Links Utilization in MPLS Networks Operating with Traffic Engineering Signal Protocols
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is a technology that ensures efficient transmission with high speed and lower delays. Traffic Engineering (TE) signal protocols are usually used for active management of the MPLS networks for efficient utilization of resources. This paper presents performance investigation of MPLS TE signal protocols to get a guideline to utilize transmission links efficiently. Comparison is made between two TE signal protocols, namely Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) and Constraint-based Routing Label Distribution Protocol (CR-LDP). Simulation results are presented for three MPLS networks having different topologies which are implemented in OPNET (version 14.5) environment to support different applications in the absence and presence of quality of service (QoS) algorithms. The results reveal that MPLS network with CR-LDP TE signal protocol has better performance in the term of link utilization. The RSVP reserves certain paths for transmission while the CR-LDP utilizes almost all of the available links.
(1) A. Hussain, S. Nazeer, T. Abdullah, B. Yaseen and A. Salam “Network Resilience in Multiprotocol Label Switching” Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Vol.2, No.4, PP. 221-227, April 2012.
(2) B. Forouzan, “Data Communications and Networking”, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 4th Ed., PP. 101-110, 2006.
(3) Dr. R. Naoum and M. Maswady, ”Performance Evaluation for VoIP over IP and MPLS”, World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal, Vol. 2, No. 3, PP. 110-114, May 2012.
(4) T.J. Shi, G. Mohan, “An Efficient Traffic Engineering Approach Based on Flow Distribution and Splitting in MPLS Networks”, Computer Communications, Vol. 29, No. 9, PP. 1284-1291, May 2006.
(5) A. Bongale, ”Analysis of Link Utilization in MPLS Enabled Network using OPNET IT Guru”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 41, No.14, PP. 35-40, March 2012.
(6) H. Perros, “An Introduction to ATM Network”, 1st Ed., Cary, USA, 2001.
(7) R. Peterkin “A Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture for VPN MPLS based Services”, MSc. Thesis, School of Information Technology and Engineering, University of Ottawa, April 2006.
(8) Y. Lee, Y. Seok, Y. Choi and C. Kim “A Constrained Multipath Traffic Engineering Scheme for MPLS Networks”, Electronic Telecommunication Research Institute, 2002.
(9) S. Shyry and V. Ramachandran, “Finagling Congestion in Selfish Overlay Routing Belittling Link Utilization” , Proc. IEEE, PP. 308-311, November 2010.
(10) C. Pelsser , O. Bonaventure “Extending RSVP-TE to support Inter-AS LSPs”, Proc. CiteSerr,Vol 41, No.5, PP. 122-128, May 2011.
(11) T. Aziz, N. Islam khan and A. Popescu ,“Effect of Packet Delay Variation on Video/Voice over DIFFSERV-MPLS in IPV4/IPV6 Networks”, International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, Vol.3, No.1, pp.27-47, January 2012.
(12) M. Bhandure, G. Deshmukh and Prof. V. J n, “ Comparative Analysis of Mpls and Non -Mpls Network”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 4, PP. 71-76, August 2013.
(13) S. Ibrahim, ” Performance Evaluation of Traffic Engineering Signal Protocols in MPLS Network “, M.Sc. Thesis, Al-Nahrain University, April 2013.
(14) A. Sulaiman and O. Alhafidh“ Performance Analysis of Multimedia Traffic over MPLS Communication Networks with Traffic Engineering“, International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications Securitik Vol. 2, No. 3, PP. 93 -101, March 2014.
(15) S. Ibrahim and M. AL-Quzwini, “Performance Evaluation of MPLS TE Signal Protocols with Different Audio Codecs for Voice Application”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 57, No.1, pp. 56-60, November 2012.
(16) H. Perros, “An Introduction to ATM Network”, 1st Ed., Cary, USA, 2001.
(17) R. Peterkin “A Reconfigurable Hardware Architecture for VPN MPLS based Services”, MSc. Thesis, School of Information Technology and Engineering, University of Ottawa, April 2006.
(18) T. Latif and K. Malkajgiri, “Adoption of Voice over Internet Protocol,” Lulea University of Technology, 2007.
(19) O. Dokun and A. Gift “PDH (Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy) /SDH-SONET (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy / Synchronous Optical Networking)”, International Journal of Mathematics and Engineering Research, Vol 3, No 1, January 2015.
(20) A. Kumar and S. G. Thorenoor, “Analysis of IP Network for Different Quality of Service.” In International Symposium on Computing, Communication, and Control (ISCCC), Proc .of CSIT Vol. 1. IACSIT Press, Singapore. 2011.
(21) P. Ivaniš and D. Drajic “The Simulation Model of Optical Transport System and Its Applications to Efficient Error Control Techniques Design”, Electronic, Vol. 13, No. 2, December 2009.
(22) K. Januu and R. Deekona,“ OPNET Simulation of Voice Over MPLS With Considering Traffic Engineering”, M.Sc. Thesis, School of Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden, June 2010.
(23) J. Evans and C. Filsfils,”Deploying IP and MPLS QoS for Multiservice Networks”, 1st Ed., Elsevier Inc, San Francisco, USA, 2007.
(24) V. Alwayn, “Advanced MPLS design and Implementation, Cisco Systems”, Cisco press 201, West 103rd Street Indianapolis, 2001.
(25) K. Salah and A. Alkhoraidly “An OPNET-Based Simulation Approach for Deploying VoIP”, International Journal of Network Management Int. J. Network, DOI: 10.1002, PP. 159–183, 27 January, 2006.
(26) H. Asif and G. Kaosa, “Performance Comparison of IP, MPLS and ATM Based Network Cores using OPNET”, IEEE Computer Society, August, 2006.
(27) A. Hadi, “Modeling Computer Laboratories in University that Contains Eight Colleges by Using OPNET Software”, Journal of Kerbala University, Vol. 7, No.1, PP.108-123, 2009.
(28) S. Kuribayashi,” Proposed Optimal LSP Selection Method in MPLS Networks”, International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications Vol.3, No.1, PP. 241-250, January 2011