Page 1 of 15

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 11, No. 1

Publication Date: January 25, 2024

DOI:10.14738/assrj.111.15922.

Nambi, R., Busimba, J. T., Lutaaya, J. N., Atuhura, D., & Nabiryo, N. R. (2024). Learning to Teach by Practice: Pre-Service Teachers’

Experiences of Using Poetry Memorization, Dramatization and Recitation Pedagogy. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal,

11(1). 53-67.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Learning to Teach by Practice: Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences

of Using Poetry Memorization, Dramatization and Recitation

Pedagogy

Rebecca Nambi

Makerere University

James Taabu Busimba

Uganda Christian University, Mukono

Josephine Najjemba Lutaaya

Makerere University

Dorothy Atuhura

Kyambogo University

Nancy Rosemary Nabiryo

Makerere University

ABSTRACT

In Uganda, poetry is a key genre in the Literature in English curriculum at the

secondary and higher institutions of teacher education. However, many teachers,

especially the novices, struggle with the teaching of poetry in secondary schools in

Uganda. Current approaches to teaching support learner-centered pedagogy where

learners are facilitated to fully participate in scaffolding their own interpretations

of the subject content. Individual in-class poetry recitation is one such activity used

to teach, and taught to, pre-service teachers of poetry because it promotes their

participation and their general attitude towards poetry. In this paper, we present

findings from a study about Makerere University pre-service teachers’ experiences

of using individual in-class poetry recitations as a learner-centered strategy for

teaching poetry. The research was carried out amongst one cohort of finalist

teacher trainees of English and Literature using lecture observation, interviews and

open-ended questionnaire research methods. A thematic analysis of the data

revealed three themes that summarize their experiences with memorization,

recitation and dramatization of poetry: recitation: facing the class; and pedagogical

reflections. As we present these themes, we also draw some pedagogical

implications for poetry classes from the actual recitation experiences of teacher

trainees who participated in this study.

Keywords: pre-service teachers, poetry, experiences, memorization, recitation, pedagogy

Page 2 of 15

54

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 11, Issue 1, January-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION

It is important for teachers in professional programmes such as teacher education to be able to

put into practice what they have learned in the lecture room. To this end, teacher education

programmes are packaged to provide both knowledge and skills to enable pre-service teachers

make connections between theory and practice (Ulvik & Smith, 2011; Bobrakov, 2014). The

most common approach of integrating theory and practice is for teacher education

programmes to embed a component of practicum that places pre-service teachers in schools

where they engage in teaching and other activities (Köksal, 2019; Park, 2016). However, the

teacher training process can provide several avenues that can allow teachers to practice what

they learn. For instance, the teaching and learning of poetry offers many such opportunities

because by its nature poetry is a live subject that allows for many practical activities. However,

literature shows that many teachers of Literature struggle when teaching poetry especially in

areas of student motivation (Farber, 2015) and student engagement with poetry during the

lessons (Dymoke, Lambirth, & Wilson, 2013).

In Uganda, poetry is a key genre in the Literature in English curriculum at the secondary and

higher levels of education. However, many teachers, especially the novices, struggle with the

teaching of literature in general and poetry in particular (Nambi, 2011). Literature in English

has been part of the Ugandan curriculum since the 1960s and although it is an optional subject

in secondary school it is highly recognized for its contribution to language development and

aesthetic values (NCDC, 2013). Indeed, some secondary schools in Uganda offer Literature as a

compulsory subject with the aim of providing their learners with increased opportunities of

improving and supporting English language learning. For a long period, Literature was a

requirement for some careers such as law and journalism in Uganda. The study of the subject

in schools and universities has contributed tremendously to the Ugandan Literature industry.

However, the students’ performance in Literature at secondary school often causes concern

with students failing to meet the minimum requirements of interpreting and responding to

texts appropriately (Tembe, 2006; Nambi, 2015).

Poetry is a very important subset of literature because it studying it readily provides room for

language development, creation and exploration of personal growth (Ofsted, 2007) In Uganda

however, the performance in poetry is usually the most worrisome whereby students

misinterpret the meaning of the examined poems. Literature is largely earmarked to be

complex especially considering the fact that English is a second language to the learners

(Tembe, 2006; Kyeyune, 2003). In addition, teachers are sometimes blamed for continually

teaching Literature as if it is a factual subject by employing teacher centered activities yet they

show an awareness of the learner centered methods of engaging learners to creatively derive

meaning from texts (Nambi, 2011; Nambi, 2015). The purpose of this study was to investigate

the experiences of pre-service Literature teachers when using poetry memorization, recitation

and dramatization as a learner centered pedagogical activity during their training and the

impact on future practice.

Pre-Service Education

Various institutions across the world structure their pre-service teacher education

programmes differently. Despite that, the key elements in all teacher-training programmes

include: subject content, pedagogical content and practicum. Subject knowledge and

pedagogical knowledge (professional knowledge) are taught at the institutions while the

Page 3 of 15

55

Nambi, R., Busimba, J. T., Lutaaya, J. N., Atuhura, D., & Nabiryo, N. R. (2024). Learning to Teach by Practice: Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences of

Using Poetry Memorization, Dramatization and Recitation Pedagogy. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(1). 53-67.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.111.15922

practicum is the practical part of teacher education programme where theoretical knowledge

gained from lectures is put into practice in the classroom context (Zeichner, 2010; Allen, 2009).

Whereas these general structures of teacher education appear to provide the necessary

requirements for the trainee to become a professional teacher, literature shows that pre- service teachers indicate that the theoretical knowledge they acquire during their training

barely prepares them for the dynamic realities in the school contexts during their practicum

(Allen, 2009; Fraser & Lefty, 2013; Darling-Hammond & Oakes, 2019). The gap between the

teacher training that pre-service teachers receive and the school contexts where they

eventually teach could be explained by challenges such as the lack of a stable partnership

between training institutions and schools (Darling-Hammond & Oakes, 2019; Loyalka, Popova,

Li & Shi, 2019; Zeichner, 2010). Other writers point to the overly theoretical nature of teacher

training programmes that are dominated by the lecture teaching method and more time is

dedicated to the subject content that the pedagogical practice (McDonald & Kahn, 2014;

Shaheen, 2010; Allen, 2009; Zeichner, 2010).

Memorization, Recitation and Dramatization Pedagogy

Memorization, dramatization and recitation are teaching/learning activities that can offer

learners a deep engagement with poetry while helping them strengthen all the language skills.

Although memorization and recitation are commonly associated with the lower order thinking

skills and rote learning (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001; Churches, 2008), they can boost

academic confidence as a student masters not just the words in a poem or play but also refines

his or her phonemic awareness and performance (Pudewa, 2016; Benton, 1999; Medeiros,

2019). Pudewa (2016) and Cliff Hodges (2016) argue that for a student to memorize and

present a poem perfectly they undergo certain processes of transformation which create a

relationship with other disciplines and some aspects of the students’ life. Pudewa (2016)

writes:

Frequently, the sense of accomplishment that accompanies the memorization of poetry builds

linguistic and even academic confidence and spills over into other areas. Like performing a

piece of music, memorization and artistic recitation of poetry requires a certain level of

perfection, which only conscientious effort and consistency can bring. If a student memorizes a

long poem and can recite it flawlessly, he will believe that he can learn anything, be it math

processes or facts from history. (p. 8)

In this paper, we argue that Literature teacher trainees could find it useful to encourage their

future students to memorize, recite and perform poems if they themselves can practically do

the same and appreciate the possibilities of such pedagogy. Memorization and recitation of

poetry is not a passive activity since the student is expected to choose a poem, interpret it and

play an active role in bringing it to life before their audience hence the dramatization aspect

(Elster, 2000).

Elting and Firkins (2006) describe the process of getting the poem from paper to performance

and provide crucial steps such as selecting the appropriate poems, forming teams, rehearsal

etc. These steps indicate the way the students consciously or unconsciously develop critical

skills, as trainees, that prepare them for their own practice as noted “... students will make use

of their different body language, facial expressions, gestures, creative use of voice and

movements in taking the poem from “the page to the stage”” (Elting & Firkins, 2006, p. 130). In

Page 4 of 15

56

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 11, Issue 1, January-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

this sense we continue to argue in this paper that memorization, recitation and dramatization

of poetry is a continuum of learner centered activities that can enable the Literature teacher

trainees to practically develop their teaching skills through action and reflection. Recitation and

dramatization pedagogy can help to bring theory to bear on actual practice whereby teacher

trainees start reflecting on the choices of their future classroom contexts or what Fanghanel et

al. (2016) term as praxis. Praxis as used in this presentation allowed for teacher trainees to

consciously navigate their feelings, choices, surroundings and responses from their peers as

they themselves explored how recitation as a pedagogy.

THE ASSIGNMENT/METHODOLOGY

The teacher trainees’ experiences with memorization, recitation and dramatization we present

in this paper are a result of observations, interviews and surveys of a course we teach at our

faculty called ‘Methods of Teaching Poetry’. This course is designed for teacher trainees of

English and Literature in English and is offered for a period of 30 hours in one semester. Some

of the learning outcomes for the course state that learners will: Confidently and critically read,

write and listen actively and reflectively to poetry; Work in collaboration with others to choose

and analyze poems for their classes and select appropriate poems for their students. Other

learning outcomes state that learners will: Demonstrate the ability to prepare sufficient

materials for their poetry classes; Write critical explications of the different approaches to the

teaching of poetry; Recite at least one poem each to the class and clearly explain its

appropriateness for selected classes. For the findings we report here we had a class of 186

trainees taking the course and they were all required to memorize, recite and dramatize a poem

of their own choice before the end of semester. The assignment was given to the class during

the very first lecture of the course for them to prepare accordingly. The assignment was

structured as follows:

By the fourth week of the semester the students had started their individual presentations and

they chose poems ranging from Shakespearean sonnets to African and local poets. Given the

large number of students in the class, we had to negotiate for additional time during the week

so that we could listen to everyone. At the end of the semester, we administered an open-ended