Page 1 of 24

European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 12, No. 5

Publication Date: October 25, 2024

DOI:10.14738/aivp.125.17785.

Antonov A. A. (2024). Experimental Evidence for the Existence of Other Mutually Invisible Universes Neighboring Our Visible

Universe. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(5). 385-408.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Experimental Evidence for the Existence of Other Mutually

Invisible Universes Neighboring Our Visible Universe

Antonov A. A.

Independent researcher, Kiev, Ukraine

ABSTRACT

The article explains that the special theory of relativity (SRT), created in the early

twentieth century, which is an outstanding scientific achievement, was ahead of its

time, because science then lacked some of the knowledge necessary for its

creation - not used discrete mathematics, was not explained the physical meaning

of imaginary numbers, were not discovered dark matter and dark energy and in

space has not yet launched spacecraft WMAP, Planck and others. Therefore

absence of the mentioned knowledge was justifiably replaced by postulates. But

not everything was guessed. And present now in the version of SRT studied in all

physics textbooks, the postulate called the principle of non-exceeding the speed of

light turned out to be incorrect. Therefore the corrected version of SRT in which

this postulate is replaced by the experimentally proved principle of physical

reality of imaginary numbers is offered. In this corrected version of SRT also

offered a experimental proof of the existence of mutually invisible parallel

universes astronomical observations in portals invisible outside the portals of

constellations. And it is explained, why the principle of non-exceeding of speed of

light not disproved so far by physical experiments is incorrect.

Keywords: special theory of relativity, principle of non-exceeding the speed of light,

principle of physical reality of imaginary numbers, relativistic formulas, dark matter,

dark energy, universes, anti-universes, Multiverse, portals, anomalous zones.

INTRODUCTION

In the 20th century, physics, having changed the thousand-year-old tradition of creating

theories on the basis of reliable experiments, began to call hypotheses that were interesting

but not experimentally confirmed theories, including the special theory of relativity (SRT).

But what's even worse is that as a result of the struggle for survival, SRT was canonized - in

the community of relativistic physicists and in public opinion, a conviction was formed about

its infallibility, about the inadmissibility of its criticism and any subsequent corrections.

Therefore, for example, in the USSR it was forbidden to criticize the STR even three times - in

1934 by the decree of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)

on the discussion of relativism, in 1942 by the decree of the Presidium of the Academy of

Sciences of the Soviet Union on the theory of relativity and in 1964 by a secret decree of the

Presidium of the Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union, which prohibited any criticism of

Albert Einstein's theory. And reviewers of some good journals have now started writing in

their reviews "I will not allow criticism of Einstein".

Page 2 of 24

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 386

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 12, Issue 5, October-2024

Unfortunately, the ban on criticism of certain scientific theories is not a new phenomenon. For

example, Nikolai Copernicus, who spent 40 years in the 16th century creating the heliocentric

system of the world, wisely published his theory "On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres",

which refuted the geocentric system of the world of Claudius Ptolemy after his own death, not

wanting to end up in the Inquisition. And Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei, who carelessly

supported Copernicus' theory, had to deal with the Inquisition. Giordano Bruno was even

burned alive at the stake. Therefore, the corresponding to common sense process of creating

scientific theories by identifying in them as a result of experimental studies of certain

shortcomings and their subsequent correction was not always smooth.

And although created in the early XX century by Joseph Larmor [1], Nobel Prize winner

Hendrik Antoon Lorenz [2], Jules Henri Poincaré [3], Nobel Prize winner Albert Einstein [4]

and other outstanding scientists STR [5]-[7], rightly recognized as a great scientific

achievement, due to the lack of the necessary experimental knowledge at that time, which was

forced to be replaced by postulates, as it turned out in the 21st century, nevertheless turned

out to be incorrect [8]-[48], because:

• its relativistic formulas were incorrect;

• the relativistic formulas obtained in it were incorrectly explained using the incorrect

principle of non-exceeding the speed of light;

• from these incorrect relativistic formulas were made incorrect conclusions about

physical unreality of imaginary numbers discovered 400 years before the creation of

STO and about the existence in nature of our only visible universe, in which everything

is measured only by real numbers.

However, it continues to be studied all over the world today uncorrected in all educational

institutions, even the most prestigious ones.

UNSUCCESSFUL REFUTATIONS OF THE VERSION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY OF

RELATIVITY PRESENTED IN ALL PHYSICS TEXTBOOKS

Why? Let's figure out why it happened this way. The relativistic formulas obtained by the

creators of STR:

m = m0 /√1 − (

v

c

)]

2 (1)

Δt = Δt0√1 − (

v

c

)

2 (2)

l = l0√1 − (

v

c

)]

2 (3)

in which

m0

‒ rest mass of a moving body;

m ‒ relativistic mass of a moving body;

0 t ‒ rest time of a moving body;

t ‒ relativistic time of a moving body;

Page 3 of 24

387

Antonov A. A. (2024). Experimental Evidence for the Existence of Other Mutually Invisible Universes Neighboring Our Visible Universe. European

Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(5). 385-408.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.125.17785

0

l ‒ rest length of a moving body;

l ‒ relativistic length of a moving body;

v ‒ speed of motion of a body;

c ‒ speed of light;

were explainable only in the range of subluminal speeds v<c, in which the quantities m, t

and l took on values measured by real numbers. But in the range of superluminal speeds v>c

these quantities m, t

and l already took on values measured by imaginary numbers

discovered by Scipione Del Ferro, Niccolò Fontana Tartaglia, Gerolamo Cardano, Lodovico

Ferrari and Rafael Bombelli [49] 400 years before the creation of the STR, the physical

meaning of which, however, was not explained by them. But, perhaps, even earlier than them,

imaginary numbers were discovered by Paolo Valmes [50], who for this was burned alive at

the stake by the sentence of the mercilessly cruel inquisitor Thomas de Torquemada. Even

Isaac Newton1, in order to avoid trouble, preferred not to use imaginary numbers at that time.

The creators of the STR also did not know how to explain them. And the physical meaning of

imaginary numbers in physics textbooks has not been explained to this day. Moreover, the

graph of the function m(v) in the range of velocities v>c (see Fig. 1a) corresponds to a

physically unstable process that cannot exist in nature at all.

Figure 1: Graphs of functions

m( v ), t( v )

and

l( v )

corresponding to the existing and the

corrected versions of the STR in the subluminal

v  c

and superluminal

v  c

ranges

But such a theory, which even its creators could not explain, was naturally of no use to

anyone. And therefore, at that time, a postulate called the principle of not exceeding the speed

of light was justifiably introduced into the STR, the essence of which is clear from its name.

1 And his friend William Whitson, in an atmosphere of the omnipotence of the Inquisition, was stripped of his

professorship and expelled from Oxford University for some of his careless statements.