Page 1 of 11

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 8, No. 7

Publication Date: July 25, 2021

DOI:10.14738/assrj.87.10602. Asrori, M., & Effendy, C. (2021). Developing Students’ Prosocial Behavior Through Collaborative Teamwork Teaching. Advances in

Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(7). 381-391.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Developing Students’ Prosocial Behavior Through Collaborative

Teamwork Teaching

Muhammad Asrori

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia

Chairil Effendy

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia

ABSTRACT

Developing students’ prosocial behavior is a very important program in the living

situation that increasingly complicated, individualistic, and hedonistic. It is

important because prosocial behavior refers to voluntary actions that intended to

help or benefit another individual or group of individuals. The present study was

designed to examine the effectiveness of a collaborative teamwork teaching to

develop the prosocial behavior of elementary school students. It was an

experimental study with one group pretest-posttest design. The experiment was

carried out in three elementary schools. They were Islamic Al-Azhar Elementary

School (SD Islam Al-Azhar), State Elementary School 34 (SD Negeri 34), and

Muhammadiyah Elementary School (SD Muhammadiyah) Pontianak. There were

four aspects of the students’ prosocial behavior to develop. These aspects were

sharing, helping, cooperating, and caring. The results of the study showed that the

collaborative teamwork teaching was effective to develop the prosocial behavior of

students in three elementary schools. All of the investigated aspects got improved.

They were categorized “high”, except the aspect of caring. It was classified as

“medium”.

Keywords: Prosocial behavior, individual and situational factors, collaborative teamwork

teaching

INTRODUCTION

The current living situation is increasingly complicated. The acceleration of the technology of

information-communication has massively brought new values. As a result, established values

are challenged and become shaky. Such a life complexity is predicted to become more and more

complicated in the future so that the human beings, including the elementary school students

are increasingly led to a very competitive pattern of life.[1] Furthermore, they tend to lead to

the individualistic and materialistic pattern of life. The future complexity challenge leads to the

two alternatives: to accept their faith or to get well-prepared. Certainly, the educational

missions which have future dimensions leads to the second alternative.

One of the educational efforts is the development of elementary school students’ prosocial

behavior. It is important because the prosocial behavior is voluntary behavior intended to

benefit another, a social behavior that benefits other people or society as a whole such as

Page 2 of 11

382

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 8, Issue 7, July-2021

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

helping, sharing, donating, cooperating, and volunteering.[2] The purest forms of prosocial

behavior are motivated by altruism, an unselfish interest in helping another person. These

actions may be motivated by empathy and by concern about the welfare and right other as well

as for egoistic or practical concern.[3] Furthermore, the circumstances most likely to evoke

altruism are empathy for an individual in need, or a close relationship between the benefactor

and the recipient.[3]

Prosocial is defined as actions that benefit other people or society as whole.[4] In this context,

prosocial behavior refers to voluntary actions are intended to help or benefit another individual

or group of individuals.[5] This definition refers to consequences of a doer’s action rather than

the motivations behind those actions. It is characterized by helping that does not benefit the

helper. In fact, prosocial behavior includes a broad range of activities: sharing, comforting,

rescuing, and helping.

Evidence suggests that prosocial is central to the well-being of social groups across a range of

scale.[6][7] Empathy is a strong motive in eliciting prosocial behavior, and has deep

evolutionary roots.[8] Prosocial behavior fosters positive traits that are beneficial for children

and society. It may be motivated both by altruism and by self-interest, for reasons of immediate

benefit or future reciprocity.

Prosocial behavior motivated or affected by both individual and situational determinant

factors. According to Gustavo, et al, the individual determinant factors that effect the prosocial

behavior are age, sex, cognitive development, and personality traits, and value orientations. On

the other side, the situational determinant factors are socialization through parental caring,

parent as a model, effective relationship between child and parent, teaching method of teacher

and parent, and structure and family function.[9]

There are interesting findings of contemporary research about prosocial behavior of children.

Aktar, et al were examine the association between representation of acceptance-rejection from

multiple attachment figures (father, mother, best friend, and teacher) and the mediating role of

authenticity in this relationship. The structural equation model suggested that paternal

acceptance-rejection was significantly directly associated with prosocial acts toward three

targets and maternal acceptance-rejection was indirectly associated with prosocial acts toward

a stranger. Moreover, best friend and teacher acceptance-rejection was related to prosocial acts

toward family and friends, and friends respectively. Sense of authenticity mediated the

association between maternal and best friend acceptance-rejection and prosocial behavior

toward strangers.[10]

Kirkland, et al in their research has linked economically unequal environments to lower

prosocial behavior in adults. However, we know little about how inequality affects children’s

prosocial. Here, 4- to 9-year-old children (N = 128) played a series of games with several

puppets where points were awarded. The distribution of points was characterized by either

high inequality or low inequality. Children’s donation behavior (i.e., the number of stickers they

donated to a poor child), resource division behavior (i.e., how they divided extra points among

poor and rich puppets), and fairness perceptions (i.e., how fair they perceived the game to be)

were measured in response. Although the experimental manipulation of inequality did not

affect children’s donations, exploratory analyses revealed that higher inequality in children’s

Page 3 of 11

383

Asrori, M., & Effendy, C. (2021). Developing Students’ Prosocial Behavior Through Collaborative Teamwork Teaching. Advances in Social Sciences

Research Journal, 8(7). 381-391.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.87.10602

home suburb was linked to lower donation rates. Furthermore, with age, children distributed

points with increasing concern for poorer individuals, and negative judgments of the inequality

were linked to distributing resources to poorer individuals. Here we present the first

comprehensive analysis of children’s prosocial reactions to high and low inequality across

development.[11]

Xin Yi, et al in their study examined the effect of a collaborative prosocial game as well as the

influence of positive and negative emotion mode in game of individuals’ attitudes, empathic

concern and prosocial intentions. Results showed that all participants who played the game had

improved attitudes and emphatic concern. Participants in the positive emotional tone condition

showed improved attitude and empathic concern change, while those in the negative emotional

tone condition showed only improved attitude towards racial ethnically difference others.

Additionally, there were also differences in players’ attitude and empathic concern based on

exposure to negative and positive emotional tone in the game.[12]

The prosocial behavior of elementary school students in the present study was developed and

improved through collaborative teamwork teaching. This teaching strategy emphasize that

success is more effective of cooperation than competition and interdependence than

independence. In this context, Covey in his best seller book entitled “The Sevent Habits of Highly

Effective People” has explained that in the modern management the interdepedence is the

highest level of habit that must be developed. The stages are dependence, independence, and

than interdependence.[13] It can be understood due to the increasingly specialization of

sciences and knowledge. So, harmonization of specialized sciences is very important and highly

required.

Teaching strategy that emphasizes on importance of cooperation than competition or

interdependence than independence is also explained by Flynn and Graham. They clarify that

if making the account of competition than cooperation can lead students to have a habit of not

respectful to others and against others.[14] On the other hand, cooperation and

interdependence tend to lead students to work with challenges, leadership, management,

respect towards others, and orientation to achievement. [15]

The advantages of collaborative teamwork was proven by Federal Express and Boeing when

restructuring organization. Davis explained that after implementing the team concept and

collaborative teamwork within its organization, Federal Express reported a 40% increase in

productivity. Similarly, Boeing experienced a decrease of over 50% in engineering problems on

its 777 passenger jet after instituting the team with a collaborative teamwork approach.[16]

The research results on Federal Express and Boeing are more and more important that

collaborative teaching must be early implemented and developed in the elementary schools.

Collaborative teaching demands the lecturers to help students to: (1) understand how to work

successfully as part of the team, and (2) develop skills to increase their teamwork needed after

they have entered the workplace in the economic or industry area.[17]

Based on the background, this research was conducted to explore in depth the profile of

prosocial behavior of elementary school students and to improved through collaborative

teamwork teaching. There are four aspects of prosocial behavior of elementary school students

Page 4 of 11

384

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 8, Issue 7, July-2021

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

that will be developed through collaborative teaching, they are: sharing, helping, cooperating,

and caring.[18] Sharing helps children learn the importance of giving to others in need. A child

who is able to share his toys with others is likely to become a generous adult. Sharing teaches a

child that the world can provide for him when time get tough provided that he is willing to

return the favor if, and when, necessary. Helping includes acts of kindness, recusing someone

or removing their distress. Removing another person’s distress can provide a child with a sense

of accomplishment and an internal sense of being a good person. Cooperating is a key concept

in child life. Children are unable to cooperate may struggle to work effectively with others

during their formative year. Cooperation also helps children learn to delegate responsibility.

Caring means someone or children or something that shows kindness and concern for others.

METHODOLOGY

The are two reseach variables in this study: (1) collaborative teaching as independence

variable, and (2) prosocial behavior of elementary school students as dependence variable that

encompassing four aspects, they are: sharing, helping, cooperating, and caring. This study was

conducted by quasi experimental with one group pretest-posttest design. The procedure of

treatment are: (1) promoting students insight into the importance of teamwork; (2) forming

the teams; (3) helping teams maintain focus through written aids; (4) distributing

responsibilities wisely; (5) promoting accountability and responsibility; (6) promoting

improved or enhanced writting skills; (7) providing initial guidance and ongoing feedback; and

(8) using record-keeping forms for organizing and planning by communication roster, task

sheet, meeting schedule form, meeting agenda sheet, end-of-project evaluation sheet, and

providing ongoing feedback.

The subject of research were students of elementary school grade 5 that overall are 75 students.

Each experimental group in each school comprised 25 students. Because the experiment was

carried out in three schools, the total research subjects were 75 students. The data were

collected using Prosocial Behavior Inventory developed by Asrori (2015). This inventory was

tried out and tested for its validity and reliability using Cronbach Alpha and it obtained 0.853,

meaning that it was eligible for use in research. Implementation of treatment through

collaborative teaching and collection of data were conducted by teacher of class.

The students’ prosocial behavior profile data were analyzed using a comparison analysis

between the actual score and the ideal maximum score based on the normal curve.[19] To

determine the effectiveness of collaborative teamwork teaching for increasing students’

prosocial behavior, the data were analyzed using t-tests for paired samples, while to determine

the effectiveness difference of collaborative teamwork teaching to increase inter-school

students prosocial behavior, the data were analyzed using analysis of variance.[18]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1. Initial Prosocial Behavior Profile of Elementary School Students

Based on the percentage analysis, namely, by dividing the actual score obtained by all students

with the ideal maximum score, the results are shown in Table 1.

Page 5 of 11

385

Asrori, M., & Effendy, C. (2021). Developing Students’ Prosocial Behavior Through Collaborative Teamwork Teaching. Advances in Social Sciences

Research Journal, 8(7). 381-391.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.87.10602

Table 1. Initial Prosocial Behavior Profile of Elementary School Students

Variable/Sub Variable Ideal Score Actual Score Percentage

(Category)

Prosocial Behavior 9000 2835 31.50% (L)

1. Sharing 2250 855 38.00% (M)

2. Helping 2250 722 32.09% (L)

3. Cooperating 2250 708 31.47% (L)

4. Caring 2250 677 30.09% (L)

L = Low; M = Moderate; H = High

As can be seen in the table 1, overall, the initial prosocial behavior profile of elementary school

students tends to the “lower level”. If examined in more detailed, it can be seen that most

aspects, that is, the aspects of helping, cooperating, and caring are classified ‘low’. The only

aspect that is categorized as 'moderate' is sharing aspect.

The results of this study indicate that elementary school students require serious intervention

to enable them to develop their prosocial behavior. It is very important because prosocial

behavior is a very importance to face the living situation that increasingly complicated and

tends to individualistic, materialistic, and hedonistic. One of the efforts is conducting

systematically through the collaborative teamwork teaching.

2. Mean Difference of Students’ Initial Prosocial Behavior among Elementary

Schools

The mean difference of students’ initial prosocial behavior among elementary school was

analyzed using analysis of variance. The result is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Mean Difference of Students’ Initial Prosocial Behavior among Elementary Schools

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Intergroup 416.006 6 72.15 1.34 .26

Intragroup 12534.67 234 54.39

Total 16694.73 240

As shown in the table 2, the result of the variance analysis, if viewed from the difference of

schools, shows that the initial prosocial behavior of elementary school students does not differ

significantly. It means that the students’ initial prosocial behavior of all schools is categorized

"low". In more detail, analysis of variance was also carried out on each aspect that was covered

in the initial prosocial behavior of elementary school students. The result of the analysis is

shown in Table 3.

Page 6 of 11

386

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 8, Issue 7, July-2021

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Table 3. Difference in Each Aspect of Students’ Initial Prosocial Behavior from Elementary

Schools

Sum of

Squares

df Mean

Square

F Sig.

Aspect 1

(Sharing)

Inter-group 49.74 6 8.30 1.84 .10

Intra-group 1083.48 234 4.66

Total 1133.22 240

Aspect 2

(Helping)

Inter-group 25.39 6 4.26 0.61 .74

Intra-group 1671.77 234 7.17

Total 1697.16 240

Aspect 3

(Cooperating)

Inter-group 71.10 6 11.87 2.40 .03

Intra-group 1162.35 234 4.99

Total 1233.45 240

Aspect 4

(Caring

Inter-group 51.37 6 8.59 1.75 .12

Intra-group 1160.31 234 4.99

Total 1211.68 240

Table 3 shows that if viewed in more detail into its aspects, the initial prosocial behavior of the

students from different schools does not differ significantly, either. Of the four aspects, there is

only one aspect (namely, cooperating) that shows a significant difference. If seen from the

aspects of sharing, helping, and caring, these three aspects do not show any significant

difference.

3. The Effectiveness of Collaborative Teamwork Teaching to Develop Prosocial

Behavior of Students from SD Islam Al-Azhar Pontianak

The effectiveness of the collaborative teamwork teaching to develop prosocial behavior of

students from SD Islam Al-Azhar Pontianak was analyzed by comparing the actual pretest and

posttest scores with the ideal maximum score. The result is shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Prosocial Behavior of Students from SD Islam Al-Azhar Pontianak Before and After

They Participated in the Learning Process with Collaborative Teamwork Teaching

Variable/Aspect of Variable Xideal

Pretest Posttest

Xactual Level Xactual Level

Prosocial Behavior 3000 931 31.03% (L) 2134 71.13% (H)

1. Sharing 750 232 31.93% (L) 532 70.93% (H)

2. Helping 750 230 30.67% (L) 525 70.00% (H)

3. Cooperating 750 237 31.60% (L) 547 72.93% (H)

4. Caring 750 225 30.00% (L) 531 70.80% (H)

L = Low; M = Moderate; H = High

Table 4 shows that before the students were given a treatment (the result of the pretest) the

prosocial behavior of students from SD Islam Al-Azhar Pontianak was categorized “low”. It can

be seen in all aspects. After they were given the treatment and the posttest was administered,

all of the aspects developed up to the category of ‘high’.

To examine the effectiveness significance of learning using collaborative teamwork teaching, t- test for paired samples was used. The result is shown in Table 5.

Page 7 of 11

387

Asrori, M., & Effendy, C. (2021). Developing Students’ Prosocial Behavior Through Collaborative Teamwork Teaching. Advances in Social Sciences

Research Journal, 8(7). 381-391.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.87.10602

Table 5. T-Test for Paired Samples of Prosocial Behavior from SD Islam Al-Azhar Pontianak

Variable Number of

pairs

Corr. 2-tail Sig Mean Std.

Deviation

Std. Error

of Mean

Pre-test 25 .104 .329 30.367 11.671 1.251

Post-test 25 112.100 28.372 2.991

Paired Differences

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error of

Mean

t-value df 2-tail sig

-89.733 29.593 3.119 -21.76 48 .000

95% CI (-95.933; -83.534)

The result of the t-test analysis shows that the value of t = -27.76 and 2-tail sig = 0.001. Thus,

the statistical hypothesis is rejected and the working hypothesis is accepted. It means that

learning using collaborative teamwork teaching is very effective to develop the prosocial

behavior of the students from SD Islam Al-Azhar Pontianak.

4. The Effectiveness of Collaborative Teamwork Teaching to Develop Prosocial

Behavior of Students from SD Negeri 34 Pontianak

The effectiveness of the collaborative teamwork teaching to develop the prosocial behavior of

the students SD Negeri 34 Pontianak was analyzed by comparing the actual pretest and posttest

scores with the ideal maximum score. The result is shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Prosocial Behavior of Students from SD Negeri 34 Pontianak Before and After They

Participated in the Learning Process with Collaborative Teamwork Teaching

Variable/Aspect of

Variale

Xideal Pretest Posttest

Xactual Level Xactual Level

Prosocial Behavior 3000 846 28.20% (L) 2134 68.13% (H)

1. Sharing 750 232 28.27% (L) 532 68.80% (H)

2. Helping 750 210 28.00% (L) 515 68.67% (H)

3. Cooperating 750 228 30.40% (L) 528 70.40% (H)

4. Caring 750 230 27.67% (L) 525 65.60%

(M)

L = Low; M = Moderate; H = High

Table 6 shows that before the students from SD Negeri 34 Pontianak were given the treatment

(the results of the pretest) their prosocial behavior was classified ‘low’. It was shown in all

aspects. After the students were given the treatment and the posttest was administered, all

aspects developed up to the "high" category. There was only one aspect whose development

reached the "medium" category. This aspect is caring.

To test this hypothesis, the pre-test and post-test data were analyzed using the t-test for paired

samples. The result is shown in Table 7.

Page 8 of 11

388

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 8, Issue 7, July-2021

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Table 7. T-Test for Paired Samples of Prosocial Behavior from SD Negeri 34 Pontianak

Variable Number of

pairs

Corr. 2-tail Sig Mean Std.

Deviation

Std. Error

of Mean

Pre-test 25 .085 .656 32.200 12.380 2.260

Post-test 25 64.400 12.073 2.204

Paired Differences

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error of

Mean

t-value df 2-tail sig

-52.200 16.543 3.020 -17.28 48 .000

95% CI (-58.379; -46.021)

The result of the t-test analysis shows that the value of t = -17.28 and p = .000. Thus, the

statistical hypothesis is rejected and the working hypothesis is accepted. It means that learning

using collaborative teamwork teaching is also effective to develop the prosocial behavior of the

students from SD Negeri 34 Pontianak. Unfortunately, it was not as effective as that was carried

out in SD Islam Al-Azhar Pontianak because there was still one aspect of development which

only reached the "medium" category. It dealt with the caring aspect.

5. The Effectiveness of Collaborative Teamwork Teaching to Develop Prosocial

Behavior of Students from SD Muhammadiyah Pontianak

To find out the effectiveness of the collaborative teamwork teaching to develop the prosocial

behavior of the students from SD Muhammadiyah Pontianak, the analysis was performed by

comparing the actual pretest and posttest scores with the ideal maximum score. The result is

shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Prosocial Behavior of Students from SD Muhammadiyah Pontianak Before and After

They Participated in the Learning Process with Collaborative Teamwork Teaching

Variable/Aspect of

Variable

Xideal Pretest Posttest

Xactual Level Xactual Level

Prosocial Behavior 3000 903 30.10% (L) 2140 71.33% (H)

1. Sharing 750 218 29.07% (L) 532 70.93% (H)

2. Helping 750 217 29.00% (L) 520 69.33% (H)

3. Cooperating 750 234 31.20% (L) 535 71.33% (H)

4. Caring 750 215 28,67% (L) 495 66.00%

(M)

L = Low; M = Moderate; H = High

As can be seen in the above Table 8, before the students of SD Muhammadiyah Pontianak were

given the treatment (the results of the pretest), their prosocial behavior was classified ‘low’. It

is shown in all aspects. After the treatment and the administration of the post-test, all aspects

developed up to the "high" category. There was one aspect whose development reached the

"medium" category. It is the caring aspect.

To test this hypothesis, the pre-test and post-test data were analyzed using the t-test for paired

samples. The result is shown in Table 9.

Page 9 of 11

389

Asrori, M., & Effendy, C. (2021). Developing Students’ Prosocial Behavior Through Collaborative Teamwork Teaching. Advances in Social Sciences

Research Journal, 8(7). 381-391.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.87.10602

Table 9. T-Test for Paired Samples of Prosocial Behavior from SD Muhammadiyah Pontianak

Variable Number of

pairs

Corr. 2-tail Sig Mean Std.

Deviation

Std. Error

of Mean

Pre-test 25 .416 .022 30.367 12.007 2.192

Post-test 25 64.400 12.073 2.204

Paired Differences

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error of

Mean

t-value df 2-tail sig

-54.033 13.000 2.375 -22.75 48 .000

95% CI (-58.892; -49.175)

The t-test result shows that the value of t = -22.75and p = .001. Therefore, the statistic

hypothesis is rejected and the working hypothesis is accepted. It means that learning using

collaborative teamwork teaching model is also effective to develop the prosocial behavior of

students in SD Muhammadiyah Pontianak. It is more effective than that done in SD Negeri 34

Pontianak. However, it is not as effective as that done in SD Islam Al-Azhar Pontianak because

there is still one aspect whose development only reached the "medium" category. This aspect

is caring aspect.

6. Differences in the Effectiveness of Collaborative Teamwork Teaching to Develop

Prosocial Behavior of Students from SD Islam Al-Azhar, SD Negeri 34, and SD

Muhammadiyah Pontianak

Test of mean difference in students’ prosocial behavior from SD Islam Al-Azhar, SD Negeri 34,

and SD Muhammadiyah Pontianak was analyzed using the analysis of variance. The result is

shown in Table 10.

Table 10. Differences in the Effectiveness of Collaborative Teamwork Teaching to Develop

Prosocial Behavior of Students from SD Islam Al-Azhar, SD Negeri 34, and SD Muhammadiyah

Pontianak

Sum of

Squares

df Mean Square F Sig.

Intergroup 420.006 6 70.161 1.282 .259

Intragroup 12930.659 234 53.280

Total 13359.660 240

The result of the variance analysis as shown in Table 10 shows that there is not any significant

difference in the effectiveness of collaborative teamwork teaching applied to develop the

prosocial behavior of elementary school students if viewed from the difference of schools. It

means that the collaborative teamwork teaching applied in the elementary schools selected as

the location of the study is equally effective at developing the prosocial behavior of elementary

school students.

To look at in detail, an analysis of variance was carried out to each aspect included in prosocial

behavior of elementary school students. The result of the analysis is shown in Table 11.

Page 11 of 11

391

Asrori, M., & Effendy, C. (2021). Developing Students’ Prosocial Behavior Through Collaborative Teamwork Teaching. Advances in Social Sciences

Research Journal, 8(7). 381-391.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.87.10602

[6] Holliwell, J.F. and Putnam, R.D. (2010). The Social Context of Well Being. Philosophical Transaction of the

Royal Society, New York: Biological Sciences.

[7] Staubhaar, J.D. (2009) Media Now: Understanding Media, Culture, and Technology, Boston, Wadsworth.

[8] Decety, J. (2011). The Neuroevolution of Empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, New York:

Wiley.

[9] Pinel, J. (2011). Biopsychology, 8th Edition. New York: Pearson.

[10] Aktar, R.; Sugiura, Y.; and Hiraishi, K. (2021). Associations Between Acceptance-Rejection and Adolescents’

Prosocial Behavior in Japan: The Mediating Role of Sense of Authenticity. Child and Adolescent Social Work

Journal. 21 June 2021.

[11] Kirkland, K.; Jetten, J.; Wilks, M., and Nielsen, M. (2021). How Economic Inequality Affects Prosocial Behavior

in Children Across Development. Journal of Child Experimental Psychology. Vol. 210, October 2021.

[12] Xin Yi, C.C.; Yu, V.; and Hua Chen, V.H. (2021). In the Mood for Doing Good: The Influence of Positive and

Negative Emotions in Game Narrative on Prosocial Tendencies. Proceeding of the 54th Hawaii International

Conference on System Sciences. 2021.

[13] Covey, S.R. (2009). The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People. New York: A Fireside Book.

[14] Flynn, R.G. (2005). Smooth Sailing for Teamwork. Personal Journal, 14, 18-25.

[15] Graham, T.S. (2007). Cooperative Learning: The Benefit of Participatory Examinations in Principles of

Marketing Classes. Journal of Education for Business, 42, 112-118.

[16] Davis, L.M. (2006). Job Preparation for the 21st Century: A Group Project. Journal of Education for Business,

12, 119-123.

[17] Howard, S.A. (2009). Guiding Collaborative Teamwork in the Classroom. Effective Teaching, 3, 21-28.

[18] Asrori, M. (2018). Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Yogyakarta: Media Akademi.

[19] Popham, W.J. & Sirotnik, K.A. (2013). Educational Statistics: Use and Interpretation. New York: Harper &

Row.