Page 1 of 6

379

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol.7, No.7

Publication Date: July 25, 2020

DOI:10.14738/assrj.77.8624.

Mahendrawati, I. K., & Prasetijowati, T. (2020). Livelihood Strategy Based On Assets As Efforts To Establish Scavenger Empowerment In

Facing The Poverty Of Living In The City (Case Study of Scavengers at Njawar, Surabaya). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal,

7(7) 379-384.

Livelihood Strategy Based On Assets As Efforts To Establish Scavenger

Empowerment In Facing The Poverty Of Living In The City (Case Study

of Scavengers at Njawar, Surabaya)

Ita Kusuma Mahendrawati

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences,

Bhayangkara University Surabaya

Tri Prasetijowati

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences,

Bhayangkara University Surabaya

ABSTRACT

Surabaya as the second largest city in Indonesia has its large scale Final

Disposal Site (FDS) in Njawar. There are quite a lot of scavengers in this

area. They live in a village not far from the landfill site - FDS.

Unfortunately, the Surabaya city government has already extended the

waste management to the private sector leading to an impact on the

income of the scavengers there. On the other hand, the human resources

are very minimal. In responding such a situation, the scavengers apply

the livelihood strategy to empower themselves to survive amid the

urban poverty. This study aims to determine the livelihood strategy

undertaken by the scavengers in building their empowerment in

Surabaya landfill and some factors affecting it. The livelihood strategy

consists of acquisition, allocation and social networking. Also the

community applies the livelihood strategy for the assets owned

comprising of physical, financial, social, waste, and spiritual assets, In

addition, the results of research indicated that work ethic, work

motivation, the role of the collectors as mediators, facilitators and

patrons have a significant influence on the livelihood strategies

undertaken by the scavengers. The job as a scavenger can be classified

as a profession although this type of profession has not been recognized

by the state. Such a condition like this leads to less government

participation in the scavenging community. The result of the study

recommended the involvement of the related agencies such as Social

Service, Office of Sanitation and Gardening, NGOs and Universities to

issue a policy to regulate all the necessary things in finding out the

matters of the scavengers. The participation of the governments of the

native cities of the scavengers is highly expected. Some employments

are supposed to be provided by their hometown so as to reduce the flow

of urbanization.

Keywords: Livelihood strategies, existence, scavengers, urban poverty.

Page 2 of 6

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.77.8624 380

Mahendrawati, I. K., & Prasetijowati, T. (2020). Livelihood Strategy Based On Assets As Efforts To Establish Scavenger Empowerment In Facing The Poverty

Of Living In The City (Case Study of Scavengers at Njawar, Surabaya). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(7) 379-384.

INTRODUCTION

The presence of scavengers in the rigors of city life is caused by not only the problems related to

economic poverty but also social and cultural factors. The condition suggests that scavengers are

present not only as a result of a culture of poverty that characterizes scavenging work as a fatalist

act, but also as a result of structures that view the work as a compulsion in the absence of choices.

(De han, 2000) The study took place at Njawar landfill (FDS), Pakal sub-district, Surabaya city

because the location is the most populated location of waste pickers or scavengers in Surabaya. The

reason to take the scavengers as the subject of study is that the scavenger community has its own

characteristics. On the one hand, their presence is rejected by the people because they are

considered to have a potential to commit a theft, not to be trusted, and as the object of suspicion.

On the other hand, their presence is really needed to minimize the waste disposed in landfills (FDS),

especially the inorganic waste needed by certain factories.

Related to the condition of the scavengers living in Njawar Disposal Site (FDS), they have to face

the problem of the change in the landfill management which is now conducted by the a private

party with the authority to run the project to make use of the waste as a power source. It

automatically leads to the reduction of their income. In response to the problem, the scavengers

have to apply the livelihood strategy fot their empowerment to occupy the position as the subject.

Through the perspective, we have the abilitiy to see that the scavengers are not static but they are

able to deal with any changes and pressures for the survival to live in Surabaya city.

Livelihood Strategy of Scavengers

As Ellis (2000) points out, livelihood is

“A livelihood comprises the assets (natural, physical, human, financial and social

capital), the activities, and the access to these (mediated by institutions and social

relations) that together determine the living gained by the individual or household”

The description above can be submitted that livelihood strategy is a variety of efforts by a person

or individual, household or family by utilizing various resources to earn income so as to maintain

its survival. The concept of livelihood strategy is closely related to the concept of capital or assets

(Coloman, 2010). There are several terms relating to capital, resources and assets, all of which bear

the purpose of benefit and carrying capacity that sustains the livelihood of individuals, families or

households, as well as the community. As Scoones (1998) explains, a livelihood strategy is a way of

leveraging assets, asset choices for investments and how the households retain the assets and

revenues. Assets consist of various forms of capital, such as social, physical, human, financial, waste

and spiritual capitals possessed and they are used for the lives of individuals or households to

maintain material well-being at different levels of survival (DFID 2001) .

There are three strategies in relation to the livelihood strategy undertaken by the scavenger

community in establishing its existence: the first one is acquisition, the second is allocation, and

the third is social network utilization. The scavengers cannot be entirely dependent on both the

shrinking waste assets and the acquisition strategy through the kinship and non-kinship ties

(Lewis 1998) such as the relationships with the fellow scavengers, with stall owners, or with landfill

apparatus. When they do the allocation strategy, they will share the experiences, provide some

hepls for other scavengers. These experiences can be shared with the fellow scavengers so that the

other scavengers can learn and do so if they are considered profitable and able to increase the

Page 3 of 6

381

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol.7, Issue 7, July-2020

income. The allocation strategy can sometimes be manipulative tactics to make a profit (Scott,

1977). In the strategy of social network utilization, they are use the built-in pulp product network

which involves the role of the collectors as mediators and as facilitators in providing the life facilities

and the as patrons in flexible patron-client bonds between collectors and scavengers. Through the

livelihood strategy, the scavengers show that there is the potential to build up their empowerment

and also a means of protest against the dominance of powerful structures (Scott , 1988)

SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING THE LIVELIHOOD STRATEGY OF THE SCAVENGERS

Work Motivation

The scavenging work has become a life choice because it provides more income than the previous

work. The scavenger are motivated because this work does not need any special requirements nor

capital money. They only have to provide their energy to work. In addition, they are highly

motivated by the obligation to send money to their families living in the villages of origin. These are

the reasons why the scavengers undertake the livelihood strategy in order to build their

empowerment in the Njawar FDS.

Work Ethic

The work ethic can be interpreted as the attitude shown by the scavenger of the work done which

is based on the scavenger's life philosophy of work. The philosophy of life is what makes the

scavengers can live together in Njawar FDS. They personally feel on the same boat because they are

poor, leave the village to come to the landfill or FDS to find a source of life, and they do not receive

any helps from others .

The Role Of Collectors As Mediators

The role of the collectors as a mediator is described as the role in the system of retail goods

management which is more familial. There is a symbiotic relationship between the collectors and

the scavengers. This is a kind of reciprocal behavior and it is an evidence that the scavengers need

the collectors and vice versa. The collectors, however, have the power to the price decisions based

on the manufacturer.

The Role Of Collectors As Facilitators

The collectors have the role to provide some facilities such as the dwellings or warehouses for a

few scavengers to live or some money to lend. The dependence of the scavengers on the collectors

as the facilitators is a form of social capital in the form of trust and the participation in the form of

force to apply a livelihood strategy in order to survive in Njawar FDS. Some facilities provided by

the collectors are the supporting factors in making a livelihood strategy run well.

The Role Of Collectors As A Patron

The role of the collectors as a patron is described as a position of a protector for those who become

his clients. Based on some concepts of some experts, it can be seen that the patron – client

relationship is a social exchange relationship of two or more persons that evolves toward an

imbalanced relationship in which one party clearly has a higher position than the other. This

position is due to a greater ability of the superior to that of the second one, the inferior, which

causes the second party to become dependent on the first one. In return for the first party, the

second one provides some assistances and supports covering personal services so that the

collectors have a position as a facilitator (Kusuma I, 2014)