Page 1 of 7

270

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol.7, No.7

Publication Date: July 25, 2020

DOI:10.14738/assrj.77.8614.

Akinnodi, O. D. (2020). Assessment Of The Implementation Of Contents For Secondary School Biology Curriculum In Three States In

Southwest, Nigeria. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(7) 270-276.

Assessment Of The Implementation Of Contents For Secondary

School Biology Curriculum In Three States In Southwest, Nigeria

Akinnodi, Oladamola Dickson

Department of Science Education,

Faculty Education, Ekiti State University, Ekiti.

ABSTRACT

The study assessed the implementation of contents for secondary school

biology curriculum in three states in Southwest, Nigeria. The descriptive

research design of the survey type was used in this study. The

population of the study comprised all Biology teachers in all the public

secondary schools in Ondo, Osun and Oyo States. The samples for the

study consisted of 180 biology teachers drawn from 180 public

secondary schools in the three states. The sample was selected using

multistage sampling procedure. An instrument tagged Inventory on

Implementation of Biology Curriculum (IIBC) was used for collecting the

data for the study. The validation process was exempted since an

inventory was used. The responses obtained were collated and analysed

using descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings of the study

revealed that Biology curriculum contents were not fully covered. It was

also revealed that most of the schools do not meet the recommended

standard of at least 2 periods per week for practical work in Biology. It

was further revealed that the implementation of the contents of Biology

curriculum in secondary schools do not differ among the three states

considered in this study. It was recommended among others that

Biology teacher should intensify efforts to see that the biology

curriculum contents are covered and implemented.

Keywords: Implementation, Contents, Biology, Curriculum.

INTRODUCTION

Biology is a very essential science subject and a requirement for advance learning of a number of

science related professional courses like medicine, agriculture, pharmacy among others. Biology is

also an essential science subject option for many students to meet registration requirement at the

Secondary School Certificate Examination (SSCE). In contemporary Nigeria, countless emphasis is

placed on science and technological growth. As a result, students moral are boosted to take up

science-related subjects. Today, Biology pervades literally every field of human endeavour, and

plays an important role in educational progress. This is seen in all the technologically advanced

countries of the world today, as a result of scientific investigations (Olayinka, 2016).

Biology is a captivating subject that ranges from microscopic cellular molecules to the biosphere,

encompassing the earth surface and its living organisms (Olayinka, 2016). Biology offers contents

in the training of students who want to study medicine, nursing, pharmacy, forestry, fisheries and

Page 2 of 7

271

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol.7, Issue 7, July-2020

so on. Requirement of a credit pass and above in Biology is needed for science related discipline.

Majority of the senior secondary school students choose Biology as an option in the West African

Senior School Certificate Examinations (WASSCE) or National Examination Council’s Senior School

Certificate Examinations (NECO SSCE). Even some students choose Biology as their first choice

because they find it to be an fascinating subject being a subject that is more related to nature.

The goals of the Biology curriculum have been pronounced as laudable according to Agu (2006),

Soyibo (2008) and Yabugbe (2009); and there is evidence to show that even though many students

find Biology interesting, thereby registering for it in the senior secondary schools, many of them

acquire poor result, in the subject year in and year out as shown by Okebukola and Akinbola (2008).

When one inspects the senior secondary school Biology results, in WASSCE and NECO SSCE in

Nigeria, and especially in Southwestern states, in the last nine years (2010-2018), one discovers

that the results were generally poor. For instance, a report from WAEC Chief Examiner has shown

that out of 591,004 candidates that enrolled for Biology examination in 2010, only 25.62% had

credit pass and above. Similarly, in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 only

34.10%, 36.02%, 41.07%, 41.92%, 40.47%, 44.92%, 49.88% and 47.41% respectively, obtained

credit pass and above in Biology.

The same trend of poor performance was reported in NECO SSCE Biology results for Nigeria from

2010 to 2018. For instance, out of 498,117 candidates that registered for the examination in 2010,

only 53.63% had credit and above. Similarly in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018

only 49.04%, 48.63%, 49.63%, 47.48%, 43.01%, 59.86%, 58.17% and 54.92% obtained credit and

above in Biology respectively.

One wonders whether the poor performance is because of lack of infrastructural amenities or the

teaching methods in use. The researcher expressed some doubts as to whether the senior secondary

school Biology curriculum is being well implemented in schools. This issue ought to be empirically

examined rather than speculated upon hence, the necessity for evaluation of the implementation of

national curriculum for secondary school Biology (NCSSB) in Southwest, Nigeria.

Olaitan and Ali (2007) see curriculum contents in terms of how they relate to the national and

individual goals. The curriculum of biology is strategized to meet the common requirements of all

schools students. Biology as a course is aimed at contributing to the broad view of science. Ajayi

(2008) regarded curriculum implementation as putting the curriculum into work for the attainment

of the objectives for which the curriculum is designed. Omotayo (2007) regarded curriculum

implementation as the task of interpreting the curriculum document into the operating curriculum

by the collective effort of the students and other concerned. Mkpa (2007) said no matter how sound

the curriculum of any subject is planned, designed and documented, if it is not appropriately

implemented, the curriculum may not accomplish its goal and objectives.

The problem of curriculum implementation ought to be empirically inspected rather than

speculated upon, hence, the necessity for the existing evaluation of the implementation of national

Biology curriculum for secondary school Biology (NCSSB). The study measured the implementation

of contents for secondary school biology curriculum in three states in Southwest, Nigeria. The study

specifically examined:

Page 3 of 7

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.77.8614 272

Akinnodi, O. D. (2020). Assessment Of The Implementation Of Contents For Secondary School Biology Curriculum In Three States In Southwest, Nigeria.

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(7) 270-276.

i. to what extent the contents of the Biology curriculum for senior secondary schools have been

implemented;

ii. the depth of practical work done in Biology in secondary schools;

iii. the difference in the implementation of the contents of Biology curriculum among the three

states

Research Questions

The following research questions were raised to guide the study:

1. To what extent are the contents of the Biology curriculum for senior secondary schools being

implemented?

2. What is the depth of practical work done in Biology in secondary schools?

Research Hypothesis

This null hypothesis was generated for this study:

1. There is no significant difference in the implementation of the contents of Biology curriculum

among the three states.

METHODOLOGY

The descriptive research design of the survey type was used in this study. The population of the

study comprised all Biology teachers in all the public secondary schools in Ondo, Osun and Oyo

States. The samples for the study consisted of 180 biology teachers drawn from 180 public

secondary schools in the three states. The sample was selected using multistage sampling

procedure. The first stage involved the selection of twelve Local Government areas from each of the

selected states using simple random sampling technique. In stage two, five public secondary schools

were selected from each of the sampled Local Government areas using simple random sampling

technique. In stage four, one Biology teachers was selected from each of the schools using purposive

sampling technique.

An instrument tagged Inventory on Implementation of Biology Curriculum (IIBC) was used for

collecting the data for the study. The inventory was divided into two sections. Section A and B.

Section A was concerned with the demographic data of the respondents such as name of school,

while section B contained items that bother on biology curriculum implementation. A modified

Likert-type three-point rating scale with the options as Fully Taught (FT), Partially Taught (PT) and

Not Taught (NT) was used.

The validation process was exempted since an inventory was used. The instruments used for the

study were administered on the respondents by the researcher. The responses obtained were

collated and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The research questions were

answered using frequency count and percentages. The hypothesis was tested using Analysis of

Variance (ANOVA) statistics at 0.05 level of significance.

RESULTS

Question 1

To what extent are the contents of the Biology curriculum for senior secondary schools being

implemented?