Page 1 of 17

European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 10, No. 1

Publication Date: February 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/aivp.101.11613. Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment

of Heavy Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-

462.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar,

Nigeria

I. O. OYO-ITA

Organic Chemistry and Food Science Research Group

Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, University of Calabar, Nigeria

P. Y. NKOM

Organic Chemistry and Food Science Research Group

Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry

University of Calabar, Nigeria

Department of Chemical Sciences, Cross River

University of Science and Technology, Nigeria

F. E. UMO

Organic Chemistry and Food Science Research Group

Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry

University of Calabar, Nigeria

E. ETON

Department of Science Education

University of Calabar, Calabar-Nigeria

H. A. NEJI

Department of Science Education

University of Calabar, Calabar-Nigeria

O. E. OYO-ITA

Organic Chemistry and Food Science Research Group

Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, University of Calabar, Nigeria

Department of Chemical Sciences, Cross River

University of Science and Technology, Nigeria

ABSTRACT

Selected heavy metals accumulation and health risk assessment were investigated

in the tissues of the widely consumed fish (Ethmalosa Fimbriata, Clarias Gariepenus,

and Tilapia Guineensis) and shrimp (Macrobrachium Felicinum) species in Calabar.

The mean concentrations of Cr, Pb, and Ni were slightly higher than the standard

levels and Hg was below detection level for all samples. Zn, Cd and Cu contents of

fish and shrimp were below the maximum guideline proposed by the US Food and

Drug Administration. The average estimated weekly intake was significantly below

the provisional tolerable intake based on the FAO and WHO standards for all

Page 2 of 17

447

Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-462.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11613

studied metals. The combined Total hazard quotient (THQ) of the studied heavy

metals were above 1 that is 7.48 for the fish and 7.0 for the shrimp and was highest

for Cr suggesting a possible carcinogenic risk to consumers of this product via Cr.

The carcinogenic risk of Pb in both species was within the acceptable range of 10-4 -

10-6 mg/kg/day. Results of this study reveal an almost safe level of Zn, Cd, Cu, and

Hg contents in the fish and shrimp consumed by Crossrivarians but recommend to

appropriate authorities to stop the sources and use of Cr, Pb, and Ni.

Keywords: Consumption, Health risk assessment, Heavy metals, Fish, Shrimp, Calabar.

INTRODUCTION

Increasing rates of consumption of Bonga fish (Ethmalosa Fimbriata), Catfish (Clarias

Gariepenus), Tilapia fish (Tilapia Guineensis) and shrimps (Macrobrachium Felicinum) as

popular delicacy in Calabar has raised worries about the safety of health of consumers in the

face of perceived rising input of heavy metals in aquatic habitat associated with increasing

urbanization. This is as a result of their tendency to absorb toxic pollutants from the

surrounding aquatic environment, depending on a variety of factors like; the characteristics of

the species under consideration, the exposure period, concentration of the elements,

temperature, salinity, pH, seasonal changes etc.,(Kwaansa-Ansah et al., 2018). Apart from being

part of the local delicacy, these commercially available sea foods are widely consumed because

of their high protein, low saturated fat and appreciable omega-3 fatty acids contents that

promote good health.

Heavy metals are well known environmental pollutants due to their toxicity, persistence in the

environment and bio accumulative nature. Their natural sources include volcanic eruptions and

weathering of metal-bearing rocks, while their anthropogenic sources include combustion of

fossil fuels, various industrial and agricultural activities etc (Essien et al., 2009). Accumulation

of potentially toxic heavy metals in sea foods and biota causes a potential health threat to their

consumers including humans. The accumulation of heavy metals in tissues of fish and shrimp

may cause actual adverse health effects via their intake and various species of fish and shrimp

are normally used as bio indicators to study heavy metals accumulation in aquatic

environments, in addition to assessing risks caused by anthropogenic activities (Kwaansa- Ansah et al., 2018).

Government and Communities have been compelled to address the issues of Global changes,

which includes growth in human population, temperature, sea level rise and contaminants

locally and globally. The formulation of policy and regulations occurs at more local scales and

requires information and data to support the regulations (Joanna et al., 2019). This increase in

human population has caused more fish and shrimps to be consumed even as more

contaminants like heavy metals from urbanization and industrialization could threaten their

suitability for human consumption.

In Cross River State, a number of studies have reported Heavy metals in sea foods and Cross

River estuary (Essien et al., 2009; Obot et. al., 2016 etc.). However, accrual of heavy metals in

muscle tissues of commercially significant seafood and their exposure level to consumers in

Calabar metropolis is yet to be reported and the general people and authorities are not mindful

of the health implication. Calabar is the capital of Cross River State, Nigeria. It was originally

Page 3 of 17

448

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

named Akwa Akpa, in the Efik language and is adjacent to the Calabar and Great Kwa rivers and

creeks of the Cross River from its inland delta. Calabar is often described as the tourism capital

of Nigeria, especially due to several initiatives implemented during the administration of

Donald Duke (1999–2007), which made the city the cleanest and most environmentally friendly

city in Nigeria (Achum, 2017). It has an area of 406 square kilometres (157 sq mi) at an

elevation of 32 m (105 ft) with a population of 371,022 as at 2006 census and a density of

910/km2 (2,400/sq m). The Cross River State Annual Christmas Festival held every year

attracts thousands from within and beyond Nigeria. The festival, includes music performance

from both local and international artists. Other annual events include the Calabar Carnival, a

boat regatta, fashion shows, a Christmas Village, traditional dances and the annual Ekpe Festival

(Achum, 2017). Being a tourist destination where fresh fish serve with shrimps is one of the

major cuisine delicacies, there is necessity to constantly monitor the accumulation of heavy

metals in these sea food species. This work therefore seeks to close this gap in knowledge, by

examining the concentration and health risk assessment of selected heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu,

Ni, Hg, Pb and Zn) accumulation in Bonga fish (Ethmalosa Fimbriata), Catfish (Clarias

Gariepenus), Tilapia fish (Tilapia Guineensis) and shrimps (Macrobrachium Felicinum) in

Calabar Metroplolis and evaluate the dietary intake as a basic step to assess consumer’s

exposure to heavy metals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Collection and analysis of samples

A total of eighty-four (84) freshly caught male and female Ethmalosa Fimbriata (n=36), Clarias

Gariepenus (n=24), Tilapia Guineensis (n=24) and 2400g of Macrobrachium Felicinum were

bought from local shops in four (4) different locations, including; Beach, Lagos Street, Mbukpa

and Watt Markets between the months of April and September, 2021. The species used in this

study was based on their accessibility, popularity among local consumers as well as their

consumption rate during the study period. The samples were placed in clean plastic bags (each

species in a separate bag), stored on an ice chest to avoid deterioration and transported to the

Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of

Calabar, Nigeria for taxonomic identification. Total length was measured from the top most part

of the mouth to the tip of the caudal fine and standard length were measured from the top most

part of the mouth to the tip of hypural bone, using a meter rule. Fresh weights were measured

using an electronic weighing balance after removing water and other substances. Samples were

washed with distilled water and kept in a refrigerator prior to digestion and chemical analysis.

Biological information and trophic level characteristics of the studied fish and shrimp species

are shown in Table 1.

Determination of heavy metals

The samples were washed with distilled water and a total of 20 g each of fish and shrimp tissues

was removed and dried at 105 °C for 24 h and then transferred to a desiccator until it reached

a constant weight. Then, 0.5 g of each sample was powdered and transferred to a beaker

containing 5 mL of nitric acid. The mixture was heated up to 140 °C to obtain a clear solution.

The solution was then filtered and diluted to 50 mL and used for metal analysis. The

concentrations of the selected heavy metals Cd, Cr, Cu, Zn, Hg, Ni, and Pb in the digested

solutions were measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Varian AA-7000).

Standard heavy metal solutions (1000 mg/L) were used to plot the calibration curves after

Page 4 of 17

449

Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-462.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11613

appropriate dilutions. Limit of detection was <0.001 mg/l and levels of heavy metals were

expressed as mg/kg wet weight (Miri et al., 2017).

Intake rate limits

Estimated weekly and daily intakes

The estimated daily intake (EDI) was evaluated as optimized by Miri et al., 2017 thus:

EDI = �! ∗ �" ∗ �#$ ∗ �! ∗ �%

�&' ∗ �&

∗ 10() ... ... ... ... .... (1)

where ED, EF, CF, WAB, FIR, CM and TA are the exposure duration (60 years), exposure frequency

(365 days/year), conversion factor (0.208) to convert dry weight of fish/shrimp to wet weight,

average body weight for adult (65 kg), ingestion rate (25.2 g/day), heavy metal concentrations

in muscle tissues of fish/shrimp and average exposure time (EF *ED), respectively (Miri et al.,

2017).

The estimated weekly intake (EWI) was evaluated following procedures by USEPA (2011);

EWI = �% ∗ �$

�&'

... ... ... ... .... (2)

where CR represent the fish/shrimp consumption rates (ca. 0.160 kg of fish/shrimp per week)

(FAO, 2016).

The percentage of provisional tolerable weekly intake (%PTWI)

The %PTWI was evaluated for each heavy metal using;

% PTW1 = ���

���� ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... (3)

The PTWI (mg/kg bw/week) guidelines were employ in this study (Cd=0.007, Cr=23.3, Cu=3.5,

Ni=0.365, Pb=0.025 and Zn = 7.0 in mgkg-1 (JECFA, 2003).

Daily intake limit

Daily consumption rate limit (CRlim) of the studied fish and shrimp species was evaluated for

carcinogenic effects of contaminants using:

��*+, = ARL ∗ �&'

CSF ∗ �%

... ... ... ... ... ... . (4)

where ARL and CSF are the maximum acceptable lifetime risk level (10-5) and cancer slope

factor, respectively (Yu et al., 2014). The cancer slope factor value of Pb according to the

Integrated Risk Information System is 0.0085 mg/kg day-1 (USEPA, 2011).

The maximum acceptable daily intake of fish and shrimp was also calculated for non- carcinogenic risk of heavy metals contaminant using:

��*+, = R�� ∗ �&'

�%

... ... ... ... ... ... ... . . (5)

Page 5 of 17

450

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

where RfD is the oral reference dose. The RfD values of Cd=0.001, Cr=0.003, Cu=0.04, Ni=0.02,

Pb=0.035 and Zn = 0.3, in mg/kg-day-1 respectively (USEPA, 2011). The maximum allowable

intake rate of fish and shrimp contaminated with heavy was determined as published in Shakeri

et al., 2015:

��,, = ��*+, ∗ �-.

�� ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . . (6)

where MS, Tap, and CRmm are the meal size (0.227 kg fish or shrimps/meals), average time

period (30.44 day/month), and maximum allowable intake rate, respectively.

Metal pollution index (MPI)

The MPI was utilized to calculate the accretion of total heavy metals, as shown in Kwaansa- Ansah et al., 2018;

MPI = (�/ ∗ �0 ∗ �) ... ... . �1)//1 ... ... ... ... ... ... (7�)

Multi-element contamination (MEC)

MEC provides a measure to assess contamination based on the content of heavy metals in

studied samples with the PTWI limits Adamu and Nganje (2010). MEC values above 1.0 signify

an anthropogenic impact on heavy metal concentration in studied samples. MEC was calculated

based on the following formula:

MEC =

�/

�/

+ �0

�0

+ �)

�)

... ... .

�1

�1

n ... ... ... ... .... (7�)

where C—content of heavy metal, T—provisional tolerable levels and n—the number of heavy

metals.

Health risks assessments

Target hazard quotient (THQ)

Non-carcinogenic risks were examined based on THQ determination and the hazard index (HI)

evaluated by adding all the target hazard quotient values respectively as follows;

THQ = �! ∗ �" ∗ �#$ ∗ �! ∗ �%

�&' ∗ �& ∗ ��� ∗ 10() ... ... ... ... .... (8�)

�� = ∑��� ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . (8�)

If the THQ or HI is below one, it implies no threat to health, THQ or HI above 1, indicate a higher

risk associated with fish/shrimp intake (USEPA, 2011).

Cancer risks (CR)

The CR over a lifetime of Pb exposure was calculated as reported by Kwaansa-Ansah et al., 2018

thus;

�� = ��� ∗ ��� ... ... ... ... ... ... ... (9)

Page 6 of 17

451

Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-462.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11613

Condition factor (K)

The condition factor which reflects the physiological and health states of marine species was

evaluated following Froese, 2006 procedures as demonstrated below:

K = W

�) ∗ 100 ... ... ... ... .... (10)

Where W and L are the fresh weight (g), and length (cm) of fish/shrimp, respectively. A factor

of 100 was used to bring the coefficient of condition close to unity. In general, higher K value

reveals fatter or thicker species.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS)

v. 20 software. A normality test was carried out to evaluate whether the data of each samples

were normally distributed. Concentrations of the analyzed Heavy metals were express as

mean±standard deviation and the association between fish size (length and weight) and heavy

metal concentrations among the fish and shrimp species was assessed using Pearson’s

correlation analysis. The cluster and principal component analyses were utilized to attain a

further understanding of heavy metal distributions by evaluating the similarities or

dissimilarities in the different fish and shrimp samples. The principal component analysis was

carried out by Ward’s Method and Varimax normalized rotation was used to extract

components with an eigenvalue greater than one.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Heavy metal concentrations

The concentration of selected heavy metals observed in the tissues of Ethmalosa Fimbriata,

Clarias Gariepenus, Tilapia Guineensis and Macrobrachium Felicinum are presented in Table 2.

Total concentration of heavy metal in mg/kg for the studied species were in the order

Ethmalosa Fimbriata> Clarias Gariepenus> Macrobrachium Felicinum> Tilapia Guineensis and

ranged between 18.38 – 25.90 mg/kg with an overall total of 85.12±9.90 mg/kg. Ethmalosa

Fimbriata being the only member of its genus and dwells particularly where rivers bring large

amount of detritus into the sea has a dissimilar size, age and feeding pattern. This attributes

may explain the highest level observed for Ethmalosa Fimbriata because this metals have

varying accumulations behavior in different species of fish/shrimp and several factors

including feeding behavior, swimming pattern, reproductive cycle, as well as sex, size, and age

can affect their intake (Canli and Atli, 2003).

Heavy metals recorded in the studied fish and shrimp species followed the order of

Cr>Pb>Cu>Ni>Zn>Cd while Hg was below detection levels for all the studied samples (Table 2).

This agrees with the finding that Cr, Pb, and Cu are some of the persistent toxic metals known

in most environmental matrices (Akinrotimi and Edun, 2015). A two-way ANOVA showed that

these metals were not normally distributed (p<0.05; SI1) in the analyzed samples. A low

coefficient of variation (CV) was observed for Cr (16.96%), Pb (12.59%) and Cu (12.35%); (CV

≤ 20%), moderate for Ni (32.32%); (21% <CV ≤ 50%), high variability for Zn (53.49%);

(50%<CV ≤ 100%) and exceeded 100% for Cd (102.31%) Table 2, (Kwaansa-Ansah et al.,

2018). These result revealed that the concentration levels of Cr, Pb, and Cu did not vary

significantly in the studied fish and shrimp samples while that of Ni indicated a non- homogenous levels. Coefficient of variation (CV) greater than 100% as in the case of Cd is an

Page 7 of 17

452

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

indication that the standard deviation exceeded the mean value. The condition factor (K)

conveyed a variable health effect with respect to heavy metal contamination. The K value>1 for

both fish and shrimp samples (7.02 and 2.28 respectively. Table 3.) revealed that all the studied

samples were healthy (Kwaansa-Ansah et al., 2018) and this was higher than the K value in the

range of 1.05–1.89 recorded by Chandra and Jhan (2010).

The mean concentration of Cd ranging from 0.03±0.01 mg/kg in Macrobrachium Felicinum and

Tilapia Guineensis to 0.13±0.11 mg/kg in Clarias Gariepenus, Zn in the range of 0.46±0.02 mg/kg

in Tilapia Guineensis to 1.64±0.02 mg/kg in Ethmalosa Fimbriata and Cu with a minimum value

of 6.25±0.67 mg/kg in Tilapia Guineensis and a maximum of 7.73±0.49 mg/kg in Ethmalosa

Fimbriata were below the level proposed by FAO/WHO (0.50, 100 and 30.0 mg/kg). On the

hand, levels of Cr, Ni and Pb ranging between 5.14±0.79 mg/kg in Tilapia Guineensis to

7.47±0.02 mg/kg in Ethmalosa Fimbriata, 1.12±0.18 mg/kg in Clarias Gariepenus to 2.30±0.12

mg/kg in Ethmalosa Fimbriata and 5.07±0.28 mg/kg in Macrobrachium Felicinum to 6.68±0.05

mg/kg in Ethmalosa Fimbriata respectively were higher than the FAO/WHO permissible values

of 0.15 mg/kg, 0.6 mg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg respectively (FAO, 2016).

Chromium is naturally present in the environment in trace amounts, but industrial use in

rubber and stainless steel manufacturing, chrome plating, dyes for textiles, timber treatment to

protect wood from decay fungi, wood-attacking insects and other uses contaminates aquatic

systems. Antifouling paints used to prevent growth of marine organism on boats contain Pb and

Nickel as important components and they can also be released into the atmosphere by coal- burning power plants and garbage incinerators, Chandra and Jhan (2010). Farombi et al. (2007)

have also reported that Cr, Pb, Ni and Cd are the major heavy metals associated with Nigerian

crude oils. Thus, the high concentration of Cr, Ni and Pb found in the studied fish and shrimp

species from Calabar is suspected because the location of the study is around the local mining,

illegal refineries, timber and paint industries areas where wastes produced are not properly

disposed. This observation corroborates the assertion that marine biota that is of economic

importance as food sources from the sea and coast are also polluted (Farombi et al. 2007).

Therefore, research efforts to monitor pollutants, especially metals contained in food sourced

from sea and coastal areas should be encouraged.

Despite the high population of Watt market, the highest heavy metal load with regard to

sampling sites was reported at Mbukpa market (22.45±2.9 mg/kg; Fig. 1). This probably may

be associated with atmospheric precipitation arising from illegal oil bunkering activities in its

vicinity.

Heavy metal concentrations measured in the studied fish and shrimp species were compared

with earlier studies. The concentration of Pd, Zn, Cd, Ni, and Cu of this study was comparable

with those in the Dhaleshwari River, Fosu Lagoon and Hypermarkets (Ahmed et al., 2009: Akoto

et al., 2014; Alturiqi and Albedair, 2012) and lower than those in Bodo creek, Cross River

Mangrove swamp and Lower Cross River Estuary, Niger Delta, Nigeria. (Abu et al, 2016: Essien

et al., 2008, Obot et al., 2016). This comparison discloses that these metals contaminant in fish

and shrimp from Calabar may not pose serious health issues compared to those that have been

recorded in literature.

Page 8 of 17

453

Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-462.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11613

Consumption rate limits

The daily consumption of the selected heavy metals was assessed based on their concentrations

in the tissues of the investigated fish and shrimp species. The consumption rate limits values

are given in Table 3. The concentration of heavy metals recorded in tissues of the studied

samples were used to evaluate the health risk posed by the intake of fish and shrimp in Calabar.

The estimated daily intake (EDI) was in the trend Cu>Cr>Pb>Ni>Zn>Cd and similar order was

also observed for the weekly intake (EWI). The %PTWI revealed: Pb>Cd>Ni>Cu>Cr>Zn. The

highest EDI values compared with the least PTDI values for all the studied heavy metals

indicated that the intake of the studied fish and shrimp species poses no effect on consumers.

These EDI values were comparable with earlier studies for several fish species sampled from

Chilika lagoon (Parida et al., 2017), Subarnarekha River (Giri and Singh, 2015) and Asafo

market, Ghana (Kwaansa-Ansah et al., 2018).

Metal Pollution Index

Pollution indices are widely considered a useful tool for the comprehensive evaluation of the

degree of contamination. Moreover, they can have great importance in the assessment of food

quality and the forecast of future ecosystem continuity. A rating, reflecting the composite

influence of dissolved heavy metals in the studied species was done by calculating the MPI. The

trend of total concentrations of heavy metal accretions by MPI in the studied species was in the

order: Ethmalosa Fimbriata (2.20)> Clarias Gariepenus (1.75)> Macrobrachium Felicinum

(1.28)> Tilapia Guineensis (1.21) (Table 2) and support that Ethmalosa Fimbriata fish species

accumulated the highest heavy metals than the other fish and shrimp species. This agreed well

with the pattern of heavy metal concentrations and also indicate that the varying accumulations

behavior in different species of fish and shrimp which relied on their feeding habit affected the

MPI values more than the weight factor in this case. The MPIs value of this study was more than

three order of magnitude higher than those reported for Asafo market, Ghana (0.021 – 0.036)

Kwaansa-Ansah et al., 2018 and comparable with the MPIs value of Pikeperch (0.91), Hao et al.,

2013.

Health Risk Assessment

The risk assessment results are given in Table 4. The non-carcinogenic daily intake rate effects

range between 7.66 x 10-4 kg/day for Cr and 4.99 kg/day for Zn in the analyzed fish and between

8.04 x 10-4 kg/day for Cr and 8.78 kg/day for Zn in the studied shrimp species. Also, the

carcinogenic daily consumption rate limit of Pb in the analyzed fish and shrimp species was

3.28 x 10-3 kg/day and 3.77 x 10-3 kg/day respectively. This relatively low values are expected

not to cause any adverse effects on human health. The meal size for non-carcinogenic effect of

the analyzed fish was in the range 0.10 in Cr to 668.77 meals/month in Zn and between 0.11 in

Cr to 1177.88 meals/month in Zn for shrimp. Meals/month of carcinogenic effect of Pb was 0.44

and 0.51 for the fish and shrimp species respectively. THQ was in the trend Cr>Pb>Cu>Cd>

Ni>Zn for the fish and Cr>Pb>Cu>Ni>Cd>Zn for the shrimp and were all less than 1 except for

Cr which recorded the highest value (8.84 and 6.52) for the fish and shrimps respectively. The

combined HI of the studied heavy metals were 7.48 for the fish and 7.0 for the shrimp. These

high values which are far greater than one and in addition to the high THQ value of Cr in both

fish and shrimp samples revealed high bioaccumulation of Cr as it concentration level on the

studied species exceeds the recommended limits. This suggest a possible carcinogenic risk to

consumers of this product via Cr consumption. The combined HI of this study was higher than

those reported in Sistan region, Iran (26.94 x 10-3) Miri et al., 2017 and Asafor Market, Ghana

Page 9 of 17

454

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

(2.61 x 10-3) Kwaansa-Ansah et al., 2018 while similar HI value was reported for wild fishes in

the Southern Sea of Korea and followed the order; Cd>Cr>Zn, Hwang et al. (2017).

The carcinogenic risk factor (CR) of Pb calculated for fish and shrimp consumption in Calabar

was 1.60 x 10-5 and 1.39 x 10-5 mg/kg/day respectively. Generally, CR above 10-4 are regarded

as unacceptable, CR below 10-6 as negligible, and ranging from 10-4 to 10-6 as an acceptable

carcinogenic risk factor (USEPA, 2011). Therefore, the CR value of Pb (1.60 x 10-5 and 1.39 x 10-

5) mg/kg/day was in an acceptable range and was lower compared to CR in the range 1.0 x 10-

3 to 9.01 x 10-3 mg/kg/day calculated for frequently consumed fish species in Bogra District of

Bangladesh (Islam et al., 2016), comparable to CR of 6.75 x 10-5 mg/kg/day in Asafor Market,

Ghana (Kwaansa-Ansah et al., 2018) and higher to CR of 1.57 x 10-7 mg/kg/day via fish intake

in Sistan region (Miri et al., 2017).

Relationship and source of Heavy metals pollution

The association between studied sea food size and heavy metals concentration was checked by

Pearson’s correlation analysis for each fish and shrimp species. Most heavy metals had

significant correlations (0.50< r < 1.0) with the strongest observed for Pb and Zn (r=0.9052,

SI2) with each at p<0.05. The positive correlation between weight and length assent well with

earlier findings by Miri et al., 2017 and may be ascribed to their similar spreading bearing,

natural and man-made activities. Nonetheless, Cd did not show any significant association with

fish and shrimp size for all the studied species except a significant negative correlation between

Cd and Cu (r = -.0.1995; SI2). This might as well be associated to differences in the feeding

behavior of each species.

MEC is quite a new index but a widely used tool for generating information about heavy metal

origin (Adamu and Nganje 2010). MEC values higher than 1 in this study for both fish and

shrimp species (11.83 and 6.12 respectively; Table 3) support strongly the anthropogenic

source of Heavy metal contamination.

Multivariate analyses

Principal Component analysis

Principal component analysis (PCA) of heavy metals concentration for Ethmalosa Fimbriata,

Clarias Gariepenus, Tilapia Guineensis fishes and Macrobrachium Felicinum shrimp species

performed using SPSS 20 was expected to identify those elements that co-vary. The PCA results

are presented in Fig. 2a where varimax rotation was applied on the first two principal

components; PC1 and PC2 accounting for 70.49 and 23.94 % respectively with an overall

variance of 94.43%. Zn, Cr and Pb with positive loading and clustering together in PCA 1

indicates the strength of their common relationship as compared with the greater distance

observed for Ni. Cu with relative negative loading in PCA 2 reveals the tendency of the fish and

shrimp species in accumulating less Cu than others.

Cluster analysis

The measurement regarding similarities and/or differences between size and heavy metals

concentration for Ethmalosa Fimbriata, Clarias Gariepenus, Tilapia Guineensis fishes and

Macrobrachium Felicinum shrimp species by cluster analysis was carried out to obtain

information on their association and patterns in data. Result of cluster analysis is shown on the

dendogram (Fig 2b) with two main distinguishable clusters. The first cluster comprised of Cd

Page 10 of 17

455

Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-462.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11613

combining first with the smallest distance to Ni and increased slightly to Zn and relates to a

common mixed source of industrial effluents, garbage incinerator and fertilizers application.

The second cluster comprised of Cu having the shortest distance which extended slightly to Cr

and Pb (persistent toxic metals) and associates with mixed source inputs from industrial

effluents and Nigerian crude oils (Farombi et al. 2007).

CONCLUSION

The results revealed that concentration of Cr, Pb, and Ni in fish and shrimp species obtained

from markets in Calabar, Cross River State was high and crosses the threshold according to the

quality standard set. MPI in the order: Ethmalosa Fimbriata > Clarias Gariepenus >

Macrobrachium Felicinum > Tilapia Guineensis advises that Ethmalosa Fimbriata should be

properly processed before consumption and that proper environmental monitoring should be

enhanced to check heavy metal hazard. The EWI of the studied heavy metals by fish and shrimp

consumption was below the PTWI values which indicate a low risk of non-carcinogenic adverse

effects for consumers. More so, the carcinogenic risk of Pb in both fish and shrimp species was

within the acceptable range of 10-4 -10-6 mg/kg/day. The combine heavy metal concentration

and health risk analysis showed that the studied fish and shrimp species could be considered

safe to local people and that there may be no potential risks relating to fish and shrimp intake

in Calabar. Even though, it is recommended to policy makers and all stakeholders to stop the

sources of Cr, Pb, and Ni pollutants, refining, trading and use in all sectors so as not to pollute

the environment and increase health risks to the community. The bioaccumulation patterns of

metals in this study can be utilized as effective indicators of environmental metal

contamination to offer baseline insights on the concentration and health risk of some toxic

heavy metals in commercial fish and shrimp species consumed in Calabar and the globe in

general.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are thankful to the management of University of Calabar, Nigeria for the financial support

through Bond Fellowship. The authors acknowledge with thanks the assistance of Dr. Stephen

Oladeji, Miss Anne Ikrihi, and Miss Favour Adagbor, all of Department of Food Science and

Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Calabar for the identification of the fish and

shrimp species used in this study and support during the sampling exercise. The technical staff

of the Institute of Oceanography and Pure & Applied Chemistry Department, University of

Calabar are also appreciated for their assistance in laboratory protocols.

References

Abu, O., Monica G., Nwokoma, G. C. Bioaccumulation of Selected Heavy Metals in Water, Sediment and Blue Crab

(Callinectes amnicola) from Bodo Creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of FisheriesSciences.com 2, 1-14. (2016)

Achum, T. Valentine http://789marketing.com.ng/calabar-restoring-tourism-glory-nigerias-pride/Archived 2

September 2017 at the Wayback Machine.

Adamu, C. L., & Nganje, T. N. (2010). Heavy metal contamination of surface soil in relationship to land use

patterns: A case study of Benue State, Nigeria. Materials Sciences and Applications, 1, 127–134.

Ahmed MK, Ahamed S, Rahman S, Haque MR, Islam MM. Heavy metals concentration in water, sediments and

their bioaccumulations in some freshwater fishes and mussel in Dhaleshwari River, Bangladesh. Terr. Aquat.

Environ. Toxicol. 3: 33–41 (2009)

Page 11 of 17

456

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Akinrotimi, O.A., Edun, O.M. Seasonal Variation of Heavy Metals in Selected Sea Foods from Buguma and

Ekerekana Creeks Niger Delta. International Journal of Innovat. Stud. in Aquatic Biol. and Fisheries (IJISABF) 1:

46-53 (2015).

Akoto O, Bismark Eshun F, Darko G, Adei E. Concentrations and health risk assessments of heavy metals in fish

from the Fosu Lagoon. Int. J. Environ. Res. 8: 403–410 (2014)

Alturiqi AS, Albedair LA. Evaluation of some heavy metals in certain fish, meat and meat products in Saudi

Arabian markets. Egypt J. Aquat. Res. 38: 45–49 (2012).

Canli M, Atli G. The relationships between heavy metal (Cd, Cr, Cu,Fe, Pb, Zn) levels and the size of six

Mediterranean fish species. Environ. Pollut. 121: 129–136 (2003).

Chandra R, Jhan N. The analysis of length-weight relationship of Channa punctatus with relative physico- chemical parameters. J. Exp. Sci. 1: 4–5 (2010)

Essien, J. P., Antai, S. P., Olajire, A. A. Distribution, Seasonal Variations and Ecotoxicological Significance of Heavy

Metals in Sediments of Cross River Estuary Mangrove Swamp. Water Air Soil Pollut. 197:91–105: (2009)

FAO. Fishery Information Data and Statistics Unit. FISHSTAT. Databases and Statistics. Food and Agriculture

Organization of the United Nation, Rome, Italy (2016)

Farombi, E. O., Adelowo, O. A. and Ajimoko, Y. R. 2007. Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Heavy Metals Levels as

Indicators of Environmental Pollution in Africa Cat Fish (Clarias gariepinus) From Nigeria Ogun River.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 4(2): 158-165.

Froese R. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and

recommendations. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 22: 241–253 (2006)

Giri S, Singh AK. Human health risk and ecological risk assessment of metals in fishes, shrimps and sediment

from a tropical river. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (Tehran) 12: 2349–2362 (2015)

Hao Y, Chen L, Zhang X, Zhang D, Zhang X, Yu Y, Fu J. Trace elements in fish from Taihu Lake, China: Levels,

associated risks, and trophic transfer. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 90: 89–97 (2013).

Hwang D-W, Kim S-S, Kim S-G, Kim D-S, Kim T-H. Concentrations of heavy metals in marine wild fishes captured

from the southern sea of Korea and associated health risk assessments. Ocean Sci J 52: 527–536 (2017).

Islam MS, Ahmed MK, Habibullah-Al-Mamun M, Raknuzzaman M, Ali MM, Eaton DW. Health risk assessment due

to heavy metal exposure from commonly consumed fish and vegetables. Environ. Syst. Decis. 36: 253–265

(2016)

Joanna B. K., Mazurek, R., Michał, G. S., Zaleski, T. Pollution indices as useful tools for the comprehensive

evaluation of the degree of soil contamination–A review. Environ Geochem Health 40:2395–2420 (2018)

JECFA. Sixty-first meeting, Rome, 10–19 June 2003: summary and conclusions. World Health Organization/Food

and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy (2003)

Kwaansa-Ansah, E.E., Nti, S. O., Opoku, F., Heavy metals concentration and human health risk assessment I seven

commercial fish species from Asafo Market, Ghana. Food Science Biotechnol. 32: 1-12.

Miri M, Akbari E, Amrane A, Jafari SJ, Eslami H, Hoseinzadeh E, Zarrabi M, Salimi J, Sayyad-Arbabi M, Taghavi M.

Health risk assessment of heavy metal intake due to fish consumption in the Sistan region, Iran. Environ. Monit.

Assess. 189: 1–10 (2017)

Obot, O.I., Isangedighi, A. I. David, G. S. Heavy metals concerntration in some commercial fishes in the lower Cross

River Estuary, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment. 12(4):218-223 (2016)

Parida S, Barik S, Mohanty B, Muduli P, Mohanty S, Samanta S, Pattanaik A. Trace metal concentrations in

euryhaline fish species from Chilika lagoon: human health risk assessment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (Tehran)

14: 2649–2660 (2017)

Shakeri A, Shakeri R, Mehrabi B. Potentially toxic elements and persistent organic pollutants in water and fish at

Shahid Rajaei Dam, North of Iran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (Tehran) 12: 2201–2212 (2015)

Page 12 of 17

457

Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-462.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11613

USEPA. Exposure factors handbook. National Center for Environmental Assessment. United State Environmental

Protection Agency, Washington, DC (2011)

Yu Y, Wang X, Yang D, Lei B, Zhang X, Zhang X. Evaluation of human health risks posed by carcinogenic and non- carcinogenic multiple contaminants associated with consumption of fish from Taihu Lake, China. Food Chem.

Toxicol. 69: 86–93 (2014).

Table 1: Biological background information, sampling location and trophic level characteristics

of the studied fish and shrimp samples

Biological Information and

Trophic level characteristics

Scientific

Name

Clarias

Gariepenu

s

Tilapia

Guineensi

s

Ethmalosa

Fimbriata

Macrobrachiu

m Felicinum

English

Name Cat Fish

Tilapia

Fish Bonga Fish Shrimps

Local

Name

Obubit

Inaha Asat Ekpai Obu

Range of

length

(cm)

40-60 16-46.2 15-25 3.5-9.5

Range of

Weight

(g)

350-550 150-250 100-150 3.70-5.50

Main

Food

Living and

dead

animal

matter,

Agro

products

etc.

Amphibio

us plants Plantons

Worms, living

and dead

organic matter

Habitat

Fresh

water

lakes,river

s,

swamps,

artificial

ponds etc.

Shallow

streams,

ponds,

lakes,

rivers etc

Fresh and

Brackish

water,

Mangrove

creeks,

inland

rivers etc.

Fresh and

Brackish

water,

Mangrove

creeks, inland

rivers etc.

Trophic

level 38 2.8 - 2.5

Location and number

(quantity) of samples collected

Beach

Market 6 6 9 600g

Lagos

Street 6 6 9 600g

Mbukpa

Market 6 6 9 600g

Watt

Market 6 6 9 600g

Total 24 24 36 2400g

Page 13 of 17

458

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Table 2: Descriptive Analysis of the selected Heavy metals

Seafood /Heavy

Metals Conc.

(Mg/Kg) (Pb) (Zn) (Cr) (Cu) (Cd) (Ni)

(H

g) Total

Rang

e

M

PI

Catfish (Clarias

Gariepenus)

5.56±

0.41

0.84

±0.0

7

6.48±

0.29

6.36±0

.73

0.13

±0.1

1

1.12

±0.1

8

N

D

20.48

±0.22

0.13-

6.48

1.

7

5

Tilapia fish (Tilapia

Guineensis)

5.24±

0.43

0.46

±0.0

2

5.14±

0.79

6.25±0

.67

0.03

±0.0

1

1.27

±0.0

8

N

D

18.38

±1.94

0.03-

6.25

1.

2

1

Bonga fish (Ethmalosa

Fimbriata)

6.68±

0.05

1.64

±0.0

2

7.47±

0.02

7.73.0

9±0.49

0.08

±0.0

1

2.3±

0.12

N

D

25.90

±0.28

0.08-

7.73

2.

2

0

shrimps

(Macrobrachium

Felicinum)

5.07±

0.28

0.56

±0.0

8

6.06±

1.01

7.35±0

.57

0.03

±0.0

1

1.3±

0.04

N

D

20.36

±1.63

0.03-

7.35

1.

2

8

Total

22.55

±0.71

3.50

±0.8

7

25.15

±1.01

19.96±

0.86

0.27

±0.0

7

5.99

±0.4

8

N

D

85.12

±9.90

0.27-

25.15

-

Range

5.07-

6.68

0.46-

1.64

5.14-

7.47

6.25-

7.73

0.03-

0.13

1.12-

2.3

N

D

18.38-

25.90 -

-

Coefficient of

variation (%) 12.59

53.4

9 16.96 12.35

102.

31

32.3

2 - - -

-

Table 3: The PTDI, EDI, and EWI values recorded for the different heavy metals detected in the

fish and species

Fish

Heavy Metal EDI (mg/kg bw/day)

EWI (mg/kg

bw/week) PTDI %PTWI K Value MEC

Pb 1.8 x 10-3 5.74 x 10-2 3.57 229.5138

7.02 11.83

Zn 3.15 x 10-4 9.62 x 10-3 1000 0.137495

Cr 2.05 x 10-3 6.26 x 10-2 23.3 0.268832

Cu 2.19 x 10-3 6.67 x 10-2 500 1.907106

Cd 2.51 x 10-5 7.96 x 10-4 0.007 11.36996

Ni 5.03 x 10-4 1.54 x 10-2 0.365 4.210467

Shrimp

Heavy Metal EDI (mg/kg bw/day)

EWI (mg/kg

bw/week) PTDI %PTWI K Value MEC

Pb 1.63 x 10-3 4.99 x 10-2 3.57 199.5815

2.28 6.12

Zn 1.79 x 10-4 5.46 x 10-3 1000 0.078066

Cr 1.96 x 10-3 5.97 x 10-2 23.3 0.25619

Cu 2.37 x 10-3 7.23 x 10-2 500 2.066989

Cd 8.87 x 10-6 2.71 x 10-4 0.007 3.868132

Ni 4.19 x 10-4 1.28 x 10-2 0.365 3.506849

Page 14 of 17

459

Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-462.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11613

Table 4: Estimated CRlim (non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic), CRmm, THQ, CR and HI

Heavy

Metal

(Fish)

Carcinogenic Non-carcinogenic

THQ

CR

(mg/kg/da

y)

CRlim

(Kg/day)

CRmm

(Meals/month)

CRlim

(Kg/day)

CRmm

(Meals/mon

th)

Pb

3.28 x 10-

3 0.44 9.76 x 10-3 1.31 0.54 1.60 x 10-5

Zn 4.99 668.77

1.05 x 10-

3

Cr 7.66 x 10-4 0.10 6.84

Cu 0.10 12.86 0.05

Cd 0.20 26.96 0.03

Ni 0.21 27.92 0.03

HI 7.48

Heavy

Metal

(Shrim

p)

Carcinogenic Non-carcinogenic

THQ

CR

(mg/kg/da

y)

CRlim

(Kg/day)

CRmm

(Meals/month)

CRlim

(Kg/day)

CRmm

(Meals/mon

th)

Pb

3.77 x 10-

3 0.51 1.12 x 10-2 1.51 0.47 1.39 x 10-5

Zn 8.78 1177.88 5.97 x 10-4

Cr 8.04 x 10-4 0.11 6.52

Cu 0.09 11.86 0.06

Cd 0.59 79.24 0.01

Ni 0.25 33.52 0.02

HI 7.06

Fig. 1. Heavy Metal concentrations of the four sampling locations in Calabar

20.03

20.29

22.45 22.36

Beach Market Lagos Street Mbukpa Market Watt Market

Total conc. (mg/kg) per sampling location

Page 15 of 17

460

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Fig. 2 : (a) Score plot of PCA and (b) Dendogram of clustering of heavy metals in fish and

shrimps species

SI1: Anova: Two-Factor With

Replication

SUMMARY

Lead

(Pb)

Zinc

(Zn)

Chromium

(Cr)

Copper

(Cr)

Cadmium

(Cd)

Nickel

(Ni) Total

Catfish (Clarias Gariepenus)

Count 4 4 4 4 4 4 24

Sum 22.23 3.37 25.92 25.42 0.53 4.46 81.93

Average 5.5575 0.8425 6.48 6.355 0.1325 1.115

3.4137

5

Variance

0.22735

8

0.0060

92 0.113867 0.706967 0.015692

0.04083

3

8.0250

07

Tilapia fish (Tilapia

Guineensis)

Count 4 4 4 4 4 4 24

Sum 20.97 1.82 20.54 25.01 0.13 5.07 73.54

Average 5.2425 0.455 5.135 6.2525 0.0325 1.2675

3.0641

67

Variance

0.24189

2

0.0005

67 0.827033 0.605292 0.000025

0.00942

5

6.9024

17

shrimps (Macrobrachium

Felicinum)

Count 4 4 4 4 4 4 24

Sum 20.27 2.22 24.25 29.39 0.11 5.2 81.44

Average 5.0675 0.555 6.0625 7.3475 0.0275 1.3

3.3933

33

Page 16 of 17

461

Oyo-Ita, I. O., Nkom, P. Y., Umo, F. E., Eton, E., Neji, H. A., & Oyo-Ita, O. E. (2022). Residue Levels and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy

Metals in Commercial Fish and Shrimp Species from Calabar, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 446-462.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11613

Variance

0.10809

2

0.0094

33 1.368092 0.432225 9.17E-05

0.00186

7

8.8294

93

Bonga fish (Ethmalosa

Fimbriata)

Count 4 4 4 4 4 4 24

Sum 26.73 6.54 29.88 30.92 0.31 9.2 103.58

Average 6.6825 1.635 7.47 7.73 0.0775 2.3

4.3158

33

Variance

0.00375

8 0.0007 0.0004 0.0118 9.17E-05

0.01786

7

9.8167

47

Total

Count 16 16 16 16 16 16

Sum 90.2 13.95 100.59 110.74 1.08 23.93

Average 5.6375

0.8718

75 6.286875 6.92125 0.0675

1.49562

5

Variance 0.53738

0.2320

03 1.212343 0.778892 0.005087

0.24925

3

ANOVA

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit

Sample

20.7744

4 3 6.924812 34.99251 4.62E-14

2.73180

7

Columns

747.744

3 5 149.5489 755.7015 1.01E-60

2.34182

8

Interaction

10.2015

4 15 0.680103 3.436702 0.000212

1.80757

1

Within

14.2483

8 72 0.197894

Total

792.968

7 95

Page 17 of 17

462

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

SI2: Pearson Correlation of the Studied Samples

Heavy Metals r N

T- statistics DF P-value

Pb with Zn 0.9051615 16 7.9676815 14 1.43549E-06

Pb with Cr 0.7217816 16 3.9020055 14 0.001595445

Pb with Cu 0.6024922 16 2.8245199 14 0.013511874

Pb with Cd 0.2418904 16 0.9327711 14 0.366746797

Pb with Ni 0.811882 16 5.2032761 14 0.000133782

Zn with Cr 0.7359713 16 4.0675047 14 0.001153082

Zn with Cu 0.5078501 16 2.2058286 14 0.044610069

Zn with Cd 0.2898834 16 1.1333062 14 0.276121143

Zn with Ni 0.8787202 16 6.8879414 14 7.46654E-06

Cr with Cu 0.7485358 16 4.2237796 14 0.000850332

Cr with Cd 0.2747822 16 1.0693018 14 0.303024301

Cr with Ni 0.6002304 16 2.8079276 14 0.013960744

Cu with Cd -0.1994891 16

-

0.7617307 14

Cu with Ni 0.5656931 16 2.5668069 14 0.022375583

Cd with Ni 0.1374725 16 0.5193056 14 0.611659589