Inter- and intra-scanner differences in Doppler flow measurements using three-dimensional printed flow phantom model of the carotid artery in preterm infants

Authors

  • Sujith Pereira Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Jonathan Reeves
  • Malcolm Birch
  • Ahmed Ali
  • Ajay Sinha
  • Stephen Kempley

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.91.11679

Keywords:

3-dimensional, 3D printed flow phantom, inter scanner, carotid artery, preterm infant

Abstract

This study compared flow measurements with three dimensional (3D) printed flow phantom models of the carotid artery of preterm infants using two commonly available brands of ultrasound scanners (scanner 1 and 2) in the neonatal unit.

3D printed flow phantoms with three different vessel diameters was used for performing continuous and pulsatile flow measurements by 2 observers, blinded to phantom characteristics and each other’s measurements. Agreement between observers were examined using Bland-Altman analysis.

Of the 48 measurements, 62% were pulsatile flow measurements and majority (36(75%)) performed with phantom vessel diameter of 0.244 cm. Bland-Altman analysis for continuous flow measurements (n=18(38%)) using scanner 1, revealed observer 1 had mean (95% LOA) bias of 3.95 (-2.06 to 9.96) ml/min compared to 0.45 (-12.74 to 13.65) ml/min for observer 2. For scanner 2, bias was -2.42 (-12.18 to 7.34) ml/min for observer 1 and 0.54 (-17.00 to 18.09) ml/min for observer 2. Pulsatile flow measurements (n=30(62%)) using scanner 1, demonstrated that observer 1 had a bias of -0.63 (-3.82 to 2.57) ml/min compared to 0.82 (-5.88 to 7.52) ml/min for observer 2. Using scanner 2, bias was -2.49 (-6.18 to 1.21) ml/min for observer 1 and -2.60 (-7.95 to 2.75) ml/min for observer 2. Inter and intra-observer reliability was excellent for most pulsatile flow measurements.

We found excellent inter and intra-observer reliability for majority of pulsatile flow measurements and lower variance for observer 1. Researchers and clinicians can use 3D printed flow phantoms for training and assessing operator capabilities using different ultrasound scanners.

References

W.P. de Boode, Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Clin Perinatol, 47 (2020) 423-434.

L.M. Dix, F. van Bel, P.M. Lemmers, Monitoring Cerebral Oxygenation in Neonates: An Update, Front Pediatr, 5 (2017) 46.

H.A. Gaspar, S.S. Morhy, The Role of Focused Echocardiography in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Critical Appraisal, Biomed Res Int, 2015 (2015) 596451.

A. Sehgal, P.J. McNamara, Does point-of-care functional echocardiography enhance cardiovascular care in the NICU?, J Perinatol, 28 (2008) 729-735.

A.K. Sinha, C. Cane, S.T. Kempley, Blood flow in the common carotid artery in term and preterm infants: reproducibility and relation to cardiac output, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 91 (2006) F31-35.

S.S. Pereira, A.K. Sinha, D.K. Shah, S.T. Kempley, Common carotid artery blood flow volume in extremely preterm infants, Acta Paediatr, 110 (2021) 1157-1165.

S. Pereira, J. Reeves, M. Birch, S. Finton-James, K. Verma, R. Krug, A. Sinha, S. Kempley, A realistic flow phantom model of the carotid artery in preterm infants for training and research, Ultrasound, 28 (2020) 145-154.

S. Pereira, J. Reeves, M. Birch, A. Ali, A. Sinha, S. Kempley, Diameter measurements in three-dimensional printed flow phantom model of the carotid artery in preterm infants, Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, 8 (2021) 8-21.

S. Pereira, J. Reeves, M. Birch, A. Ali, A. Sinha, S. Kempley, Three-dimensional printed flow phantom model of the carotid artery in preterm infants for training and research, Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Imaging, 8 (2021) 102-114.

E.J. Oh, J.H. Lee, E.J. Kwon, J.J. Min, Simulation-based training using a vessel phantom effectively improved first attempt success and dynamic needle-tip positioning ability for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in real patients: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled study, PloS one, 15 (2020) e0234567.

S. Farjad Sultan, G. Iohom, G. Shorten, Effect of feedback content on novices' learning ultrasound guided interventional procedures, Minerva Anestesiol, 79 (2013) 1269-1280.

D.F. Ten Cate, J.J. Luime, M. van der Ven, J.M. Hazes, K. Kooiman, N. de Jong, J.G. Bosch, Very different performance of the power Doppler modalities of several ultrasound machines ascertained by a microvessel flow phantom, Arthritis Res Ther, 15 (2013) R162.

S.S. Pereira, A.K. Sinha, J.K. Morris, D.F. Wertheim, D.K. Shah, S.T. Kempley, Blood pressure intervention levels in preterm infants: pilot randomised trial, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, (2018).

C.J. Teirlinck, R.A. Bezemer, C. Kollmann, J. Lubbers, P.R. Hoskins, K.V. Ramnarine, P. Fish, K.E. Fredeldt, U.G. Schaarschmidt, Development of an example flow test object and comparison of five of these test objects, constructed in various laboratories, Ultrasonics, 36 (1998) 653-660.

J.M. Bland, D.G. Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, 1 (1986) 307-310.

R.N. Landers, Computing intraclass correlations (ICC) as estimates of interrater reliability in SPSS., The Winnower, (2015).

J.R.K. Landis, G.G., The Measurement of Observer Agreeement for Categorical Data, Biometrics, 33 (1977) 159-174.

P.E. Shrout, J.L. Fleiss, Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability, Psychol Bull, 86 (1979) 420-428.

R.H. Mikkonen, J.M. Kreula, P.J. Virkkunen, Reproducibility of Doppler ultrasound measurements, Acta Radiol, 37 (1996) 545-550.

V. Chetboul, N. Athanassiadis, D. Concordet, A. Nicolle, D. Tessier, M. Castagnet, J.L. Pouchelon, H.P. Lefebvre, Observer-dependent variability of quantitative clinical endpoints: the example of canine echocardiography, J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 27 (2004) 49-56.

B. Driscoll, H. Keller, C. Coolens, Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, Med Phys, 38 (2011) 4866-4880.

V. Lopez-Lopez, R. Robles-Campos, D. Garcia-Calderon, H. Lang, E. Cugat, S. Jimenez-Galanes, J.M. Fernandez-Cebrian, V. Sanchez-Turrion, J.M. Fernandez-Fernandez, M.A. Barrera-Gomez, J. de la Cruz, A. Lopez-Conesa, R. Brusadin, B. Gomez-Perez, P. Parrilla-Paricio, Applicability of 3D-printed models in hepatobiliary surgey: results from "LIV3DPRINT" multicenter study, HPB (Oxford), (2020).

V. Filippou, C. Tsoumpas, Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound, Med Phys, (2018).

Downloads

Published

2022-02-13

How to Cite

Pereira, S., Reeves, J. ., Birch, M., Ali, A., Sinha, A., & Kempley, S. (2022). Inter- and intra-scanner differences in Doppler flow measurements using three-dimensional printed flow phantom model of the carotid artery in preterm infants . British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 9(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.91.11679