Main Article Content
This study examines environmental innovation as a prominent strategic issue in the current development of business practices. According to preliminary studies, profit-based business practices are used to determine the success of environmental innovation as superior competitiveness. Countries in Asia prioritize business development based on economic development, with social and environmental functions included in other agendas. However, this is contradictory with the phenomenon of Surabaya, where environmental-based urban social enterprises actors actually complement the role of the city government by carrying out the function of a hybrid organization (profit and social) with environmentally friendly practices. Therefore, this study aims to determine the possibility of urban social enterprises in Indonesia to obtain green innovation. This is a systematic research with 4 (four) strategic factors and conceptual models that makeup 6 (six) propositions formulated based on the scope of knowledge management theory and resource-based view. This conceptual model that connects green knowledge sharing, entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capability, and innovation performance is still relatively rare and needs to be tested to determine its theoretical resilience. The novelty of this model is formulated from contextual urban and regional social enterprises in Indonesia, therefore, it is expected to provide ready-to-test opportunities to be duplicated in other urban areas in the world that have the same contextual organizational functions and environmentally friendly business base.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., Cepeda-Carrion, G., & Henseler, J., Developing green innovation performance by fostering organizational knowledge and coopetitive relations. Review of Managerial Science, 2018. 12(2): p. 499–517.
Gürlek, M., & Tuna, M., Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 2018. 38(7–8): p. 467–491.
Huang, J., & Li, Y., Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics: JBE; Dordrecht, 2017. 145(2): p. 309–324.
Tantayanubutr, M., & Panjakajornsak, V., Impact of green innovation on the sustainable performance of Thai food industry. Business and Economic Horizons; Prague, 2017. 13(2): p. 192–209.
Martinez, F., Toward Inclusive Economic, Social and Environmental Progress in Asia: An Introduction. In The Role of Corporate Sustainability in Asian Development, 2017. (pp. 1–9). Springer.
Sari, M. M. K., Jatiningsih, O., & Listyaningsih, M., Green and Clean as Issue on Women’s Movement in Surabaya. 1st International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2018), 2018.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M., Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2017. 28(6): p. 2469–2497.
Eldar, O., The role of social enterprise and hybrid organizations. Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 2017. 92.
Mongelli, L., Rullani, F., & Versari, P., Hybridisation of diverging institutional logics through common-note practices–an analogy with music and the case of social enterprises. Industry and Innovation, 2017. 24(5): p. 492–514.
Octavie, D., Kepala Bappeko Eri Cahyadi Ingin Tiap Kampung Surabaya punya Produk Unggulan. Surya., 2019. August 8. https://surabaya.tribunnews.com/2019/08/08/kepala-bappeko-eri-cahyadi-ingin-tiap-kampung-surabaya-punya-produk-unggulan
Prasetiyo, W. H., Kamarudin, K. R., & Dewantara, J. A., Surabaya green and clean: Protecting urban environment through civic engagement community. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2019. 29(8), 997–1014.
Villar, C., Alegre, J., & Pla-Barber, J., Exploring the role of knowledge management practices on exports: A dynamic capabilities view. International Business Review, 23(1): p. 38–44.
Chen, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-H., Lin, C.-Y., & Chang, C.-W., Enhancing green absorptive capacity, green dynamic capacities and green service innovation to improve firm performance: An analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM). Sustainability, 2015. 7(11): p. 15674–15692.
Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, Y.-S., Determinants of green competitive advantage: The roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation. Quality & Quantity, 2017. 51(4): p. 1663–1685.
Fong, C.-M., & Chang, N.-J., The impact of green learning orientation on proactive environmental innovation capability and firm performance. African Journal of Business Management, 2012. 6(3): p. 727–735.
Rumanti, A. A., Samadhi, T. A., Wiratmadja, I. I., & Sunaryo, I., A systematic literature review on knowledge sharing for innovation: Empirical study approach. 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), 2018. p. 504–509.
Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J.-M., External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018. 129: p. 210–220.
Hirunyawipada, T., & Pan, Y., When will going green enhance firm performance? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2020. 28(3): p. 226–241.
Song, M., Yang, M. X., Zeng, K. J., & Feng, W., Green knowledge sharing, stakeholder pressure, absorptive capacity, and green innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020. 29(3): p. 1517–1531.
Chang, T.-W., & Hung, C.-Z., How to Shape the Employees’ Organization Sustainable Green Knowledge Sharing: Cross-Level Effect of Green Organizational Identity Effect on Green Management Behavior and Performance of Members. Sustainability, 2021. 13(2): p. 626.
Ribau, C. P., Moreira, A. C., & Raposo, M., SMEs innovation capabilities and export performance: An entrepreneurial orientation view. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2017. 18(5): p. 920–934.
Urbaniec, M., Green Entrepreneurship: Exploring a New Role for Business. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 2017. 18(12.2): p. 49-64.
Guo, Y., Wang, L., & Xie, Y., Green Innovation, Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Supply Chain Learning: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms in China. Preprints 2018, 2018050232 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201805.0232.v1).
Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, H.-C., Critical factors for enhancing green service innovation: Linking green relationship quality and green entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 2018. 9(2): p. 188-203.
Jiang, W., Chai, H., Shao, J., & Feng, T., Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 198: p. 1311–1323.
Habib, M. A., Bao, Y., & Ilmudeen, A., The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and green supply chain management practices on sustainable firm performance. Cogent Business & Management, 2020. 7(1): p. 1743616.
Guo, Y., Wang, L., & Chen, Y., Green entrepreneurial orientation and green innovation: The mediating effect of supply chain learning. SAGE Open, 2020, 10.1: 2158244019898798.
Doz, Y., Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K., Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard business review, 1989. 67(1): p. 133-139.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 1997. 18(7): p. 509–533.
Nelson, R. R., An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University press, 2009.
Xing, X., Liu, T., Shen, L., & Wang, J., Linking environmental regulation and financial performance: The mediating role of green dynamic capability and sustainable innovation. Sustainability, 2020. 12(3): p. 1007.
Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M., Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2020. 27(1): p. 146–165.
Zhang, J., Ouyang, Y., Philbin, S. P., Zhao, X., Ballesteros-Pérez, P., & Li, H., Green dynamic capability of construction enterprises: Role of the business model and green production. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2020. 27(6): p. 2920–2940.
Buzzao, G., & Rizzi, F., On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2021. 30(1): p. 135–175.
Chang, C.-H., & Chen, Y.-S., Green organizational identity and green innovation. Management Decision, 2013. 51(5): p. 1056–1070.
Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G., The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 2016. 69(11): p. 4912–4917.
Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & De Marchi, V., Absorptive capacity and relationship learning mechanisms as complementary drivers of green innovation performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2018. 22(2): p. 432–452.
Huang, J.-W., & Li, Y.-H., How resource alignment moderates the relationship between environmental innovation strategy and green innovation performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2018. 33(3): p. 316–324.
Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D., Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020. 150: p. 119762.
Awan, U., Arnold, M. G., & Gölgeci, I., Enhancing green product and process innovation: Towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020. 30(2): p. 1283-1295.
Martínez-Ros, E., & Kunapatarawong, R., Green innovation and knowledge: The role of size. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2019. 28(6): p. 1045–1059.
Snyder, H., Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 2019. 104: p. 333-339.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M., Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2019. 39(1): p. 93-112.
Mireles-Flores, L., Recent trends in economic methodology: A literature review. In Including a Symposium on Bruce Caldwell’s Beyond Positivism After 35 Years. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2018. June.
Hormiga, E., de Saá-Pérez, P., Díaz-Díaz, N. L., Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J. L., & Aguiar-Diaz, I., The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on the performance of academic research groups: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2017. 42(1): p. 10–32.
Madhoushi, M., Sadati, A., Delavari, H., Mehdivand, M., & Mihandost, R., Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge management. Asian Journal of Business Management, 2011. 3(4), 310–316.
Salleh, Z., Ngah, R., & Zainal Abidin, Z., Exploring micro enterprises business performance through entrepreneurial orientation, knowledge sharing and innovation. Management & Accounting Review (MAR), 17(2), 2018. p. 93–106.
Habib, Md. A., Bao, Y., Nabi, N., Dulal, M., Asha, A. A., & Islam, M., Impact of Strategic Orientations on the Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance. Sustainability, 2021. 13(1): p. 340.
Pittino, D., Martínez, A. B., Chirico, F., & Galván, R. S., Psychological ownership, knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: The moderating role of governance heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 2018. 84: p. 312–326.
Wach, K., Glodowska, A., & Maciejewski, M., Entrepreneurial orientation, knowledge utilization and internationalization of firms. Sustainability, 2018. 10(12): p. 4711.
Weerakoon, C., McMurray, A. J., Rametse, N., & Arenius, P., Knowledge creation theory of entrepreneurial orientation in social enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 2020. 58(4): p. 834–870.
Chennamaneni, A., Determinants of knowledge sharing behaviors: Developing and testing an integrated theoretical model. University of Texas Arlington, 2007.
Wang, Z., & Wang, N., Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012. 39(10): p. 8899–8908.
Abbas, J., & Sağsan, M., Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019. 229: p. 611–620.
Nieves, J., & Haller, S., Building dynamic capabilities through knowledge resources. Tourism Management, 2014. 40: p. 224–232.
Amaranti, R., Irianto, D., & Govindaraju, R., The Relationship Between Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Sharing Capability, and Green Dynamic Capability: A Conceptual Model. 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Creative Computing (ICSECC), 2019. p. 426–431.
Jilani, M. M. A. K., Luo, F., Islam, M. T., Uddin, M. A., The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: A Moderated Mediation Study. Sustainability, 2020. 12(3): p. 908.
Li, C., Ashraf, S. F., Shahzad, F., Bashir, I., Murad, M., Syed, N., & Riaz, M., Influence of Knowledge Management Practices on Entrepreneurial and Organizational Performance: A Mediated-Moderation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020. 11.
Chen, Y.-S., Chang, T.-W., Lin, C.-Y., Lai, P.-Y., & Wang, K.-H., The influence of proactive green innovation and reactive green innovation on green product development performance: The mediation role of green creativity. Sustainability, 2016. 8(10): p. 966.
Monteiro, A. P., Soares, A. M., & Rua, O. L., Entrepreneurial orientation and export performance: The mediating effect of organisational resources and dynamic capabilities. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 2017. 10(1): p. 3–20.
Monteiro, A. P., Soares, A. M., & Rua, O. L., Linking intangible resources and export performance. Baltic Journal of Management, 2017. 12(3): p. 329-347
Swoboda, B., & Olejnik, E., Linking Processes and Dynamic Capabilities of International SME s: The Mediating Effect of International Entrepreneurial Orientation. Journal of Small Business Management, 2016. 54(1): p. 139–161.
Breznik, L., & D. Hisrich, R., Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: Are they related? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development; Bradford, 2014. 21(3): p. 368–384.
Fahim, N. B. A., & Baharun, R. B., Market Learning Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation Effects Towards Absorptive Capacity and Innovative Capability on Firm Performance. International Business Management, 2016. 10(17): p. 3770–3778.
Ilyas, G. B., Munir, A. R., & Sobarsyah, M., Role of Strategic Leadership, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Innovation on Small and Medium Enterprises Performance. International Journal of Economic Research, 2017. 14(15): p. 61–72.
del Rosario Reyes-Santiago, M., Sánchez-Medina, P. S., & Díaz-Pichardo, R., The influence of environmental dynamic capabilities on organizational and environmental performance of hotels: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019. 227: p. 414–423.
He, J., Nazari, M., Zhang, Y., & Cai, N., Opportunity-based entrepreneurship and environmental quality of sustainable development: A resource and institutional perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 256: p. 120390.
Lisboa, A., Skarmeas, D., & Saridakis, C., Entrepreneurial orientation pathways to performance: A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of Business Research, 2016. 69(4): p. 1319–1324.
Pacheco-lari, L. M., & Liboni-lara, L. B., Dynamic capabilities for green innovations: A systematic literature review and propositions for future studies. EnANPAD San Paulo, 2017. p. 1–16.
Chang, C.-H., How to enhance green service and green product innovation performance? The roles of inward and outward capabilities. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018. 25(4): p. 411–425.
Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E., Sustainability‐oriented capabilities for eco‐innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands. Business Strategy & the Environment (John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 2019. 28(5): p. 847–857.
Eikelenboom, M., & de Jong, G., The impact of dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019. 235: p. 1360–1370.
Zhang, F., & Zhu, L., Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy & the Environment (John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 2019. 28(6): p. 1012–1026.
Singh, H., Mansor, N. A., Krubally, M., Balder, N., & Ullah, H., Investigating the impact of dynamic and relational learning capabilities on green innovation performance of SMEs. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 2019. 6: p. 10-18
Mahmud, M., Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2020). Environmental management and product innovation: The moderating role of the dynamic capability of small manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 264: p. 121633.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P., The strategy map: Guide to aligning intangible assets. Strategy & Leadership, 2004. 32(5): p. 10–17.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G.,. The core competence of the corporation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. p. 275-292.
Teece, D. J., Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2007. 28(13): p. 1319–1350.
Winter, S. G., Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 2003. 24(10): p. 991–995.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G., Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 2014. 26(2): p. 106-121
Wong, K. K.-K., Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 2013. 24(1): p. 1–32.
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P., Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 2018. 28(1): p. 227–261.