Medical Students Views on Continuous Assessment

  • Omer Abdelgadir Elfaki Professor, Director of medical education unit, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Abdulaziz Alamri Assistant professor, Head department of medical education & consultant urologist, college of medicine, KKU, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • Karimeldin A Salih Associate professor, department of medical education, pediatrics & medical education, college of medicine, Besha University, Saudi Arabia
  • Mahdi Abdullah Mohammad Alyafi MBBS , King Khalid University college of Medicine
  • Maram Mubarak Barkoot MBBS , King Khalid University college of Medicine
  • Iama Ayed Abdullah Dkheelalla MBBS , King Khalid University college of Medicine
  • Arwa Abdullah Aseeri MBBS , King Khalid University college of Medicine
  • Ahmed Alhadthi MBBS , King Khalid University college of Medicine
Keywords: Continous Assessment , MCQ’s , students


The importance of assessment in the educational process is well emphasized in medical education. The system of continuous assessment (CA) used in the College of medicine, KKU can be described as frequent summative assessments in each course since there was no regular feedback. The CA adopted carries 50% of the total marks. Achievement of students in CA is critical to their pass or failure of any course. Excessive use of summative assessment was identified as problematic by some research work. But, at the same time a single terminal summative assessment is not recommended. The objective of this study was to examine the students' perception of learning and its relation with performance in CA.


The target population of this study was the 4th, 5th and 6th year students of the college of medicine, KKU. Non-probability convenience sampling was used aiming at 25% - 30% of the total. A correlational design was adopted. A structured self-administered questionnaire was developed. This was based on four constructs: performance on CA: 3 items, feedback: 6 items, students' perception of learning: 12 items and gender.

A 5-point Likert scale was used ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree to the stated statements in the instrument. The questionnaire was validated before use. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was computed using SPSS.  P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

 Results and discussion

This is a cross sectional study where correlational design was used. The total number of respondents was 128 with 58% of them males and 42% females. The computed r for the perception of learning with performance in CA was .741 and for feedback with performance in CA was .766. This clearly indicated a significant positive correlation between them. Gender had no significant correlation with performance in CA. Although profound evidence does exist on the positive effect of CA on academic performance and motivation of students, this effect seems to be dependent on how the assessment system is used. In one experimental study, it was found that CA had positive effect on students' academic performance, learning and satisfaction compared to summative assessment. On the other hand, when continuous assessment was done in form of frequent summative assessment, the positive effect was lost and in fact a negative effect was evident.


The respondents viewed their perception of learning and feedback strongly and positively correlated with their performance in CA, while gender had no significant correlation


(1) Joughin, G. (2010). The hidden curriculum revisited: a critical review of research into the influence of summative assessment on learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 335-345.

(2) Heywood, J. (2000). Assessment in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

(3) Cruickshank, J. K., Barritt, P. W., Mcbesag, F., Waterhouse, N., & Goldman, L. H. (1975). Student views on continuous assessment at Birmingham University Medical School. BMJ, 4(5991), 265-267.

(4) General Medical Council. (2009). Assessment in Undergraduate Medical Education. Retrieved Feb 3, 2015 from:

(5) Brown, S. (1999). Institutional strategies for assessment. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches (pp. 3–13). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

(6) Knight, P. T., & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.

(7) Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment in the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18,119–144.

(8) Taras, M. (2005). Assessment—summative and formative—some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478.

(9) Rosario Herna´ ndez. Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning? High Educ(2012) 64:489-502 (2) Brown, S. (1999).
Institutional strategies for

(10) assessment. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches (pp. 3–13). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

(11) Kaddam L. and Elnimeiri M. K. (2013). Students' perceptions about the impact of continuous assessment in learning physiology in Sudanese Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research and Development, 2(10), 228-232.

(12) Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science education, 85(5), 536-553.

(13) Tan, C. M. (1992). An evaluation of the use of continuous assessment in the teaching of physiology. Higher education, 23(3), 255-272.

(14) Gibbs, G. (2010) Using Assessment to Support Student Learning, L.M. University, Leeds.

(15) Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501.

(16) Privitera, G. (2014). Research Methods for the Behavioral Science. Retrieved Feb 11, 2015 from: .

(17) Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, 2nd edition, free download from the internet, Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Un-ported License.

(18) ROFF, S., MCALEER, S., HARDEN, R.M., AL-QAHTANI, M., AHMED, A.U., DEZA, H., GROENEN, G. & PRIMPARYON, P. (1997). Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Medical Teacher, 19(4), 295-299.

(19) Carrillo-de-la-Peña, M. T., & Pérez, J. (2012). Continuous assessment improved academic achievement and satisfaction of Psychology students in Spain. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 45-47.

(20) Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.
How to Cite
Elfaki, O. A., Alamri, A., Salih, K. A., Alyafi, M. A. M., Barkoot, M. M., Dkheelalla, I. A. A., Aseeri, A. A., & Alhadthi, A. (2020). Medical Students Views on Continuous Assessment. Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, 7(5), 29-35.