Page 1 of 25

Archives of Business Research – Vol. 10, No. 10

Publication Date: October 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/abr.1010.13254. Renaldo, N., & Augustine, Y. (2022). The Effect of Green Supply Chain Management, Green Intellectual Capital, and Green

Information System on Environmental Performance and Financial Performance. Archives of Business Research, 10(10). 53-77.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

The Effect of Green Supply Chain Management, Green Intellectual

Capital, and Green Information System on Environmental

Performance and Financial Performance

Nicholas Renaldo

Economic and Business Faculty, Trisakti University, Indonesia

Yvonne Augustine

Economic and Business Faculty, Trisakti University, Indonesia

ABSTRACT

Environmental degradation is increasing and resource depletion has become a

problem. Based on the results of the preliminary survey, the majority of

respondents are more concerned with financial performance than environmental

performance. This study aims to examine the effect of green supply chain

management (GSCM), green intellectual capital (GIC), and green information system

(GIS) on environmental performance (EnvP) and financial performance (FinP). The

sample in this study was 219 respondents who came from manufacturing

companies in Riau Province. Data analysis used structural equation analysis with

SMART PLS application. The results show that only green supply chain management

has a positive effect on financial performance. Then green intellectual capital and

environmental performance each have a positive effect on financial performance.

This research develops a new measurement for green supply chain management

and green information system variables. Companies can develop systems and

information technology that can reduce waste so that their environmental and

financial performance can be better.

Keywords: GSCM, GIC, GIS, EnvP, FinP

INTRODUCTION

The measurement of company performance is generally carried out using financial

performance which cannot be avoided anymore that this is a valid performance measurement.

Measurement of financial performance using the return on assets indicator is the most

phenomenal ratio to use. In fact, financial performance is not only the main pawn in the

company, but other performance measurements also need to be considered. One of them is

environmental performance, because it refers to the principle of sustainability, of course, the

company wants to be a going concern to be able to maximize the wealth of the company owner.

In recent times, increasing environmental degradation and resource depletion have become a

perplexing problem worldwide. Environmental practices are considered a threat to the

profitability of companies due to the significant investments required for technology

investments and the long-term uncertainty and maturity associated with green investments

(Acquah, Agyabeng-Mensah, & Afum, 2020). The preliminary survey results show that 87.5%

of company representatives attach greater importance to financial performance than

environmental performance. From the results of this preliminary investigation, it can be seen

Page 2 of 25

54

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 10, October-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

that the industry in the city of Pekanbaru is still interested in financial performance rather than

environmental performance.

Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) Practices involves introducing environmental

practices into supply chain activities to ensure that sustainable supply chains continue to have

inconsistent and confusing impacts on business performance across all sectors, countries, and

continents GSCM is a subsystem of sustainable supply chains. Research (Kenneth W. Green,

Inman, Sower, & Zelbst, 2018) shows a positive effect of GSCM on environmental performance

while research results (Çankaya & Sezen, 2019) show a negative effect. Research (Kenneth

Wilburn Green, Toms, & Clark, 2015) shows a positive effect of GSCM on financial performance

while research results (Baah et al., 2020) show a negative effect of GSCM on financial

performance.

In this context, the practice of Green Intellectual Capital (GIC) has been increasingly promoted

over the past decade as a proactive response that organizations can take to improve

environmental performance. Intellectual capital is very important to companies in today's

conditions where companies face intense competition. Research (Widyastuti, Parianom, &

Permana, 2021) shows the positive influence of GIC on sustainability performance that is

included in the context of environmental performance. Research (Zalfa & Novita, 2021) shows

the negative effect of green human capital on (environmental) sustainability performance, the

insignificant effect of green structural capital on (environmental) sustainability performance,

and the positive influence of relationship capital green on sustainability (environmental)

performance. Research (Dwianika & Gunawan, 2020) shows a positive effect of the green

entrepreneur's intellectual capital on financial performance in the BSD city sample, but there is

no effect on the Bintaro city sample.

GSCM and GIC practices have become an important factor in improving the company's

environmental and financial performance. In addition to the supply chain and sustainable

human resources, the application of an accounting information system (T. Chandra, Renaldo, &

Putra, 2018) is also important for evaluating the company's performance. Applying a green

information system (GIS) that provides management information to make better decisions

requires information technology. Since it is related to environmental performance, the green

information system (GIS) application variable used in the study (Susanto & Meiryani, 2019) has

a positive influence on environmental performance. Research (Kwarteng & Aveh, 2018) shows

the positive effect of implementing an accounting information system on company

performance, while research (Hutahayan, 2020) shows an insignificant effect of implementing

a management accounting information system on financial performance.

It is undeniable that climate change conditions have disturbed the earth. The melting of polar

ice will continue so environmental factors are very important for companies to pay attention

to. A good company not only benefits financially, but also benefits environmentally, socially,

and others.

Based on the phenomena and differences in the results of these studies, it would be interesting

to further discuss the effect of green supply chain management practices, green intellectual

capital practices, and the adoption of green information systems on environmental

performance and financial performance. This study is designed to determine, first, whether this

Page 3 of 25

55

Renaldo, N., & Augustine, Y. (2022). The Effect of Green Supply Chain Management, Green Intellectual Capital, and Green Information System on

Environmental Performance and Financial Performance. Archives of Business Research, 10(10). 53-77.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.1010.13254

green factor will be able to influence environmental performance and sustainable financial

performance. Second, to determine the function of environmental performance as a mediating

variable. This study also uses three control variables to reinforce the research model

(robustness) to consider the factors of age, size, and company certification.

The difference between this research and the previous research is that it uses the

environmental performance variable as the mediating variable. This study also provides a

combination of the use of operational/industrial management variables (green supply chain

management practices), human resource management (green intellectual capital practices),

accounting information systems (adoption of green information systems), and environmental

accounting (environmental performance) and financial accounting (financial performance).

This study seeks to develop green supply chain management indicators and green information

system variables. Another difference is the measurement of all variables using primary data

which previously used secondary data.

LITERATURE REVIEW AND FORMULATION OF HYPOTHESES

Resource-based Theory

The resource-based theory states that the internal factors in achieving competitive advantage

are more important than the external factors of the company (industry). The resource-based

theory debate is about how a company can compete with other companies to gain a competitive

advantage in managing its resources based on the capabilities of the company (Hutahayan,

2020). Green supply chain management enables organizations to understand and analyze their

assets effectively and make their procedures easy to gain a competitive advantage (Shafique,

Asghar, & Rahman, 2017).

Contingency Theory

Contingency theory refers to situational factors or contingency factors that affect

organizational performance. No organizational project can be universally applied anywhere or

in any circumstance effectively. Designs may only be appropriate in certain contexts or

conditions. The implementation of contingency theory encourages researchers to identify

suitable conditions for specific organizational design and the development of supporting

theories. The thesis behind the Contingency Theory is that no single organizational concept or

project can be implemented effectively anywhere (universally) or under any circumstances.

Furthermore, contingency theory also states that the effect of strategy (including innovative

strategies) on performance depends on structural management, which includes management

control systems, human resources, and internal process performance (Hutahayan, 2020).

Legitimacy Theory

Legitimacy can be interpreted as recognition and acceptance of the existence of the company

by the community. The main assumption of legitimacy theory is the fulfillment of the

organization's social contract, which allows for the recognition of its goals. Legitimacy is a

general perception or assumption that an entity's actions are desirable, appropriate or

appropriate within a socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions

(Ifada, Indriastuti, Ibrani, & Setiawanta, 2021).