Page 1 of 16

European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 10, No. 1

Publication Date: February 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/aivp.101.11387. Chang, Y. (2022). Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology.

European Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 371-386.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent

Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology

Yi-Fang Chang

Department of Physics, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China

ABSTRACT

Ecology is closely related to the rise and fall of human society. First, we propose the

nonlinear whole ecology and its four basic rules. Second, entropy plays an

important role in ecological economics, and the cycle of resources and the general

recycling economy cannot be a single increase process of entropy, we research

possible entropy decrease. Third, in order to achieve sustainable development,

society must realize the recycling economy. We study the applications of hypercycle

in ecology, and corresponding equations of ecosystem. The key factor in the cycle is

the conversion of waste. Fourth, we propose the talent ecology, which studies the

relations among talent and circumstances (esp., the social circumstances), and

search its three basic principles. The base of talent is education. The mechanism of

the academic development is freedom. The aim is innovation. The talent ecology

must encourage the academic diversity. Fifth, the structure-function-result mode of

ecosystem is proposed. Sixth, we discuss the recycling ecosystem of traditional

Chinese agriculture, and Chinese cultural-social ecology.

Key Words: ecology; human society; entropy; recycling economy; hypercycle; talent;

traditional Chinese agriculture; structure-function-result mode.

INTRODUCTION

Ecology takes the mutual relations between human society and resources and environment as

a whole. The material basis of the sustainable development of human society comes finally from

nature. The human existence continuously reduces useful resources, and increases wastes. The

survival and development of human society are greatly stressed from these two aspects. Usual

ecology is typically an open system and also an irreversible process of entropy. The once very

glorious Babylon civilization, the Habala civilization of India and the Maya civilization of

America were destructed due to human ecological environment. These are the profound

historical lessons of human society.

Mathematics is a powerful and important tool in modern ecology and environment science

[1,2]. Based on the synergetic equations [3,4], we derived different models of population

dynamics, and various simplified results and their ecological meaning by the qualitative

analysis theory of the nonlinear equations. The ecological synergetics promulgates deeply a

complex nonlinear relation between competition and cooperation on different species. Further,

we searched the general nonlinear evolutional equations of ecosystem, and the human crises

and our outlets [5].

Page 2 of 16

372

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Any ecosystem is gradually formed and evolving. Its long existence must form a self-organized

dissipative structure [6,7]. An important order parameter for the sustainable development of

human society is the transformation of waste and the circulation of resources. In this paper, we

propose the nonlinear whole ecology and its four basic rules, and the talent ecology, and discuss

entropy and hypercycle in ecology, the structure-function-result mode of ecosystem, and

Chinese cultural-social ecology, etc.

NONLINEAR WHOLE ECOLOGY AND ITS BASIC RULES

Based on the inseparability and correlativity of the biological systems and human body, we

proposed the nonlinear whole biology [8,9] and the nonlinear whole medicine [10].

We start from the two main basic features whole and nonlinearity of ecology and combining

the general nonlinear theory, and propose the nonlinear whole ecology, and its four basic rules:

First rule: The inseparability exists always among different fields and different levels in various

ecological systems, which determinates to the ecological whole.

Second rule: Various ecological systems possess generally interaction and nonlinearity, which

include from molecular ecology, autecology, plant ecology, animal ecology to biodiversity,

evolutionary ecology, ecosphere, and so on. Their descriptions are necessarily nonlinear

mathematics. Corresponding equations all are nonlinear, and possess chaos and fractals, etc.

Third rule: A basic property of any ecological systems as an open system is this system and its

environment must be a whole, and forms environmental ecology. Usual environment may be

regarded as a boundary condition of the system, but it and the ecological systems have often

various nonlinear relations.

Fourth rule: Ecology studies the relations between living things and their natural and social

environments. This derives necessarily the totality, nonlinearity and ecological complexity. It is

related to behavioural ecology, coevolution, cultural ecology, social ecology and human ecology.

Four rules are a whole, and are closely related each other, such as, environmental economics,

etc. Because of ecological complexity, their description must apply the nonlinear theory with

the interaction terms. In ecological systems the structural complexity or the compositioal

complexity will produce and forms the functional complexity and causal complexity [11].

ENTROPY CHANGE IN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM

Entropy plays an important role in ecological economics, and provides a theoretical basis for

limiting economic growth. This has also caused some discussion [12-14]. Smith, et al., studied

economics, ecology and entropy [15]. Jørgensen discussed a pattern as integration of ecosystem

theories [16].

Recently, Harte proposed the Maximum Entropy Theory of Ecology (METE), which has

extensive influence in ecology [17,18]. For the coupled human and natural systems (CHANS),

sustainability can be defined as a set of feasible and reasonable flows, including materials,

currency, information, energy, personnel, etc. This can combine the social-ecological

hydrodynamics [19]. Based on review of information theory, Mayer, et al., provided a

theoretical framework for dynamics of feedback in CHANS, and proposed an exponential

Page 3 of 16

373

Chang, Y. (2022). Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology. European Journal

of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 371-386.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11387

combination based on information that can effectively provide information about sustainability

objectives, especially when it comes to critical feedback in CHANS [20].

Ecology and evolution are often studied separately, and researchers focus only on one aspect

of information or entropy: molecular variation, species variation, etc. Information on all these

aspects can be seen in a larger, unified framework, and have nested levels, such as molecules,

individuals, populations, species, and ecosystems. It is known in ecology that macroscientists

study combinations of different species, while microevolutionary biologists study variations in

geneticable information within the species, such as DNA and epigenetic modifications. The two

different modes of change, although the methods sometimes vary very differently, but, are

determined by the same four basic processes of innovation, propagation, motion, and

adaptation. This is the common basis for ecology and evolution. Sherwin discussed the four

basic processes, where entropy or information methods can be applied uniformly to the

analysis and prediction of ecology and evolution [21].

The general development equations in ecosystems are [22]:

. (1)

Here the first item on the right is the saturation term, and the nonlinear functions

describe the competition rate and the regulation rate, etc. This can be related to the social- ecological hydrodynamics [19].

There is no doubt that the second law of thermodynamics is a great contribution to the

development of science, and applied widely many aspects. Rifkin, et al., proposed that entropy

is a new world view that governs everything, [23]. But, the second law of thermodynamics as

science must necessary research some new discussions. It is known that the basis of

thermodynamics is the statistics, in which a basic principle is statistical independence [24].

We proposed that when there are various internal interactions and fluctuations in isolated

systems, statistical independence no longer holds and the corresponding entropy has not

additive properties, hence the possibility of entropy decrease exists in the isolated system

[25,26]. This can not only be applied to many aspects of science and society [27-32], and some

examples are calculated quantitatively [26,29].

For systems with internal interactions, we proposed a universal formula for any isolated system

[26]:

. (2)

It is symmetry with the formula:

, (3)

in the theory of dissipative structure. From this we derived a complete symmetrical structure

on change of entropy:

[ ] ({ }) ({ }) ({ },{ }) e

i i C j R j M j j

j

i i i ij j

i k X N X d X F X F X F X X

dt

dX = -åb - + + +

FC FR ,

a i dS = dS + dS

dS d S d S = i + e

Page 4 of 16

374

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

(4)

Here entropy decrease may be the dissipative structure for an open system, or be the internal

interactions for an isolated system [26]. Further, we obtained the total formula of entropy

change for any natural or social system is [29,31,32]:

. (5)

When

, (6)

entropy increase dS>0, the system tends to disorder. When

, (7)

entropy decrease dS<0, the system tends to order. Both differences are determined by the input

negative entropy flow in open system and the internal attractive interactions in isolated system

The universal rule of this theory is that nonlinear internal interactions reach self-organization,

entropy decrease and order. It can have different levels: material, chemistry, biology,

individuals, society, and ecology, etc.

The same energy flow input a system, the technological innovation can greatly reduce the

entropy increase. ET includes energy, ecology and environment technology. Technological

innovations may be different dyes for solar energy, mechanical structures of wind energy

generators, and batteries of electric vehicles, etc.

The improvement of urban management level, such as garbage classification, has important

ecological significance. This is the process of entropy decrease. Cities, as an ecosystem, must be

an open dissipative structure, so as to exist. But, some systems may be as an isolated system,

such as the whole ecosystem or black box, the system inputs the same and get different energy,

from high entropy to low entropy, to achieve entropy decrease. Big data and datalism is creating

more information, of course more redundancy.

HYPERCYCLE AND ECOLOGY

In 1971 Manfred Eigen proposed the hypercyle theory, which is a scientific theory on the

relations between protein and nuclei acid, and on the origin of life, and discussed self- organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules [33,34]. It is in order to

model prebiotic evolution governed by the Darwinian principles of competition between

species and mutations, and leads to a new level of evolution. Here cooperative behaviors are

reflected by intrinsically nonlinear reaction mechanisms. Further, the hypercycle is a principle

of natural self-organization, and it as a beautiful form is a tool [34] not only in biomolecules,

and may be widely applied to many fields. In the hypercycle each cycle as a whole has self- ï

î

ï

í

ì

î

í

ì

= +

= + ® ® .

dS d d .

.

i e

a i dS dS dS

S S

decrease

increase

Entropy

+ - = + + - - + i + e - e

a i i dS dS dS dS dS dS dS

-

-

+ + + + + > + e

i

i e

a i dS dS dS dS dS dS

-

-

+ + + + + < + e

i

i e

a i dS dS dS dS dS dS

i dSe dS-

- +

Page 5 of 16

375

Chang, Y. (2022). Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology. European Journal

of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 371-386.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11387

enhancing growth properties, and their cooperative behaviours are reflected by intrinsically

nonlinear reaction mechanisms, and the dynamics is described by a system of coupled

nonlinear differential equations, for example, mechanism of enzymatic together catalysis,

whose cycle at least with three elements (Fig.1) and an extension of hypercycle evolution

principle (Fig.2) [34].

Fig.1: Mechanism of enzymatic together catalysis

Fig.2: Extension of hypercycle evolution principle

We apply the graph theory to the hypercycle theory. Here the graph G=(V,E), in which V is point

set and E is border set. Such the hypercycle can be defined by a degree of connectivity, which is

bigger, corresponds to higher hypercycle [35]. Dieckmann, et al., searched the geometry of

ecology and simplifying spatial complexity [2]. Butler, et al., discussed permanence in

ecosystems [36-39].

It is known that hypercycle is able to evolve towards optimized functions due to inner coupling

and synergies. Moreover, the organization of hypercycle is stable, because of the inner

nonlinearity, and its selection advantage is the whole property, so it can mathematically show

that the hypercycle has an extremely high symmetry and the corresponding stability. The

generalized hypercycle structure is a very typical form of existence.

One directional change system is a line increase process. The complete cycle is a circle, and

corresponds to a zero carbon emission system. The current recycling economics is mainly the

cycle of three elements from resources to products and wastes, and latter changes renewable

resources. Generally real ecosystems can be described in Fig. 3:

Page 6 of 16

376

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Fig.3 Recycling ecosystem

For the substantially invariant input, the circle radius of cycle is larger, the less waste the

output.

The rational application and transformation of various resources and the proper disposal of

waste are the most basic problems. Human society has living, food and clothing, comfort and

other different levels of living conditions. The levels are different, and the specific values of the

various indicators are also different. The mathematical basis of recycling economics should be

combined, and can be hypercycle. Various small cycles form large cycles. Therefore, we can

apply and develop the hypercycle and its theory.

According to the recycling economics of the sustainable development, the resources must be

the recycle structures. The simplest mode is to develop the industrial reclaimed wastes, and

form a cycle of three elements on product and consumption and reclaimed waste. The usual

economics is inextricability for the recycling economy.

The ecology and environment are very complex and huge nonlinear systems, which easy to

cause the butterfly effect in chaos. From this we can derive a conclusion: large-scale

transformation of nature must be very careful. Its negative effect is probably insurmountable

for scientific and technological progress. For example, at present, we should focus on the

construction of small and medium hydropower stations, and large hydropower stations are

easy to change the climate, geological structure, and even cause earthquakes.

At present, it has been recognized that both natural resources and social resources are two

indispensable elements of the existence and development of human society. Various kinds of

natural resources are interdependent, and mutually restricted, and they are whole. Resource

economics studies the economic and quantitative relations between human, resources and the

environment, and in the process of material cycle and energy transformation. This is an

emerging combination of natural science and social science. Resource economics applies the

optimization method to design the scheme of resource utilization, and uses production

functions, linear planning and other mathematical methods for qualitative and quantitative

analysis. Its goal is to develop and utilize resources economically, rationally and effectively.

Page 7 of 16

377

Chang, Y. (2022). Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology. European Journal

of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 371-386.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11387

This combines environmental economics, which also needs to consider the input-output funds

and benefits, manpower and employment, etc. Currently only environmental pollution is

discussed. But, combined with aesthetics we should consider the harmony of the whole

environment. Further, the diversity of human society as whole can combine the environment,

ecology and culture. For example, after food and clothing are basically solved, a main index of

social development is the degree of civilization. This is much more than just an economic

problem. In short, the economy and the ecosystem should be symbiotic and reciprocal relations.

Hypercycle as a higher level of cycle with a self-organization can describe the self-selection,

self-catalytic, self-replication mechanism of the system by nonlinear equations [34]. In the

selection dynamics it is consistent with molecular evolution, and the simplest system can be

described by the evolutionary differential equations of the mutual coupling:

. (8)

Hypercycles can evolve to a more complex degree and level through a similar gene replication

and specialization process [34]. Cramer believes that hypercycle theory has the most

fundamental importance for understanding the evolutionary mechanisms of biological

development [11]. Under certain conditions, hypercycles can act as isolated system.

For ecological system S, we may simplify the hypercycle equation (8) to:

. (9)

Here free energy F is of the system input, and is a function of energy E and goods G, and M is

management, is the conversion rate of the resource, and W is the output waste. The general

solution of this equation is:

. (10)

This corresponds to the principle of least action . The key factor in the

cycle is the waste conversion rate (R), whose size corresponds to the radius in FIG. 3.

If dS/dt=0, the system is stable. For general cases of (9), the system evolves. For the constant F,

f=0, so , and the system will increase over time, the waste accumulates and

becomes overwhelmed.

Assume that the simplest , when is very big, which corresponds to the circle

with a large radius in Fig. 3. If the system generates waste Wà0, . The input

energy is preferably clean, renewable, etc. For agriculture, the problem of pesticides and

fertilizers is difficult to transform.

Assuming that the system variable is proportional to S, the equation (9) can also develop to:

. (11)

i

k i

i i i i ik k A Q D x w x

dt

dx = - +å + f 1

( )

F E G f M R W

dt

dS = ( , ) + ( , i) -

Ri

ò S = F E G + f M R -W dt i [ ( , ) ( , ) ]

ò = + -

2

1

( )

t

t

dS d F f W dt

S = (F -W )t +C

( )

2 M aRi f = Ri

S = (F + f )t +C

F E G f M R W S

dt

dS

i = [ ( , ) + ( , ) - ]

Page 8 of 16

378

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

This is also a simplify result of Eq.(1). Its general solution is:

. (12)

Further, ecosystems can be developed into a variety of nonlinear equations and equations, such

as Lotka-Volterra models may describe lengthen and extinction each other in the ecosystem,

etc.

TALENT ECOLOGY

When we stroll at Vienna, the atmosphere of music is filled, from street playing to puppet

shows, from scale of the music festivals to the introduction of tourist sites. From the 19th

century to the beginning of the twentieth century, Gottingen as a holy place in the field of

mathematics and physics in the world was not only full of academic atmosphere, but scientists

are also generally respected by whole city. Cavendish Laboratory and Copenhagen all had a

strong academic atmosphere; contrarily, this formed a stronger academic environment. These

are all fascinating.

In talent research, G. Mosca of Italy from 1900-1923 and V. Pareto in Switzerland from 1900-

1916, and H.D. Lasswell at Chicago University from 1936 to 1952 searched outstanding talent.

By the ecologic method, we propose the talent ecology, which studies the relations among talent

and circumstances (esp., the social circumstances), and research three basic principles on the

talent ecology:

1. The principle of environment control. The environment determines the value

orientation of the whole society and the situation of talents. There are several limiting

factors on talents: First, talents should be able to survive. Second, developing talents

must provide a certain information flow and capital flow, so may create a good

environment within an appropriate scope. Third, the theoretical achievements must be

published, and useful sciences must be applied for certain places. Fourth, bigger

progress must be encouraged, supported and recognized by the society. Light,

temperature and water are three basic factors for land ecological environment; light,

temperature and salinity are three basic elements for marine ecological environment.

Saline land is hard to have a good harvest. Free academic atmosphere, information and

capital seem to be the three basic elements of talent ecological environment. Of course,

this never denies individual efforts.

2. The principle of interconnection and holism. Talent ecology is related to big social

ecology and cultural ecology. In longitudinal aspect, four different levels (genes,

individuals, groups, society) are inseparable. In the long review, any level is important.

Talent ecology should not only study the part, but also study the whole. This is similar

to the rule of integrative levels in ecology proposed by Feibleman in 1954. More

generally, talent ecology involves the social-economic-talent system. Three aspects

cooperate with each other, and talents can flourish and develop.

3. The principle of quality determined by quantity. This is a statistical law. From talent to

funds, we must have a certain number to lead to a higher quality. Talent ecology is a

pyramidal structure. Good social environment, the popularization of education and

scientific knowledge, certain number of magazines and books, different schools,

theoretical diversity form the number pyramid, energy pyramid, information pyramid,

and finally lead to the quality pyramid. In pyramid the lower layers are various

S C exp{[F(E,G) f (M , R ) W ]t} = + i -

Page 9 of 16

379

Chang, Y. (2022). Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology. European Journal

of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 371-386.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11387

foundations, and the upper layers are different levels of talent. But, if structure of the

pyramid is not naturally formed, and artificially determined, especially by officials or

fake scholars, then the result must be extremely unsatisfactory, even false and poor

people. Such it points out that it is best to have several pyramids, namely, different

schools.

These three basic principles are the general laws. There are also some inferences: a few talents

are only fluctuation phenomenon. The cultivation of talents has time lag. The total talent

ecology includes: its own parts, such as genetic genes, education; and environment part,

including living and material environment, working environment, academic (democratic and

free discussion, and different schools) environment, social environment, etc. In short, an

ecosystem should be formed to support, encourage and respect talent, and not to suppress or

combat talent and new ideas.

The base of talent is education. The mechanism of the academic development is freedom. The

aim is innovation. Only popularizing education and academic freedom can produce high-quality

talents and constantly innovate. The competition between talents must be fair and equal

opportunities. The biggest purpose of talent ecology is to obtain the maximum protection and

support for talents, and thus to achieve the maximum talent output (including both quality and

quantity). The talent ecology must encourage the academic diversity.

Talent ecosystem can have different structures, functions and other aspects. The system can be

big or small, different talent ecosystem can form a virtuous cycle: democratic discussion,

complement each other, help mutual and common development. It is a basic law of ecology that

the development of communities leads to the development of biology. Only forming different

schools can promote the great development of science and essential major innovation. Further,

in the talent ecosystem the models of different schools combine each other and develop to form

the complementary models, from this can better lead to co-evolution. A good talent

environment must allow, support and encourage academic diversity. This is necessary for

freedom of academic atmosphere, and is a good way to discover talent and promote

scholarship. It is similar to the biological diversity. Without the academic atmosphere of free

and democratic discussion is difficult to have more originality. Only academic advocating and

encouraging different schools can lead to competition between each other.

Although capital and material are the basis of good talent ecosystem, scientific atmosphere, a

kind of love, reverence and devotion to science is not directly proportional to money! This is

true for ancient and modern of world.

Talent ecology can apply mathematical methods and models, and describe by the known

equations of population dynamics, for example, the relations between environment and talent

by Lotka-Volterra model; the relations between different schools by competing models; and the

synergy in the same talent ecosystem with each member power amplified due to each other by

the symbiotic model:

. (13)

(1 ) k aN

M rM

dt

dM

+ = -

Page 10 of 16

380

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

. (14)

Talent is always a few, but they are inseparable from the ordinary people and form a social

unity together. Talents have different fields and levels, and have their own expertise, their own

advantages and disadvantages, and even their own paranoia. They should be tolerant, cannot

seek perfection. This is a common sense. All people are equal in politics and personality, but

there are differences in ability and strengths. It is also common sense. Giving full play to the

talents and the expertise of everyone, by using their strengths, and avoid their weaknesses, it

is the best choice for a good society and its development.

STRUCTURE-FUNCTION-RESULT MODE OF ECOSYSTEM

Structural functionalism is an important theory in modern sociology [40-43]. Social structure

is organized set of social relationships in which members of the society or group are variously

implicated [44]. Turner investigated systematically the structure of sociological theory [45].

Neofunctionalism is a self-critical stand of functional theory that seeks to broaden

functionalism’s intellectual scope while retaining its theoretical core [46].

Based on various social structures and combining structural functionalism and

neofunctionalism and the structure-conduct-performance (SCP) mode proposed and

developed by E.Mason, J.Bain and F.M.Scherer, we proposed the structure-function-result (SFR)

mode of sociology [35]. Now we extend it to ecology, and forms the structure-function-result

(SFR) mode of ecosystem (Fig. 4), in which the structure of system determines the system

function and the evolution mechanism, and feedback modifies structure. Three can be

represented by three Borromean rings (Fig.5) in topology [47,19], in which united they stand,

divided they fall. This is also a pattern of some ternary systems.

Fig. 4. The Structure-Function-Result (SFR) mode of ecosystem

Fig. 5. Borromean rings

In modern sociology there are the evolutionary theory, the conflict theory, the exchange theory

and interactionist, etc [45]. They may belong in different dynamics. We researched the social

thermodynamics and the social hydrodynamics [48,19]. These can all be applied to ecosystems.

(1 )

p bM

N rN

dt

dN

+ = -

Page 11 of 16

381

Chang, Y. (2022). Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology. European Journal

of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 371-386.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11387

Usually ecosystems have two characters: one is stability, the other is evolution and

development. Both correspond to the dynamics and dynamics of system, respectively. The

structure determines the elastic mechanics and elasticity of the ecosystem. Only the elastic

coefficient can be introduced phenomenally, and assuming that the generalized Hooke law

holds: within the elastic limit, each stress is a linear homogeneous function of pure strain. This

can describe the changing adaptation to the environment. The elasticity of the system is greater,

the self-adaptive and restorative are also stronger. If the elasticity is small, the ecosystem is

easier to collapse, and the species is easier to perish. For example, the panda's body and food

structure make it endangered.

Usual real ecosystems have certain nonlinear characteristics: self-organization, self-repair,

fractal forms with self-similar structures, etc. And limit cycle may only appear in nonlinear

systems [22]. The ideal ecosystem should have the stability and hypercycle [33,34]

characteristics. This is most typical of the bee and ant populations.

The cycle of resources or the general recycling economy cannot be a single increasing process

of entropy. We proposed structure-function-result mode for the same ecosystem, feedback and

management levels are internal interactions in the system that may be entropy decrease. For a

certain short time, if the system acts as isolated system, the second law of thermodynamics

must be modified and developed [25-32].

ECOLOGICAL CYCLE SYSTEM OF CHINESE TRADITIONAL AGRICULTURE AND CHINESE

CULTURAL-SOCIAL ECOLOGY

A well-known economist A. Marshall said, using a certain area of the earth's surface is a basic

condition for people to do anything [49]. Thus a fundamental problem of sustainable

development is land and agriculture. In China some ancient ecological countryside has formed

the complete cycle system of agriculture-mulberry-raise-fishery [35]. This is paddy field

planting rice, planting mulberry on the ridge, fish in the water. It raises pigs by agricultural and

sideline products, pig manure as fertilizer of field. Mulberry leaves raise sheep, with sheep

manure as fertilizer of mulberry; mulberry leaves raise silkworm, with silkworm manure and

snail water grass feed fish, and fish manure as fertilizer of mulberry.

Its important foundations is the use of farm manure, mainly stable manure, human manure and

urine, vegetation ash, green manure, and mud manure, etc. Its character is by local materials,

low cost. It may increase the soil organic matter and improve the soil structure. The organic

fertilizer is recycling. This has achieved sustainable development for thousands of years, and

may be a model of sustainable development in world agriculture.

Further, the Chinese traditional house is grass as top and soil as walls, which are also easier to

return to nature. Land produces food, men manure as fertilizer of land. Clothes are cotton, living

in the house of grass-soil-wood structure, and they can be used as fertilizer, and back to the

land. Of course, the modern agricultural cycle can also add biogas, hydropower and other new

technology. In China the fertility of land has not diminished for thousands of years. Moreover,

the Dujiangyan (都江堰) and the Yuanyang terrace (元阳梯田) in Yunnan as two World Cultural

Heritage Sites have existed for more than 2200 and 1400 years, which are also the adaptability

Page 12 of 16

382

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

of river and mountain environment. They are all the structure-function models in ecology, and

may be the typical sustainable developed models for world.

It is a poetic recycle:

Fallen flowers are not merciless and useless(落红不是无情物)

They transform manure, and enrich flowers(化作春泥更护花)

Based on the traditional Chinese culture of Yi, Taoism, Buddhism, Confucianism and so on, we

proposed the Chinese culture-social ecology [50], and explore the way to resolve the human

crises. The Book of Changesis the first book in the world to discuss the relations between human

and nature. The ternary meanings of the core on Yi are change, invariance and simple. Base of

Yi theory is endless and sustainable development. But, human must follow the eternal law, and

the invariant way of nature. This is the most basic and simple truth, and the reason for the

formation of all things in the universe, and their changing and evolutional laws.

The Book of Changes said: Yi began familiar with anxiety and calamity. “The superior man, when

resting in safety, does not forger that danger may come; when in a state of security, he does not

forger the possibility of ruin; and when all is in a state of order, he does not forger the disorder

may come. Thus his person is kept safe, and his states and all their clans can be preserved.” Yi

theory can be applied to the resolution of human crises. Yi is a simple life, change is easy to

follow the fate of heaven, and invariance is the human ideal and mission.

The multi-layered Tai-Ji Diagram [51] may be the relations between people in a group; in

society it is the relations between law and virtue; in a country it is the relations between the

people and the officials; in the world it is the relations between different countries, and between

different nationalities and different beliefs, etc. The largest range is the relations between

human and the natural environment. Both must live in harmony each other in order to be

symbiotic and sustainable development. Therefore, we proposed a social sustainable developed

pattern, in which the social progress, the economic development, the science and technology,

the education and the environment complement each other [52]. It is the promotion-restraint

on Five-Elements model, and is also useful concept for ecological field. Its complete mode is the

unification field of human-nature in Chinese traditional culture.

Good society has made people better and advanced. Bad society makes people worse and

degrades. Good society can be good education and sound rule of law. Chinese traditional culture

emphasizes morality: Ren (Humanity, Benevolence,), Yi (Justice, Righteousness), Li (Etiquette,

Propriety), Zhi (Wisdom), Xin (Faith, Sincerity) and so on. They go beyond times, and request

to constitute various social orders, and moral actions as behavior criterions restrict emperors,

officials and total society. Existence of moral system is a certain extent restriction for emperor

power. It is the thought basis of super-stable structure of Chinese traditional society [53]. When

the autocratic system of emperors is abandoned, and replacing the dynasties by democracy, a

new super-stable structure can be formed. Although our behavior is limited by society, our

thoughts are free and optional, and the pursuit of truth, goodness and beauty is beyond the

control of external environment [54]. This is also one of the ten sociological perspectives [55].

Page 13 of 16

383

Chang, Y. (2022). Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology. European Journal

of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 371-386.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11387

Combining the multi-layered Tai-Ji Diagram [51] and whose three-dimensional spatial radius

can be enlarged and change associated with higher-level development. Human hope existence

and development, ecology must be cycle. From the Tai-Ji Diagram and the multi-layered Tai-Ji

Diagram with two elements to three elements and five elements [52], they are all cycle.

In Chinese traditional culture, the most perfect ideal society and future mode is that nature and

human are completely harmonious, in which human and nature and environment coordinate

each other to form a virtuous cycle of endless life, and finally reach the highest state of the unity

of nature and human, the unity of matter and mind, no life and no death, and the world forever.

SUMMARY

In a word, ecology is closely related to the rise and fall of human society. 1. Human society must

promote the cycle and hypercycle of resources and waste, and keep the ecosystem stable and

sustainable. 2. We need introduce new materials, new information and so on, so that conducive

to the ecosystem, and enhance the benign development of the ecosystem. 3. We should optimize

and improve the management level in order to entropy decrease and strengthen the ordering

of the whole ecosystem.

In the face of various ecological and social crises, we should vigorously advocate less desire,

frugality and financial management, magnanimity and contentment. This kind of happiness

view and values cannot only enhance people's morality, save and use resources effectively,

alleviate the crises between human and environment, but also resolve the conflict between

different civilizations, so that to realize the pure land of the world, and achieve the harmonious

world and permanent peace.

We believe that pursuing truth, goodness and beauty can guide that human tend to a fine noble

ideal society, and enter into higher civilization and more harmonious society [54]. The

macroscopic aspect in the bigger space-time scope, era, heroes, the modern science and society,

the increasingly rational human mutually may promote and determine the human destiny and

the evolution trajectory together.

In modern society, the lofty thought of carrying forward Chinese traditional culture has the

function of inspiring people to pursue the best realm in an ideal. Confucianism emphasizes

benevolence, Buddhism emphasizes love, Mohism emphasizes both love, combined with the

fraternity of western civilization, based on Chinese culture-social ecology, and combined with

modern science, we can construct the model of harmonious development of man and man, man

and nature, and resolve all kinds of crises. Our world can be a society of peace, harmony, mutual

help, mutual respect and mutual love. Human decision-making will shape the future of our

world.

Page 14 of 16

384

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

References

[1] Levin, S. A., Grenfell, B., Hastings, A., and Perelson A.S. Mathematical and computational challenges in

population biology and ecosystems science. Science. 1997, 275: 334-343.

[2] Dieckmann, U., Law, R., and Matz, J. A. J. The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial

Complexity. Cambridge University Press. 2000.

[3] Haken, H. Synergetics. Berlin: Springer.1977.

[4] Haken, H. Advanced Synergetics. Springer. 1983.

[5] Chang Yi-Fang. Environment, population dynamics and ecological synergetics[J]. International Journal of

Environment and Bioenergy. 2013, 7(1):18-27.

[6] Prigogine, I. From Being to Becoming. W.H. Freeman. 1984.

[7] Prigogine,I. and Stengers,I. Order Out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books Inc.1984.

[8] Chang Yi-Fang. Nonlinear whole biology and its basic laws. Chinese Science Abstracts. 2001, 7: 227-228.

[9] Chang Yi-Fang. Nonlinear whole biology and loop quantum theory applied to biology. Neuro Quantology.

2012,10(2): 190-197.

[10] Chang Yi-Fang. Nonlinear whole medicine, extensive quantum medicine and three basic origins of disease.

EC Neurology. 2021,SI.02:187-194.

[11] Cramer, F. Chaos and Order: The Complex Structure of Living Systems. Germany: Random House GmbH. 1988.

[12] Catton, W.R. Overshoot: The ecological basis of revolutionary change. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

1982.

[13] Daly, H.E. and Cobb, J. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards Community, the Environment,

and A Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Press.1989.

[14] Costanza, R. (Ed.) Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York: Columbia

Press. 1991

[15] Smith, C.E. and Smith, J.W. Economics, ecology and entropy: The second law of thermodynamics and the

limits to growth. Population and Environment. 1996, 17:309-321.

[16] Jørgensen, S.E. Integration of ecosystem theories: A pattern. Ecology & Environment. 2002, 3: 97-129.

[17] Harte J., Zillio T., Conlinsk E. and Smith A.B. Maximum entropy and the state-variable approach to

macroecology. Ecology. 2008,89:2700-2711.

[18] Harte J. Maximum Entropy and Ecology: A Theory of Abundance, Distribution, and Energetics. Oxford

University Press; Oxford, UK: 2011.

[19] Chang Yi-Fang. Social thermodynamics, social hydrodynamics and some mathematical applications in social

sciences. International Journal of Modern Social Science. 2013,2(2):94-108.

[20] Mayer, A.L. Donovan, R.P. and Pawlowski, C.W., Information and entropy theory for the sustainability of

coupled human and natural systems. Ecology and Society. 2014, 19(3):11.

[21] Sherwin, W.B. Entropy, or information, unifies ecology and evolution and beyond. Entropy. 2018, 20:10.

[22] Nicolis, G. and Prigogine, I. Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems. New York: Wiley-Interscience. 1977.

[23] Rifkin J. and Toward, T. Entropy——A New World View. New York: Bantam Edition. 1981.

[24] Landau L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. Statistical Physics. Pergamon Press. 1980.

[25] Chang Yi-Fang. Possible decrease of entropy due to internal interactions in isolated systems. Apeiron.

1997,4(4):109-111.

[26] Chang Yi-Fang. Entropy, fluctuation magnified and internal interactions. Entropy. 2005, 7(3): 190-198.

Page 15 of 16

385

Chang, Y. (2022). Nonlinear Whole Ecology, Change of Entropy, Hypercycle, Talent Ecology and Chinese Cultural-Social Ecology. European Journal

of Applied Sciences, 10(1). 371-386.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.101.11387

[27] Chang Yi-Fang. “Negative temperature” fallacy, sufficient-necessary condition on entropy decrease in

isolated systems and some possible tests in physics, chemistry and biology. International Review of Physics.

2012,6(6):469-476.

[28] Chang Yi-Fang. Possible entropy decrease in biology and some new research of biothermodynamics.

NeuroQuantology. 2013,11(2):189-196.

[29] Chang Yi-Fang. Entropy decrease in isolated system and its quantitative calculations in thermodynamics of

microstructure. International Journal of Modern Theoretical Physics. 2015,4(1):1-15.

[30] Chang Yi-Fang. Entropy economics, entropy sociology and some social developed patterns. International

Journal of Modern Social Sciences. 2015,4(1):42-56.

[31] Chang Yi-Fang. Entropy decrease in isolated systems: theory, fact and tests. International Journal of

Fundamental Physical Sciences (IJFPS). 2020,10(2):16-25.

[32] Chang Yi-Fang. Development of entropy change in philosophy of science. Philosophy Study. 2020,10(9):517-

524.

[33] Eigen M. The origin of biological information. The Physicist’s Conception of Nature. D.Reidel Publishing

Company. 1973. 594-632.

[34] Eigen, M. and Schuster, P. The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-organization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

1979.

[35] Chang Yi-Fang. Structure-function-result mode in sociology, hypercycle and knowledge economic theory.

International Journal of Modern Social Sciences. 2013,2(3):155-168.

[36] Butler, G.J. Freedman, H.I. and Waltman, P. Uniformly persistent systems. Proc.Amer.Math. Sco.

1986,96:425-430.

[37] Hofbauer, J. and So, J.W.H. Uniformal persistence and repellors for maps. Proc.Amer.Math. Sco. 1989,

107:1137-1142.

[38]Hutson, V. and Schmitt, K. Permanence in dynamical systems. Math.Biosci. 1992,111: 1-71.

[39]Jansen, V. A. and Sigmund, K. Shaken not stirred: on permanence in ecological communities. Theor.Popu.Biol.

1998,54:195-201.

[40]Parsons, T. The Social System. Free Press. 1951.

[41]Parsons, T. The Structure of Social Action. Free Press. 1968.

[42]Parsons, T. The System of Modern Societies. Prentice-Hall. 1971.

[43]Ritzer, G. and Goodman, D.J. Modern Sociological Theory (6th ed). McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. 2004.

[44]Merton, R.K. Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press. 1968.

[45]Turner, J.H. The Structure of Sociological Theory (7th ed). Thomson Learning, Inc. 2003.

[46]Alexander, J.C. and Colomy, P. Toward neo-functionalism. Sociological Theory. 1985, 3:11-23.

[47]Adams, C. franzosa, R. Introduction to Topology: Pure and Applied. Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

[48]Chang Yi-Fang. Social physics, basic laws in social complex systems and nonlinear whole sociology.

International Journal of Modern Social Science. 2013,2(1):20-33.

[49] Marshall A. Principles of Economics (9th ed). London: Macmillan. 1961.

[50] Chang Yi-Fang. Three dimensional body-mind-spirit worlds on human society, social fields and Chinese

cultural-social ecology. Sumerianz Journal of Scientific Research. 2020, 3(12): 156-165.

[51] Chang Yi-Fang. Mathematics and parapsychology in ancient Greek and China, Yi and modern society.

International Journal of Modern Social Sciences. 2017, 6(2):116-127.

[52]Chang Yi-Fang. Entropy economics, entropy sociology and some social developed patterns. International

Journal of Modern Social Sciences. 2015,4(1):42-56.

Page 16 of 16

386

European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 10, Issue 1, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

[53] Chang Yi-Fang. Modern social theories, various stable structures of society, and final nice end-result of

humankind. International Journal of Modern Social Sciences. 2016,5(2):89-101.

[54] Chang Yi-Fang. Mathematical physical social sciences and three dimensional truth-goodness- beauty ideal

society and life. International Journal of Modern Social Sciences. 2018, 7(1):25-36.

[55] Charon, J. Ten Questions: A Sociological Perspective. Cengage Learning. 2007.