Page 1 of 3

British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research - Vol. 11, No. 5

Publication Date: October 25, 2024

DOI:10.14738/bjhmr.115.17651.

Magbri, A., & El-Magbri, M. (2024). Use of Biologic Medicine in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases; Effectiveness, Side-Effects

and Loss of Strength in the Long Run, Then What? British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, Vol - 11(5). 95-97.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Use of Biologic Medicine in Autoimmune and Inflammatory

Diseases; Effectiveness, Side-Effects and Loss of Strength in the

Long Run, Then What?

Awad Magbri

Marshfield Medical Centre-Weston,

WI USA, Detroit Medical Center, MI USA

Mariam El-Magbri

Marshfield Medical Centre-Weston,

WI USA, Detroit Medical Center, MI USA

ABSTRACT

The use of biological medicines has revolutionized the treatment of various chronic

and immune-mediated diseases, offering improved outcomes in gastrointestinal

disorders like ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), rheumatological

diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis

(RA), and skin conditions like psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and eczema, among others.

These therapies, often in the form of monoclonal antibodies or cytokine inhibitors,

target specific immune pathways, providing relief where traditional treatments

often fall short. While these drugs have transformed the management of these

conditions, their long-term efficacy and safety present significant challenges,

particularly with the emergence of subtle side effects, such as the development of

new autoimmune diseases and neutralizing antibodies that render these drugs less

effective over time.

Keywords: Biologic therapy, Neutralizing antibodies, Anti-drug antibodies, Autoimmune

disease, Inflammatory disease.

MECHANISMS OF BIOLOGICS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE IMMUNE SYSTEM

Biologics, especially monoclonal antibodies, work by specifically targeting molecules involved

in immune system activation, such as TNF-alpha, IL-6, and B-cell activators. This precision

allows for the control of excessive immune responses in autoimmune and inflammatory

conditions, providing symptom relief and disease control. However, by altering immune system

activity, these drugs can inadvertently trigger new autoimmune diseases or dysregulate other

immune processes. For example, patients treated with TNF inhibitors for one autoimmune

condition, such as RA, have occasionally developed other conditions like drug-induced lupus,

autoimmune thyroid diseases, or psoriasis.

While these effects are uncommon, they raise concerns about the long-term impact of biologics

on immune system balance. The key challenge is identifying why certain patients develop these

autoimmune sequelae and how to mitigate these risks without undermining the therapeutic

benefits.

Page 2 of 3

96

British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research (BJHMR) Vol 11, Issue 05, October-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

DEVELOPMENT OF NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES

One of the major issues with biologic therapies is the potential for patients to develop anti-drug

antibodies (ADAs), particularly neutralizing antibodies. These antibodies recognize and

neutralize the biologic drug, reducing its efficacy. For example, patients treated with infliximab

(used in UC and CD) or adalimumab (used in RA, PsA, and IBD) may develop ADAs, especially

after prolonged exposure. When this occurs, the biologic is no longer effective in controlling the

disease, leading to a return of symptoms and flares.

Several factors contribute to the development of neutralizing antibodies, including:

• Immunogenicity of the biologic itself: Fully humanized or human monoclonal

antibodies tend to be less immunogenic compared to chimeric or murine-based

biologics.

• Intermittent treatment regimens: Longer gaps between doses can lead to antibody

formation, as the immune system is given time to recognize the biologic as foreign.

• Co-treatment with immunosuppressants: In some cases, co-prescribing

immunosuppressive drugs, such as methotrexate, can reduce the likelihood of ADA

development by dampening the overall immune response.

The presence of neutralizing antibodies limits the effectiveness of biologics over time, forcing

clinicians to switch therapies or increase dosages, which may lead to additional side effects or

diminishing returns.

THE LONG-TERM EFFICACY CHALLENGE: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

When biologics become ineffective due to neutralizing antibodies or the emergence of new

autoimmune diseases, physicians are faced with difficult treatment decisions. Several options

exist, but each comes with its own challenges:

• Switching to another biologic within the same class: This approach can sometimes

restore efficacy, as the patient may respond differently to a similar biologic with slightly

altered molecular structure. For instance, switching from infliximab to adalimumab in

Crohn’s disease can offer temporary benefit, although the risk of ADA development

persists.

• Switching to a different class of biologics: If a patient develops antibodies to a TNF

inhibitor, switching to another biologic targeting a different pathway, such as an IL- 12/IL-23 inhibitor (e.g., ustekinumab for IBD) or IL-17 inhibitors (for PsA and

psoriasis), might be more effective. This strategy, however, also comes with the

possibility of new side effects and unknown long-term safety issues.

• Use of small molecules: Small molecule inhibitors, such as Janus kinase (JAK)

inhibitors or S1P modulators, are non-biologic alternatives that target intracellular

signaling pathways involved in immune responses. These medications, like tofacitinib

(for RA and UC), may be useful when biologics fail, although they are also associated

with their own safety concerns, including an increased risk of infections and

malignancies.

• Re-induction with the same biologic, combined with immunosuppression: In some

cases, clinicians may attempt to reintroduce the same biologic while adding

immunosuppressive drugs to prevent antibody formation. This approach requires

careful balancing of immunosuppressive therapy to avoid additional complications such

as infections or malignancy.