Page 1 of 17

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 8, No. 11

Publication Date: November 25, 2021

DOI:10.14738/assrj.811.11269. Freeman, H., Barnes, L., & Long, W. (2021). Leading Change Without Formal Authority: The ICC Model for the 21st Century.

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(11). 335-351.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Leading Change Without Formal Authority: The ICC Model for the

21st Century

Freeman H.

Avondale University, 582 Freemans Drive

Cooranbong NSW 2265 Australia

Barnes L.

Avondale University, 582 Freemans Drive

Cooranbong NSW 2265 Australia

LongW.

Avondale University, 582 Freemans Drive

Cooranbong NSW 2265 Australia

ABSTRACT

Change seems to be a constant feature of the 21st century workplace. Successful

organisations embrace change and make sure the personnel are valued, and that

they remain engaged and motivated. Employers do not require to formally be in

charge of a group of people to be called leader, but demonstrating leadership is an

important feature for employees at every level of an organization. Women face a

diverse range of difficulties in today’s workplace, and therefore this study aims to

focus on the phenomenon of leading change without formal authority and develop

a model for women to bring about change within their working climate. This

conceptual research aims to identify novel connections between the concepts of

leadership and feminism and in consideration of the features of the 21st century

workplace. Reviewing the relevant literature particularly around the leadership

qualities (drive, motivation, honesty, self-confidence, cognitive ability, and

knowledge of the business) this study proposes dedication, political skill and

sincerity as qualities of leadership without formal authority. Since, male and female

personalities appear to be different in a number of aspects, the basic five

personality qualities (known as the Big Five) are reviewed: neuroticism,

extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Reviewing models

of change as well as females’ qualities, this study suggests a model for leading

change without formal authority including Identifying gaps, Connecting with

emotions, and Committing to change (ICC model).

Key Words: ICC Model, Informal Authority, Leadership.

LEADING CHANGE WITHOUT FORMAL AUTHORITY: A MODEL FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

“We need women who are so strong they can be gentle, so educated they can be

humble, so fierce they can be compassionate, so passionate they can be rational,

and so disciplined they can be free.”

– Ramdas (2020, p. II)

Page 2 of 17

336

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 8, Issue 11, November-2021

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION

The 21st century workplace is changing significantly (Karoly & Panis, 2004; Ware & Grantham,

2003), and change seems to be a constant feature of the work environment. Although change

and uncertainty create an opportunity to improve the status quo, it requires a deeper

understanding to be able to cope and still be productive. During the time of change and

uncertainty, organizations are successful if they are able to embrace change and make sure the

personnel are heard, understood and valued, and that they remain engaged, motivated, and

productive (Knight, 2020).

This study will look at the current literature around the features of the working environment

in the 21st century, seeking to explore the essential principles of today’s workplace; and analyse

and identify the strengths of women in today’s workplace. The primary focus of this study is on

the phenomenon of leading change with no formal authority, aiming to provide a model for

women to bring about change in their working environment.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This study will be conceptual research, which builds on prior conceptual and empirical

leadership research. Following the notion of a ‘model’ as conceptual research designed by

Jaakkola (2020), this study aims to identify novel connections between the concepts of

leadership and feminism and in consideration of the features of the 21st century workplace. As

a result, this research will develop a theoretical proposition that introduces a new relationship

between these factors. To achieve this, the relevant literature will be reported to address the

key elements of leadership, particularly leadership without formal authority, female qualities

and leading change ().

Figure 1: Conceptual Framework

The ultimate goal of the research is to develop a model that explains the relationships between

these variables in order for women to be effective leaders even without formal authorities at

the workplace.

Review of the Relevant Literature

This study aims to research literature that outlines key variables associated with leadership

without formal authority and female characteristics. Therefore, the review of literature will

focus on three major areas: leadership, feminism, and 21st century workplace features.

Leading

Change

Leadership

without authority Female qualities

Page 3 of 17

337

Freeman, H., Barnes, L., & Long, W. (2021). Leading Change Without Formal Authority: The ICC Model for the 21st Century. Advances in Social

Sciences Research Journal, 8(11). 335-351.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.811.11269

The Concept of Leadership

The term leadership refers to leading a group of people or leading an organisation; and leading

a group or an organisation is used to attain power, authority and control (Yukl & Gardner,

2019). As Irving and Strauss (2019) explained, in the past, leadership involved actions in order

to “convince, cajole, coerce, or compel others to do your bidding” (p. 5) . However today,

cajoling, coercing, or compelling have no place in leading others, and leadership is all about

influence, “nothing more, nothing less” (Maxwell, 1998, p. 3). It is defined as “a process that

involves influence with a group of people toward the realisation of goals” (Amanchukwu et al.,

2015, p. 7) where developing vision, aligning people with that vision, motivation, inspiration,

and making change are demonstrated in leadership (Kotter, 1999).

The term leadership has been used in different disciplines whereas it carries unnecessary

connotations that create ambiguity of implication (Yukl & Gardner, 2019). For instance,

management and leadership are usually used interchangeably to mean one and the same

concept. The next section discusses the distinctions between leadership and management.

Leadership qualities

Kirkpatrick and Locke (1991) discuss traits such as drive, motivation, honesty, self-confidence,

cognitive ability, and knowledge of the business are precondition characteristics which

significantly contribute to leaders’ achievement. The next six subsections briefly introduce each

of these qualities.

Drive

In the field of psychology, the concept of drive refers to the need of an individual which

motivates his/her towards a set of actions to achieve a sense of satisfaction (Heinrich &

Spielberger, 1982; Tsolas & Anzieu-Premmereur, 2017). Kirkpatrick and Locke (1991) describe

drive as a set of motives and traits reflecting a high desire. Factors such as achievement,

ambition, energy, tenacity and initiative are other aspects of drive.

Motivation

As Kirkpatrick and Locke (1991) argue, for an individual, just being achievement-oriented,

ambitious, energetic, tenacious, and proactive would not be enough to be a leader, he/she must

have a strong desire to lead and influence others. Motivated leaders inspire a sense of passion

to achieve goals and improve the status quo. Motivation is a personal resource for developing

a sustainable career as a leader (Auvinen et al., 2020).

Honesty and integrity

Stephen Covey argues that "integrity includes but goes beyond honesty. Honesty is telling the

truth - in other words, conforming our words to reality. Integrity is conforming reality to our

words - in other words, keeping promises and fulfilling expectations" (2009, p. 217). Honesty

and integrity both create the basis of a trustworthy and reliable relationship between a leader

and their followers (Kirkpatrick & Locke, 1991) where “integrity is the correspondence

between word and deed and honesty refers to being trustful or non-deceitful” (p. 53).

Self confidence

The term self-confidence refers to an individual's belief that he/she can successfully achieve a

desired goal (Herbst, 2020). High level of self-confidence not only empowers the leader to