Page 1 of 11

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 10, No. 4

Publication Date: April 25, 2023

DOI:10.14738/assrj.104.14320.

Matthijs, H. (2023). The Funding of The North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(4).

210-220.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

The Funding of The North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Herman Matthijs

University Ghent & Free University Brussels

ABSTRACTS

This study examines the financing system of the budgets of the North Atlantic Treaty

Organization (N.A.T.O.). The NATO is not a supranational organization, with partly

exception of the military coordination by SHAPE, but an intergovernmental

organization. So far, it’s the only existing military institution at present worldwide.

This 2023 study concerns only the three internal NATO budgets. Therefore, this

article is based at the only reference material available, namely the primary

budgetary sources of the NATO. It must also be pointed out that NATO does prepare

an annual report concerning the political and military situation. But there is no

equivalent concerning an overview of its finances and administrative functioning.

The aspects to be investigated are as follows:

- who is funding the NATO budgets and how?

- what happens with the money given to NATO?

- how is NATO’s budget prepared and approved?

This article doesn’t treat the military budgets of the member states or the financing

of the Parliamentary Assembly of the NATO.

Keywords: public budget, NATO funding

INTRODUCTION

The NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) was established in 1949 during the first years

of the Cold War and the tensions with the former Soviet Union in Eastern Europe. The treaty

was signed in Washington DC at 4 April 1949. What means that the NATO exists already nearly

75 years, what will the fact in 2024!

By the start twelve countries signed up for the new political and military alliance. These were

the five signatory countries of the Treaty of Brussels of 1948 and the creation of the WEU (West

European Union), namely: Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France and the United

Kingdom. The other seven started members are the United States, Canada, Iceland, Portugal,

Norway, Denmark, and Italy. Remarkable was the presence of Portugal and Italy related with

their position in the second WW. But Portugal was geopolitically too important and as a non- democracy neutral during the war years. Italy turned in the final period of WW II to the allied

side. In 1952 Greece and Turkey entered the alliance and the Federal Republic of West

Germany in the year 1955. Membership then remained the same for almost quarter of a century

until Spain joined, as a democracy, the NATO in 1982. The next expansion of the membership

came with the end of the Soviet Union’s grip and the accession of Hungary, Poland, and Czech

Republic (1999) followed by the three Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) together

with Slovakia, Slovenia and Romania in 2004. The next members were Albania and Croatia in

2009. The last two member states are also situated in the Balkan area, namely: Montenegro in

Page 2 of 11

211

Matthijs, H. (2023). The Funding of The North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(4). 210-220.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.104.14320

2017 and North Macedonia in 2020. Therethrough the NATO has all the territories on both sides

of the Adriatic Sea. At the present NATO has 30 member states. It’s waiting for the official entry

of Finland and Sweden.

To be accepted the candidacy of a potential new member must be unanimously approved by all

the existing member states during a state-government leaders council. (f.e. summer 2022 in

Madrid for Finland and Sweden). Also, the ratification of the treaty concerning the new

members must be approved by the Parliaments of the member states.

This study concerns the budget system and the financial system of the three NATO budgets,

namely:

• The civil budget,

• The military budget,

• the NSIP budget.

The official unclassified documents of the NATO only exist in the two official languages of the

military alliance: English and French. (OTAN: Organisation du Traité Atlantique du Nord).

THE BUDGET CYCLE

NATO’s budgets are prepared by the administration at Brussels headquarters. NATO’s officials

are classed as international civilian staff and there were roughly 380 civil servants of them in

2022, They do have a specific tax system and have an international statute. But most of the staff

are employees seconded of the national administrations as well the armies of the member

states. (NATO, 2019a)

The budget is approved by a consensus of the 30 member states in the Council. This is yet

another indication that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an intergovernmental

institution.

All decisions of the NAC (North Atlantic Council), which have budgetary implications are

submitted to the RPPB (Resource Policy and Planning Board) for an opinion. In the NATO

hierarchy the Budget Committee (BC), and the Investment Committee (IC) are subordinate to

this Board. The Budget Committee advises on all budgetary matters relating to the civil and the

military budget of the NATO. The Investment Committee by contrast is responsible for

implementing the NATO Security Investment Programme, which is authorized for the financing

of the installation and facilities required by the strategic command centre of SACEUR (Supreme

Allied Commander EURope). All the member states are represented in the RPPB and this Board

is chaired by a rotating Presidency. Other members are: the military staff, the chairman of the

budget committee and the chairman of the investment committee. The RPPB was established

in 2010 and is the only financial committee that reports to the NAC. Examples of these reports

are listed in the references. (NATO: 2018, NATO: 2019a , NATO : 2021b )

The Board is also supported by NOR (NATO Office of Resources). The body is chiefly concerned

with NATO’s military budget. NOR also advises the BC and the IC in this respect.

Page 3 of 11

212

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 10, Issue 4, April-2023

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

The RPPB works with the policy guidelines of the NAC. The main task of the Resource Policy

and Planning Board is to work out a policy regarding resources. To do this the RPPB examines

the affordability of choices, makes performance assessments, and determines the planning and

resource implications of new initiatives. (Matthijs, 2015)

Every year the Resource Policy and Planning Board prepares an all-inclusive Medium Term

Resource Plan for the forthcoming budget year including a projection of the planned figures for

the next four years. The result is an overview of the projected budget for the next five years.

This proposal by the RPPB is then submitted to the approval of the North Atlantic Council.

The budgetary rules governing NATO are always first approved by the NAC. These rules

however may be specific to a single or several institutions, namely,

• international staff funded from the civil budget,

• international military structure funded from the military budget,

• the NATO Security Investment Programme (NSIP),

• the NATO agencies.

The civil and military budgets run concurrently with the calendar year, that means from

January 1th until December 31.

It the Secretary General who presents the draft budget to the NAC and it is the Council that

approves the drafts. There is no role here for the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and NATO does

not have anything like the EU’s public financial regulations that set out the budget process in

detail. But the last published report from the RPPB dates from the year 2017! (NATO, 2018)

Here is more than a normal delay!

It should be remembered that a consensus is required for agreement and if the NATO budget is

not approved in due time by the NAC - NATO must rely on a system of provisional credits, which

is supervised the Budget Committee But there are not so much examples of the use of this

budget system.

The head of each NATO organization, e.g., the Secretary General where the civil budget is

concerned, has a degree of freedom when deciding how the budget is implemented as long as

he takes account of the relevant financial regulations. An example of this are the rules regarding

the transfers between budget items and the rules on the award of purchase tenders.

A number of specific rules apply regarding the NSIP. Here the point of departure is the available

assets. These are then supplemented to arrive at the requested goods.

They are then reviewed and drawn up by the RPPB and approved by the Council.

Once they have been approved, the implementation and management are the responsibility of

the Investment Committee.

AUDITING

The International Board of Auditors for NATO (IBAN) is responsible for auditing NATO

expenditure. The board monitors the efficient and effective use of the disbursements.