Page 1 of 8

European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 12, No. 6

Publication Date: December 25, 2024

DOI:10.14738/aivp.126.17769.

Ouedraogo, P. A., Tignegre, J.-B., Traore, F., Batieno, B. J., Ouedraogo, T. Y., Bama, H., & Ouedraogo, J. T. (2024). Identification of

Two Aphids’ (Aphis craccivora Koch) Biotypes Prevailing in Three Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp.) Growing Areas in

Burkina Faso. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(6). 251-258.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Identification of Two Aphids’ (Aphis craccivora Koch) Biotypes

Prevailing in Three Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp.)

Growing Areas in Burkina Faso

Adélaïde P. Ouédraogo

ORCID: 0000-0001-7718-9583

National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research (CNRST),

Burkina Faso

Jean-Baptiste Tignegre

National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research (CNRST),

Burkina Faso and African Agricultural Technology Foundation (AATF),

Nigeria

Fousseni Traore

National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research (CNRST),

Burkina Faso

Benoit J. Batieno

ORCID: 0000-0002-4156-7287

National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research (CNRST),

Burkina Faso

Theodore Y. Ouedraogo

National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research (CNRST),

Burkina Faso

Herve Bama

National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research (CNRST),

Burkina Faso

Jeremy T. Ouedraogo

National Centre for Scientific and Technological Research (CNRST),

Burkina Faso

ABSTRACT

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp.) is a plant-based protein crop with high

nutritional value but highly susceptible to insect pests, particularly aphids (Aphis

craccivora Koch). Aphids can destroy 80 to 100% of cowpea farms and also

transmit viral diseases like cowpea mosaic virus, significantly reducing yields.

This study aimed to investigate the evolution of aphid infestations from three

cowpea-growing locations of Burkina Faso (Bobo, Kamboinsé, and Pobé) and

identify the prevailing aphid biotypes. Therefore, ten varieties were screened with

three aphids’ strains from these locations. A randomized complete block design

Page 2 of 8

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 252

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 12, Issue 6, December-2024

with three (3) blocks and five (5) repetitions each was used. The number of leaves

per plant, the survival of individual plant and the degree of infestation were

evaluated. Results revealed that the degree of infestation used as a criterion for

evaluating cowpea resistance to aphids is just as reliable during the early stages of

plants development as during the following stages. Two biotypes of aphids have

been identified. Indeed, the Kamboinse strain is similar to that of Pobé and these

two strains are significantly different from the strain of Bobo. The close

relationship between the 2 biotypes suggests the possibility to develop varieties

strong enough to resist to both of them. A molecular characterization of the three

aphids’ strains would provide more precision on the genetics of the two aphides’

biotypes.

Keywords: Vigna unguiculata, Aphis craccivora, biotypes.

INTRODUCTION

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp.) is a protein-producing plant with high nutritional

value but very prone to insect attacks. With a protein content of over 25% (Boukar et al.,

2011), the crop is an alternative to animal-based proteins (Gil et al., 2024) and supplements

the nutritional intake of low-protein dishes such as those based on cereals and tubers.

Cowpea adapts well to different types of soils, tolerates drought and can be used to improve

soil fertility.

Although Burkina ranks third in the world in terms of production (FAOSTAT, 2020), yields

remain low. The major biotic stress affecting cowpea yields concerns harmful insects,

including aphids(Aphis craccivora Koch), which can destroy 80 to 100% of cowpea farms

(Singh and Jackai 1985). Aphids can also transmit viral diseases, such as cowpea mosaic virus

(CBMV), which significantly reduces cowpea yield in farmers’ fields (Aliyu et al., 2023).

Additionally, aphids honeydew induce sooty molds grow on leaves and hinder the

photosynthetic activities of plants (Guo et al., 2022). With their high reproductive potential

and their phenotypic plasticity, aphids are among the most destructive legume insect pests in

the world (Wongsa et al. 2017; Guo et al. 2022). Therefore, controlling these phytophagous

insects is a factor in increasing yields. And, to achieve this, the use of resistant cultivars is the

cheapest and most effective way (Nualsri et al. 2012). However, although the development

and deployment of aphid-resistant cowpea cultivars is an environmentally friendly way to

combat this pest, its effectiveness depends on the stability of the resistance. Hence the need to

know the biotypes that evolve in the growing areas. The general objective of this study is to

contribute to improving cowpea yields through a better knowledge of the aphid biotypes

prevailing in cowpea growing areas in Burkina Faso. In order to achieve this, two specific

objectives have been identified: (i) investigate the evolution of the infestation of 3 strains of

aphids from 3 cowpea growing areas, (ii) identify aphids’ biotypes prevailing in these three

growing areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The activity was carried out at the Institute of Environment and Agricultural Research

(INERA), which is one of the four institutes of the National Centre for Scientific and

Technological Research (CNRST). The different strains of aphids harvested were reared at the

Laboratory of Entomology and the screening were carried out at the Genetics and

Page 3 of 8

253

Ouedraogo, P. A., Tignegre, J.-B., Traore, F., Batieno, B. J., Ouedraogo, T. Y., Bama, H., & Ouedraogo, J. T. (2024). Identification of Two Aphids’

(Aphis craccivora Koch) Biotypes Prevailing in Three Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp.) Growing Areas in Burkina Faso. European Journal of

Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(6). 251-258.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.126.17769

Biotechnology laboratory based at the Environmental, Agricultural Research and Training

Centre (CREAF) of Kamboinsé. The geographical coordinates of the research station are 12°28

North latitude, 1°32 West longitude and 296 meters above sea level.

Three strains of aphids harvested on cowpea plants in the West (Bobo), the Centre

(Kamboinsé), and the North (Pobé) of Burkina Faso located in the three different

agroecological zones were used for screening. The aphids were harvested in August 2013 and

kept on the variety KVx396-4-5-2D for maintaining and rearing.

A no-choice settling test had been performed. Thusly, the plants remained under infestation

for the duration of the test as described by Ouédraogo et al. (2018). A randomized complete

block design with three (3) blocks and five (5) repetitions each was used. Seven-days-old

individual plants were screened. In each block cowpea plants were infested with only one of

the three (3) strains of aphids.

Observations were made every three days and consisted of measuring: • The number of

leaves; • The survival of individual plants; • The degree of infestation by counting aphid

individuals using six scores ranging from 0 to 5: (0 = no aphids, 1 = 1 to 5 aphids, 2 = 5 to 20

aphids, 3 = 20 to 100 aphids, 4 = 100 to 500 aphids, 5 = + 500 aphids).

Raw data of one month after infestation, 20 DAS (Days After Sowing), 35 DAS, 50 DAS and 65

DAS were used for analyses. XLSTAT 7.1 and R version 4.2.3 ( R Core Team, 2023) were used

to compute the data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Trend of Aphids’ Strains After Infestation

The evolution of aphids’ infestation from the day of infestation to 65 days after sowing is

displayed in Figure 1. For all the three aphids’ strains an exponential increase of the number

of aphids is observed from the day of infestation up to 20 days (DAS) after sowing. From 20

DAS to 65 DAS a slight and constant increase in the number of aphids is observed. This result

suggests that cowpea, throughout its life cycle, can be a host plant for aphids if they have no

alternative. It also shows that the degree of infestation used as a criterion for evaluating

resistance is just as reliable during the early stages of the plant development as during the

following stages. such method for evaluating cowpea resistance to aphids at the early stage

has already been used by Ombakho et al. (1987) and Kim et al. (2008). The method consisted

of infesting three-day-old plants and evaluating the resistance of each variety ten days after

infestation. The advantage of evaluating resistance at the early stage is that it is faster and less

expensive. Aphids can colonize cowpea crops at early stage. In fact, aphids (alatae) disperse

soon after the rains start, and has been observed to have already colonized the cowpea crops

as early as 3 weeks after germination (Ofuya, 1991). It is this ability to rapidly exploit the

ephemeral habitats that make aphids serious pests. This ability results from their high

reproductive potential, their dispersal abilities and their adaptability to local survival

(Dedryver et al. 2010). Results also show that the multiplication of the Bobo aphids’ strain is

faster than those of Kamboinse and Pobe. This suggests the presence of at least two biotypes.

Niassy et al. (1987) reported variable responses in the fecundity and honeydew production of

two distinct biotypes of Schizaphis graminum (the wheat aphid) on wheat genotypes. Aphid