Page 1 of 16

Archives of Business Research – Vol. 10, No. 2

Publication Date: February 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/abr.102.11705. Romi, I. M. (2022). Perceptions of Organizational Politics Impact on Information Systems Success: An Empirical Investigation of

Banking Sector. Archives of Business Research, 10(02). 26-41.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Perceptions of Organizational Politics Impact on Information

Systems Success: An Empirical Investigation of Banking Sector

Ismail M. Romi

Palestine Polytechnic University

Faculty of Administrative Sciences & Informatics, Hebron, Palestine

ABSTRACT

The Extent of information systems success is based on various determinants,

including perceptions of organizational politics. This paper aims to determine the

impact of perceptions of organizational politics on information systems success in

banks. A comprehensive model was developed, and data were collected from

information systems users in banks. This study used correlation matrix, descriptive

analysis and regression analysis to analyze data, and test the suggested hypotheses.

The results revealed that banks information systems users have a lower “general

political behavior”. In addition to moderate responses to “getting along to get

ahead”, and “pay and promotion” political perspectives. Furthermore, getting along

to get ahead and pay and promotion political perspectives are positively impacting

system quality, information quality, and service quality of the information systems

dimensions. These findings indicated that the more existence of group loyalties, and

more employee fit for the bank will lead to more success of information systems.

Furthermore, a lot of work is required to enhance information systems success,

mainly; IS users’ feelings towards all information systems success dimensions by

encouraging employees’ good ideas, teamwork, honesty, and make their minds for

the benefit of information system.

Keywords: Information systems success, user satisfaction, organizational politics,

interpersonal conflict, political behavior.

INTRODUCTION

Information Systems (IS) have a critical role in the organization’s success, where globalization,

digital economics, and digitized organizations took place. So, the weakness of IS considered as

a dangerous phenomenon on organizational success in general (Chan et al, 2002). Nowadays,

the question is not whether organizations should have IS or not, but it should have an effective

IS (Cragg and Tagliavini, 2006; Hamdan and Al-Hajri, 2021).

Researchers find out that the effective information system is determined by a set of individual

and contextual factors; such as training, experience, structural, as well as cultural factors

(DeLone and McLean, 1992, 2002, 2003; Sabherwal et al, 2006; Romi et al, 2010; Romi, 2013).

Furthermore, Mhlungu et al (2019) shows that the coherency of organizational politics

classified as a significant factor of successful organizational digital transformation.

A review to prior researches of the impact of organizational politics on information systems

effectiveness and success show that this construct was not deeply discussed by researchers

(Mukama et al, 2005, Romi et al, 2010; Romi, 2013). As well as, empirical results seem lacking

Page 2 of 16

27

Romi, I. M. (2022). Perceptions of Organizational PoliticsImpact on Information Systems Success: An Empirical Investigation of Banking Sector. Archives

of Business Research, 10(02). 26-41.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.102.11705

(Rai et al ,2002; Sabherwal et al, 2006). Therefore, the impact of organizational politics on

information systems success remains fuzzy and illusive.

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of perceptions of organizational politics

on information systems success in banks. This will help banks to cope with these perceptions,

and gain the benefits of information systems as an important tool for fulfilling all organization’s

functions.

Therefore, a comprehensive model was developed in this study, including the dimensions of IS

success as dependent variable, and the organizational politics as an independent variable, after

that an empirical investigation for the banking sector was held to examine the developed model,

and integrates the results with prior researches.

LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

The General Model

The general model is presented (Figure 1) to identify the relationship between information

systems success construct as a dependent variable, and the perceptions of organizational

politics construct as an independent variable. The detailed research model is developed

depending on prior IS success literature, and the organizational politics as a determinant to this

success.

INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUCCESS FACTORS

Prior researches define information system as an integrated computer-based system that

utilizes computer hardware, software, users, procedures, models, and database which interacts

to produce the suitable information at the appropriate time, to support organizational activities

(Alter, 1996; Stair,1996; Cashman and Vermaat, 1999; Laudon and Laudon, 2004; Mcleod and

Schell, 2004). Information system success factors are set of dimensions and aspects that

produce the net benefits of information system, which include system quality, information

quality, service quality, system use, and user satisfaction (DeLone and McLean, 1992, 2002,

2003; Seddon, 1994, 1997).

Where, system quality is defined as a set of constructs related to information system that

determines the quality of the systems (DeLone and McLean, 1992; Seddon, 1997). Sabherwal

et al (2006) show that these constructs are system reliability, ease of use, response time,

relevance, timeliness, accuracy of information, and system productivity. Information quality is

- System Quality

- Information Quality

- Service Quality

- Use

- User Satisfaction

- Net Benefits

Perceptions of

Organizational

Politics

Information Systems

Success

- General Political Behavior

- Getting Along to Get Ahead

- Pay and Promotion

1. The General Model

Page 3 of 16

28

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 2, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

the degree to which information presents the required benefits (DeLone and McLean,1992;

Seddon, 1994; Barnersc and Vidgen, 2002). Where, Kahn et al (2002) indicates a set of

characteristics for information quality which are; accessibility, appropriateness, believable,

completeness, concise representation, ease of manipulation, free from errors, interpretable,

objectivity, relevancy, reputation and security. Service quality was discussed by researchers as

a set of characteristics related to the services submitted by an information system to customers

which include system reliability, assurance, empathy, timeliness, and security (Parasuraman et

al, 1991; Delone and Mclean, 1992; Seddon, 1994; Hochstein et al, 2005; Kim et al, 2005). Romi

(2013) show that system use is the extent to which end-users uses the results presented by the

information systems. Which can be measured by the degree of system use, responsiveness,

adaptability, and effectiveness. DeLone and McLean (1992) and Seddon (1994) show that user

satisfaction is referred to the recipient response to the use of IS output, and associated with

attitudes towards IS which depends on system availability, accuracy, completeness,

consistency, robustness, flexibility, and unobtrusiveness.

Delone and Mclean (1992, 2003, 2008) presented the information systems success model

which can be used to measure information systems success. Romi (2013) tested this model, and

find out that it shows good explanations to information systems success factors. Besides, it

enables the applied theories in the area of information system measurements to take place

(Seen et al, 2006). Furthermore, the model takes into consideration the perspectives of all

information systems recipients. Therefore, this model will be used in this study for the purpose

of measuring information systems success.

ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS

Miles (1980) show that political activities occur in the presence of ambiguous goals, scarce

resources, changes in technology or environment, non-programmed decisions, or

organizational change. Where, Cropanzano et al. (1995) viewed organizational politics as social

influence attempts directed at those who can provide rewards that will help promote or protect

the self-interests of the actor. Meanwhile, Bauer and Erdogan (2012) show that; organizational

politics are informal, unofficial, and sometimes behind-the-scenes efforts to sell ideas which

influence an organization, increase power, or achieve other targeted objectives. Thus, the

definition of organizational politics was formulated in the literature as those activities and

actions that are not required as part of the formal roles in organizations, and influence decision

making and the distribution of benefits and resources in the organization (Miles, 1980; Pfeffer,

1992; Morgan, 1997; Cragg and Tagliavini, 2006; Robbins and Judge, 2007, Rahman and Aydın,

2018).

Researchers (Morgan, 1997; Junior, 2020; Bhattarai, 2021) show that political behavior within

an organization can be either positive or negative based on how the coalitions and individuals

manage conflict. Where, Bowditch and Buono (1997) show that managing conflict takes two

dimensions; which are assertiveness, or cooperativeness. The interaction between these two

dimensions is reflected in a set of political forms; which are avoiding, competing,

accommodating, compromising, or collaborative. They show that, avoiding is an unassertive,

uncooperative approach in which both groups neglect the concerns involved by sidestepping

the issue or postponing the conflict by choosing not deal with it. Where, competing is an

assertive, uncooperative form in which each group attempts to achieve its own goals at the

expense of the other through argument, authority, threat, or even physical force. Meanwhile,

Page 6 of 16

31

Romi, I. M. (2022). Perceptions of Organizational PoliticsImpact on Information Systems Success: An Empirical Investigation of Banking Sector. Archives

of Business Research, 10(02). 26-41.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.102.11705

Taking into consideration the dimensions of information systems success, this hypothesis can

be subdivided into the following sub-hypotheses:

H2-1: Getting along to get ahead positively impacts system quality.

H2-2: Getting along to get ahead positively impacts information quality.

H2-3: Getting along to get ahead positively impacts service quality.

H2-4: Getting along to get ahead positively impacts information systems use.

H2-5: Getting along to get ahead positively impacts user satisfaction.

H3: Pay and Promotion positively impacts information systems success.

In the same way, taking into consideration information systems success dimensions requires

subdividing H3 into the following sub-hypotheses:

H3-1: Pay and promotion positively impacts system quality.

H3-2: Pay and promotion positively impacts information quality.

H3-3: Pay and promotion positively impacts service quality.

H3-4: Pay and promotion positively impacts information systems use.

H3-5: Pay and promotion positively impacts user satisfaction.

METHODS

Data Collection

Testing the study hypothesis requires collecting data from information-intensive corporations.

Banks can be classified as information-intensive corporations; therefore, the required data is

collected from banks information system users using a questionnaire which is designed for this

purpose.

Sampling

The study population consisted of information system users in banks. 110 questionnaires were

distributed among bank information systems users (the respondents) in management levels

where, 91 questionnaires were returned (83 % response rate). seven questionnaires were

classified as non-valid; therefore, they are excluded. And hence, 84 usable questionnaires were

used (76.4%) in data analysis.

Characteristics of Survey Respondents

The distribution of respondents in the survey indicate that the sample represents a cross- section of different managerial levels in Palestinian banks. Table (1) shows the respondents’

characteristics; where, the majority of them are males (76%), bachelor degree holders (85.7%),

exceeds two years of experience (84.5%), covers all over bank levels (strategic, management,

and operational levels), performs different type of work (Managerial, data entry, and system

development), and their work classified as information intensive.

Page 11 of 16

36

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 2, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

The Impact of Pay and Promotion on IS Success

Hypothesis H3 suggests that, Pay and Promotion positively impacts information systems

success.

The results of Pearson correlation "r" (Table 6) show that there are positive relationships

between Pay and Promotion political perspective and systems quality, information quality,

service quality, system use, and user satisfaction. The results show that, the relationships are

significant (P < 0.05) for system quality, information quality, and service quality. Meanwhile,

the relationships are not significant (P > 0.05) for system use, and user satisfaction. This implies

that the results partially support H3, therefore, pay and promotion political perspective

positively impacts system quality, information quality, and service quality as important

dimensions for information systems success. This result is consistent with Witt (1995), where,

politically active individuals are promoted at the expense of others in banks information system

users.

Table 6. Regression Analysis for Pay and Promotion on IS Success Dimension

Dependent

variables

R R

Square

Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficient t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

System Quality .186a .035 .146 .086 .186 1.702 .092

Information

Quality .251a .063 .209 .090 .251 2.335 .022

Service Quality .230a .053 .190 .089 .230 2.131 .036

System Use .105a .011 .096 .101 .105 .948 .346

User Satisfaction .073a .005 .066 .099 .073 .662 .510

DISCUSSION

The results show that the respondents have moderate responses to perceptions of

organizational politics. Depending on Kacmar and Ferris (1991), these results implies that,

information systems’ users in banks do not act in a self-serving manner to obtain valued

outcomes. Meanwhile, there is a lack of action by individuals in order to secure valued

outcomes, in addition to the existence of group loyalties. In addition, the banks behaving

politically through the policies it enacts. On the other hand, and in spite of the positive

responses to information system success constructs, the results imply that there is a lot of work

required to enhance information systems success in banks, and hence, enhance the

respondent’s feelings towards all success dimensions.

The research model of this study was developed to investigate the possible impact of

perceptions of organizational politics on information systems success. The data analysis

supports the hypothesized relationships between independent and dependent variables in the

research model. This implies that, organizational politics were found to have an influence on

information systems success.

The findings are consistent with the findings of a number of prior researches. For instance,

Warne (1998) found that there is a strong impact of organizational politics on IS success. Also,

Page 12 of 16

37

Romi, I. M. (2022). Perceptions of Organizational PoliticsImpact on Information Systems Success: An Empirical Investigation of Banking Sector. Archives

of Business Research, 10(02). 26-41.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.102.11705

Chang et al (2002) found that organizational politics plays a very important role in IS success.

Furthermore, Lampaki and Papadakis (2018) found that the firm's political climate is crucial to

implementation success.

While, the impact of each perception of organizational politics on information systems success

was not previously investigated by researchers, the current study provides a further insight to

all perceptions of organizational politics, and information systems success dimensions. The

results of hypothesis testing (Table 7) show that both getting along to get ahead and pay and

promotion political perspectives related hypotheses were accepted. These results can be added

to the research model to produce the perspectives of organizational politics impact on

information systems success model (Figure 3).

The model (Figure 3) shows that getting along to get ahead along with pay and promotion

political perspectives have a positive impact on system quality, information quality, and service

quality. Furthermore, these political perspectives explain 5.3% of the variance in system

quality, 7.6% of the variance in the information quality, and 6.7 of the variance in service

quality.

Table 7. Summary of Testing results for the Hypothesis

Research Model Hypothesis

Regression

Support- Result

R

Square

H1: General political behavior positively impacts information systems success.

General political behavior positively impacts system quality. Rejected .062

General political behavior positively impacts information quality. Rejected .021

General political behavior positively impacts service quality. Rejected .000

General political behavior positively impacts information systems

use.

Rejected -.005

General political behavior positively impacts user satisfaction. Rejected .057

H2: Getting Along to Get Ahead positively impacts information systems success.

Getting Along to Get Ahead positively impacts system quality. Accepted .053

Getting Along to Get Ahead positively impacts information quality. Accepted .072

Getting Along to Get Ahead positively impacts service quality. Accepted .065

Getting Along to Get Ahead positively impacts information

systems use.

Rejected .029

Getting Along to Get Ahead positively impacts user satisfaction. Rejected .028

H3: Pay and Promotion positively impacts information systems success.

Pay and Promotion positively impacts system quality. Accepted .035

Pay and Promotion positively impacts information quality. Accepted .063

Pay and Promotion positively impacts service quality. Accepted .053

Pay and Promotion positively impacts information systems use. Rejected .011

Pay and Promotion positively impacts user satisfaction. Rejected .005

Page 13 of 16

38

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 2, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

CONCLUSION

This paper aims to determine the impact of perceptions of organizational politics on

information systems success in banks. A comprehensive model was developed which

incorporates the dimensions of IS success as dependent variable, and the organizational politics

as an independent variable. Data were collected from banks information system users to

examine the developed model.

The results show that the participants have a lower “general political behavior”, and moderate

responses to “getting along to get ahead”, and “pay and promotion” political perspectives. This

implies that, banks’ employees don’t act in a self-serving manner to obtain valued outcomes,

because of the existence of group loyalties, and banks don’t overlook employees whom are with

a good fit for the bank.

The results show a reasonable positive response to information systems success in banks.

Where, respondents have positive responses to information system success constructs; mainly,

system quality, information quality, service quality, system use, user satisfaction, and net

benefits. These, results indicate that, there is a lot of work required to enhance information

systems success, mainly; IS users’ feelings towards all information systems success dimensions

by encouraging employees’ good ideas, teamwork, honesty, and make their minds for the

benefit of information system.

Furthermore, the findings show that general political behavior cannot be considered an

important factor that influences information systems success. This result implies that banks

can invest in information systems without any fear of self-serving manner of employees, where,

these resources will serve the bank as a whole.

Getting along to get ahead and pay and promotion political perspectives are positively

impacting system quality, information quality, and service quality.

Information Systems Success

Intention Use

to Use

System

Quality

Information

Quality

Net

Benefits

Service

Quality

User Satisfaction

Perceptions of

Organizational Politics

General Political

Behavior

Getting Along to

Get Ahead

Pay and

Promotion

R2= 5.3%

R2= 7.6%

R2= 6.7%

Figure 3. Perspectives of Organizational Politics Impact on Information Systems Success

Page 14 of 16

39

Romi, I. M. (2022). Perceptions of Organizational PoliticsImpact on Information Systems Success: An Empirical Investigation of Banking Sector. Archives

of Business Research, 10(02). 26-41.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.102.11705

This article provides a further insight to the impact of perceptions of organizational politics on

information systems effectiveness and success, and integrates the results to prior researches

by providing a suggested model (Figure 3) that explains the variance of information systems

success dimensions depending on perceptions of organizational politics. Where, these political

perspectives explain 5.3% of the variance in system quality, 7.6% of the variance in the

information quality, and 6.7 of the variance in service quality. These results indicate that; the

more existence of group loyalties the more success of information systems. As well as, more

employee fit for the bank, the more success of information systems.

References

Alter, S. (1996). Information Systems - A Management Perspective, 2nd ed. New York: The Benjamin/Commings

Publishing Company, Inc.

Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2002). An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality. J. Electron.

Commerce Res., 3(3): pp.114-127.

Bhattarai, G. (2021). Impact of Organizational Politics on Employees' Behavioral Outcomes: The Role of Social

Astuteness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(2), 571-582.

Bowditch, J. L., Buono, A. F. (1997). A primer on organizational behavior", 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Cashman, S., Vermaat, R. (1999). Discovering Computers 2000-Concepts for A Connected World. Retrieved: Feb,

2, 2007, From:http://www.belkcollege.uncc.edu/jwgeurin/istypes.doc.

Chang, J. C., King, W. R., (2005). Measuring the Performance of Information Systems: A Functional Scorecard.

Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1): pp. 85-115.

Chang, L., Lin, T., Wu, S, (2002). The Study of Information System Development (ISD) Process from the

Perspective of Power Development Stage and Organizational Politics. IEEE, Proceedings of the 35th Annual

Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: pp. 265-275.

Cragg, P., Tagliavini, M., (2006). Evaluating Information Systems Alignment in Small Firms. 13th European

Conference

Cristman, A., Van Aelst, S., (2006). Robust estimation of Cronbach's alpha. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 97(7):

pp. 1660-1674.

Cropanzano, R. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Bozeman, D. P. (1995). Organizational politics, justice, and support: Their

differences and similarities. Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the

workplace: pp. 2-18.

Darbyshire, P. (2017). The practice politics of computerised information systems: a focus group study. Nurse

Researcher, 8(2): pp. 4-17.

Davis, G.B., and Olson, M.H. (1985). Management Information Systems, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book

Company.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable.

Information Systems Research, 3(1): pp. 60–95.

Delone, W.H, Mclean, E.R, (2003). The Delone and Mclean Model of Information Systems Success: a Ten- Year

Update. Journal of Information Systems, 19: pp. 9-30.

DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R., Petter, S., (2008). Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions,

measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17: pp. 236-263.

DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.,(1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable.

Information Systems Research, 3(1): pp. 60–95.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2002). Information systems success revisited. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual

Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2966-2976). IEEE.

Page 15 of 16

40

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 2, February-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer interaction. Addison- Wesley Longman Ltd.

Ferris, G. R., Ellen III, B. P., McAllister, C. P., Maher, L. P. (2019). Reorganizing organizational politics research: A

review of the literature and identification of future research directions. Annual Review of Organizational

Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6: pp. 299-323.

Ferris, G. R., Fedor, D. B., King, T. R., (1994). A political conceptualization of managerial behavior. Human

Resource Management Review, 4: pp. 1−34

Ferris, G. R., Kacmar, K. M, (1992). Perceptions of Organizational Politics. Journal of Management, 18(1): pp. 93-

116.

Ferris, G. R., Perrewe`, P. L., Anthony, W. P., Gillmore, D. C., (2000). Political skills at work. Organizational

Dynamics, 28: pp. 25-37.

Ferris, G. R., Russ, G. S., & Fandt, P. M. (1989). Politics in organizations.

Giacalone, R. A., & Rosenfeld, P. (2013). Impression management in the organization. Psychology Press.

Gable, G.G, Sedera, D., Chan, T., (2003). Enterprise Systems Success: A measurement Model. Twenty-Fourth

International Conference on Information System, pp. 576-591.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R., Black, W., (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Ed. Upper Saddle River,

NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hamdan, M., & Al-Hajri, N. (2021). The effect of information systems success factors on user satisfaction in

accounting information systems. Management Science Letters, 11(7), 2045-2052.

Hochstein, A., Zarnekow, R., Brenner, W., (2005). Managing Service Quality as Perceived by the Customer: The

Service Oriented ServQual. Wirtschafts Informatik, 46: 382-389.

Janis, I.L. (1983). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes", 2nd Ed., Revised. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin.

Junior, I. A. A. (2020). Effect Of Organizational Politics On Job Satisfaction In Education Sector Of Ghana. A Case

Study Of Christian Scholars International School, Kwadaso. Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), 3(1), 35-40.

Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (1997). Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): A multiple

sample investigation. Journal of management, 23(5), 627-658.

Kacmar, K.M., Ferris, G.R. (1991). Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale (POPS): Development and

Construct Validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(1): pp. 193-205.

Kahn,B.K, Strong, D.M.,Wang, R.y., (2002). Information Quality Benchmarks: Products and Service Performance.

ACM, 45(4): pp. 184-192.

Kim, J.K, Eom, M.T, Ahn, J.H, (2005). Measuring IS Service Quality in the Context of the Service Quality-User

Satisfaction Relationship. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application(JITTA) 7: pp. 53-70.

Lampaki, A., Papadakis, V. (2018). The impact of organisational politics and trust in the top management team on

strategic decision implementation success: A middle-manager's perspective. European Management

Journal, 36(5): pp. 627-637.

Laudon, K. C. and Laudon J. P. (2004). Management Information Systems – Managing the Digital Firm, 8th ed.

New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Mcleod, R. Jr., Schell, G. P., (2004). Management Information Systems, 9th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Mhlungu, N.S.M., Chen, J.Y.J., Alkema, P., (2019). The underlying factors of a successful organisational digital

transformation. South African Journal of Information Management 21(1).

Miles, R. H., (1980). Macro organizational behavior. Santa Monica, CA.

Morgan,G.(1997). Images of Organization, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Page 16 of 16

41

Romi, I. M. (2022). Perceptions of Organizational PoliticsImpact on Information Systems Success: An Empirical Investigation of Banking Sector. Archives

of Business Research, 10(02). 26-41.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.102.11705

Mukama, F., Kimaro, H. C., Gregory, J., (2005). Organization Culture and its Impact in Information Systems

Development and Implementation: A case study from the health information system in Tanzania. Proceedings of

IRIS, 28.

Mutambara, E., Botha, C., & Bisschoff, C. (2014). Investigating the effects of organizational politics at a national

electricity provider in sadc region. Journal of Social Sciences, 41(3): pp. 499-510.

Nye, L.G. &Witt, L.A. (1993). Dimensionality and Construct Validity of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics

Scale (POPS). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3): pp. 821-829.

Nyikayaramba B, Mutimudye G., (2014). Integrating organizational politics into organizational systems, functions

and procedures: A human capital performance enhancement strategy. International Journal of Marketing,

Financial Services and Management Research, 3(6): pp. 144-159.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale.

Journal of Retailing, 67(4): pp. 420-450.

Pfeffer, J. (1992). Understanding power in organizations. California management review, 34(2),29.

RAHMAN, M., & AYDIN, E. (2018). Political Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of E-HRM Implementations in

Bangladesh Public Sector Organizations: An Institutional Perspective. Business & Management Studies: An

International Journal, 6(3): pp. 619-633.

Rai, A., Lang, S. S., Welker, R. B., (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and

Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1): pp. 50-69.

Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., (2007). Organizational Behavior, 12th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Roldan, J. L., & Leal, A. (2003). A Validation Test of an Adaptation of the DeLone and McLean's Model in the

Spanish EIS Field. In Critical reflections on information systems: A systemic approach (pp. 66-84). IGI Global.

Romi, I. M., Awad, I. A., & Elkordy, M. (2010). A Model of Organizational Politics Impact on Information Systems

Success. In Advanced Techniques in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering (pp. 111-115). Springer,

Dordrecht.

Romi I.M. (2013). Testing Delone and Mclean’s Model in Financial. American Academic & Scholarly Research

Journal, 5(3): pp. 121-129.

Sabherwal, R., Jeyarajm A., Chowa, C., (2006). Information Systems Success: Individual and Organizational

Determinants. Management Scienc, 52(12): pp. 1849-1864.

Seddon, P. B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R., Bowtell, M., (1999). Dimensions of Information Systems Success.

Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 2(20).

Seddon, P.B, (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the Delone and Mclean's Model of IS Success. Information

Systems Research, 18(3): pp. 240-253.

Seddon, P., & Kiew, M. Y. (1996). A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean's model of IS

success. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1).

Seen, M., Rouse, A., Beaumont, N. Mingins, C, (2006). The Information Systems Acceptance Model: A Meta Model

to Explain and Predict Information Systems Acceptance and Success. Manosh University, ISSN 1327-5216.

Stair, R. M. (1996). Principles of Information Systems - A Managerial Approach, 2nd ed. Cambridge: An

International Thomson Publishing Company: Prentice Hall.

Vigoda, Eran. (2000b). Organizational Politics, Job Attitudes, and Work Outcomes: Exploration and Implications

for Public Sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior 57(3): pp. 326-347.

Warne, L. (1998). Organizational Politics and Information Systems Development-a model of conflict.

In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6: pp. 482-491.

Witt, L. A. (2003). Influences of supervisor behaviors on the levels and effects of workplace

politics. Organizational influence processes, 209.