Page 2 of 27

173

Kuka, M. & Panovski, M. (2023). Causal Connection of Macro and Micro Systems in Function of Spatial: Temporal Resonance. European Journal of

Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(6). 172-198.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.116.15972

their hidden meaning through the causal symbolic method. The scientist or the

artist act in the capacity of translator of that universal analogy. In this work, we

shall describe methodologically the phenomena that, according to our knowledge,

are in stable causal relationships, which official science does not accept yet. By

understanding these phenomena in their stable causal relationships, modern

science would take a big step in its future development.

Keywords: Natural laws, causal relations, space and time, action and reaction,

synchronicity, The Kuka - Panovsky Resonance, anticipation

INTRODUCTION

The most important characteristic of the contemporary society is perpetual change.

Appreciating the occurrence of the information revolution, developed countries are

abandoning the concept of industrialization and turning to servicing activities. Contemporary

society is transforming into a postmodern one, which increasingly doubts the previous

scientific explanations. However, the imposed social circumstances did not change the

differences in the definition of scientific knowledge in relation to the other forms of the

acquired knowledge. In their several published scientific works and media appearances, the

authors described the trichotomy of scientific religious and common sense (laic) knowledge in

following manner:

"We consider a science the developmental system of true knowledge (theorems, hypotheses,

theories, laws...) about the world, which are reached by applying certain methods, consciously

or unconsciously, starting from a certain philosophical theory and world point of view. Science

is more general term than theory, because every science includes a number of theories with

which it interprets the results of research in its field: 1) Physics contains the quantum theory

and the theory of relativity as its fundamental theories, 2) Biology contains Darwin's, Morgan's,

Weismann’s and the other theories, 3) Philosophy contains pragmatism, existentialism,

phenomenology and the other philosophical theories, which develop philosophical sciences

such as logic, ethics, aesthetics, etc. Scientific knowledge was preceded by religious and

common sense knowledge that still exists today.

Religious knowledge has its roots in human practice. It does not come from experience, but it

is the fruit of divine revelation. Religious truths or dogmas (from the Greek dogma, meaning

thought) were declared to the chosen ones (Moses, Jesus, Muhammad...), thus are considered

eternal and immutable. This means that religious dogmas (about the divine origin of man, about

the immortality of the soul, about the Last Judgment...) even if they can be properly presented

as scientific knowledge and proven in some way, are not scientific knowledge, because their

accuracy cannot be objectively verified and one can only either believe in them or not believe

in them.

Common sense (laic) knowledge is the practical knowledge of a person, which has acquired

in the process of his life experience and which theoretically serves him to direct successfully

his practical activities. This knowledge comes from practical experience and allows us to

interpret phenomena and predict their course with some success. Thus, the practice of melting

and processing metals, treating people and animals... centuries before the advent of science was

Page 3 of 27

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 174

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 11, Issue 6, December-2023

based on common sense knowledge. However, the shortcomings of these knowledge is that

they are unverified, unreliable, full of prejudices and their successful application is limited by

their one-sidedness, resulting from the fact that they are derived from the limited practice of

individuals and social groups (e.g. the common sense understanding is: The sun rises in the East

and sets in the West, i.e. the Sun revolves around the Earth). If we compare the statements that

we consider correct based on common sense, we will see that there are also those that are

mutually excluding: for some, based on common sense, the position about the existence of God

is correct, and for others, it is the position about his non-existence. Due to these shortcomings

of common sense knowledge, our activity cannot rely on them, but needs to be guided by higher

forms of knowledge, i.e. Scientific Knowledge, characterized by objective truth, and thus a high

degree of successful application in practice, forecasting and changing the course of events. In

order to achieve this, each science has a specific object of its study. According to subjects, which

make up certain areas of reality, science is divided into five large groups: 1) Mathematical, 2)

Natural (physics, chemistry, biology...), 3) Psychological, 4)Social (political economy, pedagogy,

history, sociology...), 5) Philosophical.

Depending on its subject, each science has its own specific method, i.e. ways to reach the truth.

According to the general method, scientific work is characterized by

1. Use of precise and understandable language, i.e. communicability (French

communication, communication, connection). Scientific language is not a language of

images and stylistic figures like the language of literature where the one can say: “The

Sun breaks through the rain clouds that come from afar." Scientific language is the

opposite of religious language, which poetically expresses dogmas in order to evoke

religious feelings: "And God created a man in his own image." Additionally, scientific

language differs from the imprecise laic language of colloquial, daily communication

among people, which is often used by comedians due to its inaccuracy and ambiguity

(e.g. "Kill, don't pardon" or "Kill don't, pardon", gives a completely different meaning

depending on the place of the comma in a sentence). In science, every word must have a

precise meaning, which is why so-called words are created and then developed scientific

terms (Latin terminus means word, and Greek logos means thought, science).

2. Science is characterized by accuracy (exactness) in establishing the truth about the

world, which means that every scientific truth must be objectively verifiable and

theoretically proven, which the case with other types of knowledge is not necessarily.

As soon as new facts are discovered that correct previously valid truths, the scientist is

obliged to adopt them, and this is consisted of the scientific principle of criticism. Thus,

the truth of the Christian attitude according to which Jesus "will come again with glory

to judge the living and the dead..." it cannot be objectively verified or theoretically

proven, therefore, it does not belong to science, and that attitude can only be believed

or not believed. But science can reject this position as an untrue in an indirect way, with

the premise of the non-existence of God and the divine nature of Jesus, proving that no

man was resurrected after death and from there to drive the conclusion that this cannot

be expected from Jesus either. If the religious knowledge was interpreted

philosophically, then it could be argued that God gave man a mind (wisdom) in order to

understand God's work, and not the Creator, who is unknowable to the human mind. For

example, looking at a built bridge, the meaning is in understanding how that building