Page 1 of 14
European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 10, No. 3
Publication Date: June 25, 2022
DOI:10.14738/aivp.103.12492. Bhardwaj, A. K., Soman, P., Sharma, N., Pandiaraj, T., & Labh, B. K. (2022). Crop Establishment Methods and Micro Irrigation for
Enhancing Productivity of Total System and Water in Rice-Wheat Cropping System in Haryana: An On-Farm Study. European Journal
of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 603-616.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
Crop Establishment Methods and Micro Irrigation for Enhancing
Productivity of Total System and Water in Rice-Wheat Cropping
System in Haryana: An On-Farm Study
A. K. Bhardwaj
Senior Agronomist, Jain Irrigation System Ltd.
Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India
P. Soman
Principal Agronomist (Global), Jain Irrigation System Ltd.
Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India
Neeraj Sharma
Executive Engineer
Irrigation and Water Resources Department, Haryana, India
T. Pandiaraj
Assistant Professor, College of Agriculture
(ANDUAT, Ayodhya), Azamgarh, U.P., India
B. K. Labh
Vice President, Jain Irrigation System Ltd.
Jalgaon, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT
Rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS) is sustenance for the majority of people in
India contributing food security to the nation. However, in the past two decades,
water shortage is a serious constraint to nourishing and increasing the productivity
of RWCS. Many technological interventions such as raised seed beds, direct seeding,
mechanical planting, laser levelling of the land, etc., have been tried to save a
significant amount of water. Of which, micro irrigation offers a promising
technology on water saving. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to evaluate
the grain yield and water productivity of rice-wheat rotation system under different
crop establishment and irrigation methods. The treatment consists of three
different methods of establishment (i.e., i. direct seeded rice, DSR/Zero tillage, ZT
in wheat; ii. mechanical transplanting for rice/Happy seeder for wheat; iii. Manual
method) and three irrigation systems (i.e., i. conventional flood irrigation; ii. Drip;
iii. Sprinkler irrigations) along with farmers’ practice. This study was carried out
for three years from 2018-19 to 2020-21 as on farm study at Gumthala Garhu
village, Pehowa of Kurukshetra district, Haryana, India. The manual planting
method recorded 7.8% more rice yield and 1.3% more wheat yield over DSR/ZT.
The yield advantage due to drip irrigation over flood irrigation method was 10.27%
and 2.24% in rice and wheat, respectively. The manually planted crop (11827 kg
ha-1) exerted a significant effect on TSP and on an average a 105% productivity
Page 2 of 14
604
European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
enhancement was recorded over the DSR/ZT (11263 kg ha-1) among the
establishment methods. Drip irrigation (11970 kg ha-1) resulted in 106.69%
productivity enhancement of RWCS over flood irrigation (11219 kg ha-1). Physical
water productivity (PWP) and economic water productivity (EWP) for irrigation
water use (IWU) and total consumptive water use (TCWU) of manual planting and
drip irrigation were superior to other practices in the total system. AS for water use,
manual establishment method recorded 14% less water use over DSR/ZT.
Similarly, drip irrigation could save 41% and sprinkler irrigation 37% water over
that in flood irrigation method. Therefore, micro irrigation could be a sound
technology for water saving in RWCS, thus allowing sustainable food grain
production in water scarcity regions.
Keywords: Drip, Happy Seeder, Sprinkler, Water Productivity, Zero Tillage
INTRODUCTION
Rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS) system is of vital for food security in South Asia
contributing, for instance, 60% of the total calorie intake and 85% of the total cereal production
in India [1]. The RWCS is grown in South Asia on about 13Mha; of which, in India (10 m ha),
Pakistan (2 m ha), Bangladesh (0.5 m ha) and Nepal (0.5 m ha) and large (85%) of the RWCS
area falls in the Indo- Gangetic Plains (IGP). The RWCS is prevalent in the northwest IGP where
it has popularised fast after 1960s as a result of big size of farm, rapid custom of tractors for
tillage and land preparation, accessibility of improved high yielding rice and wheat varieties,
the extensive use of good quality groundwater for irrigation and large utilization of
agrochemicals [2]. However, during the past decade, it witnessed stagnated or declined yields
and there are yawning gaps between potential yields, trial yields and farmers’ yields [3].
The RWCS has intensified the problems related with soil structure deterioration, depletion of
total nutrient status and decreasing groundwater tables resulting in decreased total factor
productivity such as crop, land and water. The conventional RWCS farming practices are
extremely exhaustive in terms of water, labour and power [4]. However, the main peril to
sustaining or increasing the productivity of RWCS of India is probably water scarcity. Haryana
and Punjab states of Indian IGPs are growing rice at the cost of their natural resources. In the
north west IGPs, the groundwater table are decreasing at 0.1–1.0 m year-1.
. Mahajan et al. [5]
projected that the annual per capita water availability in India is expected to decrease from
1600 m3 to 1000 m3 by 2025. NASA gravity mapping satellite ‘GRACE’ reported a drawdown of
groundwater by ~30 cm year− 1 from 440,000 km2 area of North West India, signifying a decline
of 0.04 m groundwater year− 1 [6]. Thus, in evaluating strategies for saving water, it is vital to
study the total cropping system over time rather than individual crops in isolation.
Water productivity can be enhanced by increasing yield and/or reducing water use. There have
been significant surges in irrigation and total water productivity of RWCS in India in the last
few decades mostly because of improved productivity of rice and wheat due to the high yielding
cultivars and management of nutrients, water, pests and diseases and weeds [7,8]. The tangible
water-saving technologies are those which curb the unproductive evaporation losses and
provision the share of unproductive evaporation to transpiration to favour inflow of soil
nutrients to the plants through roots. In this context, micro-irrigation systems (sprinkler and
drip) have the scope to enhance productivity and use efficiency of irrigation water by supplying
water to match the crop demand, minimizing the various losses and usually keeping moist only
Page 3 of 14
605
Bhardwaj, A. K., Soman, P., Sharma, N., Pandiaraj, T., & Labh, B. K. (2022). Crop Establishment Methods and Micro Irrigation for Enhancing
Productivity of Total System and Water in Rice-Wheat Cropping System in Haryana: An On-Farm Study. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3).
603-616.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12492
closer to rootzone and creating scope to infiltrate more rainwater. There are limited studies
evaluated using these technologies in RWCS. Irrigation water use was reduced by about 52%
[9] and 78% [10] in rice and wheat with drip irrigation over conventional farmer’s practices,
respectively. Among different agronomical water and energy-saving technologies, direct
seeding rice (DSR), mechanical transplanter for rice, no till wheat and Happy Seeder for wheat
plantation are some of the cutting-edge technologies. Therefore, these technologies could be
expected to cut the undesirable irrigation water losses particularly in regions where shortage
of water is a problem.
In IGPs, rice crop cultivating in the field with continuous flooded method is a traditional
practice. DSR with the soil moisture at field capacity has been recommended for enhancing
irrigation water productivity (IWP) in the IGPs. A significantly higher IWP in DSR was reported
compared to puddle transplanted rice [11]. Rice transplanting in puddled conditions involves
intensive labour input. In recent times, availability of labour has been considerably decreased
especially during the peak season for rice transplanting and thus raising the cultivation cost. In
this regard, mechanical transplanting rice (MTR) has been the promised technique as compared
to manual method due to the advantage of labour saving and similar and/or more yield. DSR or
MTR involved relatively lower irrigation water use (less 125 mm) over transplanted rice [12].
Bhatt [13] observed that MTR increased IWP over DSR. In some studies, MTR resulted in grain
higher yield and IWP than DSR or the manual transplanting [14,15].
In the past two decades, zero till (ZT) wheat area has expanded substantially under RWCS in
the IGPs with sustainable increment in yield, profits and IWP. The ZT wheat could result in
improved soil health and reduced consumptive water use [16]. In addition, ZT wheat can
increase both crop and water productivity [17, 18]. The Happy Seeder, a modified ZT machine,
has been the most promising technology for eco-friendly rice residue management [16].
Another approach on water saving is Happy Seeder (HS) technology that wheat sown by HS on
residue soil moisture can reduce at least one pre-sowing irrigation equivalent to irrigation
water saving by ~30% [19].
In this study, different irrigation water productivities were estimated under different
establishment and irrigation methods. There are few studies where the estimation of the water
productivities under micro-irrigation systems (drip or sprinkler) in India for RWCS. The
present study focuses on the agronomical evaluation of water saving technologies on RWCS,
under on-farm conditions in Haryana, India.
Water productivity offers as a promising measure for estimating the degree of sustainable
water use in agriculture. Thus, physical water productivity (PWP) has been used to evaluate
the efficiency of a total system. PWP is defined as the ratio of agricultural output to the amount
of water consumed (from all available source of water -rainfall, and irrigation). The perception
of total consumptive water use (TCWU) used in PWP, is estimated based on the
evapotranspiration rate in the region. Rice-wheat system being an irrigation intensive system,
this scientific measurement of water productivity based on PWP alone does not provide the
real field condition, since the volume of irrigation water applied in the system is often more
than the actual water requirement of the crop owing to the low overall efficiency of the surface
as well as groundwater irrigation system. Therefore, we have used the concept of irrigation
water productivity, which measures the crop productivity corresponding to unit volume of