THE CORRELATION BETWEEN CONCEPT GAINING AND RETENTION IN PQ4R, TPS, AND PQ4R-TPS LEARNING STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.49.3141Keywords:
concept gaining, learning strategies, PQ4R, regression lines, retention, TPSAbstract
Concept gaining and retention are two important things in learning. Concept gaining is the knowledge the students gain after they follow a learning process. While retention is the ability to remember concepts within a certain period of time on the material being taught. This research aimed at exploring the correlation between concept gaining and retention of the students who learned by using PQ4R, TPS, and PQ4R-TPS learning strategies, and comparing the regression lines related, whether they were parallel or not. The results of this research showed that there was a significant correlation between concept gaining and retention in all the three learning strategies. The highest contribution value was detected at TPS, followed by PQ4R-TPS, and PQ4R strategy. The results of further analysis reveal that the biggest slope or the rate of students’ retention in relation with the concept gaining is found at the TPS learning strategy. This fact indicates that the biggest potential of the increase of students’ retention due to concept gaining is found at the TPS learning strategy. In other words, TPS learning is the most effective learning strategy in empowering students’ concept gaining and retention compared to the two other learning strategy. Nonetheless, PQ4R and PQ4R-TPS learning strategies also have the potential to empower students' concept gaining and retention, that can be seen at the contribution of each learning strategy. This information is valuable for teachers in implementing appropriate learning strategies to improve students’ concept gaining because it is believed to have an effect on students’ retention.References
Allen, D. & Tanner, K. (2002). Features Approaches in Cell Biology Teaching. Cell Biology Education. 1 (Spring/Summer 2002), 3-5. Retrieved from http://www.lifescied.org, accessed on April 4th, 2014.
Anderson, R.C. (1987). Teaching and The Science of Learning. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Anderson, O.W. & Kratwohl, D.R., (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing (A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives). New York: Addision Wesley Longman, Inc.
Ardila, C., Corebima, A.D., & Zubaidah, S. (2013). Hubungan keterampilan metakognitif terhadap hasil belajar biologi dan retensi siswa kelas X dengan penerapan strategi pemberdayaan berpikir melalui pertanyaan (PBMP) di SMAN 9 Malang [The Correlation of metacognitive Skills on Biology Learning Outcome and Retention of Grade X Students through Thinking Empowerment by Questioning (TEQ) in State Senior High School 9 in Malang, Indonesia]. Online Journal of the State University of Malang, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://jurnal-online.um.ac.id/data/artikel/.
Atunasikha, L. (2010). Hubungan Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Laki-Laki dan Perempuan Kelas IV SDN Penanggungan Malang pada Pembelajaran SAINS dengan Strategi Pembelajaran PBMPdan Think Pain Share (TPS) [The Correlation between metacognitive Skills and Concept Gaining of Male and Female Class IV Students of Penanggungan Elementary School in Science Learning by using TEQ dan Think Pain Share (TPS) Learning Strategies] . Unpublished thesis. Malang: The Malang State University.
Bahri, A. & Corebima, A.D. (2015). The Contribution Of Learning Motivation and metacognitive Skill on cognitive Learning Outcome of Students within different Learning Strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487-500.
Bahri, A. (2016). Pengaruh Strategi Problem Based Learning (PBL) dipadu Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) pada Perkuliahan Biologi Dasarterhadap Motivasi Belajar, Keterampilan Metakognitif, Hasil Belajar Kognitif, Retensi, dan Karakter Mahasiswa Berkemampuan Akademik Berbeda [The Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) combined with Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) in Basic Biology Class on Motivation, metacognitive Skills, cognitive Learning Results, Retention and Character of Students having different academic Abilities]. Unpublished Dissertation. Malang: Graduate University of Malang.
Baran, M., & Maskan, A. K. (2011). A study of relationships between academic self concepts, some selected variables and physics course achievement. International Journal of Education, 3(1), 1-12.
Basith, A. (2013). Kajian Perbandingan Efektivitas Problem Based Learning dan Reciprocal Teaching dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Metakognitif, Pemahaman Konsep Biologi dan Retensi Siswa kelas X SMA dengan Potensi Akademik Berbeda di Kota Malang [Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning and Reciprocal Teaching in improving metacognitive Skills, Biology Concept Gaining and Retention of Grade X Senior High School Students having different academic Potential in Malang]. Thesis. Unpublished. Malang: PPs State University of Malang.
Bibi, R & Manzoor H. A. (2011). Effect of PQ4R Study Strategy in Scholastic Achievement of Secondary School Student in Punjab (Pakistan).Language in India. 11(12), December 2011, 247-267. Retrieved from http://www.language india.com, Accessed on June 14th, 2013.
Carss, W.D. (2007). The Effects of Using Think-Pair-Share During Guided Reading Lessons. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Education. The University of Waikato. Retrieved from http://www.ijese.comV3_N3_Randler.
Chikmiyah, C. & Sugiarto, B. (2012). Hubungan antara Pengetahuan Metakognitif Belajar Siswa melalui Hasil Jenis Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think Pair Share on Buffer Sulusi Masalah (The Correlation between Students’ metacognitive Learning through cooperative Learning Model of Think Pair Share on Buffer Problem Solution). Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 55-61. Retrieved from http://www.ejournal.unesa.ac.id/article/201/36/article.pdf.
Corebima, A.D. (2016). Pembelajaran Biologi di Indonesia Bukan untuk Hidup [Biology Learning in Indonesia is not for Life]. Proceeding Biology Education Conference (ISSN: 2528-5742), Vol 13(1) 2016: 8-22. Seminar Nasional XIII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 2016.
Corebima, A.D. (2006). Pembelajaran Biologi yang Memberdayakan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa. [Biology Learning which empowers Students Thinking Ability]. Paper presented at the Pelatihan Strategi Metakognitif pada Pembelajaran Biologi untuk Guru-guru Biologi SMA di Kota Palangkaraya, August 23rd, 2006.
Duyilemi, A. N. & Bolajoko. (2014). Effects of Constructivists' Learning Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students Achievement and Retention in Biology. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 5(27), 627-633. Retrieved from http://www.mcser.org.journal/index/php/mjss/ article/viewFile/5123/4945.
Fauziyah, D.R., Corebima, A.D., Zubaidah, S. (2013). Hubungan Keterampilan Metakognitif terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi dan Retensi Siswa Kelas X dengan Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Think Pair Share di SMA Negeri 6 Malang [The Correlation of metacognitive Skills on Biology Learning Results and Retention of Class X Students in the Implementation of Think Pair Share Learning strategy at State Senior High School 6 Malang]. Online Journal of the State University of Malang, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://jurnal-online.um.ac.id/data/artikel/2014 .
Hart, D. 1994. Authentic Assesment a Hand Book for Educators California. New York: Addison:Wesley Publishing Company.
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., and Russell, E. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. Journal Experimental Psychoogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 26(5), 1160 –1169. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11009250.
Huber, J. A. (2004). A closer lock at SQ3R. Reading Improvement, 41, 108-112. Retrieved from http://www. eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ705142.
Ibe, N.H. (2009). Metacognitive Strategies on Classroom Partisipation and Student Achievment in Senior Secondary School Science Classrooms. Science Educational International. 20 (1), 25-31. Retrieved from http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/files/p2.pdf
Jamaluddin. (2009). Pengaruh Pemberdayaan Pembelajaran Berpikir melalui Pertanyaan Dipadukan Strategi Kooperatif dan Kemampuan Akademik terhadap Keterampilan Metakognitif, Berpikir Kreatif, Hasil Belajar Kognitif IPA-Biologi, dan Retensi Siswa SD di Mataram [The Effect of Thinking Empowerment by Questioning combined with cooperative Strategy and academic Ability on metacognitive Skills, creative Thinking, Science-Biology cognitive Learning Results, and Retention of Elementary School Students in Mataram]. Unpublished Dissertation. Malang: Graduate University of Malang.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching: Model-Model Pengajaran. Terjemahan oleh Achamad Fawaid dan Ateilla Mirza. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kennedy, R. (2007). In Class Debates: Fertile Ground for Active Learning and the Cultivation of Critical Thinking and Oral Communication Skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 19(2), 183-190. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE.pdf
Khattack, I. & Khan, D. (2002). Teaching Reading Skills. A Two Component Approach. Journal of Education and Research. IER, University of Peshawar, 5(1), 29-34.
Leipzig, D. H. (2001). What is Reading?. From Learning Letters to Reading Aloud: Strategies for Reading Fun. 2010 SPAC Conference. Retrieved from http://www.spac.k12.pa.us/.../11%20Chad%20Waldron%20 From%2....
Logsdon, A. (2007). Improve Reading Comprehension With the PQ4R Strategy. Retrieved March 4, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.learningdisabilities.about.com/od/ instructionalmaterials/a/
Lord, T. R. (2001). 101 Reasons for Using Cooperative Learning in Biology Teaching.The American Biology Teacher.63(1), 30-38. Retrieved from http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1662/00027685%282001%29063%5B0030%3ARFUCLI%5D2.0.CO%3B2, accessed on April 28th, 2016.
Malahayati, E.N. (2011). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah melalui Strategi Think-Pair-Share terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, Hasil Belajar Biologi, dan Retensi Siswa dengan Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda [The Effect of Problem Based Learning through Think-Pair-Share Strategy toward metacognitive Ability, critical Thinking Skills, Biology Learning Results, and Retention of Students with different academic Ability]. Unpublished thesis. Malang: State University of Malang.
Mboto, F.A., Udo, N.N., Stephen, Utibeabasi. (2011). Effects of Improvised Materials on Students’ Achievement and Retention of the Concept of Radioactivity. African Research Review. An International Multi-Disciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, 5(1), 18, 342-353. Retrieved from www.ajol.info/index.php/afrrev/article/.../52313.
Miranda, Y. (2010). Dampak Pembelajaran Metakognitif dengan Strategi Kooperatif terhadap Kemajuan Metakognitif Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Biologi di SMA Negeri Palangka Raya (The Effects of metacognitive Learning and cooperative Strategy on Students’ metacognitive Progress in Biology Learning in State Senior High Schools in Palangkaraya). Jurnal Penelitian Kependidikan. 20(2), 187-201.
Nur, M. (2000). Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Learning). Surabaya: UNIPRESS UNESA.
Nurochma, R., Maridi, & Ariyanto, J. (2011). Perbedaan hasil belajar dengan penerapan strategi pembelajaran guided inquiry dan demonstrasi ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa kelasVIII SMP Negeri 1 Jaten tahun pelajaran 2012/2013 (The Differences in Learning Results with the Implementation of guided Inquiry Learning Strategy and Demonstration based on Students’ Learning Styles of Class VIII State Junior High School 1 Jaten in academic year 2011/2012). Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Retrieved from http://biologi.fkip.uns.ac.id.
Ofodu, G.O & Lawal, R. A. (2011). Cooperative Instructional Strategies and Performance Levels of Students in Reading Comprehension. Int J EduSci, 3(2), 103-107. Retrieved from http://www.krepublishers.com. Institute of Education, Faculty of Education, University of Ado-Ekiti, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria *Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Palennari, M. (2016). Exploring the correlation between metacognition and cognitive retention of students using some biology teaching strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(5), 617-629. Retrieved from http://oaji.net//articles//2016//987-1482502307.en.id.
Poondej, C. & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2016). Relationship between Motivational Goal Orientations, Perceptions of General Education Classroom Learning Environment, and Deep Approaches to Learning. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 37 (2016) 100e103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss. 2015.01.001. PQ4Rstrategy. Html.
Rodli, M. (2015). Applying PQ4R Strategy for Teaching Reading. Indonesian EFL Journal. 1(1), 31-41.
Rogers, B. (2006). Classroom Behaviour, A Practical Guide to Effective Teaching, Behavior Management and College Support. (2nd.ed.). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Rose, C. 2007. Super Accelerated Learning, Revolusi Belajar Cepat Abad 21 Berdasarkan Riset Terbaru Para Ilmuwan [Super Accelerated Learning, revolution of Fast Learning in 21st Century based on scientists latest research]. Bandung: Jabal.
Schmid, S. & Bogner, F.X. 2015. Effects of Students’ Effort Scores in a Structured Inquiry Unit on Long-Term Recall Abilities of Content Knowledge. Education Research International. Volume 2015, 1-11. Article ID 826734. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/826734. Retrieved from https://www. hindawi.com/journals/ edri/2015/826734/.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 279-294. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html? id...assetKey...
Stuever, D. M. (2006). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategies on Subsequent Participation in Middle School Science Classroom. Master’s Thesis, Wichita State University, 2006). Retrieved from http://www. soar.wichita.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10057/.../t06027. pdf
Suratno. (2009). Pengaruh Strategi Kooperatif Jigsaw dan Resiprocal Teaching terhadap Keterampilan Metakognisi dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa SMA Berkemampuan Atas dan Bawah di Jember (The Effect of cooperative Learning of Jigsaw and Reciprocal Teaching Strategy on metacognitive Skill and Biology Learning Results of Senior High School Students having high and low academic Ability in Jember). Doctoral dissertation. State University of Malang, Indonesia.
Tanner, K.D. (2009). Talking to Learn Why Biology Students Should Be Talking in Classroom and How to Make it Happen Feature. Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning. CBE-Life Science Education, 8, 89-94. doi:10.1187/cbe.09 – 03– 0021
Wahyuningsih, A.N. (2012). Pengembangan Media Komik Bergambar Materi Sistem Saraf untuk Pembelajaran yang menggunakan Strategi PQ4R [Developing a Comics illustrated with Nervous System Learning Material using PQ4R Strategy]. Journal of Innovative Science Education. JISE. 1(1), 2012, 19-27. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/ sju/index.php/jise.
Warouw, Z.W.M. (2009). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Metakognitif dengan Strategi Cooperative Script, dan Reciprocal Teaching pada Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda Terhadap Kemampuan dan Keterampilan Metakognitif, Berpikir Kritis, Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa, serta Retensinya di SMP Negeri Manado [The Effect of metacognitive Learning by Cooperative Script Strategy, and Reciprocal Teaching at different academic Ability on metacognitive Ability, critical Thinking, Biology Learning Results and its Retention of the Students of State Junior High Schools in Manado]. Unpublished dissertation. Malang: Post Graduate Program, State University of Malang.
Widodo., S. (2011). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Biologi dengan Menggunakan Metode Pembelajaran Cooperative Learning Tipe Group Investigation (GI) dan Think Pair Share (TPS). [The Comparison of Biology Learning Outcomes Using Cooperative Learning Method of Group Investigation (GI) and Think Pair Share (TPS)]. (Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2011). Retrieved from http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/2584/1/SIGIT%20WIBOWO-FITK.pdf
Zahri. (2010). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle terhadap Kualitas Proses, Hasil Belajar, dan Retensi Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Pokok Asam Basa Kelas XI IPA SMAN I Indrapuri Aceh Besar [The Effect of Learning Cycle Model on Students’ Quality Process, Learning Results, and Retention of the Learning Results in the Topic of Acid Alkali at Class XI of Natural Science, State Senior High School I Indrapuri in Aceh Besar]. Upublished Thesis. Malang: Post Graduate Program, State University of Malang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
