Factors That Affect The Masinical Productivity In The Indonesian Railway Industry

This research aims to examine and analyze the effect of stress, psyches environment and self-efficacy on employee productivity with burnout as an intervening variable for employees of The Indonesia Railway Industry. The method used in this research is descriptive method. The object of this research is 43 employees of The Indonesia Railway Industry. The approach used in this research is the Component or Variance Based Structural Equation Model with the Smart-PLS analysis tool. The result showed stress that has positive and significant effect on burnout of The Indonesia Railway Industry. Psyches environment that has a negative and significant effect on burnout of The Indonesia Railway Industry. Self-efficacy that has a negative and significant effect on burnout of The Indonesia Railway Industry. Stress that has a negative and significant on productivity of The Indonesia Railway Industry. Psyches environment that has a positive and significant on productivity of The Indonesia Railway Industry. Self-efficacy that has positive and significant on productivity of The Indonesia Railway Industry. Burnout that has negative and significant effect on productivity of The Indonesia Railway Industry. Keyword: Stress, Psyches Environment, Self Efficacy, Burnout, Productivity


INTRODUCTION
Human resources are a priority for an organization or company, because the role of human resources as driving and determining the course of an organization. So that company activities can run well, it requires employees who have high knowledge and skills. Thus the task of human resource management is to manage, develop and choose good human resources, so that human resources can be a good contribution to the progress of the company. According to Stoner (2013), human resource management is an ongoing procedure that aims to supply an organization or company with the right people to be placed in the right position and the position when the organization needs it.
Productivity is a very important factor in the success of a business. Productivity contains two main concepts, namely efficiency and effectiveness. Efficiency measures the level of resources, both human, financial, and natural needed to meet the desired level of service, the effectiveness of measuring the results of service quality achieved (George J. Washin, 1997). Labor productivity is one of the things that need to be considered in order to support the success. Employee productivity can be judged from what employees do in their work. Productivity can also be a reflection of a high work ethic. The higher productivity of employees in the company, the higher of earnings and profits of the company. Thus productivity can be represented by the income or profits to be earned individual labor. Labor productivity is affected by the consciousness of each individual (such as discipline, attitude and environment) level of education and training has been received as well as self-management capabilities. But in fact, the productivity of a company is also influenced by several other factors. With that a company needs to pay attention to factors that affect the productivity so that productivity is increasing and not decreasing. Most companies have experienced a decline of productivity making it difficult to achieve organizational goals. And one of these companies, namely The Indonesia Railway Industry. From the percentage yield productivity gains, in 2017 amounted to 91.60%, but decreased in 2018 and 2019 with a percentage of 91.25% and 90.70%. Of course for 3 years has decreased and does not reach the predetermined targets. And in 2018 drastically decreased enough, the decline occurred in the number of results achievement of the performance of employees at The Indonesia Railway Industry amounted to 90.70% and far from the targets set.
According to Soelton and Riyadhus (2018) stress must be seen from cases that occur in patients if excessive will cause employees in a depressed condition, because they are no longer able to handle tasks that are too heavy. stress of unsuccessful employees will hurt the company because of decreased productivity. According to Wirawan (2012), stress is an unexpected reaction that arises from an increase in environmental responses in a person. Soelton  This also affects the psychic environment that affects work productivity, because the psychic environment can affect work performance, while those related to the psychic environment will influence the emergence of integration, understanding, and low motivation (Ramli and Soelton, 2018), (Jumadi et al, 2018). Increasing and decreasing environmental performance will increase worker productivity (Retno Widowati, 2016). According to Soelton, (2018), Claws (2012) compilation of a person's self-efficacy increases, their life satisfaction will increase, this can increase on psychological, subjective well-being and mental well-being for example in terms of improvement and also fulfilling tasks that must be done and completed. According to Octary (2007) someone who has higher self efficacy than they can handle events and problems effectively. The higher self efficacy owned by employees, the more he produces high work productivity (Lukman, 2016). If it is related to the addition of work, there is no need for very good physical and physical conditions to cause fatigue ). According to Nurhayati (2017), , Rahmawati and Amir (2013) boredom conditions will also have an impact on decreasing work performance and individual work performance in the work environment such as increasing oneself from work by increasing distance, more absences and cooperation, more absences and higher turnover than workers. other.

LITERATURE REVIEW
Meneze (2006) defined productivity as the employee's ability to produce work or goods and services according to the expected standards set by the employers, or beyond the expected standards. According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), work productivity is a scientific comparison between the amount produced and the amount of each source used during production.
Burnout is a psychological syndrome that arise from prolonged stress due to interpersonal problems at work (Maslach & Leiter, 2016). Burnout is exhausted physically, emotionally, and mentally due to long-term involvement in situations full of emotional demands (Pines and Aronso in Nursalam, 2015). According to the National Safety Council (NSC) (in Maharani & Triyoga, 2012) explains that burnout is the result of perceived stress on workloads common specific symptoms in burnout in the form of boredom, pessimism, lack of concentration, quality of work is not satisfactory, depression, decreased job satisfaction, absence from work, ill or suffering from an illness.
Job burnout refers to the state in which individuals experience physical and mental fatigue after working under heavy pressure (Maslach et al. 2001;Peng et al.2014). Such concept was introduced in 1974 by Freudenberger, who considered job burnout as a symptom of emotional exhaustion that was commonly observed among individuals working in helping professions (Freudenberger1974; Shihetal.2013). Maslach defined psychological syndrome as a result of a long-term experience of work and interpersonal burnout (Maslach and Jackson 1981;Pines and Maslach 1978). In general, job burnout is an extreme reaction that individuals experience when they cannot successfully cope with work pressure. This condition refers to an exhausted state of emotion, attitudes, and behavior that arises from a prolonged experience of stress.
While Robbins (2013), work stress is a dynamic condition in which an individual is faced with an opportunity, constraint, or demand related to what they want and the result is perceived as uncertain. According Soelton and Riyadhus (2018) stress should be seen from the case by case which occurred on the sufferer if the excess will cause employees under pressure, because no longer able to cope with a task too heavy. Stress experienced employees will hurt the company because the resulting productivity may decline. Malek (2010) stated that stress is an unpleasant emotional situation that an individual experience when requirements of a job are not counter balanced with his ability to cope with the situation. It is a well-known phenomenon that expresses itself differently in various work situations and affects the workers differently.
According Soelton (2018) the work environment is one of the factors that determine the productivity of the company. If psyches environment is bad it can cause burnout, emotional tension and low motivation. Sedarmayanti (2011) states that, generally speaking, the type of work environment is divided into two, namely the physical work environment and non-physical work environment. Sedarmayanti (2011) states that the non-physical work environment are all circumstances that occur relating to the employment relationship, either with superiors or with fellow colleagues or relations with subordinates. Bandura (1997) self-efficacy is the belief someone to be able to organize and carry out an action that is required to achieve a certain goal. Self-efficacy refers to the speculation and judgment of whether an individual is capable of completing an action Santrock (2012) states that self-efficacy is the belief that one can master a situation and provide a favorable outcome. Meanwhile, according to Baron and Byrne (in Hapsari, 2016) defines selfefficacy as a person evaluation of the ability or competence to perform a task, achieve a goal, and overcome obstacles. According Trouillet (in Irfan & Veronika, 2014) said that self-efficacy is considered a person that affects how a person faces the external situation.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
According to Saunders et al. (2007), "A conceptual framework indicates how the researcher views the concept involved in a study, especially the relationship among concepts". It can guide research by providing an illustration of theoretical constructs and variables of interest. Designing a conceptual model begins with conducting a thorough review of the literature. Peer-reviewed journal articles, books/monographs, conference papers, theses/dissertations and other relevant references have investigated for conducting this research. Therefore, researchers have developed a conceptual framework based on the causes and influencing factors of productivity.
Based on the previous findings of theoretical literature and the need for more studies, below is the proposed research framework for this study.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research Design
In this study, the study design used is classified as causal research. Causal research design is useful to analyze the relationships between the variables with other variables. In this study, researchers interested in examining the independent variables are stress, psyches environment, self-efficacy to productivity as the dependent variable with Burnout as an intervening variable in The Indonesia Railway Industry.

Data Collection Instrument
The instrument used for data collection was a questionnaire submitted to the employees.   Table 1 shows that all indicators have met the convergent validity, because it has a loading factor above 0.5 and thus all the indicators to measure the construct of the study was valid. If all indicators have loading factor above 0.5 then the proposed measurement model has the potential for further testing.

Hypothesis Test
As a basis for making hypotheses by comparing the amount of t-table with t-test at alpha of 0.05 (5%) = 1.96. If the t-table is less than alpha 1.96, then the hypothesis is not accepted or rejected, and vice versa if the t-table> 1.96, then the hypothesis is accepted or a significant difference between the two variables.  This study shows that stress has a significant relationship to burnout, which may mean that the stress effect on burnout. According YU et.al stress experienced by the individual in the long term can lead to burnout. This means that the high level of perceived job stress, the higher the perceived levels of burnout, as well as also the lower the perceived work stress, the lower the level of perceived burnout. According to Yu et al. (2015) that stress influence positively and significantly related to burnout. According Khamisa et al. (2015) showed that job stress positive effect on burnout.

Effect of Psyches Environment on Burnout
Based on hypothesis testing in this study showed T-statistic values for 2095, the value of the original sample -0179And the P value Values of 0042, Value T-statistic greater than the value of the T-table 1.96, the value of the original sample is negative, and at a P value less than 0.05 Values show, these results suggest that psyches environment a significant negative effect on burnout.
This study showed the better the psyches of environment the lower the burnout symptoms exhibited by employees and environment conditions such low psyches were not good communication between colleagues, superiors or subordinates it will support the occurrence of burnout. In line with research. It is also in line with research conducted Nantsupawat et.al. (2016) states that the psyches of environment negatively affect burnout.

Effect of Self Efficacy on Burnout
Based on hypothesis testing in this study showed T-statistic values for 2381, the value of the original sample -0362And the P value Values of 0018, Value T-statistic greater than the value of the T-table 1.96, the value of the original sample is negative, and at a P value less than 0.05 Values show, these results suggest that self-efficacy a significant negative effect on burnout.
This research proves that the higher self-efficacy a person has, the lower the chance of burnout. And the lower the self-efficacy a person has, the higher the level of burnout. According Lauerman and Konig (2016) states that self-efficacy significantly and negatively related to burnout. And according Skaalvik and Skaalvik (2010) showed that self-efficacy significantly and negatively related to burnout.

Effect of Stress on Productivity
Based on hypothesis testing in this study showed T-statistic values for 2924, the value of the original sample -0510And the P value Values of 0004, Value T-statistic greater than the value of the T-table 1.96, the value of the original sample is negative, and at a P value less than 0.05 Values show, these results suggest that job stress a significant negative effect on productivity, Work stress is distress experienced by employees in the face of job. This study shows that if the level of employee stress is high, then it will decrease employee productivity levels. Results of research conducted Saefullah et al. (2017) showed that stress has a negative and significant relationship to productivity. And in line with research conducted Saranani (2013) showed that stress has a negative and significant relationship to productivity. According to Ehsan and Ali (2019) stress a significant negative effect on productivity. In this company proves that the psyches of environment impact on productivity. This means that the good state of the psyches of environment, the higher the productivity of a given employee. In line with research conducted Sinaga and Ibrahim (2016) states that there is a positive and significant relationship psyches environment to work productivity. And in line with the research conducted Retno Widowati (2016) that there is a positive and significant relationship between the psyches of environment on productivity.

Effect of Self Efficacy on Productivity
Based on hypothesis testing in this study showed T-statistic values for 2026, the value of the original sample0149And the P value Values of 0001, Value T-statistic greater than the value of the T-table 1.96, the value of the original sample showing a positive value, and at a P value less than 0.05 Values show, these results suggest that self-efficacy positive and significant impact on the productivity Self-efficacy is their belief in the ability to perform actions that will produce the intended impact. Self-efficacy is crucial owned by employees, because many employees have the ability even if it does not have confidence in himself the task not be resolved. This means that the higher one's own self efficacy, the higher the productivity of its work and vice versa. Results of research conducted Judge (2016) showed that self-efficacy and significant positive effect on productivity.

Effect of Burnout on Productivity
Based on hypothesis testing in this study showed T-statistic values for 2183, the value of the original sample -0207And the P value Values of 0006, Value T-statistic greater than the value of the T-table 1.96, the value of the original sample is negative, and the value of p values less than 0.05 indicate, these results suggest that burnout a significant negative effect on productivity.
Burnout is a psychological process that is generated by the stress of work is not liberated and produces emotional fatigue, personality changes and feelings. The existence of burnout will affect the level of productivity that employees and will reduce the productivity level. In line with results of research conducted Judge (2016) states that burnout significant negative effect on productivity. And in line with the results of research conducted Woo et.al (2017) which state that burnout significant negative effect on productivity.

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTION Conclusion
This study tries to analyze the variables associated with work stress, psyches environment, selfefficacy, burnout, and productivity, Results of this study was obtained from research on the employees of The Indonesia Railway Industry. From the results of the calculations in this study, it can be concluded as follows: 1. Stress has a significant positive effect on burnout on The Indonesia Railway Industry employees. This means that the higher the level of work stress felt by someone, the higher the level of burnout that exists.
2. Psyches environment has a significant negative effect on burnout on The Indonesia Railway Industry employees. This means that the better the employee's perception of the psychological work environment, the lower the burnout symptoms exhibited by the employee. 3. Self efficacy has a significant negative effect on burnout on The Indonesia Railway Industry employees. This means that the higher the self-efficacy a person has, the lower the chance of burnout. 4. Job stress has a significant negative effect on productivity in The Indonesia Railway Industry employees. This means that the lower the level of stress a person feels at work, the higher the level of productivity a person will do in his work. 5. Psyches environment has a significant positive effect on productivity in The Indonesia Railway Industry employees. This means that the better the psychological work environment of an employee, the higher the work productivity he will provide. 6. Self efficacy has a significant positive effect on productivity in The Indonesia Railway Industry employees. This means that the higher the confidence in him (self-efficacy) in completing his task, the higher the level of productivity of his performance. 7. Burnout has a significant negative effect on productivity in The Indonesia Railway Industry employees. This means that if an employee's burnout level is low, the higher productivity the employee will provide in carrying out their duties.

Suggestion
Based on the conclusion, it can put forward some suggestions into consideration for The Indonesia Railway Industry or for further research: Suggestions for The Indonesia Railway Industry 1. Leaders must provide clear information to the tasks assigned to the employee, to avoid mistakes and pressure at work. 2. The company should provide a career path, it can encourage employee motivation to work. 3. The company must provide a positive side to the tasks assigned to employees, so that employees can always look at the positive side. 4. Companies should allow time for quality time on the employees, such as the gathering. 5. The company should control every job given to employees, in order to maintain the timeliness in settlement.

Suggestions for Further Research
Suggestions for further research, which will conduct research in the same field and using this paper as a reference, it would need to be reviewed because it is possible there are statements that have not been appropriate, because as the author feels there are still many shortcomings and limitations in completing this research.