Page 1 of 5

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 10, No. 1

Publication Date: January 25, 2023

DOI:10.14738/assrj.101.13461.

Aluwi, A. H., Omar. M .K., Hussein, N., Mohd, I. H & Rusdi, S. D. (2023). Developing Work Practices and Sustainable Talent

Management of Autonomous Agile Teams. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(1). 148-152

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Developing Work Practices and Sustainable Talent Management

of Autonomous Agile Teams

Ainie Hairianie Aluwi

Faculty of Business and Management

Universiti Teknologi MARA,

Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam,

42300, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Muhamad Khalil Omar

Faculty of Business and Management

Universiti Teknologi MARA,

Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam,

42300, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Norashikin Hussein

Faculty of Business and Management

Universiti Teknologi MARA,

Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam,

42300, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Idaya Husna Mohd

Faculty of Business and Management

Universiti Teknologi MARA,

Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam,

42300, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

Syezreen Dalina Rusdi

Faculty of Business and Management

Universiti Teknologi MARA,

Cawangan Selangor Kampus Puncak Alam, 42300,

Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to examine the practice behind sustainable agile

work practices. In the wake of Covid-19, organizations need to understand the

importance of agile development processes to be able to continue doing business.

This study looks at a process made popular by software engineering development

in the context of post covid organization. This study takes consideration into

existing social-psychology research from a human resource perspective. Namely,

this study will examine group socialization and how much new members of the

organization contribute to the group, particularly in sustaining organization goals.

Page 2 of 5

149

Aluwi, A. H., Omar. M .K., Hussein, N., Mohd, I. H & Rusdi, S. D. (2023). Developing Work Practices and Sustainable Talent Management of

Autonomous Agile Teams. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(1). 148-152

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.101.13461

Keywords: Work Practices, Sustainable Talent Management, Autonomous Agile Teams,

Covid-19

INTRODUCTION

Post Covid 19 is changing the organizational landscape as we know it. Organizations are

required to find digital solutions and to work remotely to serve employees and most

importantly customers, develop new ways of doing things to keep the organization competitive

(Moe, Stray, & Hode, 2019). Developing new ways of working requires team to be more agile.

Particularly autonomous teams (also known as self – organizing or self – managing teams).

Autonomous teams are defined as “teams that are given the freedom by management to take

responsibility for their supervisors and are composed of people with a variety to effectively

tackle the variety in their environments. Autonomous teams are found in sectors like ICT,

telecom, finance and banking, energy, transport and manufacturing. Moe, Stray and Hode

(2019) mentioned that in the ICT industry autonomous team are more likely to use an agile

process.

However, organizations are now required to use technology in wake of this pandemic, which

would mimic the use of technology in ICT organizations. Hence, the need for this research to

examine the agile work practices’ effect on new members in an organization (new talent in an

organization and keeping them competitive). So the question is does the organization need to

transform to an agile operating system? With the new norm set in place, agility is not the

question but how do we implement it? This is what this study examines to help the organization

understand how to easily into an agile process, particularly the people and technology facet of

the organization (Brousseau, Ebrahim, Handscomb, & Thaker, 2019)

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

1. How to implement agile practice for members’ commitment to the group's goal

fulfilment?

2. What is the impact of agile practice on sustaining organizations?

3. How does agile practice influence an organisation’s commitment to new members in

achieving organisational goals?

LITERATURE REVIEW

The core of agile practice can be divided into five main elements. Here the researchers will

discuss these elements according to Gren (2020) for software development.

Iterative Development - A Core Practice of Agile Development

Delivering in short iterations has high face validity, but when broken down, these ideas include

a diversity of competencies and dynamics needed by the agile team to deliver value in such

short iterations. In more general management research, there has been more thorough

research on which general work practices contribute to performance and to successfully

implement iterative development, the team must have a high degree and maturity of, for

example, staffing, decentralized decision-making, and communication. So, to understand the

dynamics of iterative development, researchers should consider these confounding factors

before they jump to conclusions about other found effects.

Page 3 of 5

150

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 10, Issue 1, January-2023

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Iteration Planning - A Teamwork Practice

Obtaining empowered and motivated individuals that have the needed support to solve any

given task together with high levels of trust, are all aspects known to be necessary but are not

always in place. Creating a shared vision has also been shown in research to be a key to success

since the beginning of the 1990s and is one of the main components of transformational

leadership. A shared vision is necessary since the team needs an overall goal to break down

when planning the upcoming iteration. The importance of simplicity in agile is somewhat

connected to the concept of reducing waste in lean manufacturing, together with the continued

avoidance of doing unnecessary activities in the project (or process) life-cycle. To plan in such

a way, the team must know the members’ real competencies and abilities, which also implies

maturity in the development process and that the members of the group are committed and

fully integrated into the group. With such prerequisites, understanding the group socialization

process then becomes paramount when understanding how teams plan in short iterations.

Stand-Up Meetings - A Teamwork Practice

Developers, but also business people and testers, should be on the same team and

collaboratively work together through the whole project life-cycle (i.e., having cross-functional

teams). When connecting the popularity of having cross-functional teams in the modern

workplace to social identity theory, it becomes clear that it decreases intergroup bias. Having

these various organizational functions share their chores and issues often, would be expected

to increase cohesion and understanding of the whole project through shared mental models,

which have also gained initial empirical support. Having social identity theory and intergroup

bias as factors in software engineering research would then probably increase the explained

variance.

Retrospectives - A Teamwork Practice

The idea of a retrospective meeting is that the team should reflect on possible improvement

points about their teamwork at the end of each iteration. More generally, such reflective

meetings are often called team debriefs, and have been shown with scientific rigour to increase

effectiveness. McHugh et al. (2011) found that these types of meeting need work and careful

guidance to function in their intended way and also in software development. In a recent

longitudinal study, Lehtinen et al. (2017) showed that, initially, newly formed teams focus more

on task progress and task outcome and, as the teams mature, they focus to a larger extent on

process and cooperation. Such findings also relate the “agility” of a team to group socialization

and group development since members of the group will behave differently depending on how

well-integrated, they are in the team, meaning that a well-integrated individual will be more

likely to perform retrospectives in the way they are intended. If the socialization process is not

a part of understanding the dynamics of retrospective meetings, studies will have difficulty

explaining and predicting patterns of behaviour.

Co-location - A Teamwork Practice

Having the team co-located in the same room with requirements as sticky notes on physical

boards has been promoted by the agile community to, again, increase the velocity of

development in a rapidly changing environment. Many cases have been reported where the

communication challenges of distributed teams have been satisfactorily dealt with using

modern technology and slightly different practices. Another study showed that both agile and

traditional projects have the same issues regarding co-location. All-in-all, every social aspect of

Page 4 of 5

151

Aluwi, A. H., Omar. M .K., Hussein, N., Mohd, I. H & Rusdi, S. D. (2023). Developing Work Practices and Sustainable Talent Management of

Autonomous Agile Teams. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(1). 148-152

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.101.13461

building a relationship will become more cumbersome with distance and this implies that more

effort is needed to mitigate these challenges. Since the social problems are amplified with

distance, failing to understand their influence in distributed agile teams will have even larger

negative effects on teamwork. And since agile processes are dependent on the team as a

working unit, understanding the social aspects of both distributed and co-located teams are a

key to building effective agile teams.

Objectives of the Research:

To investigate a way to implement agile practice for members’ commitment to a group’s goal

fulfilment.

To investigate the impact of agile practices on sustaining organizations.

To examine how agile practice influences to organization’s commitment of members to

achieving organizational goals.

METHODOLOGY

This research group will investigate how organizations help new team members shift from an

individual view of working to a team-oriented view of working in an organization that is moving

to be agile. The study will select an appropriate method for addressing the research question

using respondents from local university intern students. The data will be collected primarily

through interviews. All people in the project team will be asked if they would agree to be

interviewed and will be provided with an information sheet about the research. More than half

of the project team will be interviewed. The set of interviews covers a range of interns from

local universities to other Team members who had the longest experience in the project team.

Initial meetings and observations will be held and followed by interviews and observations of

the workplace. Two researchers will carry out the interviews. The interviews will be semi- structured and followed by an interview schedule, but the interviewers will strive to remain

open to new ideas and probe for additional information when necessary or relevant to the topic.

All interviews will be transcribed, and then analysed using the NVIVO tool. Observations of daily

work and specific meetings will be undertaken to get to know team members, observe how the

teamwork and aspects of team culture, and identify problems. Observations will be recorded

with field notes and recordings during and immediately following the observation session. The

interview transcripts will be initially coded by the first author for themes related to

socialization approaches, practices and challenges. The data will also be analysed to understand

the team’s history, work practices (both social practices and agile practices), and the

organization and team culture. Once this is completed, the researchers will map the

socialization approach and practice theme. The researchers will then further analyse the

themes to separate agile-related and traditional approaches. All researchers will review the

final analysis, and a draft of the paper will be shared with the research participants for review

and discussion before submission (Gregory, et. al., 2020).

CONCLUSION

Undergraduates will be the focal point of the organization when they enter the organization.

Many studies examine ICT companies and software development already in existence. This

study investigates post-pandemic ODL products (which is our student’s ability to exist in the

new job market). What is unique about this study is we are examining how ODL help or hinders

our new graduate’s movement into an agile organization. This is a preliminary study that is

ready to contribute to theory building in assessing the socialization process of new graduates

Page 5 of 5

152

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 10, Issue 1, January-2023

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

after the process of lack of socialization during class sessions and essentially using technology

to connect with group members. The researcher plan to get data on how to essentially help

graduates prepare for real-world experience.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This research was funded by Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, file no 600-

TNCPI 5/3/DDF (FPP) (003/2021).

References

Brosseau, D., Ebrahim, S., Handscomb, C., & Thaker, S. (2019). The journey to an agile organization. McKinsey &

Company, May, 10.

Gregory, P., Strode, D. E., AlQaisi, R., Sharp, H., & Barroca, L. (2020, June). Onboarding: How Newcomers Integrate

into an Agile Project Team. In International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 20-36). Springer,

Cham.

Gren, L. (2020, June). Understanding Work Practices of Autonomous Agile Teams: A Social-psychological Review.

In International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 227-235). Springer, Cham.

Lehtinen, T. O., Itkonen, J., & Lassenius, C. (2017). Recurring opinions or productive improvements—what agile

teams discuss in retrospectives. Empirical Software Engineering, 22(5), 2409-2452.

McHugh, O., Conboy, K., & Lang, M. (2011). Agile practices: The impact on trust in software project teams. Ieee

Software, 29(3), 71-76.

Moe, N. B., Stray, V., & Hoda, R. (2019, May). Trends and updated research agenda for autonomous agile teams: a

summary of the second international workshop at XP2019. In International Conference on Agile Software

Development (pp. 13-19). Springer, Cham.