Page 1 of 13

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 8, No. 5

Publication Date: May 25, 2021

DOI:10.14738/assrj.85.10266.

Mulligan, B. P., & Koren, S. A. (2021). Geopsychology of instrumental aggression: daily concurrence of global terrorism and solar- geomagnetic activity (1970-2018). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(5). 487-499.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Geopsychology of instrumental aggression: daily concurrence of

global terrorism and solar-geomagnetic activity (1970-2018)

Bryce P. Mulligan

Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada;

Stanley A. Koren

Neuroscience Research Group & Psychology Department

Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada

ABSTRACT

Formal scientific study of the geopsychology of human aggression dates back at

least a century and has consistently demonstrated a positive association between

solar-geomagnetic activity and aggressive behaviour. Advances in the theories,

methodologies, and practical applications of geopsychology could therefore

contribute to collective efforts to comprehend, to forecast, and to develop

interventions for aggressive behaviours such as those seen in terrorism. This

requires a rigorous and precise estimate of the magnitude of association between

solar-geomagnetic activity and aggression using a representative, contemporary

sample of strictly-operationalized behaviour. Here we show that days in recent

history (1970-2018) with the lowest levels of instrumental human aggression

(number of casualty-associated terrorism incidents) also had the lowest levels of

solar and geomagnetic activity, and that stepwise increases in human aggression

were mirrored by progressive increases in solar activity. We used Bayesian

methods robust to outliers and heterogeneity of variance to analyze the most

comprehensive and contemporary global database of terrorism incidents available,

which included more than 106,000 unique instances of instrumental aggression

spanning 48 years. We conclude that there is a small, nonzero promotional effect of

solar-geomagnetic activity on terrorism-related aggression. This may reflect the

fact that solar-geomagnetic activity serves as a zeitgeber that coordinates the

expression of instrumental aggression across an aggregation of susceptible

individuals. We propose that many behaviours – even instrumental acts such as

terrorism which are presumed to involve a degree of planning and intention – may

be subject to subtle geopsychological induction or suppression.

Keywords: biophysics; geophysics; behavioural ecology; aggregate human behaviour;

Bayesian data analysis.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE GEOPSYCHOLOGY OF AGGRESSION

Geopsychology, or geo-neuroscience, denotes the manifold impacts of the Earth's physical

environment on biology and behaviour [1,2]. Interest in the geopsychology of aggression

originates prior to recorded history, with indigenous peoples inhabiting northern regions of

the globe. Displays of aurora borealis – visible light phenomena reflecting transient

disturbances in the geomagnetic field [3] often linked to variations in solar activity [4] – were

Page 2 of 13

488

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 8, Issue 5, May-2021

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

in some cases likened to ancient warriors or considered omens foretelling of war, famine, and

disease [5].

In 1924, A.L. Chizhevski first published (in Russian) the seminal scientific work on the

geopsychology of aggression. His statistical analyses of historical data from 500 BCE to 1914

CE demonstrated that the most acute/severe human conflicts and violent revolutions occurred

around maxima of 11-year solar activity (sunspot) cycles and that cultural development tended

to flourish at solar minima [6]. In 1928, Chizhevski described a comparable association

between Russian terrorism and solar activity for the period 1902 to 1911 [7]. Later (1999), M.A.

Persinger demonstrated that higher yearly levels of solar-geomagnetic activity similarly

predicted higher levels of armed human conflict for the years 1904 to 1950 [8]. Then, in 2015,

Vares and Persinger showed that daily solar activity predicted 4% to 10% of the variance in the

daily number of force and confrontation events occurring in the years 2009 to 2013 [9].

While both innovative and informative, existing naturalistic geopsychology of aggression

studies are limited by sample size/representativeness, operational definitions of aggression,

and data analysis methodology. For one, some prior studies have tended to examine relatively

small samples of data and/or datasets with low time-resolution (e.g. yearly data). Considering

that solar and geomagnetic activity are known to show substantial variation at a period of 11

years (as well as shorter- and longer-period cycles of varying magnitudes), geopsychological

studies should at minimum include data spanning more than one 11-year cycle. Furthermore,

larger datasets and those with higher time-resolution provide the high precision necessary to

detect and generate meaningful statistical estimates of geopsychological effect sizes, which

tend to be small (i.e. ~0.1-0.2 SD group differences or ~5-15% shared variance) [2, 7]. Second,

existing studies have tended to employ relatively broad or non-specific operational definitions

of aggressive behaviour. However, reactive/impulsive and instrumental subtypes of aggressive

behaviour involve differences in the nature of the aggressive behaviour as well as its social

context and neuroanatomical underpinnings [10, 11]. Because geopsychological effects may

operate via multiple distinct and behaviour-specific geo-neurobiological mechanisms [1, 2, 12,

13], effects could be diluted by tallying multiple distinct subtypes of aggressive behaviour

under a common metric. Finally, previous studies of the geopsychology of aggression have

tended to rely on methods of data analysis that are not robust to outliers or heterogeneity of

variance across groups or factor levels, which could introduce a source of confound into effect

size estimates.

AIMS AND PURPOSES OF THE PRESENT STUDY

To address these limitations and contribute to advances in the geopsychology of aggression, we

used contemporary datasets and analysis methods to produce representative, rigorous, and

precise geopsychological effect size estimates (e.g. to inform policy development and the design

and interpretation of experimental studies). As such, we used the most complete and

representative terrorism dataset available (Global Terrorism Database, GTD) [14], reflecting

the global daily occurrence of a narrowly-defined subtype of instrumental aggressive behaviour

and spanning 48 years of recent history (1970-2018). We also employed Bayesian methods of

data analysis that provided informative detail about the range of credible parameter values (i.e.

geopsychological effect sizes) and that accommodated for outliers and for heterogeneity of

variance across groups/levels [15].

Page 3 of 13

489

Mulligan, B. P., & Koren, S. A. (2021). Geopsychology of instrumental aggression: daily concurrence of global terrorism and solar-geomagnetic

activity (1970-2018). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(5). 487-499.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.10266

In addition to the theoretical and methodological aims just outlined, we chose to study the

geopsychology of terrorism for humanistic reasons. Terrorism has far-reaching and long- lasting detrimental physical, social, psychological, and economical impacts [16-18]. We thus

aspired to re-examine and to enhance the current understanding and conceptualization of the

phenomenology of terrorism-related aggression in order to better anticipate and disrupt

intended acts of violent coercion before they occur; we aimed to facilitate development of just

economic and social policy to redress modifiable biopsychosocial risk factors underlying

terrorism [19, 20].

STUDY METHODS

Instrumental Aggression (Terrorism) Data

The Global Terrorism Database (GTD) [14] is in ongoing, active development; is freely available

for non-commercial use; currently includes information on more than 190,000 terrorism

incidents; and presently spans complete years 1970 to 2018 (all data from 1993 were

irretrievably lost). There are 4 data collection epochs in the GTD wherein distinct

methodologies were employed: 1 January 1970 to 31 December 1997; 1 January 1998 to 31

March 2008; 1 April 2008 to 31 December 2011; and 1 January 2012 to present. As such, the

GTD project leaders recommend treating each epoch distinctly when conducting statistical

analysis [21].

After retrieving the GTD, any terrorism incident with an unknown/missing value for date,

month, year, or casualties (number of wounded or killed persons) was omitted. For the

purposes of the present study, all GTD terrorism incidents associated with at least one casualty

(≥1 wounded or killed persons) were considered casualty-incidents. The number of such

casualty-incidents was then counted within each day, where days with no terrorism casualty- incidents were assigned a score of zero. The total number of distinct terrorism casualty- incidents occurring on each day from 1970 to 2018 served as our daily metric of global

instrumental human aggression.

There was a disproportionate number of days with zero terrorism casualty-incidents, giving

the distribution of daily casualty-incident counts a pronounced positive skew. Casualty- incident counts were hence indexed to quintiles within each study epoch using the quantcut

function [22]. In other words, each day was assigned to a subgroup (nominal factor level)

corresponding to its epoch-wise instrumental aggression (terrorism casualty-incident)

quintile.

Solar-Geophysical Data

Solar-geophysical data for years 1970 to 2018 (spanning solar cycles 20 through 24) were

obtained from GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences (www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/kp- index/) and then matched by date and merged with the terrorism casualty-incident dataset.

Daily (sum) KP index (a measure of global geomagnetic activity) [23] and daily 10.7 cm radio

flux (a measure of solar activity) [24] were each separately regressed on case (day) number

and the standardized residuals were saved for use as predicted variables in our analyses. (This

was done in order to unit-normalize and linearly detrend the solar and geomagnetic data series

prior to analysis.)

Page 4 of 13

490

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 8, Issue 5, May-2021

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Statistical Analysis

Bayesian MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo) simulation was used to estimate a credible range

of solar and geomagnetic activity values (metric-scale predicted variables) for days grouped

according to their terrorism casualty-incident quintile (a nominal factor with 5 levels). To

account for differing methodologies and sample sizes across the 4 GTD study epochs, epoch was

included as a second nominal factor (with 4 levels) in the models. Distinct means and standard

deviations were thus estimated for each casualty-incident quintile within each epoch (i.e. there

was no assumption of homogeneity of variance in solar/geomagnetic data across epochs or

aggression factor levels). Noise in the data was represented with a t-distribution that included

a normality parameter to prevent bias of geopsychological effect estimates as a result of

extreme values [15].

Prior distributions for all parameters were selected to be broad on the scale of the data and to

exert minimal influence over the posterior distributions. Broad normal priors were used for

baseline solar/geomagnetic estimates and for estimates of deflections from baseline associated

with each casualty-incident factor level. Standard deviation parameters were given broad

gamma prior distributions and the prior for the normality parameter was a broad exponential

distribution. Our main interest lie in examining and reporting the magnitude of differences in

solar/geomagnetic activity between instrumental aggression factor levels. This was estimated

by examining factor-level contrasts (relative differences) in the posterior distribution of

estimated solar-geomagnetic activity parameter values (i.e. using a conservative approach that

compared, in turn, values from each individual casualty-incident quintile to those from all other

quintiles combined).

Data analyses were conducted in R [25] with JAGS [26] and runjags [27] for Bayesian MCMC

simulation. We employed functions and a modified script for analysis of metric predicted

variables with two nominal factors made available and extensively described by Kruschke [15].

All of the MCMC chains were checked for convergence. Effective sample size (ESS) was

examined and reported as a measure of estimate stability/accuracy for parameters of interest.

Further detail regarding data processing and analysis can be obtained from the corresponding

author.

RESULTS

The GTD (downloaded 6 November 2020), spanning the 17,532 days from 1970 to 2018 (data

from 1993 missing), contained 191,464 unique terrorism incidents. After omitting those with

missing date or casualty information, 172,579 incidents remained for analysis. Of those,

106,998 (~62%) incidents were associated with ≥1 wounded or killed persons and so were

considered terrorism casualty-incidents. Daily tallies of terrorism casualty-incidents varied

from 0 to 56, with a mean (SD) of 6.10 (7.55) terrorism casualty-incidents per day. Upper and

lower limits for casualty-incident quintiles (i.e. casualty-incident factor levels), computed

separately for each of the 4 GTD study epochs, revealed qualitative across-epoch differences

(Table 1), reflecting in part the appreciable growth in terrorism behaviour from the late 20th to

the early 21st Century.

Page 5 of 13

491

Mulligan, B. P., & Koren, S. A. (2021). Geopsychology of instrumental aggression: daily concurrence of global terrorism and solar-geomagnetic

activity (1970-2018). Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(5). 487-499.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.10266

Table 1. Epoch-wise terrorism casualty-incident quintile ranges.

Global Terrorism Dataset (GTD) data-collection epoch

1 January 1970-

31 December 1997

1 January 1998-

31 March 2008

1 April 2008-

31 December 2011

1 January 2012-

31 December 2018

Casualty

quintile

Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper

1st 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 14

2nd 1 1 2 2 6 7 15 18

3rd 2 3 3 3 8 9 19 22

4th 4 5 4 5 10 12 23 27

5th 6 30 6 36 13 34 28 56

Each day from 1970 to 2018 was assigned a quintile rank based on the number of terrorism

casualty-incidents occurring on that day. Upper and lower limits of casualty-incident quintiles

were computed separately for each of the 4 data collection epochs (reflecting methodological

differences) included in the Global Terrorism Database (GTD).

Examination of terrorism casualty-incident factor-level differences in the posterior

distributions showed that solar activity levels were credibly lower (i.e. the 95% HDI for the

estimated differences excluded zero) on days falling in the 1st and 2nd terrorism casualty- incident quintiles, and credibly higher for days in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th quintiles. In fact, point

estimates of solar activity showed a rank-ordered stepwise increase across casualty-incident

quintiles. And while geomagnetic activity was likewise credibly lower on days in the 1st

casualty-incident quintile and credibly elevated on days falling in the 4th quintile, estimates of

differences in geomagnetic activity for days in the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th casualty-incident quintiles

had 95% HDIs that included zero (i.e. null contrasts). These results are summarized in Table 2

and in Figures 1 and 2.