Page 1 of 17

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 9, No. 6

Publication Date: June 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/assrj.96.12590. Tian, R. G. (2022). Shi Zhengyi on Basic Theoretical Issues of Ethnologic Economics. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal,

9(6). 353-369.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Shi Zhengyi on Basic Theoretical Issues of Ethnologic Economics

Robert Guang Tian

Huaihua University, Hunan, China

rgtian@yahoo.com

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to introduce Professor Shi Zhengyi’s early theoretical views and

contributions to ethnologic economics to the international academic community.

China’s ethnic minorities live in the western regions, and their economic and

social development for a long time has been far behind that of the eastern and

central areas where the Han majority live. Professor Shi Zhengyi proposed in

March 1979 that China needed to establish and develop ethnologic economics. It is

a particular branch of economics in China with solid Chinese characteristics.

Ethnologic economics, starting from the status and role of ethnic factors in

economic activities, studies the economic changes and economic relations of

ethnic groups or ethnic regions. The ethnologic economy has the characteristics of

duality and diversity, which is the starting point of the study of national

economics. Ethnologic economics has adapted to the national conditions of China’s

multi-ethnic country and the needs of China’s modernization drive. It has the dual

disciplinary attribution of Ethnology and economics. It is hoped that the

international academic community will be interested in ethnologic economics. It is

also hoped that they can apply the research results of Chinese ethnologic

economists to promote societies in other countries similar to China’s ethnic

minority areas’ economic development.

Keywords: Ethnologic Economics, Ethnic Minorities, Ethnic Minority Areas, Economic

Development

INTRODUCTION

China is a large united, multi-ethnic country with 55 ethnic minorities in addition to the Han

majority. Due to historical and natural reasons, most of China’s ethnic minorities live in the

western regions. Their economic and social development for a long time has been far behind

that of the eastern and central regions where the Han majority people live (Tian, 2021). Since

the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, significant achievements have been

made in the economic and social development of ethnic minority areas in China under the

strong support of the central government. Nevertheless, there is still a long way to go

compared with the developed areas in the east (Li, 2004). Professor Shi Zhengyi proposed at

the National Economic Science Eight-year Planning Conference in Beijing in March 1979 that

China needed to establish and develop ethnologic economics because of China’s actual

national conditions and the current economic and social development situation in minority

areas (Dong, 2006).

Ethnologic economics is a particular branch of economics in China, so it has strong Chinese

characteristics. At the end of the 1970s and earlier 1980s, in Chinese academic circles,

Page 2 of 17

354

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 9, Issue 6, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

especially in the intellectual process of ethnic economics, scholars believed that the

economics of ethnic minorities is an essential part of Chinese economics. They thought that

when studying ethnologic economics, it is necessary to take Chinese economics as the basis

and premise. They further believed doing so would allow them to reveal the originality of the

economy of ethnic minorities in an in-depth and systematic way. They argued that only in this

way can China promote the economic development of ethnic minorities and China’s economy

(Liu, 2009). Therefore, Professor Shi Zhengyi and his colleagues conducted a series of

theoretical studies on the creation and development of ethnologic economics and published

some high-level academic articles (Ye, 2004).

This paper aims to introduce Professor Shi Zhengyi’s early theoretical views and

contributions to ethnic economics to the international academic circle. It should be pointed

out that all the contents of this paper are from The Collection of Shi Zhengyi, published by

Professor Shi Zhengyi in 2001. The author only systematically sorted out, translated and

edited Professor Shi’s theoretical exposition. Therefore, all the academic contributions of this

paper are attributed to Professor Shi Zhengyi. Of course, the author must be responsible for

the mistakes in the article. Professor Shi Zhengyi stresses that ethnologic economics is a new

discipline. It occupies a particular position in ethnology and has become the main content of

ethnic research. At the same time, it also occupies a prominent role in economics. As such, it

has become a particular field in economic analysis. Therefore, studying ethnologic economics

in China is critical (Shi, 2001:495).

THE RESEARCH OBJECT OF ETHNOLOGIC ECONOMICS

Ethnologic economics has a relatively short history. As an independent discipline initially

established in earlier 1980s, it is still in its infancy. This fact mainly reflects how the Chinese

academic circle’s understanding of the research object of ethnologic economics has

developed. Regarding its research object, researchers have proposed several different

explanations or definitions:

1. Some scholars believe that, in simple terms, the research object of ethnologic economics

is the economic issues of ethnic groups. These scholars believe that, broadly, ethnologic

economics studies the economic problems of a specific ethnic group or some ethnic

groups. It examines economic issues from the perspective of ethnology, or, in other

words, it studies ethnic issues from the economic outlook. Its research object covers

ethnological economic problems in both foreign countries and China. In a narrow sense,

the research object of ethnologic economics is the economic issues of ethnic minorities in

China. It includes multiple aspects. The economic issues of an ethnic group can be its

unique research object, and so can the economic issues of an ethnic area where several

ethnic minorities live. In addition, the economic issues of all ethnic minorities can also be

its comprehensive research object (Shi, 1980).

2. Some researchers argue that ethnologic economics is a discipline that studies ethnologic

economic issues. It is integrated with ethnology and economics and uses these two

disciplines’ basic principles and techniques. The ethnologic economy looks at the society

and economy of ethnic minorities. It is to discover the particular laws of the ethnologic

economy (Dong, 1983).

3. Some people hold that the determination of the research object and tasks of China’s

economics of ethnic minorities should be based on China’s established socialist system

Page 3 of 17

355

Tian, R. G. (2022). Shi Zhengyi on Basic Theoretical Issues of Ethnologic Economics. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(6). 353-369.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.96.12590

and its existing production relations. It should study the elimination of de facto

inequalities among ethnic groups. Its task should be to reveal the laws of this issue. In this

way, its research object and tasks have actual scientific content. There is a clear line

between this discipline and political economics. Simultaneously, it is not unreasonably

confused with ethnology. It has an organic connection to policy issues, thus avoiding the

situation of all-encompassing policy research (Shi, 1983).

4. Some researchers believe the ethnic minority economy is a social science. In the field of

social phenomena, it examines the socio-economic phenomenon of the ethnologic

economy and its contradictions. It studies the contradictions of China’s ethnologic

economy and its characteristics and laws in social and economic development. Therefore,

it does not explore the natural aspects of the ethnologic economy but the social aspects. In

other words, it studies the ethnologic economy’s social production modes (mainly

production relations) and reveals its characteristics, structures and laws (Huang, 1983).

5. Some scholars believe that the economy of ethnic minorities studies the living conditions

of ethnic minorities and the characteristics of the economic life of ethnic minorities. It

examines the living habits of ethnic minorities and the influence of cultural traditions and

cultural levels on their economic life (including production, distribution, exchange and

consumption). The economy of ethnic minorities is inseparable from the economy of

ethnic minority areas. However, they are different concepts. The economy of ethnic

minorities studies economic issues from the perspective of ethnology rather than from

the perspective of regions. Since they are other concepts, we should also examine the

relationship between the economy of ethnic minorities and the economy of ethnic

minority areas (Yu, 1983).

These five definitions are the initial views put forward by the first group of Chinese scholars

engaged in the research of ethnologic economics in the late 1970s and early 1980s. They

reflect the researchers understanding of the research object of ethnologic economics at that

time. The above views have some things in common. They all emphasize the importance of

studying the ethnologic economy in China, and they all advocate the creation of a new

discipline. However, there are also significant differences. There are several different

proposals regarding the name of the domain. Some suggest it be named ethnologic economics.

Others suggest it be called China’s economics of ethnic minorities, the economy of ethnic

minorities, or the economy of ethnic minority areas.

There are also different views on the scope of the study. Scholars who advocate naming this

ethnologic discipline economics maintain that it should study the economic issues of ethnic

groups and ethnic minority areas in China and those of other countries. While the discipline is

named China’s economics of ethnic minorities, the economy of ethnic minorities and the

economy of ethnic minority areas, the research scope is only on the economic issues of China’s

ethnic minorities and ethnic minority areas. The former can be called ethnologic economics in

a broad sense, and the latter can be called ethnologic economics in a narrow sense.

In addition, there are significant differences between the above views regarding the research

object. Some ideas only emphasize the relations of production. Unlike political economics,

only the social production relations of the ethnic minorities are studied in this discipline,

while the production relations of the Han nationality are not included. Another view is that