Page 1 of 14

European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 11, No. 5

Publication Date: October 25, 2023

DOI:10.14738/aivp.115.15723

Salminen-Tuomaala, M. (2023). What Factors Affect the Attractiveness of Nursing Education-Nurse Teachers’ Experiences.

European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(5). 352-365.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

What Factors Affect the Attractiveness of Nursing Education- Nurse Teachers’ Experiences

Mari Salminen-Tuomaala

Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences,

Health Care and Social Work, Finland

ABSTRACT

Effective measures are required to mitigate the persisting nursing staff shortage. As

the number of applicants for nursing education is decreasing, it is important to

identify factors which can make the profession more appealing. This qualitative,

observational, cross-sectional study brings in the nurse teachers’ perspective. It

presents nurse teachers’ perceptions of factors that influence the attractiveness of

nursing profession to potential recruits. Data was collected through online essays

in May 2023 from 22 nurse teachers at a University of Applied Sciences in Finland.

As in earlier studies with nurses, nurse students and nurse managers, the

importance of improving the working conditions and promoting the general

appreciation of nursing and nursing education was emphasized. The teachers

appealed to nursing unions to speak for the importance of the profession in society

rather than emphasize the poor pay and stressful working conditions. The

participants also suggested improving the quality of teaching through evidence- based knowledge, individualized support, multiple modes of learning and effective

teamwork between teachers. Concern was raised over the quality of the clinical

training; finding clinical placements had been harder and clinical supervisors

overburdened.

Keywords: (4-6) Attractiveness, Experience, Nursing Education

INTRODUCTION

Effective measures are required across the world to mitigate the persisting nursing staff

shortage [1-3]. According to the International Council of Nurses, 13 million more nurses may

be needed by the year 2030 worldwide [3, 4]. Among the causes of the shortage are the ageing

of the population and of the workforce, a skewed work-life balance and decreased work

satisfaction among nursing professionals. Further frequently cited background factors involve

poor pay and working conditions, increased workload [1] and, most recently, the burden

imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic [5].

The decreasing number of applicants for nursing courses increases the need to attract and

retain nurses in the workforce [6]. Further research is required to examine what factors

influence the attractiveness of the nursing profession [7, 8]. This study, conducted in Finland,

presents nurse teachers’ perceptions of the topic. Until now, there has been little research on

the teachers’ perspective. The information produced can contribute to the body of information

that can be used to make the nursing profession more appealing to potential recruits. The

article is part of a series of articles on the attractiveness and retention in the nursing profession.

Page 2 of 14

353

Salminen-Tuomaala, M. (2023). What Factors Affect the Attractiveness of Nursing Education-Nurse Teachers’ Experiences. European Journal of

Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(5). 352-365.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.115.15723

Besides nurse teachers, the articles will cover the perspectives of nurses, nurse students and

nurse leaders.

BACKGROUND

Some research has been conducted on factors that affect the attractiveness of the nursing

profession from the perspectives of registered nurse students [9-11]; practical (enrolled) nurse

students [12, 13], registered nurses [14] and nurse managers [15].

According to Wilkes et al. [16], the students’ reasons for applying to nursing programmes are

both personal and career related, with personal being more dominant. Although the desire to

help seems to persist as a compelling motivator for nursing students [10, 17, 18], job security

and a favourable employment situation may also affect students’ decision to apply to nursing

programmes. [10, 19]. Other potential reasons for choosing the profession have been found to

involve family or friend role models [18, 20], prior healthcare exposure [19], and being suited

for the profession [10, 21]. The image of nursing affects potential recruits’ decisions

significantly [21]. According to a recent study, nursing students found that the attractiveness

of nursing could and should be increased by enhancing the social recognition of the profession

at the level of individuals, organizations and society. Nursing students would appreciate

meaningful duties, influence over their work and fair employment conditions and salary. Work

and career advancement and good leadership were considered important for the appeal of the

profession [9].

Similarly, nurses often report having chosen the profession because of their “calling” [23] and

seem to find their work meaningful [24]. However, many of them report disillusionment later

during their career [23], often due to an unhealthy work environment characterized by

inadequate staffing, support and salary [25]. A current study reveals the nurses’ wish that their

profession should be made more appealing through increased appreciation and influence,

compassionate leadership and professional development and wellbeing at work [11].

In a study from the nurse manager perspective, the results were not different from those with

nurses and nurse students. The importance of good leadership and emotional atmosphere was

emphasized. According to the managers, nursing could be an appealing choice, if the workplace

ensured employee influence over their work and invested in constant development, flexible

rota planning and diversification of duties. Employers and workplaces with a good reputation

can attract and retain employees [15].

To summarize briefly factors that seem to undermine the attractiveness of the profession:

Nursing is still sometimes perceived as a course for (female) students with poor academic

ability and the work considered inferior to doctors’ work, with a limited level of autonomy [19,

26, 27). The gap between theory and practice [2] and idealism and realism [28], as well as safety

threats experienced during clinical practice [29] can undermine students’ will to continue

studying. On the other hand, newly qualified nurses have found that they are entering an

overburdened and understaffed healthcare system where they must transition quickly from

students to effective, competent practitioners [30]. New nurses may experience a “transition

shock” characterized by confusion and uncertainty [2]. Some studies have also raised concerns

about the competence of new nurses [31-33]. According to nurse managers, the attractiveness

Page 3 of 14

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 354

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 11, Issue 5, October-2023

of nursing is marred by lack or resources, poor pay, stressful working conditions and a negative

media image [15].

Some recruitment and retention strategies have been proposed to address the nursing shortage

and to make the profession more attractive. Some of the proposals concern education, which

might be one of the easiest areas to start with. In concrete terms, young people could be exposed

to nursing in early school years to promote a better understanding of the role of nurses and

their career options [16, 19]. Researchers agree that both students and the public need more

realistic information of the nursing profession [9, 27]. In addition, exploring students’ career

choices by screening early during their enrolment might help understand factors that influence

career choices [34]. During the nursing studies, clinical teaching behaviour is an important

component [2]. Orientation and graduate transition programmes have been developed [30, 35]

to support recently graduated nurses on entering the profession. It is important that new nurse

gain access to supportive teams, and feel accepted and welcome at the workplace [36].

This study from the nurse educator perspective presents nurse teachers’ perceptions of factors

that influence the attractiveness of nursing profession to potential recruits.

METHODS

Study Design, Data Collection and Analysis

The study is based on an observational, cross-sectional online survey and on inductive content

analysis of qualitative data. The COREQ checklist for qualitative studies was used to help

conduct the study.

In May 2022, 22 nurse teachers at a University of Applied Sciences in Finland were contacted

via a group e-mail address designed for nurse teachers at the University. They received a cover

letter and a link to an online survey tool called Webropol, which allowed them to respond

anonymously to the following question: “Describe factors that, in your opinion, influence the

attractiveness of nursing education.” The response rate was 54.5% (n=12). The teachers were

also asked to give their age and number of years in nursing and teaching. They were not

requested about their gender, as there was only one male teacher in the organization.

Inductive content analysis was used to analyse the data [37]. First, the data (16 pages, Times

New Roman 12, spacing 1.5) was read through several times. Phrases, clauses and sentences

with similar contents were colour-coded, and relevant parts underlined and reduced to 124

expressions. The reduced expressions were grouped to subcategories, which were combined

into generic categories and finally collapsed to 2 main categories.

Ethics

The Code of Ethics Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association [38] and Ethical

guidelines of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK [39] were observed

throughout the study process. Potential recruits were explained about the anonymity and

voluntary nature of participation in the cover letter. They gave their consent to participate by

ticking a box following the consent clause in the online form. Ethics committee approval was

not required, because the study did not involve health service users [40]. The Research and

Development Manager of the University granted the study permission. The response rate of