Page 1 of 19
European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 12, No. 6
Publication Date: December 25, 2024
DOI:10.14738/aivp.126.17983.
Ayala, Y. S. S (2024). Wellposedness of a Cauchy Problem Associated to the Even Order Equation. European Journal of Applied
Sciences, Vol - 12(6). 512-530.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
Wellposedness of a Cauchy Problem Associated to the Even Order
Equation
Yolanda Silvia Santiago Ayala
ORCID: 0000-0003-2516-0871
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos,
Fac. de Ciencias Matemáticas, Av. Venezuela Cda. 34 Lima-PERU
ABSTRACT
In this article we prove that the Cauchy problem associated to n-th order equation
in periodic Sobolev spaces is globally well posed when n is an even number
multiple of four. We do this in an intuitive way using Fourier theory and in a fine
version using semigroups theory. Finally, we demonstrate the dissipative property
of the Cauchy problem using differential calculus in Hper
s
.
Keywords: Semigroups theory, even order equation, existence of solution, dissipative
property, Periodic Sobolev spaces, Fourier Theory.
MSC 2010: 35G10, 35Q53, 47D06, 35B40
INTRODUCTION
We study the problem:
(P1): ∂tu + ∂x
nu = 0 in Hper
s−n
, with u(0) = φ ∈ Hper
s
,
considering s a real number, n is an even number multiple of four and denoting by Hper
s
to the
periodic Sobolev space. This problem was proposed in [9], specifically in remark 4.3. In [9],
the case n=3 was studied and some comments on the possibility of its generalization were
given.
Also we can cite [6], where we find some works related to the model (P1) coupled to
Kuramoto-Sivashinski equation, and [1] where our model is stated among the proposed
problems. In these additional references we have motivation to study the problem and
inspiration with the ideas we find there.
We also cite some works about existence by semigroups [2], [3], [4] and take support in some
results of [5].
Our article is organized as follows. In section 2, we indicate the methodology used and cite the
references used. In section 3, we prove that problem (P1) is well posed. Moreover, we
introduce a family of operators that form a semigroup of class C0 to state the result Theorem
3.3 and prove it in a fine version. In section 4, we study the dissipative property of the
homogeneous problem (P1) and applications. Finally, in section 5, we give the conclusions of
our study.
Page 2 of 19
513
Ayala, Y. S. S (2024). Wellposedness of a Cauchy Problem Associated to the Even Order Equation. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(6).
512-530.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.126.17983
METHODOLOGY
As a theorical framework in this article we use [6]. Also, we use the references [1], [8], [6] and
[7] for the Fourier theory in periodic Sobolev spaces, and differential and integral calculus in
Banach spaces.
THE PROBLEM (P1) IS WELL POSED
We prove that (P1) is well posed. Also, we introduce a family of operators that form a
semigroup of class Co, as we make it in Theorem 3.2. Finally, we state the Theorem 3.3 whose
content is a fine version of Theorem 3.1 based on the semigroup {S(t)}t≥0 .
Theorem 3.1
Let s a fixed real number, n an even number multiple of four and the problem
(P1) |
u ∈ C([0, ∞), Hper
s
)
∂tu + ∂x
nu = 0 ∈ Hper
s−n
u(0) = φ ∈ Hper
s
then (P1) is globally well posed, that is ∃! u ∈ C([0, ∞), Hper
s
) ∩ C
1
((0, ∞), Hper
s−n
) satisfying
equation (P1) so that the application : φ → u , which to every initial data φ assigns the solution u
of the IVP (P1), is continuous. That is, for φ and φ̃ initial data close in Hper
s
, their corresponding
solutions u and ũ respectively, are also close in the solution space.
Also,
ǁu(t) − ũ(t)ǁs ǁφ − φ̃ ǁs , ∀t ∈ [0, ∞)
and
supt∈[0,∞) ǁu(t) − ũ(t)ǁs = ǁφ − φ̃ ǁs .
Moreover, the solution u satisfies
u(t) ∈ Hper
r
, ∀t ∈ [0, ∞) , ∀r ≤ s
with
ǁu(t)ǁs ǁφǁs and ǁu(t)ǁr ≤ ǁφǁs , ∀r < s and t ∈ [0, ∞).
The application: φ → ∂tu, wich for every initial data φ assigns the derivative of solution u of the
IVP (P1) is continuous. That is, for φ and φ̃ initial data close in Hper
s
their corresponding ∂tu and
∂tũ , respectively, are also close in the solution space. Also, the following inequalities are verified
ǁ∂tu(t) − ∂tũ (t)ǁs−n ≤ ǁφ − φ̃ǁs, ∀t ∈ (0, ∞) ,
supt∈(0,∞), ǁ∂tu(t) − ∂tũ (t)ǁs−n ≤ ǁφ − φ̃ǁ.
Page 3 of 19
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 514
European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 12, Issue 6, December-2024
Moreover, ǁ∂tu(t)ǁs−n ≤ ǁφǁs, ∀t ∈ (0, ∞).
Proof:
We prove it in the following way.
1. First, we obtain the candidate to the solution. In order to get it we apply the Fourier
transformation to the equation
∂tu = −∂x
nu
and using (ik)
n = k
n
, ∀ k ∈ Z, we have
∂tû = −(ik)
nû
= −k
nû
which for every k is an ODE with initial data û(k, 0) = φ̂(k).
Thus, solving the IVP’s
(Ωk
) |
û ∈ C([0, ∞),ls
2
(Z))
∂tû(k,t) = −k
n û(k,t)
û(k, 0) = φ̂(k)
we obtain
û(k,t) = e
−k
ntφ̂(k),
from which we get our candidate to the solution:
u(t) = ∑ û(k,t)φk
+∞
k=−∞
= ∑ e
−k
ntφ̂(k)φk (3.1)
+∞
k=−∞
here we are denoting φk
(x) = e
ikx for xR.
2. Second, we prove:
u(t) ∈Hper
s
and ǁu(t)ǁs ǁφǁs (3.2)
In effect, let t ∈ (0,), φ ∈ Hper
s
, we have