Transdermal Iron Therapy in Women with Anemia: A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Tolerability Versus Oral Supplementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhr.1204.19116Keywords:
Iron Deficiency Anemia, Transdermal Therapy, Ferritin, Vitamin D, Women’s Health, Compliance, Oral Iron Side EffectsAbstract
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a significant health concern among adolescent girls and women, often compounded by poor adherence to oral iron therapy due to gastrointestinal side effects. Objective: To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and compliance of two transdermal iron lotion formulations with oral iron supplementation in women with confirmed IDA. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 300 women divided into three arms: oral iron supplementation, Transdermal Lotion 1 (iron, folic acid, B12, vitamin D), and Transdermal Lotion 2 (minimal-iron comparator). Primary outcomes included hemoglobin improvement and adherence; secondary outcomes were changes in ferritin and vitamin D levels. Results: Transdermal Lotion 1 showed higher adherence (90% vs. 65%) and fewer side effects compared to oral therapy. Hemoglobin improved >1 g/dL in 60% of the oral group and 39.8% of Lotion 1 users. Notably, 56% of Lotion 1 users improved ferritin from <30 to >50 ng/mL and 67% achieved sufficient vitamin D levels—benefits not observed with oral iron or Lotion 2. Conclusion: Transdermal iron delivery, especially Lotion 1, offers a well-tolerated, moderately effective alternative for managing anemia in women with enhanced nutritional benefits.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hema Divakar, Vijay K. Shastri, Jayeeta Pahan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
