Page 1 of 23
456
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol.8, No.1
Publication Date: January 25, 2021
DOI:10.14738/assrj.81.9639.
Herndon, J. M. (2021). Humanity Imperiled by the Geomagnetic Field and Human Corruption. Advances in Social Sciences Research
Journal, 8 (1) 456-478.
Humanity Imperiled by the Geomagnetic Field and Human
Corruption
J. Marvin Herndon, Ph. D
Transdyne Corporation
San Diego, California, USA
ABSTRACT
Earth’s magnetic field acts as a shield, protecting life and our
electrically-based infrastructure from the rampaging, charged-particle
solar wind. In the geologic past, the geomagnetic field has collapsed,
with or without polarity reversal, and inevitably it will again. The
potential consequences of geomagnetic collapse have not only been
greatly underestimated, but governments, scientists, and the public
have been deceived as to the underlying science. Instead of trying to
refute or advance a paradigm shift that occurred in 1979, global
geoscientists, individuals and institutions, chose to function as a cartel
and continued to promote their very-flawed concepts that had their
origin in the 1930s and 1940s, consequently wasting vast amounts of
taxpayer-provided research money, and making no meaningful
advances or understanding. Here, from a first person perspective, I
describe the logical progression of understanding from that paradigm
shift, review the advances made and their concomitant implications,
and touch upon a few of the many efforts that were made to deceive
government officials, scientists, and the public. It is worrisome that
geoscientists almost universally have engaged in suppressing or
ignoring sound scientific advances, including those with potentially
adverse implications for humanity. All of this suggests that the entire
institutional structure of the geophysical sciences, funding,
institutions, and bureaucracies should be radically reformed.
Keywords: Magnetic reversals; Corona ejections; Electrical transmission
networks; Communications disruptions; Solar wind; Geomagnetic storms;
Paradigm shift; Inner core.
INTRODUCTION
Our planet’s magnetic field, sometimes called the geomagnetic field, is important, not only as a
navigational aid for many creatures [1, 2], but as a shield that protects all life on Earth from the
charged-particle rampages of the solar wind [3]. As illustrated in Figure 1, the geomagnetic field
deflects the solar wind safely around Earth.
Page 2 of 23
Herndon, J. M. (2021). Humanity Imperiled by the Geomagnetic Field and Human Corruption. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8 (1) 456-478.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.81.9639. 457
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the geomagnetic shield. From [4].
Neither the impinging solar wind nor the shielding geomagnetic field is constant. From time to
time, more-intense-than-usual outbursts from the sun briefly overwhelm the geomagnetic field.
During these times charge particles stream through Earth’s atmosphere lighting the Northern and
Southern skies with dazzling auroral displays and inducing dangerous and damaging electrical
currents in long metallic conductors at the surface. These sporadic events prefigure potential
calamities that will inevitably occur when the geomagnetic field weakens, reverses and/or
collapses [5].
From time to time irregularly, the geomagnetic field reverses. The last geomagnetic reversal
occurred about 786 million years ago. Our stone-age ancestors with no technological
infrastructure survived that reversal. The next geomagnetic field reversal and/or collapse will
ravage our electrically-based infrastructure, potentially wiping out two centuries of infrastructure
development [6]. One of the foremost obligations and responsibilities of scientists should be to
advance geomagnetic understanding to protect humanity. Instead, as described below, the global
geoscience community, functioning as a cartel, for decades has systematically deceived world
governments, scientists, and the public about the origin and nature of the geomagnetic field and its
potentially near-term risks to humanity’s infrastructure [5]. In the following, I provide first-hand
documentation.
Page 3 of 23
458
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol.8, Issue 1, January-2021
CONSENSUS NONSENSE
In 2020, Li et al. published an article entitled “Shock melting curve of iron: A consensus on the
temperature at the Earth's inner core boundary” [7]. Its title illustrates well the non-science that
permeates the geoscience establishment, specifically, the failure to understand principles of
science, which are contrary to consensus, and the nature of Earth’s interior.
In the realm of politics, concensus is a measure of the popularity of an idea, not necessarily its
correctness. In science, consensus is nonsense. At the frontiers of understanding, at the interface
of the unknown, the popularity of a concept in science is not a measure of correctness. Providing
data that supports a consensus is not the way science progresses; if consensus determines scientific
truth, progress would be impossible. Scientific paradigm-shifting revolutions inevitably overturn
consensus. Science progresses by determining what is wrong with currently-held perceptions.
When a new concept emerges in science that challenges important current thinking, the obligation
of the scientific community is to attempt to refute the new concept. If unable to do so, the new
concept should be cited in subsequent literature. To ignore or fail to cite a new concept that
challenges important current thinking, is not only poor science, but it cheats those who fund the
research, usually taxpayers, and cheats fellow scientists who might otherwise make advances on
the new concept.
Li et al. [7] join hundreds, if not thousands, of scientists who for forty years have systematically
ignored or failed to cite published contradictions to the very consensus they attempt to support.
That collective failing has wasted millions of dollars of taxpayer-provided research funding and
has misled governments officials, scientists, and the public into a false sense of security
concerning the risks and consequences of a geomagnetic reversal and/or collapse. Why? To what
end? Malfeasance by government funding-agencies and scientific publishers are partially to blame,
but so too are the scientists, some of whom are corrupt, or are afraid to speak out, or are simply
ignorant of what constitutes good science.
FUNDAMENTAL DEEP-EARTH DISCOVERIES AND DECEIT
In the following I present a historical record of the deceitful response to a challenging new concept
published in 1979 [8]. Not only has that challenging new concept been systematically ignored, but
concerted efforts have been made to deceive the public of its consequential advances, many of
which are related to geomagnetic field origin [9-13] and the next potential geomagnetic reversal
and/or collapse [5].
In 1906, Oldham discovered Earth’s iron metal core whose boundary lies about half way to the
planet’s center [14] (Figure 2). By 1930, its dimensions were well established and the core was
found to be liquid [15]. A simple picture of Earth’s interior emerged: An iron alloy core
surrounded by a silicate-rock mantle and topped with a very thin crust (discovered by
Mohorovičić in 1909 [16]). But something was missing. Earthquake waves from a large New
Zealand earthquake, instead of being shadowed by the core, were actually observed at the surface
in the shadow zone. This posed a great geoscience mystery.