vol. 11). Harvard university press. http://mobile.kwansei.ac.jp/s_hws/attached/0000052629.pdf%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:No+Title#0

BAZNAS. (2020). Statistik Zakat Nasional 2019 (Issue Mei). BAZNAS - Sub Divisi Pelaporan.

Coryna, I. A., & Tanjung, H. (2015). Formulasi Strategi Penghimpunan Zakat oleh Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (BAZNAS). Al-Muzara’ah, 3(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.29244/jam.3.2.158-179

Gazell, J. A. (1970). Authority-Flow Theory and the Impact of Chester Barnard. California Management Review, 13(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164265

Hay, R. D. (1973). A BRIEF HISTORY OF INTERNAL ORGANIZATION COMMUNICATION THROUGH THE 1940s ROBERT. The Journal of Business Communication, 11(4), 6–11.

Ibrahim, S. M. (2015). The Role of Zakat in Establishing Social Welfare and Economic Sustainability: The Case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 3(1), 437–441. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n6p196

Kasri, R. A., & Putri, N. I. S. (2018). Fundraising Strategies to Optimize Zakat Potential in Indonesia: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v10i1.6191

Khairuldin, W. M. K. F. W., & Mohammad, M. (2013). The philosophy and elasticity of zakah distribution in Islam. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(8), 1–12.

Miller, K. (2012). Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes (6th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Mulyana, D. (2005). Ilmu Komunikasi : Suatu Pengantar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nadzri, F. A. A., Rahman, R. A., & Omar, N. (2012). Zakat and Poverty Alleviation: Roles of Zakat Institutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 1(7), 61–72.

Nahar, S. (2008). Panduan Praktis Menghitung Zakat. Divisi Humas Baitul Maa.

Nikezić, S., Dželetović, M., & Vučinić, D. (2016). Chester Barnard Organisational-Management Code for the 21st Century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 126 – 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.098

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 38 Tahun 1999 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 164.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Zakat. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 115.

Pusat Kajian Strategis BAZNAS. (2017). Outlook Zakat Nasional 2017. Pusat Kajian Strategis - Badan Amal Zakat Nasional (BAZNAS).

Pusat Kajian Strategis BAZNAS. (2018). Outlook Zakat Indonesia 2018. In Outlook Zakat Indonesia. Pusat Kajian Strategis - Badan Amal Zakat Nasional (BAZNAS).

Putri, A. Z., & Pratama, A. Y. (2020). AN INTRODUCTION TO FIQH ZAKAT: Definition, Normative Basis, and Social Implication. El -Hekam, 5(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.31958/jeh.v5i2.2413

Raz, J. (1985). Authority and Justification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14(1), 3–29.

Ruben, B. D., Stewart, L. P., & Householder, B. J. (2014). Communication and Human Behavior (Updated 15). Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.

Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2015). Communication competence in organizations and groups: Historic and emerging perspectives. In A. F. Hannawa & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), Communication Competence (pp. 397–430). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110317459-017

Smith, E. B. (1975). Chester Barnard’s Concept Authority. Educational Administration Quarterly, 11(1), 21–37.

Smith, E. B. (1994). Chester barnard’s concept of responsibility. International Journal of Public Administration, 17(6), 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699408524937

Sudarman, A. (2019). Strategi Komunikasi Untuk Meningkatkan Kesadaran Masyarakat Dalam Membayar Zakat Maal. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v2i1.5056

Thanh, N. C., & Thanh, T. T. Le. (2015). The Interconnection between Interpretivist Paradigm and Qualitative Methods in Education. American Journal of Educational Science Vol., 1(2), 24–27.

Walsh, A., & Brady, M. (2019). Chester Barnard revisited: Spontaneous orders and the firm. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2019, 951–962. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137419000365

Wardani, R. W. K. (2017). Dakwah Nabi Muhammad terhadap Masyarakat Madinah Perspektif Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies, 11(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.15575/idajhs.v11i1.1356

Widarwati, E., Afif, N. C., & Zazim, M. (2016). Strategic Approcah for Optimizing of Zakah Institution Performance: Customer Relationship Management. Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics, 9(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v9i1.4010