Factors Affecting the Adoption of Augmented Reality as Pedagogical Tools in Higher Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Ebtisam Alqahtani PhD Student at Education School, Glasgow University, Glasgow, UK.
  • Muir Houston Faculty of Education School of Glasgow University, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.98.12758

Abstract

Advanced digital technology has produced modern visual technology tools named Augmented Reality (ART), which can integrate virtual reality objects within the real environment. Current studies have proven that AR technologies can enhance teaching and learning practices in higher education. While university learners have become more digitally savvy to support their learning, this is not the case with many faculty members using technology to enhance their teaching practice. The factors that can affect academic staff to use of ART as pedagogical tools are still unclear. this study aims to investigate the potential factors that can influence academic members' decision to adopt ART  to support students learning, using the decomposed theory of planned behavior (DTPB) model as a theoretical framework. A survey was conducted, and  851 usable responses from participants were received in total. Additional results indicated that most of the potential factors can have a strong influence on faculty members' behaviour to use ART. The research model fitted the data and supported most hypotheses. Thus, these factors are crucial for universities to integrate ART to enhance the educational environment. 

 

Keywords: Augmented Reality, teaching and learning, pandemic period.

 

 

References

References

Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The internet and higher education, 11(2), 71-80.

Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Alahmari, M., Issa, T., Issa, T., & Nau, S. Z. (2019). Faculty awareness of the economic and environmental benefits of augmented reality for sustainability in Saudi Arabian universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 259-269.

Alfarani, L. A. K. (2016). Exploring the Influences on Faculty Members’ Adoption of Mobile Learning at King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).

Alsadoon, H., & Alhussain, T. (2019). Faculty at Saudi Electronic University attitudes toward using augmented reality in education. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 1961-1972

Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher education, 25(1), 1-11.

Cheng, J., Wang, Y., Tjondronegoro, D., & Song, W. (2018). Construction of interactive teaching system for course of mechanical drawing based on mobile augmented reality technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(2), 126-139. doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7847

Coleman, E., & Mtshazi, S. (2017). Factors affecting the use and non-use of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by academic staff. South African Computer Journal, 29(3), 31-63.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, pp.319-340.

Flavin, M., & Quintero, V. (2018). UK higher education institutions’ technology-enhanced learning strategies from the perspective of disruptive innovation. Research in Learning Technology, 26.

Martin-Gonzalez, A., Chi-Poot, A., & Uc-Cetina, V. (2016). Usability evaluation of an augmented reality system for teaching Euclidean vectors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 627-636

Ouedraogo, B. (2017). Model of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Acceptance and Use for Teaching Staff in Sub-Saharan Africa Public Higher Education Institutions. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 101-118.

Paver, J., Walker, D. A., & Hung, W. C. (2014). Factors that predict the integration of technology for instruction by community college adjunct faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(1), 68-85.

Renda dos Santos, L. M., & Okazaki, S. (2016). Planned e-learning adoption and occupational socialisation in Brazilian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1974-1994.

Rizov, T., & Rizova, E. (2015). Augmented reality as a teaching tool in higher education. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE).

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press.

Smahi, M. (2017). Utilizing Social Media in Higher Education Teaching by Ohio University's Patton College of Education Faculty Members (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University)

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 561-570.

Tull, S., Dabner, N., & Ayebi-Arthur, K. (2017). Social media and e-learning in response to seismic events: Resilient practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 21(1), 63-76.

Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. J. Agric. Res. 20, 557-585.

Yip, J., Wong, S. H., Yick, K. L., Chan, K., & Wong, K. H. (2019). Improving the quality of teaching and learning in classes by using augmented reality video. Computers & Education, 128, 88-101.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-15

How to Cite

Alqahtani, E., & Houston, M. (2022). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Augmented Reality as Pedagogical Tools in Higher Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(8), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.98.12758