Page 1 of 3
European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 12, No. 4
Publication Date: August 25, 2024
DOI:10.14738/aivp.124.17343.
Gurevitz, M. (2024). The Unimaginable Conversion of Paradise into Hell. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(4). 238-
240.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
The Unimaginable Conversion of Paradise into Hell
Michael Gurevitz
Department of Plant Molecular Biology and Ecology
George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University
Ramat Aviv 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel
PARADISE AND HELL
Our cognitive perception of ׳Paradise׳ usually portrays an attractive heavenly garden, ‘Eden’,
where Adam and Eve were created (ref. 1). Quite the opposite is our imaginary picture of
‘Hell’, a concept raised at early Christianity, describing an afterlife world of punishment in
flames of those being evil or living in sin during their life time. Both imaginary pictures are
shaped in our mind mostly by famous paintings and descriptions of religious preachers
threatening their ׳sheep׳ during prayers or other religious rituals (refs. 2,3). So, engraved in
human minds are these imaginations that upon visiting a fascinating place (e.g., seashore with
Palm trees and a nearby forest, colorful flowers and a small water stream), people tend to call
it ‘Paradise-like’, whereas a dry volcanic place with bubbly lava, no grass and poisonous
vapors resembles Hell. These two cognitive concepts are common to people of all religions
and ethnic origin due likely to thousands of years of conviction, mostly by sanctified
mediators (e.g., Priests, Imams, Rabbis). Astoundingly, religious people tend to consider
Paradise and Hell in a simplistic, almost realistic way, and are therefore worried about their
afterlife destination. Free-minded people, however, consider Paradise and Hell as conceptual
metaphors, part of the ‘reward and punishment’ discernment. The Paradise metaphor applies
to a wonderful place that meets our dreams, whereas the Hell metaphor describes torture,
pain, and despair. From a historic viewpoint, prior to the overpopulation of Earth and
pressurized industrial control over human life, many terrestrial natural regions could be
considered Paradise-like areas. However, as humanity populated almost every terrestrial
nich, destroyed forests, contaminated the environment, exterminated many speci, overused
most resources, and fought over control and dissemination of primitive ideas and beliefs,
most Paradise-like places have disappeared while fears, bloodshed, destruction, despair (Hell- like reality) have prevailed and became a daily reality (ref. 4). Interestingly, although the
metaphoric perception of Paradise and Hell sounds better to rational people, the simplistic
belief in these afterlife worlds by a large portion of humanity is intriguing, raising
uncertainties about the ‘advanced level of their cognition’.
ADVANCEMENT OF HUMAN COGNITION IS LIMITED BY RELIGIOUS CONCEPTIONS AND
PREJUDICE IDEAS
Despite the high self-esteem of humanity, there is a clear contradiction between the cognition
level of technologically-oriented minds (e.g., scientists, physicians) and that of religious
prejudiced minds, who ignore proven facts about the creation and age of Earth, as well as the
evolutionary process that raised Homo sapiens. This vast difference in cognitive perception
and leaning of so many people on mythic, irrational legends arose due likely to spiritual needs
and fears of death and the unknown. Not only that such a difference in cognitive perception
limits the practical as well as spiritual development of humanity, it provokes disputes, hatred,
Page 2 of 3
239
Gurevitz, M. (2024). The Unimaginable Conversion of Paradise into Hell. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(4). 238-240.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.124.17343
and aggression that distract our mind from the upcoming global risks. Unfortunately, a large
portion of humanity, particularly the religious fraction, is either apathic or skeptic about these
dangers and so they ignore warnings like that of Stephen Hawking, who suggested prior to his
passing away to expedite the scientific research aiming to develop means for intergalactic
travel to evacuate humanity to another life-supporting planet. The religious sector belives
that ‘God’ would save them in times of need, a belief, that could be tolerated much earlier in
human history, but not in the 21st century.
EXPECTATIONS
Although planet Earth is expected to last millions of years, the probability of a cosmic
catastrophe (e.g., hit by a large asteroid; detrimental irradiation wave; shift from orbit; some
damage to the Moon; a black hole effect), or some environmental disaster (e.g., gigantic
Vulcanic eruption; ice melting and flood), or a human-evoked tragedy (e.g., nuclear world
war; incurable microbial pandemic; extreme alterations in climax) may surprise us much
earlier (ref. 4). To minimize such global dangers, rational people are expected to actively
reduce the risk factors (e.g., remove from chair ignorant leaders whose personal and national
aspirations endanger the world; minimize the contamination of the environment; reduce the
green-house effect; stop developing risky biological warfare). Since very little was done thus
far, humanity is clearly stepping toward self-destruction (refs. 5,6). Under such increasing
pressures, it is time to consider (a) the suggestion of leading scientists to expedite the search
for another life-supporting planet enabling evacuation of humanity from the deteriorating
Earth; (b) take immediate measures to minimize the religious influence on our life and unite
all nations in a common project aiming at preservation of our species as well as protect
nature. The irrational belief of the religious sector that some divine power (‘God’) would save
humanity in times of need is obviously ‘utter nonsense’ and so the only way of minimizing the
dangers to humanity must get rid of all nuclear reservoirs; abort all efforts to create vicious
micro organismic weapons; prevent the industrial spills leading to climax changes and
greenhouse effect; and stop all environmental contaminations, while repairing damaged
habitats, mainly forests and sea plankton required for photosynthesis. In addition, all
advanced physical efforts that may risk our existence, like exploring the interaction of matter
with anti-matter should stop before a possible provocation by mistake of a disastrous
outcome. The energy requirements should instead be compensated by natural resources like
sunlight, wind, sea-waves, waterfalls, heat gradients or other safer means. All military
disputes must cease and the arms race between superpowers eliminated. Notably, fulfillment
of all these conditions do not guaranty secure future for humanity, but still may provide ample
time to figure out ways of colonizing other life-supporting planets (following S. Hawking
suggestion). Evidently, we should give up some unrealistic aspirations and understand that
the ‘experiment’ (if any) of developing a clever, highly cognitive super species (Homo sapiens),
within a relatively short galactic period, was unsuccessful.
IS THERE HOPE?
Clearly, as humanity advances technologically, its negative influences on Earth intensify. Since
people cannot settle down their endless fights over territories, resources, power and religion
(ref. 5), and despite the progress in various aspects of life, the survival prospects of humanity
are seemingly at descent, not to mention the possibility of a putative cosmic catastrophe (ref.
6). Rather than establishing a firm set of international rules to limit the human-directed
Page 3 of 3
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 240
European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 12, Issue 4, August-2024
destruction of Earth, most attention is still being focused on daily needs, over-exploitation of
natural resources, continuous contamination of the environment, development of means for
mass destruction (refs. 4,7) accompanying loss of important ethical values (homo homini
lupus). Ignorant, quite primitive (even insane), leaders keep their power and control over
suffering populations, while threatening the rest of the world (ref. 8) and offering an insecure
reality and future. Within this messy situation, the continued religious control over
approximately half of the world population, just pours oil on the growing flame. The public
conviction about ‘Paradise’ and ‘Hell’ is just one example of the irrelevance of the religious
conviction. In using Axel Munthe’s last sentence in his book ‘The story of San Michele’, I allow
myself to declare that it would be a shocking surprise to find myself after death in either
‘Paradise’ or ‘Hell’. Furthermore, if we consider the rise of humanity as an experimental
exercise planned by either ‘God’ or some extraterrestrial civilization (refs. 9,10), the
upcoming results of this experiment do not seem promising (ref. 11), and so the concepts of
‘Paradize’ and ‘Hell’ might remain a temporary memory or completely disappear from the
galactic history.
References
1. Bible, Book of Genesis, Chapter 2.
2. Gurevitz, M. (2022) Religion - a sophisticated strategy to gain control over the masses. Annal. Depress.
Anxiety, 9(1), 1115.
3. Gurevitz, M. (2023) The creation of God in the mind of mankind - a spiritual need or hiding in a cave. Eur. J.
Appl. Sci., 11(6), 145.
4. Gurevitz, M. (2022) Has humanity reached the stationary phase of its growth curve? Eur. J. App. Sci., 10(5),
169.
5. Gurevitz, M. (2021) Self-extinction on verge - an illogical reality. Intern. J. BioMed. Res., 1, 1.
6. Gurevitz, M. (2023) Giant asteroid or nuclear winter - a 2023 menu. Eur. J. Appl. Sci., 11(1), 40.
7. Gurevitz, M. (2022) Reputed intentions behind the Corona outbreak. J. BioMed. Sci., 4(2), 1792.
8. Gurevitz, M. (2023) Leaders nearing the end of their career may endanger humanity. Eur. J. Appl. Sci., 1(5),
366.
9. Vonnegut, K. (1959) The Sirens of Titan.
10. Hoyle, F. & Wickramasinghe, C. (1982) Evolution from space: A theory of cosmic creationism. Simon and
Schuster, Publ., The University of Michigan.
11. Gurevitz, M. (2023) The rise and fall of Homo sapiens. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. & Res., 18(1), 867.