Page 1 of 20
European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 11, No. 5
Publication Date: October 25, 2023
DOI:10.14738/aivp.115.15726
Buertey, J. I. T., Doe, D. A., Atsrim, F., & Sarfo, F. (2023). Managing Construction Project Constraints: Towards an Integrated Risk
Management Hub for Efficient Project Delivery. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(5). 373-392.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
Managing Construction Project Constraints: Towards an
Integrated Risk Management Hub for Efficient Project Delivery
Joseph Ignatius Teye Buertey
Department of Built Environment,
Pentecost University College, P. O. Box KN1739, Accra, Ghana
David Amedegbe Doe
Department of Building Technology, Accra Technical University
Felix Atsrim
Department of Built Environment,
Pentecost University College, P. O. Box KN1739, Accra, Ghana
Francis Sarfo
School of Engineering,
Accra Institute of Technology, Private Mail Bag, Accra, Ghana
ABSTRACT
Construction plays a key role as an economic booster in every economy across the
globe. Construction projects globally are however plagued by the challenge of
systemic risk associated with the project constraints. These varying risks are either
overlooked or taken for granted by most project professionals. This research
sought to explore project professionals' perceptions of risk management and
examine the extent to which they are integrated into the various processes of
construction project management in Ghana. As a quantitative based study,
structured questionnaires distributed to the built environment received a response
rate of 81%. The data obtained was analysed, using univariate statistical analysis.
It was established from the survey that 73% of the respondents did not undertake
risk identification and profiling at the initiation stage of the project. It can therefore
be held that the concept of risk management being an integral aspect of project
planning has therefore not caught up well with the project teams. It was therefore
not surprising that even though 81% of the projects included a risk management
plan, over 47% of risks unforeseen surfaced during the execution stage. This
undoubtedly shows the reason why 91.1% of the projects experienced varying
forms of risk during the execution stage. The study again revealed that even though
most government-awarded projects (86%) have the challenge of meeting the key
project objectives due to scope creep, resulting in schedule overruns and delays in
interim payment, most project participants were more particular about delivering
the project within budget and governments honoring their payment on time.
Although most respondents were aware of the possibility of risk management on
the project, the systematic knowledge of managing risk and the forthright
application of risk management techniques on construction projects was lacking.
This study therefore proposed an all-inclusive risk objective management
framework woven around risk education, integration of risk management
Page 2 of 20
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 374
European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 11, Issue 5, October-2023
techniques and broader stakeholder consultation on the subject of risk to equip
industry professionals on the subject for the successful delivery of projects.
Keywords: risk management, risk tools, risk management phases, deliverables, cost,
schedule
INTRODUCTION
Construction globally is the largest contributor to the GDP of most economies. Construction
ranks number two in the amount of economic activity contributed to the gross national product
(GNP) of the United States. The construction industry is a vital element of every economy and
has a significant effect on the efficiency and productivity of other industry sectors. One cannot
think of widespread investment in manufacturing, agriculture, or service sectors unless
construction results of infrastructure facilities are in place. In most developing countries, the
growth rate of construction activity surpasses that of population and the GDP [1]. However,
cost overrun, scheduling slippage and low quality are very common phenomena, and the
majority of projects in the construction industry face these problems. The most common is the
cost overrun where the variance between the final and the baseline cost estimates are widely
negative usually due to scope creep or failure to promptly honor payment by constructional [2].
The reason for these varying phenomena is that construction projects are usually characterized
by many varying risks that need a critical watch. The ability of the project team to manage these
risks throughout the construction process is an important and central element in preventing
unwanted consequences and thereby positioning firms strategically amongst contemporary
competitors in the construction industry. In this study, risk is placed as the hub for managing
construction projects where surprises take place, things happen, and important decisions are
taken. Similarly, risk management is also decisive for achieving a good final result with security
within the economy of every company [3]. Risk is intrinsic in construction projects and has
traces in all the construction phases.
Risk can be postulated as an uncertain event or condition that has a positive or negative effect
on one or more project objectives (scope, schedule, cost and quality) when it occurs [2]. The
objective of risk management is to increase the probability of positive events and decrease the
probability and impact of negative events in the project. Amid the current economic slowdown
and difficulties in raising funds, putting further strain on both the private and the public capital
project owners, there is a clear consensus that organisations will reap benefits by managing
their construction projects in a coordinated manner, using a structured risk management
framework. It is therefore research justifiable that this study seeks an integrated, tailored and
dynamic risk management strategy that hinges “all-inclusive risk-objective” framework to
maximize the achievement of proportionalities through enhancing positive likelihood events
for achieving construction project objectives of scope, cost, schedule and quality.
EMPIRICAL REVIEW
The PMI [2] defines a project as a temporary endeavour undertaken to create a unique product,
service, or result. [4] states that a project is a unique endeavour, to produce a set of deliverables
within clearly specified time, cost, and quality constraints. The PMI emphasizes the
temporariness of the project to indicate a definite beginning and end. Projects are subdivided
into phases where extra control is needed to effectively manage the completion of a major