Page 1 of 12

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 11, No. 6

Publication Date: June 25, 2024

DOI:10.14738/assrj.116.17058.

Lessa, R. C. M. M. S., Bacha, E., & Wanderley, F. A. C. (2024). Construction and Validation of An Audiovisual Program on Body

Education. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(6). 58-69.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Construction and Validation of An Audiovisual Program on Body

Education

Risia Carine Maciel Meira Schwartz Lessa

ORCID: 0000-0001-5869-9879

Mestrado Profissional Ensino em Saúde e Tecnologia,

State University of Health Sciences, Brazil

Elizabeth Bacha

ORCID: 0000-0002-8971-8582

School of Medicine, Centro Universitário de Maceió,

Alagoas, Brazil

Flávia Accioly Canuto Wanderley

ORCID: 0000-0003-0775-9119

Mestrado Profissional Ensino em Saúde e Tecnologia,

State University of Health Sciences, Brazil

ABSTRACT

To build and validate an audiovisual program as a resource to encourage body

education. Study with a qualitative and quantitative methodological approach. The

content was developed with a view to encouraging people who work predominantly

seated to seek new well-being strategies based on (self-)knowledge of the body. For

the development of the program, the contents were divided into scripts for 11

videos. All materials were built based on the CTM3 Method, a method for

structuring educational products. Validation was carried out with the contribution

of ten reviewers, five specialists and five laypersons. They evaluated the videos

through a form composed of six questions. The criteria used for validation were a)

Agreement Index (simple majority) and Content Validity Index (CVI ≥ 0.8). The body

education program was validated with AI equal to or greater than 80% and CVI

equal to or greater than 0.8. The content of the audiovisual program was considered

valid for stimulating a culture of body education.

Keywords: Exercise Movement Techniques, Educational Technology, Instructional Film

and Video, Validation Study, Health Education.

INTRODUCTION

The understanding of health is gradually changing from the dualistic and mechanistic view

towards a state of constant collective construction, based on social and subjective relationships

[1,2]. Specifically, in the areas of health, regarding aspects of care, dualistic conceptions still

predominate. The biomedical model, which is the foundation of modern scientific medicine that

seeks to identify body dysfunctions, stripping individuals of their subjectivity, has been losing

ground to the biopsychosocial model, which involves a continuous restructuring of concepts

about health, disease, quality of life, perception of oneself, the other, and the environment [3].

Page 2 of 12

59

Lessa, R. C. M. M. S., Bacha, E., & Wanderley, F. A. C. (2024). Construction and Validation of An Audiovisual Program on Body Education. Advances

in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(6). 58-69.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.116.17058

The body is now considered as a mediator through which we build our relationship with the

world and a large part of this relationship takes place through movement [4]. Costin and Kelly

[5] stresses the fact that we are increasingly inactive, exposed to high loads of stress and

plagued by a high prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases rooted in a lifestyle that

does not include much movement – which is the basis of our physiology.

Body education arises as an attempt to stimulate the recognition that choices related to posture,

movement and body self-perception, that is, the change of behaviors and the way we move in

our daily lives, have a direct impact on our well-being and physical and motor health [5].

A dichotomous view of the body-mind, based on a Cartesian perspective, has marked, and

backed much of contemporary scientific knowledge, sometimes producing a fragmented view

of the body [6], disregarding its subjective aspects [7].

A systematic critique of these dichotomous views and the proposition of a more integrated view

of the body are made from Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, which overcomes the idea of

body-object and argues that human experience takes place through the body-subject.

In the field of neuroscience, an approach has been developed that considers a comprehensive

and integrated view of the individual and the dialogic character of care, namely, pain education.

Generally used for different populations with chronic pain, pain education has been the object

of study since the end of the 1990s. This trend that prioritizes the subject’s understanding of

neurophysiological aspects concerns a change in awareness and an increase in autonomy and

self-knowledge. All this is in line with the phenomenological perspective, which emphasizes the

importance of self-perceptions as the main source of change in human behavior [ 8].

There is a theoretical and practical field – widespread in the field of arts but still little known in

the scientific field of health – that corroborates the importance of these elements (self- knowledge and self-perception) in the search for autonomy and behavior change. It is known

as somatic education and exists for over a century in Europe and North America. According to

Bolsanello[9], this field investigates body and movement awareness, involving both theoretical

and empirical knowledge. It is composed of several techniques that are especially concerned

with the educational aspect and the individual’s responsibility, reiterating the concept of the

body as an experience. Some of these techniques are already very popular, such as Pilates,

Holistic Gymnastics, Feldenkrais, Alexander technique, Anti-gymnastics, among others.

In a possible dialogue between pain education and somatic education, we move towards body

education, which aims to build a care approach that invariably goes through an educational

process: in addition to addressing pain and its neurophysiological aspects, reducing

catastrophic thoughts and anxiety (pain education), it is important to combine knowledge with

experience, based on an exploration focused on the singularities of each individual and in each

circumstance (somatic education) [9].

“Body education” is proposed here with the intention of stimulating the recognition that choices

related to posture, movement and self-perception of the body, that is, the change of behaviors

and the way we move in our daily routine directly impact our physical and motor well-being

and health [9].

Page 3 of 12

60

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 11, Issue 6, June-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Within the scope of health education, there is a growing need for new educational technologies

to facilitate the construction of knowledge, considering the active participation of the subjects

involved within a creative, innovative and critical conception [10].

Among the educational resources with the greatest educational potential, videos are identified

as a clear, attractive and accessible communication option and can reach a wide and varied

audience [11,12].

The simple, easy and democratic access to resources for video production and the fact that no

in-depth mastery of technical skills is needed for recording and editing videos, among many

other aspects, explain the existence of a generation that is adept at using these tools and that

publishes and consumes a multitude of videos on portals such as YouTube, Google Video, and

Tik Tok [13].

It is noteworthy that one of the factors that justifies the constant increase and expansion of the

use of this digital technology is the possibility of easy and rapid sharing, including on social

networks. Silva and Santos [14] draws attention to the fact that visual content corresponds to

90% of the information transmitted to the brain is and processed 60,000 times faster than texts.

Supported by the perspective of the biopsychosocial model, this study aimed to describe the

construction and validation of a video program to stimulating the so-called ‘body education’.

This approach in the health area has an educational nature and intends to provide access to a

set of information and ways of observing the own body and own corporeity in all its aspects

(biological, psychological and social) in order to qualify the professional care and the self-care

of people in their treatment, rehabilitation and prevention processes, with a special focus on

encouraging individuals who work predominantly seated to seek new well-being strategies.

METHODS

Ethical Aspects

The study was designed and developed in accordance with International and National

resolutions (CNS 466/12), specifically the second and the third stages were initiated only after

approval of the study protocol by the Ethics Committee for Research (ECR) Involving Human

Beings of the Federal University of Alagoas. All reviewers were invited after being clarified

about aims, procedures and being explained evaluation criteria. Those who agreed in

participate signed the consent letter.

Study Design

This is a validation study with a quantitative methodological approach carried out in three

sequential stages: content selection and organization, program development, and validation by

specialists and laypeople. All procedures occurred between September 2021 and August 2022,

in Federal University of Alagoas and Alagoas State University of Health Sciences.

Population

The expert reviewers should: i) be a professional who works as a higher education teacher, in

management or health care, with at least a post graduate degree (stricto sensu); and ii) develop

research projects and publications or have professional experience in education, corporeity,

anatomy and/or technology [15,16]. They were identified through representativeness in the

Page 4 of 12

61

Lessa, R. C. M. M. S., Bacha, E., & Wanderley, F. A. C. (2024). Construction and Validation of An Audiovisual Program on Body Education. Advances

in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(6). 58-69.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.116.17058

area, through the curriculum on the Lattes Platform, and through the “snowball” technique [17]

a resource that was also used to attract lay participants.

Lay reviewers must be public servant for more than five years at a federal university and work

predominantly in the seated posture.

Protocol

Content Selection and Organization:

In this first stage, after choosing the central theme (body education) and the target audience

(individuals who work predominantly in a seated position), we sought to reflect on what sets

of knowledge would have the greatest impact and best use and could increase the

understanding about the body, its functioning, its structures, specificities and interconnections

of corporeity, focusing on contents that could benefit the target audience.

Program Development:

The program consists of eleven videos:

1. Opening video: Welcome presentation [18]

2. Video 1: A bone to sit on [19]

3. Video 2: The spine [20]

4. Video 3: In the little house (neutral position) [21]

5. Video 4: The lid and the pan [22]

6. Video 5: The lower limb [23]

7. Video 6: The shoulders [24]

8. Video 7: Breathing [25]

9. Video 8: In recent files [26]

10. Video 9: The connected body [27]

11. Acknowledgments [28]

A priori, a script was prepared with detailed information on each scene to be recorded, as well

as on what elements and people would be part of the scenes, what would be the subtitles and

the titles of each video, the translation into English and Libras, the choice of songs, vignettes

and everything that involved the production of the content.

Then, in addition to educational issues, a technical team assisted in capturing, editing and

finalizing the images and in the presentation and formatting of the content for the audiovisual

media.

The script for the videos was developed by the author herself, who presented it in front of the

cameras using resources such as demonstrations on her own body, illustrations using a

synthetic skeleton and other props, and the collaboration of a professional dancer, always using

the most accessible language, examples of movements, and metaphors, to facilitate the

understanding.

All materials were built based on the CTM3 Method [29] a method for structuring educational

products. The CTM3 Method offers ways that help in a better organization of the elements for

the construction of the product. The method is distributed in the following stages: