Page 1 of 16

European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 10, No. 3

Publication Date: June 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/aivp.103.12473. Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19

Isolation Centres in Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among

Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in Lagos, Nigeria

Rasheed, Tajudeen Olusegun

Department of Health, Safety and Environment Studies

Training and Research Institute, Economic and

Financial Crimes Commission, Academy

Karu, Abuja, Nigeria

Aina, Joseph Oyeniyi

Department of Mental Health/Psychiatric Nursing

Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo

Ogun State, Nigeria

ABSTRACT

Nurses suffered panic disorder due to virulent high aerosol spreading rate of

coronavirus and limited data on definitive treatment of affected COVID-19 patients.

This study assessed the prevalence of panic disorder and associated factors among

nurses working in COVID-19 isolation centres in Lagos, Nigeria. The study was a

quantitative, cross-sectional survey design. A population of N=75 nurses was

sampled using a total enumeration sampling technique. Purposive sampling

method was used to select the two isolation centres where the study was conducted.

A structured self-administered questionnaire with validity and reliability

established was used to collect data from nurses between 7th February and 25th

March, 2022. Data were collated, screened and imported into SPSS version 25 for

analysis. Significance levels of associated factors were established with Fisher’s

Exact Test and Multivariate Logistic Regressions at significant level of p < 0.05 and

95% confidence interval. The results showed the mean age of nurses was m=37.6 +

10.2 years and 20.6% developed panic disorder. The age p=0.002, and living with

vulnerable persons p=0.005 were significantly associated with panic disorder p <

0.05. Nurses who felt there is threat to their life working in COVID-19 isolation

centre were 3.4 times more likely to develop panic disorder compared to nurses

who did not (AOR=3.4, 95% CI=2.337, 7.271, p=0.001). In conclusion, twenty

percent of nurses developed mild to severe panic disorder due to associated

psychological and working conditions factors. Counseling and support program is

recommended for affected nurses to improve quality of life.

Keywords: COVID-19 isolation Centre, Nigeria, Nurses, Panic Disorder, Prevalence

INTRODUCTION

Nurses experienced feelings of panic disorder when the first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed

on a foreign visitor on the 27th of February 2020 in Lagos, Nigeria [1]. The panic disorder

heightened for nurses working in the COVID-19 isolation centres when it was discovered that

the novel coronavirus (SARS-nCOV-2) has a unique high aerosol spreading rate, and that there

is limited data on the definitive treatment of the viral infection with poor prognosis and death

Page 2 of 16

505

Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12473

[2]. Therefore, nurses are at increased risk of developing panic disorder due to response of the

body and mind to a threatening situation [3, 4].

Caldirola et al. [5] described the symptoms of panic disorder experienced by nurses as either

with or without agoraphobia and these includes intense panic attack which begins suddenly

without warning and reaches a peak within a minute and last for 10 to 20 minutes. But, in

extreme cases, it may last more than an hour. Though individual experiences do differ and the

signs vary from palpitation to racing heartbeat, shortness of breath, and feelings of choking,

nausea, dizziness, lightheadedness, and sweating, trembling, change in mental state, feeling of

depersonalization, tingling sensation in hand or feet, chest pain and fear that one might die [6].

Worldwide, nurses were confronted with enormous mental health pressure and physical

exhaustion as they dealt relentlessly with the unprecedented demands of the COVID-19

patients in isolation centres [6, 7, 8]. The global estimated pooled prevalence of panic disorder

is 79.62% with significant difference across regions and counties [9]. Nurses’ well-being may

have been threatened especially with the fear of transmission of the virus to their loved ones at

home [10, 11].

In Nigeria, nurses caring for COVID-19 patients experienced uneasiness or apprehension due

to anticipation or perceived threat to their lives [12]. Also, nurses were faced with emotional

stress, physical exhaustion, and pressures on their mental health leading to panic attack [13].

Higher levels of panic disorder will increase psychological trauma, impair bodily functions,

leading to negative coping mechanisms among nurses [13].

During COVID-19 pandemic, the strategies typically involved control of infection through

intense focus on breaking the pathway of the pathogen transmission, contact tracing,

surveillance for persons at risk, and health system strengthens (WHO, 2020). Conversely,

responders may have overlook the psychological trauma and the effects on individuals,

community and healthcare workers especially nurses and this oversight might lead to long- lasting psychological distress as the consequences [14].

Researchers have observed that nurses as one of the frontline health workers were exposed to

panic disorder due to fear associated with contact with coronavirus patients in isolation

centres. The panic disorder was compounded as they continue to have regular contact with

COVID-19 patients with symptoms leading to susceptibility of the nurses to coronavirus

infection which has a virulent spreading rate. The situation precipitated emotional imbalance,

worries, and panic disorder. Also, nurses experienced shortage of personal protective

equipment in COVID-19 isolation centres and this might have heightened the panic disorder

due to inadequate protection. Furthermore, nurses were unable to relate freely with their

family due to fear of infecting them leading to concerns and panic disorder.

The theoretical model of stress and responses as a product of transaction between a person and

his or her complex environment “Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping (TTSC)” by Lazarus

[15] was applied to this study. Lazarus stated that noxious stressors influencing work

environment of nurses is moderated by individual responses and adaptive mechanism

exhibited. This will depend on the combination of working conditions, personal attributes, and

Page 3 of 16

506

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

healthcare facilities factors. There is a transaction between a nurse (physical, physiological,

psychological, cognitive, affective, and neurological) and his or her complex and stressful

environment with either negative or positive health outcome [16]. Individual nurses need to

maintain a state of equilibrium to avert the psychological distress and traumatic factors

associated with the disequilibrium brought about by COVID-19 pandemic stressors at the

workplace.

Lagos being an epicenter in Nigeria experienced high burden of COVID-19 pandemic and this

might have increased panic disorder for nurses working in isolation centres. The psychological

wellbeing of the nurses might have been compromised, so, assessing nurses for panic disorder

is important to protect their health and conserve their life [17]. There is a dearth in literature

on studies that focus on panic disorder experienced by nurses working in isolation centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. Thus, this study was conducted to fill the gap in knowledge as it focuses on

prevalence and factors associated with the panic disorder among nurses working in Covid-19

isolation centres in Lagos. The specific objective of this study were to; determine the levels of

prevalence of panic disorder, identify socio-demographic characteristics, psychological and

working conditions factors that are related to prevalence of panic disorder.

The justification for this study is that mental health challenges that do arise from pandemic are

often neglected as all efforts are being directed towards containment of the plague. The scope

of this study covered assessment of the prevalence of panic disorder, psychological trauma

experiences like feelings of (immediate threat to life, stressful working environment, regular

contact with COVID-19 patient experiencing symptoms, and regular contact with COVID-19

patient that died, and witnessing unexpected death) that could influence the prevalence of

panic disorder were assessed and working conditions factors. The significance of this study is

that it provided data on the prevalence of panic disorder among nurses working in COVID-19

isolation centres in Lagos. The study may improve the quality of life of nurses and reduce the

morbidity and disability that might be associated with the care of COVID-19 patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Research Design

This study was a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design. The study design measured the

outcome of exposures of nurses to psychological and working conditions factors during COVID- 19 pandemic in isolation centres. The research design was preferred because it established the

relationship that exists between dependent and independent variables. It is not expensive,

requires less time, establishes the causal-effect, and the results could be generalized to the

entire population.

Research Setting

The research settings for this study were the two selected COVID-19 isolation centres located

at Lagos State Infectious Disease Hospital (IDH), Yaba and General Hospital Gbagada. The Yaba

COVID-19 isolation centre is owned by Lagos State and located inside the Mainland Infectious

Disease Hospital (IDH), Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria. The total number of hospital beds is 265. There is

male and female ward and a designated Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for critically-ill COVID-19

patients. The General Hospital Gbagada COVID-19 isolation centre is also owned by Lagos state

government and is located at T-junction of 3 major express at No 1, Hospital Road, Gbagada,

Page 4 of 16

507

Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12473

Kosofe, Lagos. It has 180 beds, male and female wards, and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for

critically-ill patients.

Population

The target population for this study was 75 nurses, male and female working in the two selected

COVID-19 isolation centres in Lagos. The inclusion eligibility criteria included only nurses

whose duty post was Yaba, and Gbagada COVID-19 isolation centre since outbreak of the

pandemic in Nigeria till date. The exclusion criteria included nurses who follow patients on

emergency situations to Yaba or Gbagada COVID-19 isolation centres. Also, nurses’ working in

other COVID-19 isolation centres in Lagos either belonging to government or private

institutions were excluded.

Sample size Determination and sampling Technique

This study sample size was a total inclusion of all nurses working in the two selected COVID-19

isolation centres in Lagos. As at the time of data collection the number of nurses working in

Lagos State COVID-19 isolation centres, Yaba was n=59 and n=16 in General Hospital Gbagada.

Therefore, the total sample size for this study was 75. Purposive sampling method was used to

select the two COVID-19 isolation centres that were in active operations since the outset of the

pandemic. Total enumeration sampling technique was used to select all the nurses in COVID- 19 isolation centres. However, the risk of negative bias due to incomplete coverage of the entire

population was avoided to guide against error of under coverage.

Instrumentation

A self-administered structured questionnaire consists of four (4) sections was used for this

survey. The sections were divided into A, B, C and D. Section A: consist of 10 questions and

collected data on socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents. Section B: consist of 10

questions and collected data on prevalence of panic disorder. The questions were close-ended

adapted from standardized and validated self-reporting assessment scales for panic disorder.

The adapted self-reporting scale formatted in English language had been used widely and

extensively by researchers (PDSS-10). Section C: consist of 5 questions and collected data on

psychological trauma factors suffered by nurses’ while, Section D: consist of 7 questions and

collected data on working conditions factors of nurses in COVID-19 isolation centres.

Reliability of Instrument

Test-retest method of establishing reliability of instrument was done. The questionnaire was

administered to 10 nurses working in COVID-19 isolation centre, Olodo, Ibadan, Oyo state. It

was collected back immediately after filling was completed. Two weeks later, another new set

of the same questionnaires were given to the same nurses. The results were analyzed with

Cronbach’s Alpha test. The results showed that 32 items tested for reliability in the instrument

have Cronbach’s Alpha value of between α = 0.792 to α = 0.927. The results of reliability test

shows that the instrument was reliable and appropriate for the study.

Validity of Instrument

The face and content validity of the instrument was established by my supervisors and 3 other

experts in the field of study for clarity, relatedness, meaningfulness and adequacy of the

content. Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (CFA) was also run using SPSS to confirm instrument

Page 5 of 16

508

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

validity. The value of internal correlation coefficient of the questions was between 0.4 - 0.79

and it indicates the scale measured what it intended to measure.

Procedure of Data Collection

The procedure and strategy employed for data collection was by going to the isolation centres

daily from Monday to Friday by the researcher to seek nurse’s participation. The data collection

was carried out between 7th February to 25th March, 2022 among nurses working in COVID-19

isolation centre in Yaba and Gbagada. Informed Consent form was giving to nurses to fill and

their consent was secured freely without compelling them before questionnaire was

completed. Compensation was not offered to the nurses and the filled questionnaires were

collated and kept in a safe and secure locker by the investigator who solely has access for

security of the data.

Method of Data Analysis

The errors that might have occurred during the field work corrected since primary data were

collected. Data were screened before imported into SPSS version 25 for analysis. All dependent

variables were categorized for easy measurement before commencement of the analysis. The

acceptable significant alpha (α) level was p < 0.05 because the study has to do with the

screening of human subject for a disorder; so, the level of error was set at minimal value. Also,

the association that exists between dependent and independent variables were established and

tested at p < 0.05 and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Fisher’s Exact Test was run to test the level

of significant of socio-demographic characteristic associated with prevalence of panic disorder.

This statistical model was preferred because some of the values in the cells were lower than 5.

Multiple logistic regressions statistical model was run to test the level of significance of

psychological and working conditions factors associated with prevalence of panic disorder.

Measurement of Variables

Dependent variables: the panic disorder among nurses during COVID-19 pandemic was

measured by 10-items questions in the “Severity Measure for Panic Disorder” (PDSS-10) self- reporting scale [18]. Nurses were asked to describe symptoms they felt in term of fear or fright,

feel anxious, had thought of losing control, dying, going crazy, racing heartbeat, trouble

sleeping, participation at work minimally and needed help to cope at the outset of the COVID- 19 pandemic were rated on a 5-points scale for each question on the checklist. The rating on

the likert include (0 = never), (1 = occasionally), (2 = Half of the time), (3 = most of the time),

and (4 = All of the time) (APA, 2013). The range of total score is from 0 to 40, with higher scores

indicating greater severity of panic disorder [18]. The severity was calculated by adding the

raw scores for each item in the section to obtain a total raw score. Individual’s panic disorder

was categorized into normal (0 – 9), mild (10 – 19), moderate (20 – 29), severe (30 – 40).

Independent variables: the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants that were

measured include age, gender, education level, marital status, year of experience, family size,

and living with vulnerable persons. The psychological trauma experiences variables that may

lead to panic disorder were measured with NO and YES responses on a scale of 0 and 1

respectively, and they includes (immediate threat to life, stressful working environment,

regular contact with COVID-19 patient experiencing symptoms, regular contact with Covid-19

patient that die and witnessing unexpected death). Working conditions independent variables

Page 6 of 16

509

Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12473

were measured with NO and YES responses on a scale of 0 and 1 respectively, and they include

(increase workload, inadequate staffing, and hours on duty per shift, PPE availability, safety

guideline provided, training on Infection Prevention (IP).

Ethical Considerations and Participant Rights

Ethical issues and right of the participants were protected during the conduct of this study. The

Babcock University Health Research Ethical Committee (BUHREC) approval number is 830/21

and the permission to collect data was obtained from Lagos State Health Services Commission.

Confidentiality and rights of the participants was maintained throughout this study. Informed

consent form was giving to participant to read, understand and consented freely before

participation in the study and no identifiers were collected from the participants. Data collected

were protected and only used for the research purpose.

RESULTS

Figure 1 shows the level of prevalence of panic disorder among the nurses working in COVID- 19 isolation centres in Lagos. More than half of the respondents n=41 (54.7%) did not suffer

panic disorder. But, n=25 (33.3%) developed mild, n=2 (2.67%) had moderate, while only n=7

(9.3%) had severe panic disorder.

Table 1, shows that N=75 nurses’ participated in the study and no missing value (N) recorded.

The finding of the survey showed that n=28 (37.3%) of the respondents were between the age

range of 21-30 years, while n=9 (12.0%) were in the age range 51-59 years. The mean age of

the respondents m=37.6 + 10.2 years. Majority of the respondents were female nurses n=53

(70.7%). The respondents n=35 (46.7%) had worked in the COVID-19 isolation centres for the

period more than twelve months. Only n=10 (13.3%) of the respondents were not living with

vulnerable persons, and n=37 (49.3%) of the respondents’ were holders of RN/RM/RPHN

qualifications. In Table 2, the results revealed that age p=0.002, living with vulnerable persons

p=0.005, duration of period working in COVID-19 isolation centre p=0.019, and year of

experience p=0.001 were significantly associated with the prevalence of panic disorder with p

< 0.05. The nurses’ gender, marital status, and education level were not significantly associated

with the prevalence of panic disorder at p > 0.05.

Table 3 shows the psychological factors that nurses were exposed to as they work in COVID-19

isolation centres. Majority of the respondents n=59 (78.7%) indicated they had regular contact

with COVID-19 patients with symptoms in isolation centres, while n=16 (21.3%) had no regular

contact with COVID-19 patients experiencing symptoms. In Table 4., the results revealed that

nurses who felt there is threat to their life by working in COVID-19 isolation centre were 3.4

times more likely to experience psychological trauma leading to panic disorder compared to

nurse who did not (AOR=3.4, 95% CI=2.337, 7.271, p=0.001).

Table 5 shows respondents’ working conditions factors in COVID-19 isolation centres. Majority

of the respondents n=53 (70.7%) indicated they were spending extra hours on duty per week

due to inadequate staffing of COVID-19 isolation centres. Similarly, n=52 (69.3%) stated that

there was inadequate supply of PPE and lack of regular training on infection prevention and

control.

Page 7 of 16

510

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

In Table 6, the finding revealed that adequate supply of PPE to nurses working in COVID-19

isolation centre was 5.7 times more likely to reduce prevalence of panic disorder among nurses

(AOR=5.7, 95% CI=0.710, 9.913, p=0.003). Similarly, the study revealed that availability of

safety guideline in the workplace was 1.9 times more likely to alleviate feeling of threat to life

and reduce panic disorder among nurses (AOR=1.9, 95% CI=0.002, 8.870, p=0.002) compared

to when nurses were working in COVID-19 isolation centre without safety guideline.

Page 8 of 16

511

Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12473

Table 1: Socio-Demographic characteristics of the respondents

Variables Frequency

(N=75)

Percent

(100%)

Age of Nurses

21 - 30 28 37.3

31 - 40 21 28.0

41 - 50 17 22.7

51 - 60 09 12.0

Gender of Nurse

Male 22 29.3

Female 53 70.7

Marital Status

Married 44 58.7

Not Married 31 41.3

Education Level

RN/RM/RPHN 37 49.3

BNSc 35 46.7

MSN 03 4.0

Living with vulnerable persons

Young children ≤ 2 years of age 16 21.3

Young children ≥ 2 years of age 28 37.3

Adults ≥ 60 years of age 17 22.7

Aged 65 years and above 04 5.3

Not living with vulnerable person 10 13.3

Duration in Covid-19 isolation centre

< 3 months 12 16.0

3 – 12 months 28 37.3

> 12 months 35 46.7

Year of professional experience

< 5 years 20 26.7

5 – 9 years 23 30.7

10 years and above 32 42.7

Page 9 of 16

512

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Table 2: Respondents’ Crosstab of Socio-Demographic Characteristics Factors Associated with

Prevalence of Panic Disorder in COVID-19 Isolation Centres in Lagos

Dependent Variable Statistical

Panic Disorder (PD) Total Analysis

None Present N=75 (95% CI)

Independent Variables n (%), < 10 n (%), ≥ 10 n (100%) p-value

Age of Nurses

21 - 30 16 (21.4) 12 (16.0) 28 (37.4)

31 - 40 06 (8.0) 15 (20.0) 21 (28.0) 0.002

41 - 50 13 (17.3) 04 (5.3) 17 (22.6)

51 - 60 06 (8.0) 03 (4.0) 09 (12.0)

Gender of Nurse

Male 13 (17.3) 09 (12.0) 22 (29.3) 0.113

Female 28 (37.3) 25 (33.4) 53 (70.7)

Marital Status

Married 24 (32.0) 20 (26.7) 44 (58.7) 0.282

Not Married 17 (22.7) 14 (18.6) 31 (41.3)

Education Level

RN/RM/RPHN 17 (22.7) 20 (26.7) 37 (49.4)

BNSc 21 (28.0) 13 (17.3) 34 (45.3) 0.663

MSN 03 (4.0) 01 (1.3) 4 (5.3)

Living with vulnerable persons

Young children ≤ 2 years of age 07 (9.3) 09 (12.0) 16 (21.3)

Young children ≥ 2 years of age 18 (24.0) 10 (13.3) 28 (37.3)

Adults ≥ 60 years of age 09 (12.0) 08 (10.6) 17 (22.6) 0.005

Aged 65 years and above 02 (2.7) 02 (2.7) 04 (5.4)

Not living with vulnerable person 05 (6.7) 05 (6.7) 10 (13.4)

Duration in Covid-19 isolation centre

< 3 months 04 (5.3) 08 (10.7) 12 (16.0)

3 – 12 months 12 (16.0) 16 (21.4) 28 (37.4) 0.019

> 1 year 25 (33.3) 10 (13.3) 35 (46.6)

Year of experience

< 5 years 06 (8.0) 14 (18.8) 20 (26.8)

5 – 9 years 10 (13.3) 13 (17.3) 23 (30.6) 0.001

10 years and above 25 (33.3) 07 (9.3) 32 (42.6)

Note: Fisher’s Extract Test Crosstab, p < 0.05 at 95% Confidence Interval considered significant.

Panic disorders score < 10 indicate not present, while ≥ 10 is panic disorder present

Page 10 of 16

513

Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12473

Table 3: Respondents’ Psychological Trauma Factors in COVID-19 Isolation Centres, Lagos

Variables

Frequency

N=75

Percent

(100%)

Did you feel there is immediate threat

to your life working in COVID-19

isolation centre?

NO 54 72.0%

YES 21 28.0%

Did you feel working in COVID-19

isolation centre is stressful?

NO 22 29.3%

YES 53 70.7%

Did you have regular contact with

COVID-19 patients experiencing

symptoms?

NO 16 21.3%

YES 59 78.7%

Did you have regular contact with

COVID-19 patients that died?

NO 26 34.7%

YES 49 65.3%

Did you witness unexpected death of

admitted COVID-19 patients?

NO 17 22.7%

YES 58 77.3%

Total 75 100.0%

Table 4: Respondents’ Psychological Factors Related to Prevalence of Panic Disorder in COVID- 19 Isolation Centres in Lagos

Independent Variables

Adjusted

Odd Ratio

Dependent Variable

Statistical

Analysis

Prevalence of Panic Disorder

(95% CI, N=75)

Psychological Factors (AOR) Lower limit Upper

limit

p-value

Feel threat to life for working in

covid-19 isolation centres

NO 3.435 2.337 7.271 0.001

YES 1 [Reference]

Feel work environment is stressful

NO 0.135 0.587 1.512 0.893

YES 1 [Reference]

Regular contact with Covid-19

patients with symptoms

NO 0.551 0.824 2.467 0.584

YES 1 [Reference]

Regular contact with covid-19

patients that died

NO 2.158 1.244 5.128 0.034

YES 1 [Reference]

Witnessing unexpected death of

admitted Covid-19 patients

NO 1.215 1.084 3.264 0.228

YES 1 [Reference]

Note: Multiple logistic regression tests, p < 0.05 at 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was

considered significant. Model adjusted for covariate variables (age, gender, marital status,

education, living with vulnerable persons, duration in covid-19 centre and years of experience)

Page 11 of 16

514

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Table 5. Respondents’ Working Conditions Factors in COVID-19 Isolation Centres, Lagos

Variables

Frequency

N=75

Percent

(100%)

Are you witnessing increased workload

in COVID-19 isolation centre?

NO 27 36.0%

YES 48 64.0%

Did you have adequate nursing staff

caring for COVID-19 patients?

NO 49 65.3%

YES 26 34.7%

Are you spending extra hours on duty

per week?

NO 22 29.3%

YES 53 70.7%

Are you having adequate supply of

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)?

NO 52 69.3%

YES 23 30.7%

Is there an availability of safety

guideline in the workplace?

NO 34 45.3%

YES 41 54.7%

Is there a regular training of nurses on

infection prevention and control?

NO 52 69.3%

YES 23 30.7%

Are you coping with psychological

trauma associated with caring for

COVID-19 patients?

NO 33 44.0%

YES 42 56.0%

Total 75 100.0%

Page 12 of 16

515

Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12473

Table 6. Respondents’ Working Conditions Factors Associated with Prevalence of Panic

Disorder in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in Lagos

Dependent Variable

Independent Variables

Adjusted

Odd Ratio

Prevalence of Panic Disorder

(95% CI, N=75)

Statistical

Analysis

Working Condition Factors (AOR) Lower limit Upper

limit

p-value

Witnessing increased workload in

covid-19 isolation centre

NO 1.211 0.171 7.100 0.751

YES 1 [Reference]

Adequate nursing staff caring for

covid-19 patients

NO 0.589 3.530 6.480 0.924

YES 1 [Reference]

Spend extra hours on duty per week

NO 2. 454 1.241 7.910 0.043

YES 1 [Reference]

Adequate supply of Personal

Protective Equipment (PPE)

NO 5.729 0.710 9.913 0.003

YES 1 [Reference]

Availability of safety guideline in the

workplace

NO 1.988 0.002 8.870 0.002

YES 1 [Reference]

Regular training on infection

prevention

NO 0.821 0.308 .739 0.414

YES 1 [Reference]

Coping with psychological trauma

associated with the caring for Covid- 19 patients

NO 1.539 0.868 3.112 0.080

YES 1 [Reference]

Note: Multiple logistic regression tests, p < 0.05 at 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was considered

significant. Model adjusted for covariate variables (age, gender, marital status, education, living

with vulnerable persons, duration in covid-19 centre, and years of experience).

DISCUSSION

This study assessed the prevalence of panic disorder among nurses working in COVID-19

isolation centres in Lagos, Nigeria. The study also determined the level of the prevalence and

established an association that exists between independent variables (socio-demographic

characteristics, psychological trauma factors, working conditions factors) and dependent

variables (panic disorder).

Level of Prevalence of Panic Disorder

This study revealed that 20.6% is the proportion of nurses having mild to severe panic disorder

while working in COVID-19 isolation centres in response to the pandemic. The percentage was

Page 13 of 16

516

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

high compared to the World Health Organization acceptable value of 3.6% across regions and

countries [2]. The finding of this study is not consistent with that of the study conducted in

Brazil where the prevalence was 22.8% [13]. The difference in the prevalence of panic disorder

might be related to level of emergency preparedness, severity of the pandemic and personal

resilience of coping with the psychological crisis of the pandemic. The implication of this finding

is that nurses suffered emotional stress as they dealt with demand of care required by COVID- 19 patients [7, 8].

Socio-demographic Characteristics Factors Associated with Prevalence of Panic Disorder

The socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents’ is an important factors for coping

with stressful working conditions and psychological trauma associated with the caring of

coronavirus patients in isolation centres. The prevalence of panic disorder was significantly

associated with the nurses’ age, living with vulnerable persons, duration of period working in

COVID-19 isolation centre, and year of experience. This study finding was supported by a

finding of the study conducted in China where these variables were significant predictors of

higher prevalence of panic disorder among nurses [19]. The odd of panic disorder was seven

times higher among nurses who worked in covid-19 isolation centres for more than one year

compared with those nurses who did not. The implication of this finding on duration is that the

longer the period of time nurses spent working in isolation centres the more the likelihood of

developing panic disorder based on continuous exposure to psychological trauma of dealing

with highly contagious coronavirus disease patients.

Psychological Trauma Factors Associated with Prevalence of Panic Disorder

The causal relationships between frequency of exposure to coronavirus infected patients with

symptoms, and associated mental disorders are suggestive reflection of emotional feelings and

worries. The finding of this study shows that nurses who felt their life is being threatened by

working in COVID-19 isolation centres were three times more likely to develop panic disorder.

The psychological factors like work environment is stressful, regular contact with Covid-19

patient that died, and witnessing unexpected death of COVID-19 patients was not significantly

associated with panic disorders. The implication of this finding is that limited knowledge about

definitive treatment of the coronavirus at the onset of pandemic and lack of emergency

preparedness was obvious as an overwhelming circumstances resulting into panic disorder.

Working Conditions Factors Associated with Prevalence of Panic Disorder

Majority of the nurses reported they were spending extra hours on duty per week due to

inadequate staffing of COVID-19 isolation centres. The odd of having adequate number of staff

in COVID-19 isolation centre is five times more likely to improve working conditions, reduce

workload, and prevalence of panic disorder compared with when there is inadequate staffing.

This study finding is consistent with that of the study conducted by Luceno-Moreno et al. [20]

where the researchers found that the risk variable for prevalence of panic disorder included

nurses working longer hours and excessive workload due to inadequate staffing (Luceno- Moreno et al., 2020). This study result on PPE was consistent with the finding of the study

conducted in Michigan, USA by [21] where the researchers found that availability of PPE in

COVID-19 isolation centres was four times more likely to improve the working conditions and

reduce the prevalence of nurses panic disorder compared with when there is inadequate supply

of PPE. The implication of these findings is that environmental stressors may constitute stress

Page 14 of 16

517

Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12473

for the nurses in the course of duty in the face of deadly COVID-19 pandemic. Providing

necessary supporting safety materials for nurses could reduce panic disorder.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the study revealed that twenty percent was the proportion of nurses who had

mild to severe panic disorder while working in COVID-19 isolation centres in response to the

pandemic in Lagos. The outcomes of this study is evidence that personal attributes,

psychological and working conditions factors interplay with emotions, worries and irritability

suffered by nurses.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Counseling is recommended for affected nurses’ and government should develop a national

program on how to protect nurses from physical and biological hazards during pandemic. The

stakeholders should provide proactive measures and functioning support system with

appropriate tools and adequate staffing.

IMPLICATION OF THE STUDY FOR NURSING

This study contributed to the body of knowledge in nursing research because it determined the

proportions of nurses who had mild to severe prevalence of panic disorder in response to

COVID-19 pandemic. The study could improve the quality of life of nurses who worked in

COVID-19 isolation centres, and reduce the morbidity and disability. The implication of this

study is that it improves the knowledge of nurses on factors associated with prevalence of panic

disorder. Nurses are now aware that personal attributes, psychological trauma experiences and

working conditions may influence prevalence of panic disorder.

LIMITATIONS

This study has limitations; it utilized a total enumeration sampling of nurses’ in a single state

out of 36 states of the federation. The results may not be generalized to the total population of

Nigeria nurses. Studied participants were from various departments in COVID-19 isolation

centres but differences between participants working in various departments were not

analyzed. It Further investigation in the area of causal-factors associated with the prevalence

of panic disorder among nurses working in COVID-19 isolation centres is suggested.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We authors thank all nurses for their cooperation and time their time spent filling the

questionnaire. Also, we thank reviewers and those who contributed towards successful

completion of this project.

Page 15 of 16

518

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

References

[1]. National Population Commission. (2006). Population by sex and number of households. Report on 2006

census in Nigeria.

[2]. World Health Organization. (2020). Global Surveillance for human infection with coronavirus disease

(COVID-2019), Interim Guidance, Switzerland, Geneva. Retrieved from

https://www.who.int/publicationsdetail/global-surveillance-for-human-infectionwith-novel-coronavirus-

(2019-ncov).

[3]. Marthoenis, Maskur, Fathiariani, L, & Nassimbwa, J. (2021). Investigating the burden of mental distress

among nurses at a provincial COVID-19 referral hospital in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs, 20, 76-

85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00596-1

[4]. Saricam, M. (2021). COVID-19-Related anxiety in nurses working on front lines in Turkey. Nurs Midwifery

Stud, 9, 178-181. Retrieved from: https://www.nmsjournal.com/text.asp?2020/9/3/173/289985

[5]. Caldirola, D., Daccò, S., Cuniberti, F., & Perna, G. (2021). Expert opinion in panic disorder: The impact of

COVID-19-related fears, protective devices, and lockdown on panic and agoraphobia. Personalized Medicine in

Psychiatry, 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmip.2021.100080

[6]. Islam, M. S., Ferdous, M. Z., & Potenza, M. N. (2021). Panic and generalized anxiety during the COVID-19

pandemic among Bangladeshi people: An online pilot survey early in the outbreak. Journal of Affective Disorders,

276, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.049

[7]. International Council of Nurses. (2021). The COVID-19 Effect: World’s nurses facing mass trauma, an

immediate danger to the profession and future of our health systems. Press Information. Geneva, Switzerland.

Retrieved from https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/PR_01_%20COVID- 19%20Effect_FINAL_0.pdf

[8]. Azim, D., Kumar, S., Nasim, S., Arif, T. B., & Nanjiani, D. (2020). COVID-19 as a psychological contagion: A new

Pandora's box to close? Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 41(8), 989–990.

https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.127.

[9]. Li, Y., Scherer, N., Felix, L., & Kuper, H. (2021). Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress

disorder in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS

ONE, 16(3), e0246454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246454

[10]. Akande, O. W., & Akande, T. M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: A global health burden. The Nigerian

Postgraduate Medical Journal, 27(3), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_157_20

[11]. Baiyewu, O., Elugbadebo, O., & Oshodi, Y. (2020). Burden of COVID-19 on mental health of older adults in a

fragile healthcare system: the case of Nigeria: dealing with inequalities and inadequacies. International

Psychogeriatrics, 32(10), 1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220001726

[12]. Okediran, J. O., Ilesanmi, O. S., Fetuga, A. A., Onoh, I., Afolabi, A. A., Ogunbode, O., . . ..Balogun, M. S. (2020).

The experiences of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 crisis in Lagos, Nigeria: A qualitative study. Germs,

10(4), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2020.1228

[13]. Perna, G., & Caldirola, D. (2021). COVID-19 and panic disorder: clinical considerations for the most physical

of mental disorders. Braz J Psychiatry, 43, 110-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446- 2020-1235

[14]. Si, M. Y., Su, X. Y., Jiang, Y., Wang, W. J., Gu, X. F., Ma, L., . . . Qiao, Y. L. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID- 19 on medical care workers in China. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 9(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-

020-00724-0

[15]. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

[16]. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European

Journal of Personality, 1, 141–169.

[17]. Apisarnthanarak, A., Apisarnthanarak, P., Siripraparat, C., Saengaram, P., Leeprechanon, N., & Weber, D. J.

(2020). Impact of anxiety and fear for COVID-19 toward infection control practices among Thai healthcare

workers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 41(9), 1093–1094. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.280

Page 16 of 16

519

Rasheed, T. O., & Aina, J. O. (2022). Prevalence of Panic Disorder and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Covid-19 Isolation Centres in

Lagos, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 504-519.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12473

[18]. American Psychological Association. (2013). APA_DSM_5_Severity-Measure-For-Panic-Disorder-Adult.

Retrieved from https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/APA_DSM5_Severity- Measure-For-Panic-Disorder-Adult.pdf

[19]. Chatterjee, S.S., Chakrabarty, M., Banerjee, D., Grover, S., Chatterjee, S.S, & Dan, U. (2021). Stress, sleep and

psychological impact in healthcare workers during the early phase of COVID-19 in India: A Factor Analysis. Front.

Psycho, 12(2), 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611314

[20]. Amerio, A., Bianchi, D., Santi, F., Costantini, L., Odone, A., Signorelli, C., . . . Aguglia, A. (2020). Covid-19

pandemic impact on mental health: a web-based cross-sectional survey on a sample of Italian general

practitioners. Acta Bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis, 91(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2.9619

[21]. Arnetz, J. E., Goetz, C. M., Sudan, S., Arble, E., Janisse, J., & Arnetz, B. B. (2020). Personal Protective

Equipment and Mental Health Symptoms Among Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Occupational

and Environmental Medicine, 62(11), 892–897. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001999