Offset Phase Shift Keying Modulation in Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Spatial Multiplexing


  • Adeyemo Zacheaus Kayode Ladoke Akintola University of Technology



Offset, digital modulation, Spatial Multiplexing, MIMO, M-PSK scheme, Intercarrier Interference


The increasing demand for multimedia data transmission in mobile wireless communication poses a challenge to reliable signal reception. In order to have good signal quality, a robust digital modulation scheme is required at the transmitter. However, the conventional M-ary Phase Shift Keying (MPSK) commonly used in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication systems with non-linear radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers causes a relative increase in intercarrier interference (ICI). This paper presents a development of offset-MPSK (O-MPSK) modulation scheme in MIMO spatial multiplexing over the Rayleigh fading channel.

The O-MPSK modulation schemes were developed for 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 constellation sizes. The development of the O-MPSK was done by shifting the phase of the conventional QPSK, 8-PSK, 16-PSK, 32-PSK and 64-PSK by an odd multiple of pi (π) to give -QPSK, -8PSK, -16PSK, -32PSK and -64PSK, respectively, with a view to reducing the spectral spreading in the power amplifiers at the receiver of a MIMO system. The MIMO techniques used was MIMO Spatial Multiplexing (MIMO–SM). The system models were developed around these schemes and later simulated using MATLAB application toolkit. The performances of the O-MPSK schemes were evaluated using bit error rate (BER) at signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) range of 0 to 20 dB and compared with the conventional MPSK schemes.

The results obtained for all the SNRs in MIMO-SM showed that mean BER of 0.0024, 0.0040, 0.0085, 0.0183 and 0.036 were obtained for -QPSK, -8PSK, -16PSK, -32PSK and -64PSK respectively as against mean BER of 0.0025, 0.0044, 0.0088, 0.0178 and 0.0358 obtained for conventional QPSK, 8PSK, 16PSK, 32PSK and 64PSK respectively.

The mean BER values obtained reveal that the developed O-MPSK outperforms the conventional MPSK due to the relatively lower BER of O-MPSK schemes compared with the MPSK schemes. This is as a result of the reduction in the amplitude variations and spectral spreading at the receiver of the MIMO system.

Author Biography

Adeyemo Zacheaus Kayode, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology

Electronic/Electrical Engineering

Associate Professor


Harjot K., Bindiya J. and Amit V., “Comparative Performance Analysis of M-ary PSK Modulation Schemes using Simulink” International Journal of electronic & Communication Technology, 2. 3, (2011): 204 – 209.

Gesse, M. K. and Oladele O. P., “Performance Evaluation of LTE Downlink with MIMO Techniques,” M.Tech Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden, (2010).

Proakis, J. G. and Salehi, M., Communication Systems Engineering, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., USA, (2002).

Proakis, J. G., Digital Communications, McGraw – Hill Companies, inc, International Edition, New York City, USA, (2001).

Rappaport, T. S., Wireless Communications – Principles and Practice, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., USA, (2002).

Bernard, S., “Digital Communications: Fundamentals and Applications”, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, USA, (2001).

Amin, A. (2011), “Computation of Bit-Error Rate of Coherent and Non-Coherent Detection M-ary PSK with Gray Code in BFWA Systems,” International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 3.1 (2011):27-38.

Antti V. R. and Arto L., “Radio Engineering for Wireless Communication and Sensor Applications”, Artech House, Boston, London, (2003)

Poongodi, C., Ramya, P. and Shanmugam A., “BER Analysis of MIMO OFDM System using M-QAM over Rayleigh Fading Channel,” International Conference on Communication and Computational Intelligence, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai, erode, T. N., India, (2010): 284-288.

Ippolito, L. J. “Satellite communication system engineering: Atmospheric Effect, Satellite link Design, and System Performance,” first edition John Wiley & Sons, Singapore, (2008).

Foschini G. J. and Gans M., “On Limits of Wireless Communications in a Fading Environment when using Multiple Antennas,” Wireless Personal Communications, 6,(1998):311-335,

Sulyman, A. I., “Performance of MIMO Systems with Antenna Selection over Nonlinear Fading Channels,” IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 2.2, (2008):159 – 170.

Gesbert D., Bolcskei H., Gore D. and Paulraj A., “MIMO Wireless channels: Capacity and Performance Prediction,” in Proc. IEEE Globecom, San Francisco, CA, (2000):1083 - 1088

Almouti, S. M., “A Simple Transmit Diversity Technique for Wireless Communications,” IEEE Journal on Select Areas in Communications, 16.8, (1998):1451-1458.

Mindaudu, A. S. and Miyim, A. M., “BER Performance of MPSK and MQAM in 2x2 Almouti MIMO Systems,” International Journal of Information Sciences & Techniques, 2.5, (2012):1 – 10.

Jaiswal A. K., Kumar A. and Singh A. P., “Performance Analysis of MIMO-OFDM System in Rayleigh Fading Channel,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2. 5, (2012): 1 – 5.

Kaur N. and Kansal L., “Performance Comparison of MIMO Systems over AWGN and Rician Channels with Zero Forcing Receivers,” International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Networks, 5.1, (2013):73 – 84.

Nelson, T. and Rice, M., “MIMO Communications using offset modulations,” Proceedings of IEEE International Waveform Diversity and Design Conference, (2006): 23 – 27.

Dang, X., Offset QPSK in SISO and MIMO Environments, PhD Dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, (2009).

Vadhera A. and Kansal L., “BER Analysis of 2x2 MIMO Spatial Multiplexing under AWGN and Rician Channels for Different Modulations Techniques,” International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Networks, 5.5, (2013):85 – 98.

Mangla R. and Singh M., “Performance Comparison of MIMO-OFDM Transceiver Wireless Communication System using QAM and QPSK Modulation Schemes,” International Journal of Advances in Engineering Science and Technology, 1.2, (2012): 66 – 72.




How to Cite

Kayode, A. Z. (2015). Offset Phase Shift Keying Modulation in Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Spatial Multiplexing. Discoveries in Agriculture and Food Sciences, 3(2), 116.