Page 1 of 12

European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 10, No. 3

Publication Date: June 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/aivp.103.12177. Babatope, I. O., Esumeh, F. I., Orhue, P. I., & Iyevhobu, K. O. (2022). Viral Load Pattern and Virological Suppression Rate of a Cohort

of Hiv-1 Patients in a Rural Community in Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 8-19.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Viral Load Pattern and Virological Suppression Rate of a Cohort

of Hiv-1 Patients in a Rural Community in Nigeria

Babatope, I. O.

Department of Medical Laboratory Science

Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences

Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State

Nigeria and Department of Haematology

Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Edo State, Nigeria

Esumeh, F. I.

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences

Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria

Orhue, P. I.

Department of Medical Laboratory Science

Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences

Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State

Nigeria and Department of Haematology

Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Edo State, Nigeria

Iyevhobu, K. O.

Department of Public Health, National Open University of Nigeria

Uromi Community Study Centre, Uromi, Edo State, Nigeria

ABSTRACT

HIV is a pandemic infection and remains a public health concern for many decades.

This infection is associated with life threatening depletion of immune response,

opportunistic infections and malignancies. The aim of this study is to determine the

viral load pattern and virological suppression rate of HIV-1 subjects in Irrua, Edo

Central Senatorial District of Edo state, Nigeria. A total of three hundred and forty

four (344) HIV-1 subjects aged between 17-60 years and of both sexes were

recruited into the study. The HIV-1 subjects were divided into asymptomatic and

symptomatic subjects. One hundred and fifty (150) apparently healthy HIV-1

negative subjects served as control. The viral load titre was determined using the

COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS “Taqman” HIV-RNA test (PCR technology). Results

obtained revealed that the mean viral loads of the asymptomatic and symptomatic

HIV-1 subjects were 20,333.00±13,474.65 and 535,000.02±485,423.40 against

control (20.00±0.00). Both asymptomatic and symptomatic groups revealed a

statistical significant difference (P<0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant

difference according to gender while comparison between viral load and age

showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).The overall virological

suppression rate of HIV-1 subjects on-ART was 81.6%. Sex-wise distribution

revealed that more females (48.87%) were virally suppressed compared to their

Page 2 of 12

9

Babatope, I. O., Esumeh, F. I., Orhue, P. I., & Iyevhobu, K. O. (2022). Viral Load Pattern and Virological Suppression Rate of a Cohort of Hiv-1 Patients

in a Rural Community in Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 8-19.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12177

male counterparts (32.73%). According to age distribution, subjects belonging to

the age bracket of 37-46 years recorded the highest frequency distribution of

37.96% while the least (5.70%) belonged to the age group of 17-26 years. In

summary, there was a significant and progressive increase in the viral load titre of

asymptomatic and symptomatic HIV-1subjects in relation to control. Also, the

proportion of HIV-1 subjects who had viral load <1,000 RNA copies/ml was

relatively high at 81.6% but falls short of UNAIDS’ 90% target for on-treatment viral

suppression. It re-emphasizes the need to test subjects and start treatment with

antiretroviral drugs early.

Keywords: Viral load, Virological suppression rate, HIV-1 subjects, Irrua

INTRODUCTION

At the 2014 International AIDS Conference in Melbourne, the Joint United Nations Programme

on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) proposed the 90-90-90 and 95-95-95 targets to accelerate efforts

towards ending the epidemic by 2030, which was approved by the United Nations (UN)

(UNAIDS, 2014; United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), 2016).

The UNAIDS 90-90-90 declaration states that by 2020, 90 percent of people living with HIV

should know their status, 90 percent of people who know their status should be sustained on

combination ART, and 90 percent of treated patients should achieve viral suppression (UNAIDS

2015; UNAIDS, 2017a). Viral load suppression is an important component of the UNAIDS 90-

90-90 declaration (UNAIDS, 2015). HIV-1 viral load (VL) is an important clinical endpoint

(Quinn et al., 2000; Attia et al., 2009). Viral load suppression reduces onward transmission and

improves the long-term health and quality of life of people living with HIV (UNAIDS, 2017b).

Sub-Saharan Africa (divided now in UNAIDS reports into Eastern/Southern Africa and

Western/Central African) continues to bear the brunt of this epidemic with 25.5 million adults

and children (69% of global total) living with HIV in 2015 (UNAIDS, 2016). Nigeria has the

second largest HIV epidemic in the world (NACA, 2017). Although HIV prevalence among adults

is much less (1.5%) than other sub-Saharan African countries such as South Africa (20.4%) and

Zambia (11.3%), the size of Nigeria’s population means that 1.9 million people were living with

HIV in 2018 (NAIIS, 2018). Although Nigeria adopted the “test and treat” policy of WHO in 2015

which means anyone with a positive diagnosis is eligible for treatment, this is far from reality.

This is because at the national level, viral suppression (the last 90) among people living with

HIV aged 15-49 years stand at 42.3% (45.3% among women and 34.5% among men) (NAIIS,

2018). In view of the above-mentioned, it is essential to look at the viral load pattern and viral

suppression rate of HIV-1 subjects in Edo Central Senatorial district of Edo State, Nigeria with

emphasis on determining its last 90 status.

MATERIALS & MATERIALS

A total of three hundred and forty four (344) HIV-1 subjects which comprised two hundred

(200) asymptomatic HIV-1 subjects not-on-ART (Group 1) and one hundred and forty four

(144) symptomatic HIV-1 subjects (On-ART) (group 2) were recruited for this study. One

hundred and fifty (150) apparently healthy HIV-1 negative individuals served as the control

group (group 3). The subjects were between 17 and 60 years of age and of both sexes.

Page 3 of 12

10

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Subjects and selection criteria

The subjects were grouped into asymptomatic HIV-1 subjects, symptomatic HIV-1 subjects and

apparently healthy HIV-1 negative subjects. Selection criteria included inclusion and exclusion

criteria and clinical stage of the subjects based on WHO clinical staging of HIV/AIDS and case

definition for resource-constrained settings. All the subjects were recruited voluntarily through

the HIV counseling and Testing services (HCT) unit and the Adult Retroviral Clinic of Irrua

Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Edo State.

Ethical Approval

Approval was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of Irrua Specialist Teaching

Hospital (I.S.T.H.), Irrua, Edo State, Nigeria for this study. Informed consent was obtained from

each participant/subject before blood collection.

Blood sampling and handling

Ten millitres (10ml) of whole blood was withdrawn by venipuncture from the antecubital vein

using vacutainer needles into two EDTA containers. The two EDTA containers were spun at

800-1,600 x g for 20 minutes at room temperature. About 1.2ml each of the plasma was

transferred into three (3) sterile polypropylene screw capped (cryovials) tubes. All viral load

samples were stored at between - 200C and -700C prior to analysis.

Viral load estimation

The COBAS (R) Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® (COBAS Amplicor; Roche Diagnostics, Rotkrous,

Switzerland) was used. The HIV-1 test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the

quantification of Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in human plasma using

COBAS® AmpliPrep/instrument for automated specimen amplification and detection. The

principle is based on real-time technologies that continuously monitor the fluorescence emitted

by the amplification products. The test can quantitate HIV-1 RNA over the range of 48-

10,000,000 copies/mL. One copy of HIV-1 RNA is equivalent to 1.7 ± 1.0 International Units (IU)

based on WHO 1st International Standard for HIV-1 RNA for Nucleic Acid Based Techniques

(NAT).

Viral load suppression rate

Viral load suppression rate was determined at 90% suppressed viral load which equivalent to

90% Suppressed viral load =

Number of patients on antiretroviral therapy with suppressed viral load

The number of patients taking antiretroviral therapy

Statistical analysis

The data generated from this study was analyzed by Student’s t-test and analysis of variance

(ANOVA). Values with P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Viral load of the study population

The results of the viral load of the study population are presented in Table 1. The mean ± SD

values of control, asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects were 20.00±0.00,

20,333.00±13,474.65and 535,000.02±485,423.43 respectively. There was a significant

Page 4 of 12

11

Babatope, I. O., Esumeh, F. I., Orhue, P. I., & Iyevhobu, K. O. (2022). Viral Load Pattern and Virological Suppression Rate of a Cohort of Hiv-1 Patients

in a Rural Community in Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 8-19.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12177

increase (P<0.05) in the mean value of the viral load of symptomatic subjects in comparison to

asymptomatic subjects and control.

Viral load of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART and not on-ART

The mean viral load of symptomatic subjects on-ART and not-on-ART were 37,251.00 ±

9,735.33 and 455,578.00 ± 41,878.79 respectively (Table 2). Statistical comparison revealed a

statistical significant difference (P<0.05) between the two groups.

Viral load of asymptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on gender

The results of the viral load of asymptomatic subjects based on gender are highlighted in Table

3. The mean values of the viral load of both male and female asymptomatic subjects were

26,372.00±14,629.15 and 16,139.00±10,970.98 respectively. There was a significant increase

(P<0.05) between the viral load of asymptomatic male subjects compared to their female

counterparts.

Viral load of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on gender

The mean values of the viral load of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on gender are presented

in Table 4. The mean values of the viral load of the male and female subjects were

407,402.00±301,914.30 and 617,805.00±562,662.50 respectively. There was no significant

difference (P>0.05) between the viral load based on gender.

Viral load of asymptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on age

The results of the viral load of asymptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on age are presented in Table

5. The mean values of the viral load of the subjects belonging to age groups of 17-26 years, 27-

36 years, 37-46 years and 47 years and above were 1,850.00±602,77, 8,328.00±5,983.39,

23,700.00±6,863.95 and 41,333.00±9,000.00 respectively. There was no significant difference

(P>0.05) in the mean values of the viral load of asymptomatic subjects belonging to the age

groups of 17-26 years and 27-36 years, whereas subjects belonging to the age groups of 37-46

years and 47 years and above revealed statistically significant increase (P<0.05).

Viral load of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on age

The mean values of the viral load of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on age are presented in

Table 6. The mean ± SD of the viral load of the subjects according to the age groups of 17-26

years, 27-36 years, 37-46 years and 47 years and above were 430,838.00 ± 416,138.40,

367,139.00 ± 312,930.60, 461,435.00 ± 427,637.50 and 1,202,110.00 ± 513,253.80

respectively. Subjects belonging to the age groups of 17-26 years, 27-36 years and 37-46 years

did not reveal any significant difference (P>0.05) in the mean values of the viral load of

symptomatic HIV-1 subjects ,whereas the subjects belonging to age groups of 47 years and

above showed a statistically significant increase (P<0.05).

Age and sex distribution of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART

The age and sex distribution of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART in the study area are

presented in Table 7. According to age groups, subjects belonging to the age bracket 37-46

years recorded the highest frequency distribution followed by those in the age bracket of 27-

36 years with subjects belonging to the age group of 17-26 years ranked as the least. According

to sex, more female subjects (60.0%) are on-ART compared to their male counterparts (40.0%).

Page 5 of 12

12

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Viral load suppression rate of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART

The results of the viral load suppression rate of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART in the

study area are presented in Table 8. According to age and sex, subjects belonging to the age

bracket of 37-46 years recorded the highest frequency of viral load suppression for both male

and female sexes followed by those in the age group of 27-36years with the least belonging to

the age group of 17-26 years. More women (48.87%) had viral load suppression compared to

their male counterparts (32.73%). The overall viral load suppression rate of symptomatic HIV- 1 subject of-ART was 81.6% while 18.4% were virally unsuppressed.

Combined viral load suppression rate of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART

The combined viral load suppression rate of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on–ART are presented

in Table 9. Subjects belonging to the age bracket of 37-46 years were the most virally

suppressed (37.96%) individuals followed by those in the age group of 27-36 years (27.03%).

Subjects belonging to the age group of 47 years and above had 10.9% with individuals

belonging to the age bracket of 17-26 years recording the least frequency distribution of 5.70%.

Table 1: Viral load of the study population

Parameter

Control

subjects

Mean ± SD

n = 150

Asymptomatic subjects

Mean ± SD

n = 200

Symptomatic Subjects

Mean ± SD

n = 144

F- value

P- value

Viral Load 20.00 ± 0.00a 20,333.00 ± 13,474.65b 535,000.02 ± 485,423.40c 7.390 0.0001

KEYS: n - Number of Samples

SD - Standard deviation

Values in a row with a different superscript is significantly different at P<0.05

Table 2: Viral load of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART and not-on--ART

Parameter Symptomatic

subjects

(On-ART)

Mean ± SD

n = 60

Symptomatic subjects

(Not-on-ART)

Mean ± SD

n = 84

T- value

P- value

Viral load

37,251.00 ± 9,735.33 455,578.00 ± 41,878.79 5.7699 0.0001

KEYS:

n - Number of Samples

SD - Standard deviation

Page 6 of 12

13

Babatope, I. O., Esumeh, F. I., Orhue, P. I., & Iyevhobu, K. O. (2022). Viral Load Pattern and Virological Suppression Rate of a Cohort of Hiv-1 Patients

in a Rural Community in Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(3). 8-19.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.103.12177

Table 3: Viral load of asymptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on gender

Parameter

Male subjects

Mean ± SD

n = 80

Female subjects

Mean ± SD

n = 120

F- value

P- value

Viral Load 26,372.00 ± 14,629.15 16,139.00 ± 10,970.98 3.1225 0.0028

KEYS:

n - Number of Samples

SD - Standard deviation

Table 4: Viral load of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on gender

Parameter

Male subjects

Mean ± SD

n = 58

Female subjects

Mean ± SD

n = 86

F- value

P- value

Viral Load 407,402.00±301,914.30 617,805.00±562,662.50 1.679 0.0985

KEYS:

n - Sample size

SD - Standard deviation

Table 5: Viral load of asymptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on age

Parameter

17-26yrs

Mean ± SD

n = 14

27-36yrs

Mean ± SD

n = 60

37 – 46yrs

Mean ± SD

n = 100

47yrs & above

Mean ± SD

n = 26

F- value

P- value

Viral load

1,850.00

±

602.77a

8,328.00

±

5,983.39a

23,700.00

±

6,863.94b

41,333.00

±

9,000.00b

315.45 0.0002

KEYS:

n - Sample size

SD - Standard deviation

Values in a row with a different superscript is significantly different at P<0.05

Table 6: Viral load of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects based on age

Parameter

17-26yrs

Mean ± SD

n = 10

27-36yrs

Mean ± SD

n = 54

37 – 46yrs

Mean ± SD

n = 60

47yrs & above

Mean ± SD

n = 20

F- valu

e

P- value

Viral load

430,838.00

±

416,138.40a

367,139.00

±

312,939.60a

461,345.00

±

427,637.50a

1,202,110.00

±

513,253.80b

4.96

14 0.0002

KEYS:

n - Sample size

P<0.05- Significant

P>0.05- Not Significant

Values in a row with a different superscript is significantly different at P<0.05

Page 7 of 12

14

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 3, June-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Table 7: Age and sex distribution of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART

Sex / Age groups Male Female

17-26 years 2 (3.33%) 2 (3.33%)

27-36 years 8 (13.33%) 12 (20.0%)

37-46 years 11 (18.33%) 17 (28.33%)

47 years and above 3 (5.0%) 5 (8.33%)

Total / Frequency 24 (40.0%) 36 (60.0%)

Table 8: Viral load suppression rate of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on – ART

Viral load suppressed Viral load unsuppressed

Sex / Age groups Male Female Male Female

17-26years 1.43 1.99 0.32 0.45

27-36years 6.54 9.68 1.48 2.18

37-46years 9.11 13.67 2.05 3.08

46 years and above 2.56 3.98 0.58 0.9

Total/frequency 19.64 (32.73%) 29.32 (48.87%) 4.43 (7.38%) 6.61 (11.02%)

Overall frequency 81.6% 18.4%

Table 9: Combined viral load suppression rate of symptomatic HIV-1 subjects on-ART

Sex/Age group Male Female Combined frequency

17-26 years 1.43 (2.38%) 1.99 (3.32%) 5.70%

27-36 years 6.54 (10.9%) 9.68 (16.13%) 27.03%

37-46 years 9.11 (15.18%) 13.67 (22.78%) 37.96%

47 years and above 2.56 (4.27%) 3.98 (6.63%) 10.9%

19.64 (32.73%) 29.32 (48.86%) 81.59%

DISCUSSION

HIV-1 viral load is an important clinical endpoint ( Quinn et al.,2009).In this study, the mean

values of the viral load titre of asymptomatic and symptomatic HIV-1 subjects were

20,333.00±13,474.65 and 535,000.02±485,423.40 copies/ml respectively (table 1). Statistical

analysis revealed that there was a significant and progressive increase (P<0.05) in the viral load

titres of asymptomatic and symptomatic HIV-1 subjects in relation to control. This finding is in

line with the earlier reports of Piatak et al. (1993) and Cao et al.(1995) who observed that

subsequent improvements in the methods for detecting HIV have indicated that even

asymptomatic patients can carry 103-105 copies of HIV RNA per ml of plasma and symptomatic

patients can carry 105-108 copies/ml. Ochieng et al., (2006) reported that asymptomatic and

symptomatic HIV-1 disease had, respectively, a rise in median HIV-1 RNA load from 1,195 to

132,543 and from 42,962 to 1,109,281 copies/ml in children below 6 years. In a study,

Govender et al. (2014) reported an overall viral load of 13,000 (IQR: 2050 - 98171) copies/ml

among newly diagnosed HIV-infected individuals. In a very recent study, Kamangu, Bongenya,

Bulanda, Kalume, Mabanza & Kalala (2018) reported the median value of the viral load of their

patients to be 5.531 log10 RNA copies/ml (340,000 RNA copies/ml). The minimum and

maximum values were respectively 1.35-7.95 log10 RNA copies (22.28-88,850,000 RNA

copies/ml). Also, Kamangu et al. (2018) observed the minimum and maximum values were