Page 1 of 5

European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 12, No. 6

Publication Date: December 25, 2024

DOI:10.14738/aivp.126.18050.

Ciobanu, M. Z. (2024). A Secular Variation in the Moon’s Orbit Inclination Supposing the Moon is an Ejected Body: About the Lunar

Nodal Point and the Precession Constant. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(6). 630-634.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

A Secular Variation in the Moon’s Orbit Inclination Supposing the

Moon is an Ejected Body: About the Lunar Nodal Point and the

Precession Constant

Monica Zoe Ciobanu

Astronomical Institute of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

ABSTRACT

Supposing the Moon as if it has been ejected in a past geological period, the author

of this paper analysed the possible variation of the Moon’s orbit inclination, from

that moment of possible ejection, until now, in the ecliptic frame of axis. Admitting

that the obliquity of ecliptic could be greater in that distant geological past, the

author supposes that the inclination of Moon’s orbit related to ecliptic plan could

decreased from an abstractly supposed great value (for instance around “40°”) to

five degrees now. That could impose the acceptance of a possible secular variation

in the Moon’s orbit inclination, related to the ecliptic plan.

Keywords: The Earth’s Moon distance, the Moon’s orbit inclination, the lunar nodal point,

the precession.

INTRODUCTION

The precision in the astronomical observations have been rising in the last centuries, some of

which were detected by astronomers, particularity in the Earth’s Moon Dynamic. In a past

paper (1), the three well known particularities were presented in more detail, namely they

being the great eccentricity of the Moon’s synchronous orbit, the Moon’s unusual orbit

inclination, and the Moon’s great mass related to the Earth’s mass.

The author tried to explain all these particularities in that paper, supposing the Moon as if it

were an ejected body from a terrestrial equatorial band. Indeed, if the heavy Moon was

suddenly ejected (in some dramatic geological past period) the Earth would have suddenly lost

then 0.0123 of its mass, diminishing its attraction power over the Moon, and step by step the

Moon’s initial ejected circular orbit become more elliptical, under the Sun’s attraction.

MORE ABOUT THE MOON’S ORBIT

Let us suppose the ecliptic as an orbital plane and the Earth as a body whose gravity centre is

situated in this plane. Around five centuries ago, Galileo Galilei (2), detected the “lunar secular

acceleration” of the Moon’s longitude (of about 11”), meaning that the Moon’s orbit is changing

not only its shape, but also its growth. This implies that the well-known increase of the Earth –

Moon distance exists, and it grows with some centimetres yearly.

In the last century, some genuinely interesting studies about fossils proved that around the

Cambrian-Neoproterozoic eon border, the Moon was closer to the Earth (3). Indeed, before the

Ediacaran geological period (630Mya-541Mya), (4), (5), there was a great and long glaciation

period when the obliquity of the ecliptic could have been more 40°. After the Ediacaran period,

Page 2 of 5

631

Ciobanu, M. Z. (2024). A Secular Variation in the Moon’s Orbit Inclination Supposing the Moon is an Ejected Body: About the Lunar Nodal Point and

the Precession Constant. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(6). 630-634.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.126.18050

from the beginning of the Phanerozoic eon (541Mya) the obliquity of the ecliptic was certainly

less 40°. Consequently, during the Ediacaran geological period, a considerable tectonic activity

took place which caused changing in the Earth’s momentum of inertia, variation in the Earth’s

angular momentum and a great piece from the continental platform could suddenly have been

ejected.

Therefore, supposing that the Moon could have been ejected in the past geological period, and

the obliquity of the ecliptic was greater, the Moon’s orbit inclination related to the ecliptic plane

could be that of the obliquity of the ecliptic at that moment, for instance 40°. In the same

moment of ejection, the Moon’s orbit inclination related to the celestial equatorial frame (the

declination) would be almost null; also, at the beginning of the same ejection, the draconic

period and the synodic period could be about one terrestrial day.

After ejection, the Moon’s orbit (always around the Earth’s gravity centre) would leave the

celestial equatorial plane in incremental steps. Now, after a great geological period, due to Sun’s

attraction, its orbit’s inclination is about 5° related to the ecliptic plane, and not around 40° as

was supposed in the abstract approximation from the moment of ejection. Finally, currently,

the draconic period when Moon surrounds the ecliptic plane is 27,212221 days and its synodic

period is 29,530 589 days (6).

Meanwhile, the inclination of the celestial equatorial plane related to the ecliptic plane

diminished from that abstractly proposed value of 40°, to the actual obliquity of the ecliptic of

23,4°.

Briefly, if the Moon were ejected, then between its last quarter and its first quarter, under the

Sun’s stronger attraction, its elliptical orbit (around the Earth’s gravity centre) and its

eccentricity would be submitted to a continuous increase; another significant consequence

could be the secular diminution of the Moon’s orbit inclination related to the ecliptic plane.

ABOUT THE MOON’S NODAL POINT

In celestial mechanics, the intersections of Moon’s orbit with the ecliptic plane are the well- known, “lunar nodal points”; their retrogradation cause the principal periodical component in

the wobble of Earth’s rotation axis, namely the nutation period.

Supposing the Moon as an ejected body, it is of interest to verify if the retrogradation of the

lunar points is only a periodical phenomenon, or it also has a discreet secular component. For

this, the distance between two successive nodal points must be precisely known. Looking at an

interval of a century, the distance between the two nodal points in 1900.0 was 19°341162; in

2000.0, it was 19°341357, which proves there is a very real, small, but secular increase

component of 0,7 arcsec within the given timeframe (6).

Also, performing a simple analysis for values of others some precise periods regarding the

Earth-Moon dynamic for 1900.0 and 2000.0, a secular variation is also noticeable, all of which

have increased (6). For instance, all the important monthly periods, namely the synodic,

draconic, sideral, tropic, were augmented by 0.1 seconds from 1900.0 to 2000.0 (an

infinitesimal secular value indeed, but a tangible increase over a century).

Page 3 of 5

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 632

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 12, Issue 6, December-2024

It would be interesting to compare the values for the draconic, synodic, and sideral periods,

with those from past centuries, as they could be shorter.

Naturally, as the Moon’s orbit continued growing, each of its intersection with the ecliptic plane

could only come later and later, causing the phenomenon of retrogradation of nodal points (like

being in a station where a train passes with a circular trajectory and a passenger that is always

late manages to climb only in the following wagon, and never in the one occupied before, meaning

in a retrograded position).

At the moment of ejection, the draconic and the synodic period could have been around one

day; afterwards, as studies of fossils proved, due to the increase of the Moon’s orbit, the synodic

period became longer and the Moon always intersects ecliptic plane later and later.

SIMPLE QUESTIONS ARISE

Can it be concluded that the retrogradation of the lunar nodal points are caused by the secular

component in the Moon’s orbit inclination? Could it be that the retrogradation of the lunar

nodal points does not only have a 18,6 periodical component but also an infinitesimal secular

component?

ABOUT THE PRECESSION PHENOMENON

Creating a reference system of axes in the sky may be the most abstract achievement of the

human being. More than two millennia ago some people did it. They defined the ecliptic

reference system of axes and the equatorial reference system of axes and their intersection, the

equinox line; which then indicated an important reference point in the sky, the 5-magnitude

star, gamma Arietis, whose coordinates were obviously (0,0).

It is well known that this intersection of these two imaginary celestial reference planes was

supposed to be fixed until Hipparchus discovered a secular variation in its direction, namely,

the well-known phenomena of precession.

Consequently, now, the intersection indicates a celestial point near a faint 7-magnitude star in

the Pisces zodiacal constellation (7); also now, the ecliptically coordinates of gamma Arietis are

about +33 ° longitude and +7° latitude (using the catalogue for star position of 2000 (7)).

It is noticeable in the coordinates of gamma Arietis that the ecliptic longitude component is

greater, and the precession was first detected in the ecliptic longitude. Consequently, this

component is known as “the constant of precession”. Ptolemy (100-170 AD) gave us the value

of 38” for the yearly value of “the constant of precession” (8).

Supposing now the ecliptic reference frame as an inertial one; it must then be admitted that it

is the celestial equatorial reference axis which is moving, and imposes a variation in the

direction of the equinox line due to a change in the Earth’s equator position. The two reference

axes have the same origin, while each variation of their intersection is due to a rotation. As the

precession is a secular phenomenon it must also be caused by a secular component in the

Earth’s equator position change.