Page 2 of 9
15
Shehata, A. B., AlAskar, A. R., Aldosari, R. A., & AlMutairi, F. R. (2023). Characterization of the Calibration Results of Glass Electrode pH-Meters Using
Buffer Solutions Certified by Different Producers. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(6). 14-22.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.116.15791
routine pH-meters. In this work, the performance of certified buffer solutions of pH4, 7 and 10
produced by the Saudi National Metrology Institute, SASO/NMCC [10] has been verified with
regard to three sets of certified buffer solutions of pH 4, 7, and 10 produced by the Slovak
National Metrology Institute, SMU. This has been carried out by multipoint calibration of four
pH-meters. The calibration results of each pH-meter were characterized by studying the
compatibility of calibration results with the certified pH values (4, 7 and 10), bias, residuals,
and the regression of pH mean values. By this study, performance of the SASO/NMCC buffer
solutions were verified by showing similar calibration results of the three SMU buffer solutions.
Evaluation of the calibration results has been carried out in accordance with the relevant
international standards [11, 12].
EXPERIMENTAL
The 4 pH-meters with glass electrodes which were calibrated are:1) ion meter 3345, Jenway,
UK, 2), ion meter 3520, Jenway, UK, Multi 9420 Willis Towers Watson (wtw) and Mittler Toledo,
Switzerland. The pH values and their uncertainties of the four sets of CRM buffer solutions used
for calibration are shown in table below.
SMU CRM 1 SMU CRM 2 SMU CRM 3 SASO/NMCC CRM
4.002±0.020
7.001±0.020
10.000±0.020
4.002±0.020
6.999±0.020
10.001±0.020
3.999±0.020
7.006±0.020
9.998±0.020
4.001±0.019
7.005±0.015
10.002±0.023
The calibration of the 4 pH-meters was performed at 25°C using an ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory- accredited procedure.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Examining Traceability of the Calibration Results of the 4 pH-meters
The traceability of measurement results can be achieved by a chain of calibrations each is
associated by an uncertainty of measurements. Calibration is defined as: operation that, under
specified conditions, in a first step, establishes a relation between the quantity values with
measurement uncertainties provided by measurement standards and corresponding
indications with associated measurement uncertainties and, in a second step, uses this
information to establish a relation for obtaining a measurement result from an indication [13].
Figure 1 shows the calibration curves of the four different pH-meters. Three of them were
calibrated by the SMU sets of buffer solutions of pH 4, 7 and 10. The fourth pH-meter was
calibrated by the SASO/NMCC buffers.
y = 0.9973x + 0.0184
R2 = 1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Response
CRM pH
y = 1.0088x - 0.0472
R2 = 1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Response
CRM pH
SMU buffer
2
SMU buffer 1
Page 3 of 9
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 16
European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 11, Issue 6, December-2023
Figure 1: The calibration graphs of 4 pH-meters calibrated by 4 sets of CRM buffer solutions
From this figure, one can notice that the four curves showed different slopes and intercepts
which is normal because of the random errors. They also showed R2 of approximately 1,
indicating good linearity of the calibration results. The variation of the slopes and intercepts
can be owed to the different sensitivities of the glass electrodes. The metrological traceability
of these calibration results was assured by fulfilling the criterion shown in equation 1 [12,14].
(1)
Tables 1-4 show the calculations required by this criterion. From these tables, it is clear that
the numerator │xobs-xref│ is smaller than the denominator 2 √(uobs)2 + (uref)2. This means that
the calibration results of the 4 pH-meters meet the aforementioned criterion, and confirms the
equivalence of the SASO/NMCC buffer solutions to the SMU buffers.
Table 1: Compatibility of the calibration results of pH-meter 1 with the CRM pH of SMU 1
pH xobs xref xobs - xref uobs uref
pH4 4.010 4.002 0.008 0.011 0.010 0.030
pH7 7.000 7.000 0.000 0.013 0.010 0.033
pH10 9.991 10.000 -0.009 0.015 0.010 0.036
Table 2: Compatibility of the calibration results of pH-meter 2 with the CRM pH of SMU 2
pH xobs xref xobs - xref uobs uref
pH4 3.999 4.002 -0.003 0.016 0.010 0.038
pH7 7.01 6.999 0.011 0.023 0.010 0.050
pH10 10.042 10.001 0.041 0.031 0.010 0.065
Table 3: Compatibility of the calibration results of pH-meter 3 with the CRM pH of SMU 3
pH xobs xref xobs - xref uobs uref
pH4 3.995 3.999 -0.004 0.014 0.010 0.034
pH7 7.008 7.006 0.002 0.018 0.010 0.041
pH10 9.994 9.998 -0.004 0.023 0.010 0.050
Table 4: Compatibility of the calibration results of pH-meter 4 with the CRM pH of SASO/NMCC
y = 0.9973x + 0.0184
R2 = 1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Response
CRM pH
y = 1.0015x - 0.0121
R2 = 1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Response
CRM pH
SASO/NMCC buffer
( ) ( ) 2 2
2 obs ref x obs x ref xx u u - £ +
( ) ( ) 2 2
2 u u x obs x ref +
( ) ( ) 2 2
2 u u x obs x ref +
( ) ( ) 2 2
2 u u x obs x ref +
SMU buffer 3