Page 1 of 9
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 11, No. 2
Publication Date: February 25, 2024
DOI:10.14738/assrj.112.16565.
Schembri, N. (2024). Experiences of Undergraduate Nursing Students on Clinical Placement as a Formal Community of Practice.
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(2). 496-504.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
Experiences of Undergraduate Nursing Students on Clinical
Placement as a Formal Community of Practice
Neville Schembri
Institute of Applied Science,
Malta College of Arts Science and Technology (Malta)
ABSTRACT
Background: Through their academic journey at their academic institutions and
clinical practice placements, nursing students experience mutual engagement, joint
enterprise, and a shared repertoire that marks a community of practice. As a result
of this interaction and activity, students develop an interprofessional identity as
they also become active members of this interprofessional community. Method: A
descriptive qualitative approach was used to study the experience of 12 student
nurses following clinical practice placements. Purposive sampling was adopted
and the data from individual interviews was analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: Five themes emerged, namely: Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap, Feeling
Welcomed and Wanted, Belongness and Support, Chance of Being Selected and Need
for Further Collaboration. Conclusion: Through practical placements and
engagement with other healthcare professionals, the student’s ability to utilize
interpersonal skills and professional skills are highly developed and by becoming
part of a community of practice, they develop to become an essential asset in today’s
health workforce.
Keywords: Student nurses, community of practice, student experiences, practice learning
INTRODUCTION
A Communities of Practice (CoP) is a group of people who share a common concern or passion
for something they do and learn how to improve it through regular interaction. The inclusion
of such practice in various educational systems has gained momentum since the 1990s (Fox,
2000; Wenger, McDermott and Snyder, 2002).
Lave and Wenger (1991) described learning as a situated activity, employing the phrase,
‘Legitimate Peripheral Participation’. Learners participating in a community of practitioners,
assimilate into the sociocultural practices of that community and gain competence through
acquisition of knowledge and skill from those positioned as masters (Lave and Wenger, 1991).
This viewpoint is in line with the apprenticeship and work-based models of learning, that have
been developed as a social learning framework incorporating four main components i.e.,
community, identity, meaning and practice (Wenger, 1998).
Undergraduate nurse education in Europe is harmonized through the requirements set out
within the EU Directive 2005/36 and the Council Directive 2006/100. This includes established
participation in theoretical and practical hours to help learners reach the required standards.
The clinical practice component comprises at least 50% of the total degree and generally takes
Page 2 of 9
497
Schembri, N. (2024). Experiences of Undergraduate Nursing Students on Clinical Placement as a Formal Community of Practice. Advances in Social
Sciences Research Journal, 11(2). 496-504.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.112.16565
place within a licensed health and social care settings under the form of mentored practice
placement. This experience is based upon an established tripartite collaboration involving the
learner, the nurse educator and the clinical mentor as the main stakeholders. Such framework
can be viewed as a formal Community of Practice (CoP) as it comprises the three dimensions
required to form a CoP i.e., mutual engagement, joint enterprise and shared repertoire (Wenger,
1998).
This study explored the experiences of undergraduate nursing students in enhancing the
clinical placement experience as a formal Community of Practice.
Development of the Community of Practice Concept
The concept of CoP has been introduced in the early 1990s, with most of the papers on the
subject published a decade later 2007 (Ranmuthugala et al., 2011). In 1991, Laver and Wenger
introduced CoP in their situated learning theory putting emphasis on the development of
novice and expert relationships (Wenger, McDermott and Snyder, 2002). The same authors
further developed the concept in 1998 whereby they focused on the interaction between people
and the participation of members who actively engage in sharing and creating knowledge
(Wenger, McDermott and Snyder, 2002). At such stage, a CoP was considered a joined
enterprise, with members’ mutual engagement, and a shared repository of resources. In 2002,
Wenger and his colleagues (Wenger, McDermott and Snyder, 2002) redefined a CoP as an
informal tool to bring a group of people who work parallel together to share knowledge and to
innovate practice. These people have a shared interest and pursue innovative ways to improve
practice, and share resources (Ranmuthugala et al., 2011). An important issue to be noted is
that a CoP is considered different from a network, because members of a CoP share a mutual
interest in something, in contrast to the informal relationships in networks which are often
related to a broad area of practice (Andrew et al., 2009).
Features of a Community of Practice
A community of practice is usually characterised by the existence of a mutual engagement in
social practices from which a shared repertoire of practices, understandings, routines, actions
and artefacts emerge. There are three main essential characteristics required to create a
community of practice that are defines as the domain, the community and the practice.
The Domain:
A community of practice has an identity defined by a shared domain of interest. Membership
therefore implies a commitment to the domain and a shared competence that distinguishes
members from other people.
The Community:
In pursuing their interest in their domain, the members engage in various activities and
discussions aimed to assist each other and share relevant information. The members build
mutual relationships that enable them to learn from each other.
The Practice:
Members of a COP develop a shared repertoire of resources that often range from experiences,
stories, tools that are shared in ways to address recurring problems encountered in practice.
Communities of practice are also known as learning networks or thematic groups.
Page 3 of 9
498
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 11, Issue 2, February-2024
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
As argued by Wenger (2000), it is by developing these three elements in parallel that one
cultivates such a community.
Community of Practice in Nurse Education
Andrew, Tolson and Ferguson (2008) discuss functions of Communities of Practice in nurse
education by emphasising that for learning to be of lasting value, the process must build on the
strengths of both academics and practitioners. In nursing, the complexity surrounding the
relative positions of theory and practice means that collaborative working is not yet fully
embedded into the profession. As a way forward, educators and nurse practitioners could use
this approach to develop collaborative professional networking and to achieve greater
theory/practice alignment (Andrew and Wilkie, 2007).
Nursing students become part of a CoP as they learn about and become enculturated in their
discipline. Through their academic coursework and clinical practice components within the
course structure, they experience mutual engagement, joint enterprise, and a shared repertoire
that marks a community of practice. They are also exposed to the interprofessional experience
with a multidisciplinary community established between their academic institutions and the
clinical settings including lecturers and other professional practitioners. As a result of this
interaction and activity, students develop an interprofessional identity as they also become
active members of this interprofessional community. Through becoming active members
within this community, they enhance their learning and form their professional identity
(DeMatteo and Reeves, 2012).
In their work, Lauder et al. (2004) proposed that for student nurses to learn to become fully
fledged nursing professionals, they needed to be in authentic practice placements working with
patients, communities and other professionals. When the learner arrives in the authentic
context (clinical practice placement), it is often likely that the situation for them is unfamiliar.
Lave and Wenger (1991) developed the concepts of sponsorship and legitimate peripheral
participation within Communities of Practice to explain the process that occurs when the
learner arrives in the workplace and begins to acquire professional competence. Support and
guidance are usually provided by experienced members of the community as the learner
becomes involved in everyday activities and this is enhanced by the involvement of the
educators that act as experienced member of the Community of Practice to continually support
the student. As the learner becomes more settled and familiar with the activities they
undertake, the community members engage them further into practice and subsequently, their
responsibilities increase and develop along with their expertise.
METHOD
This research adopted a descriptive qualitative approach to facilitate the collection and analysis
of insights on the phenomenon under investigation. The study involved a total of 12 student
nurses enrolled on the undergraduate general nursing degree program at the Malta College of
Arts, Science and Technology. Inclusion criteria specified participants who were currently
student nurses in their final year of training, proficient in English, and have participated in a
clinical practice placement within the previous six months. A non-probability purposive
sampling was adopted.